Kazutaka Kobayashi

Thalamic deep brain stimulation for writer's cramp

OBJECT Writers cramp is a type of idiopathic focal hand dystonia characterized by muscle cramps that accompany execution of the writing task specifically. In this report, the authors describe the clinical outcome after thalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) therapy in patients with writers cramp and present an illustrative case with which they compare the effects of pallidal and thalamic stimulation. In addition to these results for the clinical effectiveness, they also examine the best point and pattern for therapeutic stimulation of the motor thalamus, including the nucleus ventrooralis (VO) and the ventralis intermedius nucleus (VIM), for writers cramp. METHODS The authors applied thalamic DBS in five patients with writers cramp. The inclusion criteria for the DBS trial in this disorder were a diagnosis of idiopathic writers cramp and the absence of a positive response to medication. The exclusion criteria included significant cognitive dysfunction, active psychiatric symptoms, and evidence of other central nervous system diseases or other medical disorders. In one of the cases, DBS leads were implanted into both the globus pallidus internus and the VO/VIM, and test stimulation was performed for 1 week. The authors thus had an opportunity to compare the effects of pallidal and thalamic stimulation in this patient. RESULTS Immediately after the initiation of thalamic stimulation, the neurological deficits associated with writers cramp were improved in all five cases. Postoperatively all preoperative scale scores indicating the seriousness of the writers cramp were significantly lower (p < 0.001). In the patient in whom two DBS leads were implanted, the clinical effect of thalamic stimulation was better than that of pallidal stimulation. During the thalamic stimulation, the maximum effect was obtained when stimulation was applied to both the VO and the VIM widely, compared with being applied only within the VO. CONCLUSIONS The authors successfully treated patients with writers cramp by thalamic DBS. Insofar as they are aware, this is the first series in which writers cramp has been treated with DBS. Thalamic stimulation appears to be a safe and valuable therapeutic option for writers cramp.

Motor Cortex Stimulation for Phantom Limb Pain: Comprehensive Therapy with Spinal Cord and Thalamic Stimulation

The effects of spinal cord stimulation (SCS), deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the thalamic nucleus ventralis caudalis (VC) and motor cortex stimulation (MCS) were analyzed in 19 patients with phantom limb pain. All of the patients underwent SCS and, if the SCS failed to reduce the pain, the patients were considered for DBS and/or MCS. Satisfactory pain control for the long-term was achieved in 6 of 19 (32%) by SCS, 6 of 10 (60%) by DBS and 1 (20%) of 5 by MCS. SCS and DBS of the VC sometimes produced a dramatic effect on the pain, leading to a long pain-free interval and infrequent use of stimulation. The effects of both DBS of the VC and MCS were tested in four. One patient of them reported better pain control by MCS than by DBS, whereas two reported the opposite results. There is no evidence at present for an advantage of MCS over SCS and DBS of the VC in controlling phantom limb pain.

Motor Cortex Stimulation for Post-Stroke Pain: Comparison of Spinal Cord and Thalamic Stimulation

We analyzed the effects of spinal cord stimulation (SCS), deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the thalamic nucleus ventralis caudalis (VC) and motor cortex stimulation (MCS) in 45 patients with post-stroke pain. Satisfactory pain control was obtained more frequently as the stimulation site was moved to higher levels (7% by SCS, 25% by DBS and 48% by MCS). A painful sensation was sometimes produced by stimulation of the VC as well as the post-central, pre-central and pre-frontal cortices. Such a sensation occurred less frequently as the stimulation site was moved to higher levels (50% at the VC, 39% at the post-central cortex, 6% at the pre-central cortex and 3% at the pre-frontal cortex). These findings imply that abnormal processing of nociceptive information develops at the level of deafferentation and spreads to higher levels to a varying extent. This may be one of the reasons why satisfactory pain control was obtained more frequently as the stimulation site was moved to higher levels.

