Kenichi Suda

Clinical and pathologic features of lung cancer expressing programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1).

BACKGROUND Programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) negatively regulates antigen receptor signaling upon binding by either of its ligands, programmed cell death ligand 1 or 2 (PD-L1/2). Blockade of this interaction with either PD-1 or PD-L1 antibodies has been successful in the treatment of human cancer, especially melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer. PD-L1 expression has been proposed as a predictor of tumor response. However, the relationships between PD-L1 expression and various clinicopathological characteristics remain unclear. MATERIALS AND METHODS PD-L1 expression was examined in 220 non-small cell lung cancer specimens that were consecutively resected at our hospital after validating the E1L3N antibody immunohistochemical assay by comparing IHC and RT-PCR data for lung cancer cell lines. We evaluated the relationships between PD-L1 positivity, several clinical factors and the immunohistochemical expression of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), cancer stem cell and proliferative markers. RESULTS PD-L1 was expressed in 22% of lung adenocarcinomas and 60% of squamous cell lung cancers. There was no significant association between PD-L1 expression and clinicopathological features in squamous cell lung cancer. However, in patients with lung adenocarcinoma, PD-L1 expression was significantly correlated with solid subtype histology, vimentin expression, increased Ki-67 labeling index and poor prognosis by multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION PD-L1 expression was associated with high proliferative activity and the EMT phenotype in adenocarcinoma but not in squamous cell carcinoma of the lung. PD-L1 expression was a significant poor prognostic factor in patients with lung adenocarcinoma.

EGFR Exon 18 Mutations in Lung Cancer: Molecular Predictors of Augmented Sensitivity to Afatinib or Neratinib as Compared with First- or Third-Generation TKIs.

Purpose: Lung cancers harboring common EGFR mutations respond to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), whereas exon 20 insertions (Ins20) are resistant to them. However, little is known about mutations in exon 18. Experimental Design: Mutational status of lung cancers between 2001 and 2015 was reviewed. Three representative mutations in exon 18, G719A, E709K, and exon 18 deletion (Del18: delE709_T710insD) were retrovirally introduced into Ba/F3 and NIH/3T3 cells. The 90% inhibitory concentrations (IC90s) of first-generation (1G; gefitinib and erlotinib), second-generation (2G; afatinib, dacomitinib, and neratinib), and third-generation TKIs (3G; AZD9291 and CO1686) were determined. Results: Among 1,402 EGFR mutations, Del19, L858R, and Ins20 were detected in 40%, 47%, and 4%, respectively. Exon 18 mutations, including G719X, E709X, and Del18, were present in 3.2%. Transfected Ba/F3 cells grew in the absence of IL3, and NIH/3T3 cells formed foci with marked pile-up, indicating their oncogenic abilities. IC90s of 1G and 3G TKIs in G719A, E709K, and Del18 were much higher than those in Del19 (by >11–50-fold), whereas IC90s of afatinib were only 3- to 7-fold greater than those for Del19. Notably, cells transfected with G719A and E709K exhibited higher sensitivity to neratinib (by 5–25-fold) than those expressing Del19. Patients with lung cancers harboring G719X exhibited higher response rate to afatinib or neratinib (∼80%) than to 1G TKIs (35%–56%) by compilation of data in the literature. Conclusions: Lung cancers harboring exon 18 mutations should not be overlooked in clinical practice. These cases can be best treated with afatinib or neratinib, although the currently available in vitro diagnostic kits cannot detect all exon 18 mutations. Clin Cancer Res; 21(23); 5305–13. ©2015 AACR.

The insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor causes acquired resistance to erlotinib in lung cancer cells with the wild-type epidermal growth factor receptor

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)‐tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy often provides a dramatic response in lung cancer patients with EGFR mutations. In addition, moderate clinical efficacy of the EGFR‐TKI, erlotinib, has been shown in lung cancer patients with the wild‐type EGFR. Numerous molecular mechanisms that cause acquired resistance to EGFR‐TKIs have been identified in lung cancers with the EGFR mutations; however, few have been reported in lung cancers with the wild‐type EGFR. We used H358 lung adenocarcinoma cells lacking EGFR mutations that showed modest sensitivity to erlotinib. The H358 cells acquired resistance to erlotinib via chronic exposure to the drug. The H358 erlotinib‐resistant (ER) cells do not have a secondary EGFR mutation, neither MET gene amplification nor PTEN downregulation; these have been identified in lung cancers with the EGFR mutations. From comprehensive screening of receptor tyrosine kinase phosphorylation, we observed increased phosphorylation of insulin‐like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF1R) in H358ER cells compared with parental H358 cells. H358ER cells responded to combined therapy with erlotinib and NVP‐AEW541, an IGF1R‐TKI. Our results indicate that IGF1R activation is a molecular mechanism that confers acquired resistance to erlotinib in lung cancers with the wild‐type EGFR.

