Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Katrice A. Lippa is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Katrice A. Lippa.


Clinica Chimica Acta | 2013

An assessment of 25-hydroxyvitamin D measurements in comparability studies conducted by the Vitamin D Metabolites Quality Assurance Program.

Mary Bedner; Katrice A. Lippa; Susan S.-C. Tai

BACKGROUND The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), in collaboration with the National Institutes of Health Office of Dietary Supplements, established the first accuracy-based program for improving the comparability of vitamin D metabolite measurements, the Vitamin D Metabolites Quality Assurance Program. METHODS The study samples were human serum or plasma Standard Reference Materials (SRMs) with 25-hydroxyvitamin D values that were determined at NIST. Participants evaluated the materials using immunoassay (IA), liquid chromatography (LC) with mass spectrometric detection, and LC with ultraviolet absorbance detection. NIST evaluated the results for concordance within the participant community as well as trueness relative to the NIST value. RESULTS For the study materials that contain mostly 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 (25(OH)D3),the coefficient of variation (CV) for the participant results was consistently in the range from 7% to 19%, and the median values were biased high relative to the NIST values. However, for materials that contain significant concentrations of both 25-hydroxyvitamin D2 (25(OH)D2) and 25(OH)D3, the median IA results were biased lower than both the LC and the NIST values, and the CV was as high as 28%. The first interlaboratory comparison results for SRM 972a Vitamin D Metabolites in Human Serum are also reported. CONCLUSIONS Relatively large within-lab and between-lab variability hinders conclusive assessments of bias and accuracy.


Macromolecular Bioscience | 2012

Effect of Polymer Degree of Conversion on Streptococcus mutans Biofilms

Alison M. Kraigsley; Kathy Tang; Katrice A. Lippa; John A. Howarter; Sheng Lin-Gibson; Nancy J. Lin

Biofilm-material interactions are increasingly recognized as critical to success of some materials/devices and failure of others. We use a model system of dental monomers, salivary pellicles, and oral biofilms to demonstrate for the first time that degree of conversion of cross-linked dimethacrylate polymers alters biofilm metabolic activity. This response is due primarily to leachable release (not surface chemistry) and is complex, with no changes in some biofilm measurements (i.e., biomass), and time- and leachable-dependent responses in others (i.e., metabolic activity). These results highlight the need for considering biofilm-material interactions when designing/evaluating new materials.


Angewandte Chemie | 2014

Probing the intracellular glutathione redox potential by in-cell NMR spectroscopy.

Steve Y. Rhieu; Aaron A. Urbas; Daniel W. Bearden; John P. Marino; Katrice A. Lippa; Vytas Reipa

Non-invasive and real-time analysis of cellular redox processes has been greatly hampered by lack of suitable measurement techniques. Here we describe an in-cell nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) based method for measuring the intracellular glutathione redox potential by direct and quantitative measurement of isotopically labeled glutathione introduced exogenously into living yeast. By using this approach, perturbations in the cellular glutathione redox homeostasis were also monitored as yeast cells were subjected to oxidative stress.


Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry | 2010

Evaluation of the state-of-the-art measurement capabilities for selected PBDEs and decaBB in plastic by the international intercomparison CCQM-P114.

Reinhard Zeleny; Stefan Voorspoels; M. Ricci; Roland Becker; Christian Jung; Wolfram Bremser; M. Sittidech; N. Panyawathanakit; W. F. Wong; S. M. Choi; K. C. Lo; W. Y. Yeung; Dalho Kim; J. Han; J. Ryu; S. Mingwu; W. Chao; Michele M. Schantz; Katrice A. Lippa; Shigetomo Matsuyama