Deep brain stimulation for the treatment of vegetative state

One hundred and seven patients in vegetative state (VS) were evaluated neurologically and electrophysiologically over 3 months (90 days) after the onset of brain injury. Among these patients, 21 were treated with deep brain stimulation (DBS). The stimulation sites were the mesencephalic reticular formation (two patients) and centromedian–parafascicularis nucleus complex (19 cases). Eight of the patients recovered from VS and were able to obey verbal commands at 13 and 10 months in the case of head trauma and at 19, 14, 13, 12, 12 and 8 months in the case of vascular disease after comatose brain injury, and no patients without DBS recovered from VS spontaneously within 24 months after brain injury. The eight patients who recovered from VS showed desynchronization on continuous EEG frequency analysis. The Vth wave of the auditory brainstem response and N20 of the somatosensory evoked potential could be recorded, although with a prolonged latency, and the pain‐related P250 was recorded with an amplitude of > 7 μV. Sixteen (14.9%) of the 107 VS patients satisfied these criteria in our electrophysiological evaluation, 10 of whom were treated with DBS and six of whom were not treated with DBS. In these 16 patients, the recovery rate from VS was different between the DBS therapy group and the no DBS therapy group (P < 0.01, Fisher’s exact probability test) These findings indicate that DBS may be useful for the recovery of patients from VS if the candidates are selected on the basis of electrophysiological criteria.

DBS therapy for the vegetative state and minimally conscious state

Twenty-one cases of a vegetative state (VS) and 5 cases of a minimally conscious state (MCS) caused by various kinds of brain damage were evaluated neurologically and electrophysiologically at 3 months after brain injury. These cases were treated by deep brain stimulation (DBS) therapy, and followed up for over 10 years. The mesencephalic reticular formation was selected as a target in 2 cases of VS, and the CM-pf complex was selected as a target in the other 19 cases of VS and 5 cases of MCS. Eight of the 21 patients emerged from the VS, and became able to obey verbal commands. However, they remained in a bedridden state except for 1 case. Four of the 5 MCS patients emerged from the bedridden state, and were able to enjoy their life in their own home. DBS therapy may be useful for allowing patients to emerge from the VS, if the candidates are selected according to appropriate neurophysiological criteria. Also, a special neurorehabilitation system may be necessary for emergence from the bedridden state in the treatment of VS patients. Further, DBS therapy is useful in MCS patients to achieve consistent discernible behavioral evidence of consciousness, and emergence from the bedridden state.

Deep brain and motor cortex stimulation for post-stroke movement disorders and post-stroke pain

Our experience of deep brain stimulation (DBS) and motor cortex stimulation (MCS) in patients with post-stroke movement disorders and post-stroke pain is reviewed. DBS of the thalamic nuclei ventralis oralis posterior et intermedius proved to be useful in more than 70% of patients with post-stroke involuntary movements (hemiballismus, hemichoreo-athetosis, distal resting and/or action tremor, and proximal postural tremor). The effect of DBS of the thalamic nucleus ventralis caudalis or internal capsule on post-stroke pain was usually disappointing. Excellent pain control can be achieved by MCS in approximately 50% of patients with post-stroke pain. In the course of clinical trials on MCS for the control of post-stroke pain, it was found that co-existent post-stroke involuntary movements (hemichoreo-athetosis and resting tremor) could also be controlled by MCS. Post-stroke involuntary movements, especially those in thalamic syndrome, are sometimes associated with post-stroke pain. In such disorders, involuntary movements are attenuated, but the pain in the same patients is often exacerbated by DBS of the thalamic nuclei ventralis oralis posterior et intermedius. MCS could be the therapy of choice under such circumstances. Subjective improvement of voluntary motor performance, which had been impaired in association with mild or moderate hemiparesis, was reported during MCS by approximately 20% of patients with post-stroke pain. Such an effect on voluntary motor performance appears to be caused by an inhibition of their rigidity. The reversibility of DBS and MCS makes them an important option for the control of post-stroke movement disorders and post-stroke pain.

