Masahiko Kasai

Motor Cortex Stimulation for Phantom Limb Pain: Comprehensive Therapy with Spinal Cord and Thalamic Stimulation

The effects of spinal cord stimulation (SCS), deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the thalamic nucleus ventralis caudalis (VC) and motor cortex stimulation (MCS) were analyzed in 19 patients with phantom limb pain. All of the patients underwent SCS and, if the SCS failed to reduce the pain, the patients were considered for DBS and/or MCS. Satisfactory pain control for the long-term was achieved in 6 of 19 (32%) by SCS, 6 of 10 (60%) by DBS and 1 (20%) of 5 by MCS. SCS and DBS of the VC sometimes produced a dramatic effect on the pain, leading to a long pain-free interval and infrequent use of stimulation. The effects of both DBS of the VC and MCS were tested in four. One patient of them reported better pain control by MCS than by DBS, whereas two reported the opposite results. There is no evidence at present for an advantage of MCS over SCS and DBS of the VC in controlling phantom limb pain.

Motor Cortex Stimulation for Post-Stroke Pain: Comparison of Spinal Cord and Thalamic Stimulation

We analyzed the effects of spinal cord stimulation (SCS), deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the thalamic nucleus ventralis caudalis (VC) and motor cortex stimulation (MCS) in 45 patients with post-stroke pain. Satisfactory pain control was obtained more frequently as the stimulation site was moved to higher levels (7% by SCS, 25% by DBS and 48% by MCS). A painful sensation was sometimes produced by stimulation of the VC as well as the post-central, pre-central and pre-frontal cortices. Such a sensation occurred less frequently as the stimulation site was moved to higher levels (50% at the VC, 39% at the post-central cortex, 6% at the pre-central cortex and 3% at the pre-frontal cortex). These findings imply that abnormal processing of nociceptive information develops at the level of deafferentation and spreads to higher levels to a varying extent. This may be one of the reasons why satisfactory pain control was obtained more frequently as the stimulation site was moved to higher levels.

DBS therapy for the vegetative state and minimally conscious state

Twenty-one cases of a vegetative state (VS) and 5 cases of a minimally conscious state (MCS) caused by various kinds of brain damage were evaluated neurologically and electrophysiologically at 3 months after brain injury. These cases were treated by deep brain stimulation (DBS) therapy, and followed up for over 10 years. The mesencephalic reticular formation was selected as a target in 2 cases of VS, and the CM-pf complex was selected as a target in the other 19 cases of VS and 5 cases of MCS. Eight of the 21 patients emerged from the VS, and became able to obey verbal commands. However, they remained in a bedridden state except for 1 case. Four of the 5 MCS patients emerged from the bedridden state, and were able to enjoy their life in their own home. DBS therapy may be useful for allowing patients to emerge from the VS, if the candidates are selected according to appropriate neurophysiological criteria. Also, a special neurorehabilitation system may be necessary for emergence from the bedridden state in the treatment of VS patients. Further, DBS therapy is useful in MCS patients to achieve consistent discernible behavioral evidence of consciousness, and emergence from the bedridden state.

Intraoperative wake-up procedure with propofol and laryngeal mask for optimal excision of brain tumour in eloquent areas.

This is the first thesis describing a new technique for awake craniotomy using a laryngeal mask. Awake craniotomy with propofol infusion has become increasingly popular for the optimal excision of brain tumours located in eloquent areas. During awake craniotomy, tracheal intubation is not performed and propofol infusion is limited to within doses which render the patient just sedated. This asleep-awake procedure is occasionally associated with difficulty in controlling brain volume, especially in patients with a significant mass effect of their brain tumours, since sufficient sedation with propofol tends to cause hypercapnea. We report an intraoperative wake-up procedure employing a laryngeal mask, which enables general anaesthesia to be performed at a sufficient dose of propofol and with control of the brain volume under mechanically assisted ventilation. Before the beginning of cortical mapping, propofol infusion is completely terminated, so allowing the patient to wake up within 5-15 min. Following completion of the tumour excision, general anaesthesia is re-induced at a sufficient dose of propofol. The laryngeal mask can be temporarily removed and repositioned with ease, if necessary. In our experience, this technique is applicable for the optimal excision of brain tumours, especially in patients who are very obese or those who have very large lesions.