AbstractAn international intercomparison involving eight national metrology institutes (NMIs) was conducted to establish their current measurement capabilities for determining five selected congeners from the brominated flame retardant classes polybrominated diphenyl ethers and polybrominated biphenyls. A candidate reference material consisting of polypropylene fortified with technical mixtures of penta-, octa- and decabromo diphenyl ether and decabromo biphenyl, which was thoroughly assessed for material homogeneity and stability, was used as study material. The analytical procedures applied by the participants differed with regard to sample pre-treatment, extraction, clean-up, employed calibrants and type of calibration procedure as well as regarding analytical methods used for separation, identification and quantification of the flame retardant congeners (gas chromatography coupled to an electron capture detector (GC-ECD), gas chromatography-mass spectrometry in the electron ionisation mode (GC-EI-MS), gas chromatography-mass spectrometry in the electron capture negative ionisation mode (GC-ECNI-MS), and liquid chromatography-inductive coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (LC-ICP-MS)). The laboratory means agreed well with relative standard deviations of the mean of means of 1.9%, 4.8%, 5.5% and 5.4% for brominated diphenyl ether (BDE) 47, 183 and 209 and for the brominated biphenyl (BB) congener 209, respectively. For BDE 206, a relative standard deviation of 28.5% was obtained. For all five congeners, within-laboratory relative standard deviations of six measurements obtained under intermediate precision conditions were between 1% and 10%, and reported expanded measurements uncertainties typically ranged from 4% to 10% (8% to 14% for BDE 206). Furthermore, the results are in good agreement with those obtained in the characterization exercise for determining certified values for the flame retardant congeners in the same material. The results demonstrate the state-of-the-art measurement capabilities of NMIs for quantifying representative BDE congeners and BB 209 in a polymer. The outcome of this intercomparison (pilot study) in conjunction with possible improvements for employing exclusively calibrants with thoroughly assessed purity suggests that a key comparison aiming at underpinning calibration and measurement capability (CMC) claims of NMIs can be conducted. FigureMass fraction of deca-brominated diphenyl ether (BDE 209) in the polypropylene study material analysed in the international intercomparison CCQM-P114


Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology | 2008

Microarray Scanner Performance Over a Five-Week Period as Measured With Cy5 and Cy3 Serial Dilution Slides

Mary B. Satterfield; Katrice A. Lippa; Z. Q. Lu; Marc L. Salit

To investigate scanner performance and guide development of an instrument qualification method, slides with replicates of successive dilutions of cyanine 5 (Cy5) and cyanine 3 (Cy3) dyes (referred to as dye slides) were scanned. The successive dilutions form a dose-response curve from which performance can be assessed. The effects of a variety of factors, including the number of scans and slide storage conditions, on scanner performance over a five-week period were investigated and tracked with time series charts of dye signal intensity, signal-to-noise (S/N), signal background, slope, and limit of detection (LOD). Scanner drift was tracked with a known stable reference material, Standard Reference Material (SRM) 2242. The greatest effect on the figures of merit was the dye, with the Cy5 dye showing signs of degradation after one week of scanning independent of all other factors while the Cy3 dye remained relatively stable. Use of the charts to track scanner performance over time holds promise for development of a method for microarray scanner performance qualification. Although not a prescription for performance qualification, this introductory study provides sufficient information regarding the use of dye slides to enable the user to institute a preliminary test method.


Metrologia | 2012

Final report on key comparison CCQM-K55.b (aldrin): An international comparison of mass fraction purity assignment of aldrin

Steven Westwood; Ralf D. Josephs; Tiphaine Choteau; Adeline Daireaux; Charline Mesquida; Robert Wielgosz; Adriana Rosso; Mariana Ruiz de Arechavaleta; Stephen Davies; Hongjie Wang; Eliane Cristina Pires do Rego; Janaína Marques Rodrigues; Evelyn de Freitas Guimarães; Marcus Vinicius Barreto Sousa; Tânia Monteiro; Laura Alves das Neves Valente; Fernando Gustavo Marques Violante; Renato Rubim Ribeiro Almeida; Maria Cristina Baptista Quaresma; Raquel Nogueira; Anthony Windust; Xinhua Dai; Xiaomin Li; Wei Zhang; Ming Li; Mingwu Shao; Chao Wei; Siu-kay Wong; Julie Cabillic; Fanny Gantois