Oncogene swap as a novel mechanism of acquired resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor‐tyrosine kinase inhibitor in lung cancer

Mutant selective epidermal growth factor receptor‐tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR‐TKIs), such as rociletinib and AZD9291, are effective for tumors with T790M secondary mutation that become refractory to first‐generation EGFR‐TKI. However, acquired resistance to these prospective drugs is anticipated considering the high adaptability of cancer cells and the mechanisms remain largely obscure. Here, CNX‐2006 (tool compound of rociletinib) resistant sublines were established by chronic exposure of HCC827EPR cells harboring exon 19 deletion and T790M to CNX‐2006. Through the analyses of these resistant subclones, we identified two resistant mechanisms accompanied by MET amplification. One was bypass signaling by MET amplification in addition to T790M, which was inhibited by the combination of CNX‐2006 and MET‐TKI. Another was loss of amplified EGFR mutant allele including T790M while acquiring MET amplification. Interestingly, MET‐TKI alone was able to overcome this resistance, suggesting that oncogenic dependence completely shifted from EGFR to MET. We propose describing this phenomenon as an “oncogene swap.” Furthermore, we analyzed multiple lesions from a patient who died of acquired resistance to gefitinib, then found a clinical example of an oncogene swap in which the EGFR mutation was lost and a MET gene copy was gained. In conclusion, an “oncogene swap” from EGFR to MET is a novel resistant mechanism to the EGFR‐TKI. This novel mechanism should be considered in order to avoid futile inhibition of the original oncogene.

Effect of dasatinib on EMT-mediated-mechanism of resistance against EGFR inhibitors in lung cancer cells

OBJECTIVE The epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) is associated with acquired resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in certain non-small cell lung cancers that harbor EGFR mutations. Because no currently available drugs specifically kill cancer cells via EMT, novel treatment strategies that overcome or prevent EMT are needed. A recent report suggested that dasatinib (an ABL/Src kinase inhibitor) inhibits EMT induced by transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta in lung cancer cells (Wilson et al., 2014). In this study, we analyzed effects of dasatinib on the resistance mechanism in HCC4006 cells, which tend to acquire resistance to EGFR-TKIs via EMT. MATERIALS AND METHODS Sensitivity to dasatinib in HCC4006 and HCC4006 erlotinib-resistant (ER) cells with an EMT phenotype was analyzed. HCC4006 cells acquired resistance against the combination of erlotinib and dasatinib (HCC4006EDR) following chronic treatment with these drugs. The expression of EMT markers and the resistance mechanism were analyzed. RESULTS Short-term or long-term treatment with dasatinib did not reverse EMT in HCC4006ER. In contrast, HCC4006EDR cells maintained an epithelial phenotype, and the mechanism underlying resistance to erlotinib plus dasatinib combination therapy was attributable to a T790M secondary mutation. HCC4006EDR cells, but not HCC4006ER cells, were highly sensitive to a third-generation EGFR-TKI, osimertinib. CONCLUSIONS Although dasatinib monotherapy did not reverse EMT in HCC4006ER cells, preemptive combination treatment with erlotinib and dasatinib prevented the emergence of acquired resistance via EMT, and led to the emergence of T790M. Our results indicate that preemptive combination therapy may be a promising strategy to prevent the emergence of EMT-mediated resistance.

LAG-3 Protein Expression in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer and Its Relationship with PD-1/PD-L1 and Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes

Introduction: Immunotherapy targeting the programmed death 1 (PD‐1)/programmed death ligand 1 (PD‐L1) checkpoint has shown promising efficacy in patients with NSCLC. Lymphocyte activating 3 gene (LAG‐3) is another important checkpoint, and its role in NSCLC is still not clear. In this study we investigated lymphocyte activing 3 (LAG‐3) protein expression; its correlation with PD‐1, PD‐L1, and tumor‐infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs); and its association with survival in NSCLC. Methods: The expression of LAG‐3 (EPR4392 [Abcam, Cambridge, MA]) protein was assessed in 55 NSCLC cell lines by immunohistochemistry. LAG‐3, PD‐1 (NAT 105 [Cell Marque, Rocklin, CA]), and PD‐L1 (22C3 [Dako, Carpenteria, CA]) protein expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry, and TIL abundance was scored in 139 surgically resected specimens from patients with NSCLC. We also verified results in samples from 62 patients with untreated NSCLC and detected a correlation between LAG‐3 expression and EGFR and KRAS mutation and echinoderm microtubule associated protein like 4 gene (EML4)–anaplastic lymphoma receptor tyrosine kinase gene (ALK) rearrangement. Results: LAG‐3 was not expressed on any of the 55 NSCLC cell lines. However, LAG‐3 was expressed on the TILs in 36 patients with NSCLC (25.9%). Sixty patient samples (43.2%) were positive for PD‐1 on the TILs, and 25 (18.0%) were positive for PD‐L1 on tumor cells. Neither LAG‐3 nor PD‐1 was expressed on the tumor cells. LAG‐3 was overexpressed on the TILs in nonadenocarcinoma compared with in adenocarcinoma (p = 0.031). LAG‐3 expression on TILs was significantly correlated with that of PD‐1 on TILs (p < 0.001) and PD‐L1 on tumor cells (p = 0.041) but not with TIL percentage (p = 0.244). With the logistic regression model, the ORs for LAG‐3 were 0.320 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.110–0.929) and 4.364 (95% CI: 1.898–10.031) when nonadenocarcinoma was compared with adenocarcinoma and TILs that were negative for PD‐1 were compared with those positive for PD‐1. Recurrence‐free survival was significantly different in patients whose TILs were LAG‐3–negative as opposed to LAG‐3–positive (1.91 years [95% CI: 0.76–3.06] versus 0.87 years [95% CI: 0.27–1.47] [p = 0.025]). Likewise, LAG‐3 status of TILs (negative versus positive) did significantly affect overall survival (OS) (3.04 years [95% CI: 2.76–3.32] versus 1.08 years [95% CI: 0.42–1.74] [p = 0.039]). Using Kaplan‐Meier analysis, we found that patients with both PD‐L1–negative tumor cells and LAG‐3–negative TILs have longer recurrence‐free survival than patients who are either PD‐L1– or LAG‐3–positive or both PD‐L1– and LAG‐3–positive (2.09 years [95% CI: 0.90–3.28] versus 1.42 years [95% CI: 0.46–2.34] versus 0.67 years [95% CI: 0.00–1.45] [p = 0.007]). In the verification stage, high expression of LAG‐3 was also significantly correlated with higher expression of PD‐1 on TILs (p = 0.016) and PD‐L1 on tumor cells (p = 0.014). There was no correlation between LAG‐3 expression and EGFR (p = 0.325) and KRAS mutation (p = 1.000) and ALK fusion (p = 0.562). Conclusions: LAG‐3 is expressed on TILs in tumor tissues of some patients with NSCLC. Its expression was higher in nonadenocarcinoma and correlated with PD‐1/PD‐L1 expression. LAG‐3 positivity or both LAG‐3 and PD‐L1 positivity was correlated with early postoperative recurrence. LAG‐3 was related to poor prognosis.

Heterogeneity in resistance mechanisms causes shorter duration of epidermal growth factor receptor kinase inhibitor treatment in lung cancer

OBJECTIVES Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are used as a first line therapy for metastatic lung cancer harboring somatic EGFR mutation. However, acquisition of resistance to these drugs is almost inevitable. T790M (threonine to methionine substitution at codon 790 of the EGFR gene) and MET amplification are well-known resistance mechanisms, and we previously demonstrated that three of six autopsied patients showed inter-tumor heterogeneity in resistance mechanisms by analyzing T790M and MET gene copy number (Suda et al., 2010). To further elucidate the role of heterogeneity in acquired resistance, here we performed further analyses including additional five patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS We analyzed somatic mutations in 50 cancer-related genes for 26 EGFR-TKI refractory lesions from four autopsied patients using target sequencing. MET and ERBB2 copy numbers were analyzed by real-time PCR. Data for additional one patient was obtained from our recent study (Suda et al., 2015). Relationship between heterogeneity in resistance mechanism(s) and time to treatment failure (TTF) of EGFR-TKI and post-progression survival (PPS) were analyzed. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION We observed heterogeneity of resistance mechanisms in two of four patients analyzed (T790M+MET gene copy number gain, and mutant EGFR loss+unknown). We also identified quantitative heterogeneity in EGFR T790M mutation ratio among EGFR-TKI refractory lesions. In analyzing patient outcomes, we found that patients who developed multiple resistance mechanisms had shorter TTF compared with those who developed single resistance mechanism (p=0.022). PPS after EGFR-TKI treatment failure was compatible between these two groups (p=0.42). These findings further our understanding of acquired resistance mechanisms to EGFR-TKIs, and may lead to better treatment strategies after acquisition of resistance to first generation EGFR-TKIs in lung cancer patients with EGFR mutations.

Impact of bevacizumab in combination with erlotinib on EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer xenograft models with T790M mutation or MET amplification.

