Kenichi Takechi

The antinociceptive and antihyperalgesic effects of topical propofol on dorsal horn neurons in the rat

BACKGROUND:Propofol (2,6-diisopropylphenol) is an IV anesthetic used for general anesthesia. Recent evidence suggests that propofol-anesthetized patients experience less postoperative pain, and that propofol has analgesic properties when applied topically. We presently investigated the antinociceptive effects of topical propofol using behavioral and single-unit electrophysiological methods in rats. METHODS:In behavioral experiments with rats, we assessed the effect of topical hindpaw application of propofol (1%–25%) on heat and mechanically evoked paw withdrawals. In electrophysiological experiments, we recorded from lumbar dorsal horn wide dynamic range (WDR)-type neurons in pentobarbital-anesthetized rats. We assessed the effect of topical application of propofol to the ipsilateral hindpaw on neuronal responses elicited by noxious heat, cold, and mechanical stimuli. We additionally tested whether propofol blocks heat sensitization of paw withdrawals and WDR neuronal responses induced by topical application of allyl isothiocyanate (AITC; mustard oil). RESULTS:Topical application of propofol (1%–25%) significantly increased the mean latency of the thermally evoked hindpaw withdrawal reflex on the treated (but not opposite) side in a concentration-dependent manner, with no effect on mechanically evoked hindpaw withdrawal thresholds. Propofol also prevented shortening of paw withdrawal latency induced by AITC. In electrophysiological experiments, topical application of 10% and 25% propofol, but not 1% propofol or vehicle (10% intralipid), to the ipsilateral hindpaw significantly attenuated the magnitude of responses of WDR neurons to noxious heating of glabrous hindpaw skin with no significant change in thermal thresholds. Maximal suppression of noxious heat-evoked responses was achieved 15 minutes after application followed by recovery to the pre-propofol baseline by 30 minutes. Responses to skin cooling or graded mechanical stimuli were not significantly affected by any concentration of propofol. Topical application of AITC enhanced the noxious heat-evoked response of dorsal horn neurons. This enhancement of heat-evoked responses was attenuated when 10% propofol was applied topically after application of AITC. CONCLUSIONS:The results indicate that topical propofol inhibits responses of WDR neurons to noxious heat consistent with analgesia, and reduced AITC sensitization of WDR neurons consistent with an antihyperalgesic effect. These results are consistent with clinical studies demonstrating reduced postoperative pain in surgical patients anesthetized with propofol. The mechanism of analgesic action of topical propofol is not clear, but may involve desensitization of TRPV1 or TRPA1 receptors expressed in peripheral nociceptive nerve endings, engagement of endocannabinoids, or activation of peripheral &ggr;-aminobutyric acid A receptors.

Scratching inhibits serotonin-evoked responses of rat dorsal horn neurons in a site- and state-dependent manner

Scratching inhibits pruritogen-evoked responses of neurons in the superficial dorsal horn, implicating a spinal site for scratch inhibition of itch. We investigated if scratching differentially affects neurons depending on whether they are activated by itchy vs. painful stimuli, and if the degree of inhibition depends on the relative location of scratching. We recorded from rat lumbar dorsal horn neurons responsive to intradermal (id) microinjection of serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT). During the response to 5-HT, scratch stimuli (3mm, 300 mN, 2 Hz, 20s) were delivered at the injection site within the mechanosensitive receptive field (on-site), or 4-30 mm away, outside of the receptive field (off-site). During off-site scratching, 5-HT-evoked firing was significantly attenuated followed by recovery. On-site scratching excited neurons, followed by a significant post-scratch decrease in 5-HT-evoked firing. Most neurons additionally responded to mustard oil (allyl isothiocyanate). Off-site scratching had no effect, while on-site scratching excited the neurons. These results indicate that scratching exerts a state-dependent inhibitory effect on responses of spinal neurons to pruritic but not algesic stimuli. Moreover, on-site scratching first excited neurons followed by inhibition, while off-site scratching immediately evoked the inhibition of pruritogen-evoked activity. This accounts for the suppression of itch by scratching at a distance from the site of the itchy stimulus.

Real-time ultrasound-guided infraorbital nerve block to treat trigeminal neuralgia using a high concentration of tetracaine dissolved in bupivacaine