Under the auspices of the Organic Analysis Working Group (OAWG) of the Comit? Consultatif pour la Quantit? de Mati?re (CCQM) a key comparison, CCQM K55.b, was coordinated by the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM) in 2010/2011. Nineteen national measurement institutes and the BIPM participated. Participants were required to assign the mass fraction of aldrin present as the main component in the comparison sample for CCQM-K55.b which consisted of technical grade aldrin obtained from the National Measurement Institute Australia that had been subject to serial recrystallization and drying prior to sub-division into the units supplied for the comparison. Aldrin was selected to be representative of the performance of a laboratorys measurement capability for the purity assignment of organic compounds of medium structural complexity [molar mass range 300 Da to 500 Da] and low polarity (pKOW < ?2) for which related structure impurities can be quantified by capillary gas phase chromatography (GC). The key comparison reference value (KCRV) for the aldrin content of the material was 950.8 mg/g with a combined standard uncertainty of 0.85 mg/g. The KCRV was assigned by combination of KCRVs assigned by consensus from participant results for each orthogonal impurity class. The relative expanded uncertainties reported by laboratories having results consistent with the KCRV ranged from 0.3% to 0.6% using a mass balance approach and 0.5% to 1% using a qNMR method. The major analytical challenge posed by the material proved to be the detection and quantification of a significant amount of oligomeric organic material within the sample and most participants relying on a mass balance approach displayed a positive bias relative to the KCRV (overestimation of aldrin content) in excess of 10 mg/g due to not having adequate procedures in place to detect and quantify the non-volatile content?specifically the non-volatile organics content?of the comparison sample. There was in general excellent agreement between participants in the identification and the quantification of the total and individual related structure impurities, water content and the residual solvent content of the sample. The comparison demonstrated the utility of 1H NMR as an independent method for quantitative analysis of high purity compounds. In discussion of the participant results it was noted that while several had access to qNMR estimates for the aldrin content that were inconsistent with their mass balance determination they decided to accept the mass balance result and assumed a hidden bias in their NMR data. By contrast, laboratories that placed greater confidence in their qNMR result were able to resolve the discrepancy through additional studies that provided evidence of the presence of non-volatile organic impurity at the requisite level to bring their mass balance and qNMR estimates into agreement. Main text. To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database kcdb.bipm.org/. The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCQM, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).


Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry | 2009

Demonstrating the comparability of certified reference materials.

David L. Duewer; Katrice A. Lippa; Stephen E. Long; Karen E. Murphy; Katherine E. Sharpless; Lorna T. Sniegoski; Michael J. Welch; Wataru Tani; Masao Umemoto

Certified reference materials (CRMs) enable the meaningful comparison of measurement results over time and place. When CRMs are used to calibrate or verify the performance of a measurement system, results produced by that system can be related through the CRM to well-defined, stable, and globally accessible reference(s). Properly done, this directly establishes the metrological traceability of the results. However, achieving the meaningful comparison of results from measurement systems calibrated and/or verified with different CRMs requires that the different materials truly deliver the same measurand, that is, are “the same” within stated uncertainty except for differences in the level of the analyte of interest. We here detail experimental and data analysis techniques for establishing and demonstrating the comparability of materials. We focus on (1) establishing a uniform interpretation of the common forms of CRM uncertainty statements, (2) estimating consistent measurement system response uncertainties from sometimes inconsistent experimental designs, (3) using “errors-in-variables” analysis methods to evaluate comparability studies and novel graphical tools for communicating results of the evaluation to reviewing authorities and potential CRM customers, and (4) augmenting established comparability studies with new materials using measurements provided by the certifying institution. These experimental and data analytic tools were developed in support of the Joint Committee for Traceability in Laboratory Medicine’s efforts to enhance the reliability of clinical laboratory measurements and are illustrated with potassium and cholesterol measurands of clinical relevance; however, these tools can be applied to any group of materials that deliver the same nominal measurand with stated value and uncertainty.


Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry | 2015

Metrological approaches to organic chemical purity: primary reference materials for vitamin D metabolites

Michael A. Nelson; Mary Bedner; Brian E. Lang; Blaza Toman; Katrice A. Lippa

Given the critical role of pure, organic compound primary reference standards used to characterize and certify chemical Certified Reference Materials (CRMs), it is essential that associated mass purity assessments be fit-for-purpose, represented by an appropriate uncertainty interval, and metrologically sound. The mass fraction purities (% g/g) of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) reference standards used to produce and certify values for clinical vitamin D metabolite CRMs were investigated by multiple orthogonal quantitative measurement techniques. Quantitative 1H-nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (qNMR) was performed to establish traceability of these materials to the International System of Units (SI) and to directly assess the principal analyte species. The 25(OH)D standards contained volatile and water impurities, as well as structurally-related impurities that are difficult to observe by chromatographic methods or to distinguish from the principal 25(OH)D species by one-dimensional NMR. These impurities have the potential to introduce significant biases to purity investigations in which a limited number of measurands are quantified. Combining complementary information from multiple analytical methods, using both direct and indirect measurement techniques, enabled mitigation of these biases. Purities of 25(OH)D reference standards and associated uncertainties were determined using frequentist and Bayesian statistical models to combine data acquired via qNMR, liquid chromatography with UV absorbance and atmospheric pressure-chemical ionization mass spectrometric detection (LC-UV, LC-ACPI-MS), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), and Karl Fischer (KF) titration.