Erlotinib (ERL), an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor, shows notable efficacy against non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring EGFR mutations. Bevacizumab (BEV), a humanized monoclonal antibody to vascular endothelial cell growth factor (VEGF), in combination with ERL (BEV+ERL) significantly extended progression‐free survival in patients with EGFR‐mutated NSCLC compared with ERL alone. However, the efficacy of BEV+ERL against EGFR‐mutated NSCLC harboring T790M mutation or MET amplification, is unclear. Here, we examined the antitumor activity of BEV+ERL in four xenograft models of EGFR‐mutated NSCLC (three harboring ERL resistance mutations). In the HCC827 models (exon 19 deletion: DEL), ERL significantly inhibited tumor growth by blocking EGFR signal transduction. Although there was no difference between ERL and BEV+ERL in maximum tumor growth inhibition, BEV+ERL significantly suppressed tumor regrowth during a drug‐cessation period. In the HCC827‐EPR model (DEL+T790M) and HCC827‐vTR model (DEL+MET amplification), ERL reduced EGFR signal transduction and showed less pronounced but still significant tumor growth inhibition than in the HCC827 model. In these models, tumor growth inhibition was significantly stronger with BEV+ERL than with each single agent. In the NCI‐H1975 model (L858R+T790M), ERL did not inhibit growth or EGFR signal transduction, and BEV+ERL did not inhibit growth more than BEV. BEV alone significantly decreased microvessel density in each tumor. In conclusion, addition of BEV to ERL did not enhance antitumor activity in primarily ERL‐resistant tumors with T790M mutation; however, BEV+ERL enhanced antitumor activity in T790M mutation‐ or MET amplification‐positive tumors as long as their growth remained significantly suppressed by ERL.

CRKL amplification is rare as a mechanism for acquired resistance to kinase inhibitors in lung cancers with epidermal growth factor receptor mutation

OBJECTIVES Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) often provide dramatic responses in lung cancer patients with somatic EGFR mutation. However, acquired resistance to the drugs usually emerges within a few years. EGFR T790M secondary mutation, MET gene amplification, and transformation to small cell lung cancer are well-validated mechanisms that underlie acquisition of resistance to EGFR-TKIs. In addition, many molecular aberrations have been reported as candidates for mechanisms of acquired resistance to EGFR-TKIs. Amplification of the CRKL gene was reportedly observed in 1 of 11 lung cancer patients with EGFR mutations who acquired resistance to EGFR-TKI. This study is the first report, to our knowledge, that validated the role of CRKL gene amplification as a mechanism for acquisition of resistance to EGFR-TKIs. MATERIALS AND METHODS We analyzed CRKL gene copy numbers, using a quantitative real-time PCR method, in 2 in vitro acquired-resistance cell-line models: 11 clinical samples from patients who developed acquired resistance to EGFR-TKIs, and 39 tumor specimens obtained from 7 autopsy patients whose cancers acquired resistance to EGFR-TKIs. Mutational status of EGFR codon 790 and copy numbers for the MET gene were also determined. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION In analysis for in vitro models, CRKL gene copy numbers were identical between EGFR-TKI-sensitive parental cells and their acquired resistant descendant cells. In addition, we found no clinical tumor specimens with acquired EGFR-TKI resistance to harbor amplified CRKL genes. These results indicate that CRKL gene amplification is rare in acquisition of resistance to EGFR-TKIs in lung cancer patients with EGFR mutations.

Functional Analyses of Mutations in Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Genes in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: Double-Edged Sword of DDR2

Purpose: This study investigated whether mutations of receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) genes detected using next-generation sequencing (NGS) are suitable therapeutic targets. Experimental design: Fifty surgically resected non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) samples were target resequenced using NGS. We then investigated the functions of the identified RTK gene mutations, including their oncogenic potential, in vitro. Results: Mutations in RTK genes were found in 20 samples (EGFR, 15; ERBB4, 1; ALK, 1; DDR2, 2; FGFR1, 1), mutations in MAPK pathway genes were found in nine samples (KRAS, 7; NRAS, 1; BRAF, 2), and mutations in PI3K pathway genes were found in three samples (PIK3CA, 1; PTEN, 3). Among the mutations in RTKs, the functions of four mutations were unclear (ERBB4 D245G; DDR2 H246R and E655K; FGFR1 A263V). These mutations did not exhibit any transformational activities. Neither the phosphorylation nor the protein expressions of RTKs were changed by the DDR2 H246R, ERBB4 D245G, and FGFR1 A263V mutations, although the expression level of the DDR2 protein harboring the E655K mutation was particularly low. Collagen stimulation decreased cellular proliferation through p38 activation in the DDR2 wild-type–overexpressed cell lines, whereas the growth-suppressive effect was weakened in DDR2 E655K–overexpressed cell lines. Furthermore, the DDR2 E655K protein strongly bound to ubiquitin ligase E3 (Cbl-b), and the mutant protein expression was increased after treatment with a proteasome inhibitor. Conclusions: Our experimental findings suggest that RTK mutations are not always suitable as therapeutic targets. The DDR2 E655K mutation can play a role in cancer progression by reducing the growth-inhibitory effect of collagen. Clin Cancer Res; 22(14); 3663–71. ©2016 AACR.