Intraoperative wake-up procedure with propofol and laryngeal mask for optimal excision of brain tumour in eloquent areas.

This is the first thesis describing a new technique for awake craniotomy using a laryngeal mask. Awake craniotomy with propofol infusion has become increasingly popular for the optimal excision of brain tumours located in eloquent areas. During awake craniotomy, tracheal intubation is not performed and propofol infusion is limited to within doses which render the patient just sedated. This asleep-awake procedure is occasionally associated with difficulty in controlling brain volume, especially in patients with a significant mass effect of their brain tumours, since sufficient sedation with propofol tends to cause hypercapnea. We report an intraoperative wake-up procedure employing a laryngeal mask, which enables general anaesthesia to be performed at a sufficient dose of propofol and with control of the brain volume under mechanically assisted ventilation. Before the beginning of cortical mapping, propofol infusion is completely terminated, so allowing the patient to wake up within 5-15 min. Following completion of the tumour excision, general anaesthesia is re-induced at a sufficient dose of propofol. The laryngeal mask can be temporarily removed and repositioned with ease, if necessary. In our experience, this technique is applicable for the optimal excision of brain tumours, especially in patients who are very obese or those who have very large lesions.

Deep brain stimulation and spinal cord stimulation for vegetative state and minimally conscious state.

OBJECTIVE On the basis of the findings of the electrophysiological evaluation of vegetative state (VS) and minimally conscious state (MCS), the effect of deep brain stimulation (DBS) was examined according to long-term follow-up results. The results of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) on MCS was also examined and compared with that of DBS. METHODS One hundred seven patients in VS and 21 patients in MCS were evaluated neurologically and electrophysiologically over 3 months after the onset of brain injury. Among the 107 VS patients, 21 were treated by DBS. Among the 21 MCS patients, 5 were treated by DBS and 10 by SCS. RESULTS Eight of the 21 patients recovered from VS and were able to follow verbal instructions. These eight patients showed desynchronization on continuous electroencephalographic frequency analysis. The Vth wave of the auditory brainstem response and N20 of somatosensory evoked potential were recorded even with a prolonged latency, and pain-related P250 was recorded with an amplitude of more than 7 μV. In addition, DBS and SCS induced a marked functional recovery in MCS patients who satisfied the electrophysiological inclusion criteria. CONCLUSION DBS for VS and MCS patients and SCS for MCS patients may be useful, when the candidates are selected on the basis of the electrophysiological inclusion criteria. Only 16 (14.9%) of the 107 VS patients and 15 (71.4%) of the 21 MCS patients satisfied the electrophysiological inclusion criteria.

On-Demand Control System for Deep Brain Stimulation for Treatment of Intention Tremor

Intention tremor becomes evident only when patients intend to move their body and is characterized by dysmetria. We have developed an on‐demand control system that triggers the switching on/off of deep brain stimulation (DBS) instantly for the control of intention tremor.

Thalamic Sensory Relay Nucleus Stimulation for the Treatment of Peripheral Deafferentation Pain

We applied chronic deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the thalamic nucleus ventralis caudalis (Vc) for the treatment of peripheral deafferentation pain. The subjects included 11 cases of phantom limb pain and 7 of root or nerve injury pain without phantom sensation. In the phantom limb pain patients, the spike density markedly increased in the same area of the Vc where microstimulation induced paresthesia in the part with phantom sensation. Reorganization of the receptive field representation within the Vc was also demonstrated by microrecording and microstimulation. In the root or nerve injury pain patients with severe allodynia and without phantom sensation, oscillating neural hyperactivity appeared when the allodynia was induced during single-cell recording in the Vc. In both groups stimulation of these areas with the DBS electrode was useful for achieving pain reduction. Inhibition of spinothalamic tract neurons, restoration of the original receptive field representation and modulation of thalamocortical rhythmic oscillations are proposed to play important roles in a possible mechanism of Vc-DBS for the treatment of deafferentation pain.