Thalamotomy Caused by Cardioversion in a Patient Treated with Deep Brain Stimulation

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been applied mainly for the treatment of intractable pain and involuntary movement disorders. Based on the rising numbers of patients undergoing DBS therapy, the possibility of emergent application of cardioversion for the treatment of occasional severe arrhythmia in DBS patients has also increased. However, there has been insufficient discussion about cardioversion in DBS patients. We employed a radiofrequency receiver that transmits to the brain impulses provided by an external generator through an antenna applied to the skin in front of the receiver. We experienced a patient who displayed almost complete cessation of his action tremor with thalamic stimulation. He also developed central dysesthetic pain and showed complete disappearance of his action tremor, even without stimulation, following successful application of cardioversion. It is considered that slight changes in the high-voltage electrical current or high-voltage electrical current spread induced central dysesthetic pain and almost identical effects to thalamotomy. We report for the first time a case of thalamotomy induced by cardioversion in a DBS patient. Clearly, we need to bear in mind that cardioversion has the capability to cause brain lesions in DBS patients with a radiofrequency receiver implanted subcutaneously at the anterior chest wall.

DBS therapy for a persistent vegetative state: ten years follow-up results.

Twenty-one cases of a persistent vegetative state (PVS) caused by various kinds of brain damage were evaluated neurologically and electrophysiologically at 3 months after the brain injury. The 21 cases were treated by deep brain stimulation (DBS) therapy, and followed up for over 10 years. The stimulation sites were the mesencephalic reticular formation (2 cases) and CM-pf complex (19 cases). Eight of the patients emerged from the PVS, and became able to obey verbal commands. However, they remained in a bedridden state. These 8 cases revealed a desynchronization on continuous EEG frequency analysis. The Vth wave of the ABR and N20 of the SEP could be recorded even with a prolonged latency, and the pain-related P250 was recorded with an amplitude of over 7 microV. The mean survival time of these 8 cases was 6.1 years, as compared to 3.1 years for the other 13 cases. Overall, 4 cases are alive after more than 10 years. DBS therapy may be useful for allowing patients to emerge from a PVS, if the candidates are selected according to neurophysiological criteria. The fact that 19% (4/21) of the PVS cases treated with DBS survived for over 10 years should be stressed in comparison with the usual survival period for the untreated PVS.

Motor cortex stimulation in patients with post-stroke pain: Conscious somatosensory response and pain control

Abstract We analyzed the conscious sensory responses to cortical stimulation of 31 patients with post-stroke pain who underwent motor cortex stimulation (MCS) therapy. During surgery for electrode placement, a sensory response (tingle projected to a localized peripheral area) was elicited by high-frequency stimulation (50 Hz) in 23 (84%) from the somatosensory cortex, and in 16 (52%) from the motor cortex without muscle contraction. Unpleasant painful sensation was induced or their original pain was exacerbated in 12 patients (39%) when the somatosensory cortex was stimulated and in two (6%) when the motor cortex was stimulated. Somatosensory responses were induced in eight (25%) even by low-frequency stimulation (1–f the motor cortex at an intensity below the threshold for muscle contraction. In contrast, among 20 nonpain patients who underwent a similar procedure for cortical mapping in epilepsy or brain tumor surgery, a sensory response was produced by high-frequency stimulation in only eight (40%; p < 0.02) from the somatosensory cortex and four (20%; p < 0.03) from the motor cortex. Pain sensation was not induced by stimulation of the somatosensory cortex (p < 0.002) or motor cortex in any of these patients. In addition, none of these patients reported a sensory response to low-frequency stimulation. In both of the two post-troke pain patients who reported abnormal pain sensation in response to stimulation of the motor cortex, MCS failed to control their post-stroke pain. These findings imply that the sensitivity of the perceptual system even to activity of the motor cortex is heightened in post-stroke pain patients, which can sometimes hinder pain control by MCS.

Localization of thalamic cells with tremor-frequency activity in Parkinson's disease and essential tremor

It has been reported that parkinsonian and essential tremor can be controlled by deep brain stimulation or radiofrequency lesion within the cluster of cells with a tremor-frequency activity in the ventral thalamic nuclei. However, there have been very few reports about the exact localization of cells with tremor-frequency activity in the ventral thalamic nuclei. In the present study, we investigated the localization of cells with tremor-frequency activity in the ventral thalamic nuclei employing autopower spectrum and coherence analysis. Activity of a total of 130 cells, 63 in patients with parkinsonian tremor and 67 in patients with essential tremor, were recorded from the area anterior to the nucleus ventralis caudalis. Among these cells, 31 cells showed a coherence of greater than 0.4 to the electromyographic activity of both agonist and antagonist muscles. The proportion of cells exhibiting tremor-frequency activity were 26.8% in the nucleus ventralis intermedius (Vim) and 25.0% in the nuclei ventralis oralis posterior et anterior (Vop + Voa). There were no significant differences in proportion by nuclear location or disease. The present study demonstrated that cells with tremor-frequency activity are widely distributed over the area extending from the Vim to the Vop + Voa. This indicates that the best location for placing electrodes for deep brain stimulation or a radiofrequency lesion cannot be defined by identification of cells with tremor-frequency activity alone.

Thalamic deep brain stimulation for the treatment of action myoclonus caused by perinatal anoxia.

Background: Perinatal anoxia rarely causes myoclonus as the main neurologic abnormality. The exact neuronal mechanism underlying myoclonus induced by perinatal anoxia remains unknown. Some studies have indicated that the development of involuntary movements may be related to the maturation of the thalamus after birth. Objectives and Methods: Here, we describe the first case of a patient who developed action myoclonus after experiencing perinatal anoxia and was successfully treated by chronic deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the thalamus (thalamic DBS). Results andConclusion: The effectiveness of chronic thalamic DBS in this patient supports the concept of involvement of the thalamus in postperinatal anoxic myoclonus.

Impairment of motor function after frontal lobe resection with preservation of the primary motor cortex.

We investigated the clinical course and characteristics of the motor deficits in patients who underwent surgical resection of the frontal lobe for tumorous lesions. Only patients who met the following criteria were included in the present study: 1) postoperative MRI revealed that resection of the frontal lobe involved the area closely adjacent to the primary motor cortex, but 2) the D wave of the corticospinal MEP did not decrease in amplitude below 50% of the original level during surgery. The extent of resection was classified into 4 groups. In Group A (6 cases), resection was limited within the area above the superior frontal sulcus and posterior to a line vertical to the line connecting the anterior and posterior commissures at the anterior commissure (AC vertical line). Resection was extended anterior to the AC vertical line in Group B (4 cases) or below the superior frontal sulcus in Group C (5 cases). In Group D (3 cases), resection was extended to both of these two boundaries. Severe motor paresis and/or apraxia of the upper and lower extremities were noted in all patients of Group D immediately after surgery. A complete recovery in the lower extremity was observed in these patients, while disturbance in the fine movements of the upper extremity remained for more than 1 year after the surgery. Disturbance in the fine movements and/or apraxia of the upper extremity were observed immediately after surgery in 2 of the Group A patients (33%), 2 of the Group B patients (50%) and 3 of the Group C patients (60%). However, a rapid recovery occurred in these patients, and only a subtle or mild disturbance remained for more than 1 year after the surgery in one of the Group B and one of the Group C patients. Permanent and severe motor deficit is rarely induced when resection of the frontal lobe is limited to only the SMA proper (corresponding roughly to Group A), the SMA proper and pre-SMA (corresponding roughly to Group B), or the SMA proper and premotor cortex (corresponding roughly to Group C), insofar as the primary motor cortex is preserved. Disturbance in fine movements of the upper extremity is frequently induced for the long term when wide areas of the SMA proper, pre-SMA as well as premotor cortex are resected altogether (corresponding roughly to Group D).