Abstract Background Trigeminal neuralgia is a neuropathic disorder characterized by episodes of intense pain in the face. Drug therapy is the first choice of treatment. However, in cases where drug therapy are contraindicated due to side effects, patients can get pain relief from lengthy neurosurgical procedures. Alternatively, a peripheral trigeminal nerve block can be easily performed in an outpatient setting. Therefore it is a useful treatment option for the acute paroxysmal period of TN in patients who cannot use drug therapy. We performed real-time ultrasound guidance for infraorbital nerve blocks in TN patients using a high concentration of tetracaine dissolved in bupivacaine. In this report, we examine the efficacy of our methods. Patients As approved by the Institutional Review Board, the medical records in our hospital were queried retrospectively. Six patients with TN at the V2 area matched the study criteria. All patients could not continue drug therapy with carbamazepine due to side effects and they received an ultrasound-guided infraorbital nerve block with a high concentration of tetracaine dissolved in bupivacaine. Methods The patient was placed in the supine position and the patient’s face was sterilized and draped. An ultrasound system with a 6-13 MHz linear probe was used with a sterile cover. The probe was inserted into the horizontal plane of the cheek just beside the nose and was slid in the cranial direction to find the dimple of the infraorbital foramen. The 25G 25 mm needle was inserted from the caudal side just across from the probe using an out-of-plane approach. To lead the needle tip to the foramen, needle direction was corrected with real-time ultrasound guidance. After the test block with lidocaine (2%, 0.5 ml), a solution of tetracaine (20 mg) dissolved in bupivacaine (0.5%, 0.5 ml) was injected. During each injection, the spread of the agent around the nerve was confirmed using ultrasound images. Results Ten blocks were performed for six patients. Immediately after the procedure, all 10 blocks produced analgesia and relieved the pain. In the three blocks, pain was experienced in a new trigger point outside of the infraorbital nerve region (around the back teeth) within a week after the block and pain were relieved using other treatment. Two patients developed small hematomas in the cheek but they disappeared in a week. All patients did not complain about other side effects including paraesthesia, hyperpathia, dysaesthesia, or double vision. Hypoaesthesia to touch and pain in the infraorbital region were observed in all blocks after 2 weeks. Conclusions We performed real-time ultrasound-guided infraorbital nerve block for TN with a high concentration of tetracaine dissolved in bupivacaine. Our method achieved a high success rate and there were only minor and transient side effects. Implications Real-time ultrasound-guided infraorbital nerve block is one of the useful options to treat the acute paroxysmal period of TN at the infraorbital nerve area. Ultrasound-guided injections may become the standard practice for injecting peripheral trigeminal nerves. Using this high concentration of tetracaine as a neurolytic agent is effective and appears to have only minor side effects.

Management of Intractable Upper Extremity Pain With Continuous Subarachnoid Block at the Low Cervical Level Without Impairment of Upper Extremity Function

We present a case of continuous subarachnoid block for the treatment of refractory cancer pain in the shoulder and upper extremity on the right side of the patient. The catheter tip was placed in the subarachnoid space close to the nerve roots on the right side at the height of C5 corresponding to the painful region. Until the patient died, his pain was controlled with infusions of bupivacaine (30-58.7 mg/d) and morphine (2-19.6 mg/d) for 120 days during which upper extremity function was not disturbed and respiratory function and performance status were improved. This case suggests continuous subarachnoid block at the low cervical level is useful for refractory cancer pain in the shoulder and upper extremity.

Effect of dexmedetomidine on intraocular pressure in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy under total intravenous anesthesia: A randomized, double blinded placebo controlled clinical trial

STUDY OBJECTIVE To study the effects of intraoperative dexmedetomidine on the intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALRP) under propofol-remifentanil anesthesia. DESIGN Double-blind, randomized controlled trial. SETTING Operating room. PATIENTS Forty consenting male patients aged ≥20 to <80 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classes I and II. INTERVENTIONS The patients were randomly assigned to either dexmedetomidine (DEX) (n = 20) or control (n = 20) group. Anesthesia was induced and maintained using propofol, remifentanil, and rocuronium. In the dexmedetomidine group, dexmedetomidine was administered at 0.4 μg/kg/h immediately after anesthesia induction until the end of the surgery, whereas normal saline was administered as placebo in the control group. MEASUREMENTS IOP was measured using a rebound tonometer. Time points of measuring IOP were as follows: T1: before anesthesia induction, T2: 5 min after intubation, T3: 60 min after placing patient in the Trendelenburg position, T4: 120 min after placing patient in the Trendelenburg position, T5: 180 min after placing patient in the Trendelenburg position, T6: 5 min after placing patient in a horizontal position, T7: 5 min after extubation, and T8: 30 min after extubation. MAIN RESULTS A linear mixed model analysis demonstrated a significant intergroup difference in IOP over time and during pneumoperitoneum in the steep Trendelenburg position. IOP at T5 was significantly lower in the dexmedetomidine group than in the control group even after post-hoc analysis in the steep Trendelenburg position periods with Bonferroni correction. CONCLUSIONS Dexmedetomidine combined with propofol decreases IOP in the steep Trendelenburg position during RALRP.

Abstract PR078: The Usefulness of Thiel Embalmed Cadavers for Training in Invasive Anesthetic Techniques.

Background & Objectives: Invasive anesthetic techniques, such as invasive airway access and image guided nerve blocks, are crucial techniques for anesthesiologists. However, in clinical settings, there are limited opportunities to learn these procedures. Thiel’s embalming method is a well-known technique that confers cadavers with superior flexibility and natural coloring, suitable for several applications, such as training and research (1). We conducted a training course for invasive anesthetic techniques using Thiel embalmed cadavers and evaluated the effectiveness of this training.

874 THE MANAGEMENT OF UPPER EXTREMITY PAIN USING CONTINUOUS SUBARACHNOID BLOCK AT THE CERVICAL LEVEL

In this study we analysed 224 patients who had been operated in the period of 2003–2008. We compared the efficacy of analgesic methods by using visual analog scale (VAS). Treatment of postoperative pain was different. Patients were divided in 3 groups: group A (n =75) patients were treated only with ketoprofen, group B (n =71) patients were treated with ketorolak and tramadol, group C (n =78) patients were treated with acetaminofen and tramadol, and were placed peridural cateter. A combination of acetaminofen and tramadol with peridural cateter can reduce 40% of the total amount of nonopioids and opioids needed postoperatively and also reduce its side effects.