Ken Ladwig

Adsorption of arsenic(V) onto fly ash: a speciation-based approach.

Arsenic (As) poses a significant water quality problem and challenge for the environmental engineers and scientists in the world. The large volume of coal fly ash produced around the world is a potentially significant anthropogenic source of arsenic. Currently the leaching behavior of arsenic from fly ash is not well understood. Batch methods were used in this study to investigate arsenic leaching using a raw ash, and arsenic adsorption using a clean, washed ash. Experimental results indicated that pH had a significant effect on arsenic leaching or adsorption. Between pH 3 and 7, less arsenic was in the dissolved phase. When pH was less than 3 or greater than 7, increasing amounts of arsenic were leached or desorbed from fly ash. The leaching and adsorption behavior of arsenic was interpreted with the speciation of surface sites and arsenic. In a new approach, a speciation-based model was developed to quantify the arsenic adsorption as a function of pH and surface acidity parameters. This work is important in offering insight into the leaching mechanism of arsenic from coal fly ash, and providing a robust model based upon specific, measurable parameters to quantify arsenic adsorption by other solid media in addition to fly ash.

Effects of flue gas desulfurization and mined gypsums on soil properties and on hay and corn growth in eastern ohio.

Gypsum (CaSO·2HO) is a quality source of Ca and S and has various beneficial uses that can improve agricultural production. This study was conducted to compare rates of flue gas desulfurization (FGD) gypsum and commercially available agricultural (i.e., mined) gypsum as soil amendments on soils typical of eastern Ohio or western Pennsylvania. Two field experiments were conducted, one involving a mixed grass hay field and the other corn ( L.). Gypsum was applied once at rates of 0.2, 2.0, and 20 Mg ha and a seventh treatment was a zero rate control. Corn grain yields response to gypsum was mixed with significant differences between low and high gypsum rates in 2010 but not between gypsum and no gypsum treatments. In the hay study, the low and intermediate gypsum rates generally did not result in any significant changes compared with the control treatment. At the high rate of 20 Mg ha, the following results were observed for the hay study: (i) both gypsums generally increased Ca, S, and soluble salts (electrical conductivity) in the topsoil and subsoil, when compared with the control; (ii) the FGD gypsum decreased Mg in soil when compared with all other treatments, and mined gypsum decreased Mg when compared with the control; and (iii) there were few effects on soil concentrations of trace elements, including Hg. Also at the high application rate, hay yield for the first cutting (May) in 2009 and 2010 was significantly less for mined and FGD gypsum compared with the control, but increased yields in subsequent cutting resulted in no significant treatment differences in total annual hay yield for 2008, 2009, or 2010 or cumulative yield for 2008 to 2010. Overall, for the hay study, the absence of significant soil chemical effects for the intermediate gypsum rate and the decrease in soil Mg concentrations for the high gypsum rate indicate that an application rate of approximately 2.0 Mg ha would be optimal for this soil.

Meta-Analysis of Gypsum Effects on Crop Yields and Chemistry of Soils, Plant Tissues, and Vadose Water at Various Research Sites in the USA

Gypsum has a long history as a soil amendment. Information on how flue gas desulfurization (FGD) gypsum affects soil, water, and plant properties across a range of climates and soils is lacking. We conducted a meta-analysis using data from 10 field sites in the United States (Alabama, Arkansas, Indiana, New Mexico, North Dakota, Ohio, and Wisconsin). Each site used three rates each of mined and FGD gypsums plus an untreated control treatment. Gypsum rates included a presumed optimal agronomic rate plus one rate lower and one rate higher than the optimal. Gypsum was applied once at the beginning of each study, and then data were collected for 2 to 3 yr. The meta-analyses used response ratios () calculated by dividing the treatment value by the control value for crop yield or for each measured element in plant, soil, and vadose water. These values were tested for their significance with values. Most values varied only slightly from 1.00. Gypsum significantly changed more values from 1.00 for vadose water than for soil or crop tissue in terms of numbers of elements affected (11 for water, 7 for soil, and 8 for crop tissue). The highest value for soil was 1.57 (Ca) which was similar for both mined and FGD gypsum, for crop tissue was 1.46 (Sr) for mined gypsum, and for vadose water was 4.22 (S) for FGD gypsum. The large increase in Ca and S is often a desired response to gypsum application. Lowest values occurred in crop tissue for Mg (0.89) with FGD gypsum and for Ni (0.92 or 0.93) with both gypsums. Although some sites showed crop yield responses to gypsum, the overall mean values for mined gypsum (0.987) and for FGD gypsum (1.00) were not significantly different from 1.00 in this short-term study.