Accreditation and Quality Assurance | 2012

Experimental design and data evaluation considerations for comparisons of reference materials

David L. Duewer; Hugo Gasca-Aragon; Katrice A. Lippa; Blaza Toman

The analysis of reference materials (RMs) can help assess the equivalence of chemical measurement processes. When two or more RMs are available for a given measurand, confidently establishing the equivalence of measurement processes requires the RMs to be capable of yielding equivalent results. Evaluating the degrees of equivalence among RMs that differ in analyte quantity and perhaps matrix composition requires an approach other than that used to assess results for samples of a single material. We have more than a decade of experience with an approach that compares the assigned values of RMs to a simple linear model of the relationship between those values and measurement results ideally made under repeatability conditions. In addition to accessing the metrological equivalence of specific RMs, the equivalence of the value-assignment capabilities of the organizations that issue the RMs can also be accessed. This report summarizes our experience with the design of and analysis of studies using this approach and provides numeric and graphical tools for estimating degrees of equivalence. We divide the required tasks into four steps: (1) design, (2) measurement, (3) definition of a reference function, and (4) estimation of degrees of equivalence. We regard the experimental design and measurement tasks as most critical to the eventual utility of the comparison, since creative mathematics cannot fully compensate for poor planning or erratic measurements.


Fuel | 2017

Unsupervised classification of petroleum Certified Reference Materials and other fuels by chemometric analysis of gas chromatography-mass spectrometry data

Werickson Fortunato de Carvalho Rocha; Michele M. Schantz; David A. Sheen; Pamela M. Chu; Katrice A. Lippa

As feedstocks transition from conventional oil to unconventional petroleum sources and biomass, it will be necessary to determine whether a particular fuel or fuel blend is suitable for use in engines. Certifying a fuel as safe for use is time-consuming and expensive and must be performed for each new fuel. In principle, suitability of a fuel should be completely determined by its chemical composition. This composition can be probed through use of detailed analytical techniques such as gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy (GC-MS). In traditional analysis, chromatograms would be used to determine the details of the composition. In the approach taken in this paper, the chromatogram is assumed to be entirely representative of the composition of a fuel, and is used directly as the input to an algorithm in order to develop a model that is predictive of a fuels suitability. When a new fuel is proposed for service, its suitability for any application could then be ascertained by using this model to compare its chromatogram with those of the fuels already known to be suitable for that application. In this paper, we lay the mathematical and informatics groundwork for a predictive model of hydrocarbon properties. The objective of this work was to develop a reliable model for unsupervised classification of the hydrocarbons as a prelude to developing a predictive model of their engine-relevant physical and chemical properties. A set of hydrocarbons including biodiesel fuels, gasoline, highway and marine diesel fuels, and crude oils was collected and GC-MS profiles obtained. These profiles were then analyzed using multi-way principal components analysis (MPCA), principal factors analysis (PARAFAC), and a self-organizing map (SOM), which is a kind of artificial neural network. It was found that, while MPCA and PARAFAC were able to recover descriptive models of the fuels, their linear nature obscured some of the finer physical details due to the widely varying composition of the fuels. The SOM was able to find a descriptive classification model which has the potential for practical recognition and perhaps prediction of fuel properties.

Collaboration


Dive into the Katrice A. Lippa's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David L. Duewer

National Institute of Standards and Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lane C. Sander

National Institute of Standards and Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Blaza Toman

National Institute of Standards and Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mary Bedner

National Institute of Standards and Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michele M. Schantz

National Institute of Standards and Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Aaron A. Urbas

National Institute of Standards and Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Johanna E. Camara

National Institute of Standards and Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Karen W. Phinney

National Institute of Standards and Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michael A. Nelson

National Institute of Standards and Technology

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge