Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Kenji Jinno is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Kenji Jinno.


Journal of Gastroenterology | 1998

Circulating vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a possible tumor marker for metastasis in human hepatocellular carcinoma

Kenji Jinno; Masahito Tanimizu; Ichinosuke Hyodo; Yoshiyuki Nishikawa; Yasushi Hosokawa; Toshihiko Doi; Hisashi Endo; Tetsuji Yamashita; Yoshio Okada

Abstract: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is closely related to angiogenesis in various human cancers. However, little is known of its circulating levels in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We examined circulating VEGF levels in chronic liver disease to assess their clinical significance. Plasma VEGF concentrations were determined, by enzyme immunoassay, in patients with chronic hepatitis (CH; n = 36), liver cirrhosis (LC; n = 77), and HCC (n = 86) for a cross-sectional study. Plasma VEGF levels in healthy controls (n = 20) and CH, LC, and HCC patients were 17.7 ± 5.4 (mean ± SD), 30.6 ± 22.8, 34.4 ± 27.0, and 51.1 ± 71.9 pg/ml, respectively. The levels were significantly elevated in the HCC group, compared with the control, CH, and LC groups. Plasma VEGF levels in stage I, II, III, IVA, and IVB HCC patients were 27.6 ± 16.1, 26.5 ± 13.7, 35.8 ± 15.3, 45.4 ± 39.4, and 103.1 ± 123.2 pg/ml, respectively. The stage IVB patients with remote metastasis showed significantly marked elevation compared with the patients at the other stages. Platelet numbers were weakly correlated with plasma VEGF levels in the HCC group. Plasma VEGF level was highly elevated in patients with HCC, particularly those with metastatic disease. We consider that plasma VEGF is a possible tumor marker for metastasis of HCC. Circulating VEGF may be derived mainly from the large burden of tumor cells, and partly from platelets activated by the vascular invasion of HCC cells.


Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology | 1992

Prospective and randomized clinical trial for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma — a comparison of lipiodol-transcatheter arterial embolization with and without Adriamycin (first cooperative study)

Saburo Kawai; Jun Okamura; Makoto Ogawa; Yasuo Ohashi; Masayoshi Tani; Jushiro Inoue; Yoshifumi Kawarada; Mitsuo Kusano; Yasuhiko Kubo; Chikazumi Kuroda; Yu Sakata; Yoshiyuki Shimamura; Kenji Jinno; Akira Takahashi; Kenichi Takayasu; Kazuo Tamura; Naofumi Nagasue; Yoshimi Nakanishi; Masaoki Makino; Manabu Masuzawa; Shuichi Mikuriya; Morito Monden; Yasuhiro Yumoto; Takesada Mori; Toshitsugu Oda

SummaryA randomized, controlled clinical trial comparing the use of lipiodol-transcatheter arterial embolization (L-TAE) in the presence versus the absence of Adriamycin (ADR) for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma was conducted from August 1988 through September 1989. In all, 125 Japanese hospitals participated in this study and 289 patients were entered in the trial. The patients were randomly allocated into group A (L-TAE) or group B (L-TAE+ADR) by telephone registration. There was no significant difference in background factors between group A and group B. Additional treatment, including repeated TAE or hepatic resection, was given to 189 patients. Among the four endpoints analyzed, the rate of tumor reduction and lipiodol accumulation in the tumor did not significantly differ between the two groups. The 3-year survival values for groups A and B were 33.6% and 34.9%, respectively; the difference was not significant. The serum alpha-fetoprotein level, however, decreased to a significantly greater extent in the group that received ADR than in the group that did not (P<0.05). This result suggests that ADR has some favorable additional effect in L-TAE for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.


Journal of Gastroenterology | 1997

Plasma level of basic fibroblast growth factor increases with progression of chronic liver disease

Kenji Jinno; Masahito Tanimizu; Ichinosuke Hyodo; Kurimoto F; Tetsuji Yamashita

Basic fibroblast growth factor (FGF) is thought to be involved in carcinogenesis and, to clarify its clinical significance, the study of its blood level in cancer patients is important. Plasma levels of basic FGF are reported to be elevated in some cancers. However, little is known of basic FGF levels in plasma in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In this study, we measured basic FGF plasma levels in patients with chronic liver disease and compared the levels in chronic hepatitis (CH), liver cirrhosis (LC), and HCC. We also examined whether these levels were related to serum levels of asparate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, γ-glutamyl transpeptidase, alkaline phosphatase, leucine aminopeptidase, total bilirubin, total protein, and albumin, and to the indocyanine green test (i.e., liver function tests) and to type III procollagen, 7S domain of IV type collagen, and hyaluronic acid (i.e., markers of liver fibrosis). Levels of basic FGF. determined by a quantitative “sandwich” enzyme immunoassay, were significantly elevated with the progression of liver disease; being 3.67 ± 2.37 (mean ± SD), 7.78 ± 6.61, and 12.37 ± 7.67pg/ml in the CH, LC, and HCC groups, respectively. FGF levels were elevated to a greater extent in the HCC patients than in the CH (P<0.0001) and LC patients (P=0.0117). Levels were higher in LC than in CH (P=0.0204). None of the liver function test findings or levels of markers of liver fibrosis were correlated with levels of basic FGF. These results suggest that circulating basic FGF could serve as a new indicator of the progression of chronic liver disease. The extremely elevated plasma of level basic FGF in the HCC group suggests that basic FGF may be related to the development of HCC.


Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology | 1992

Clinicopathological study on combination therapy consisting of arterial infusion of lipiodol-dissolved SMANCS and transcatheter arterial embolization for hepatocellular carcinoma*

Kenji Jinno; Shosuke Moriwaki; Minoru Tanada; Toshihiro Wada; Koichi Mandai; Yoshio Okada

SummaryCombination therapy (LpTAE) consisting of arterial infusion of a lipophilic anticancer drug, SMANCS, dissolved in an oily lymphographic agent, lipiodol (LPD), and transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was studied with special reference to the pathological findings. A total of 32 patients were subjected to surgical resection after LpTAE. The pattern of LPD deposition in the tumor was examined by CT scan (Lipiodol CT, LpCT) at 7 days and/or 1 month after LpTAE. The resected materials were examined radiographically with soft X-rays and histologically. LPD was deposited in tiny daughter nodules with a diameter of less than 5 mm and in tumor thrombi as well as in the main tumors, which showed necrotic change. Part of the LPD flowed out from the main tumor via the drainage vein and was deposited in the capsular invasion, resulting in necrosis. LPD accumulated almost exclusively within the blood spaces of trabecular-type HCC, creating a pattern corresponding to a cast of the tumor vessels, which showed prominent necrossi. On the other hand, LPD was not deposited in scirrhous, compact, or well-differentiated HCC, which showed little or no necrosis. It was demonstrated that LpCT images, which accurately depicted the existence and the extent of LPD deposition and necrosis in peutic effect. Our findings indicate that LpTAE and LpCT are valuable for the diagnosis and treatment of HCC and should play a central role in systemic therapeutic approaches to this disease.


Cancer | 1987

Expression of ABH and lewis blood group antigens in combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma. Possible evidence for the hepatocellular origin of combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma

Yoshio Okada; Kenji Jinno; Shousuke Moriwaki; Shigeru Morichika; Shouichiro Torigoe; Terukatsu Arima; Hideo Nagashima; Hilary Koprowski

Expression of ABH, Lewis, and sialyl Lea antigens was studied in five combined hepatocellular‐cholangiocarcinomas. Formalin‐fixed liver tissues were immunostained for those antigens using well‐characterized monoclonal antibodies and an avidin‐biotin‐peroxidase complex (ABC) method. Results were compared with those obtained in normal liver tissues and cholangiocarcinomas, and also with the previous observations of the authors on hepatocellular carcinomas. Although not detected in normal parenchymal liver cells, A, H, Lewis, and sialyl Lea antigens were found in combined hepatocellular‐cholangiocarcinoma cells. Incompatible A antigen also was detected in one blood type O patient. Distribution and intensity of the antigens were similar to those in hepatocellular carcinomas and different from those in cholangiocarcinomas. No preferential accumulation of blood‐group antigens could be found in the area of cholangiocarcinoma‐like differentiation of the combined hepatocellular‐cholangiocarcinoma. The observations suggested that.


Gastrointestinal Endoscopy | 1995

Simultaneous combination of endoscopic sclerotherapy and endoscopic ligation for esophageal varices

Yoshiyuki Nishikawa; Yasushi Hosokawa; Toshihiko Doi; Syuji Shima; Masatsugu Miyoshi; Tohru Ohnishi; Masato Tanimizu; Ichinosuke Hyodo; Kenji Jinno

Endoscopic injection sclerotherapy (EIS) is an established standard t reatment for esophageal varices 1, 2; however, EIS entails complicated manipulation. Endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) ~-5 has been increasingly performed because of the safety and simplicity of the technique because no sclerosant is used. To accomplish rapid eradication of the varices and prevent recurrence, a technique that combines EVL and EIS has also been performed. 6, 7 For more effective and simple EIS, we developed a method that simultaneously combines EVL and EIS (endoscopic injection sclerotherapy with ligation: EISL). EIS was performed after application of the EVL device, and EVL was performed (including the injection site) immediately after infusion of the sc]erosant. This technique may be more effective because of better sclerosant effect after interruption of blood flow s and the absence of bleeding after removal of the needle.


Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology | 1994

Prospective and randomized clinical trial for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma—a comparison between L-TAE with Farmorubicin and L-TAE with Adriamycin: preliminary results (second cooperative study)

Saburo Kawai; Masayoshi Tani; Jun Okamura; Makoto Ogawa; Yasuo Ohashi; Morito Monden; Shigeki Hayashi; Jushiro Inoue; Yoshifumi Kawarada; Mitsuo Kusano; Yasuhiko Kubo; Chikazumi Kuroda; Yu Sakata; Yoshiyuki Shimamura; Kenji Jinno; Akira Takahashi; Kenichi Takayasu; Kazuo Tamura; Naofumi Nagasue; Yoshimi Nakanishi; Masaoki Makino; Manabu Masuzawa; Yasuhiro Yumoto; Takesada Mori; Toshitsugu Oda

A randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted to compare the use of Farmorubicin (FARM) and Adriamycin (ADR) in Lipiodol transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (L-TAE) as a treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. In all, 192 hospitals participated, and 415 patients were enrolled in the study during the period from October 1989 through December 1990, and their data were collected. The patients were randomly allocated to group A (FARM) or group B (ADR) by a central telephone registration. Several clinical characteristics were slightly worse in group A than in group B, but there was no statistically significant difference. The actual doses of FARM and ADR were 72 mg/body and 48 mg/body, respectively. Additional treatments, including repeated TAE or surgery, were given to 248 patients. The 1- and 2-year survival rates were 69% and 44% for group A and 74% and 57% for group B, respectively. The difference was marginally significant (P value in the log-rank test, 0.038). When each group of patients was classified into two subgroups, i.e., high-risk and low-risk categories, based on the severity index calculated by the Cox regression model from significant prognostic factors, the ADR subgroup was significantly superior to the FARM subgroup in the low-risk category, but there was no significant difference between the subgroups in the high-risk category. The change in the serum alpha-fetoprotein level, the extent of Lipiodol accumulation in the tumor, and the extent of tumor reduction did not show any significant difference between the groups. At the above-mentioned doses, ADR seemed to have efficacy almost the same as or slightly superior to that of FARM in L-TAE for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.


Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology | 1992

Prospective and randomized clinical trial for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. A comparison of L-TAE with farmorubicin and L-TAE with adriamycin (second cooperative study

Jun Okamura; Saburo Kawai; Makoto Ogawa; Yasuo Ohashi; Masayoshi Tani; Jushiro Inoue; Yoshifumi Kawarada; Mitsuo Kusano; Yasuhiko Kubo; Chikazumi Kuroda; Yu Sakata; Yoshiyuki Shimamura; Kenji Jinno; Akira Takahashi; Kenichi Takayasu; Kazuo Tamura; Naofumi Nagasue; Yoshimi Nakanishi; Masaoki Makino; Manabu Masuzawa; Shuichi Mikuriya; Morito Monden; Yasuhiro Yumoto; Takesada Mori; Toshitsugu Oda

SummaryA randomized clinical trial comparing L-TAE with Farmorubicin (FARM) and L-TAE with Adriamycin (ADR) in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma was conducted from October 1989 through December 1990. In all, 192 hospitals participated in this study and 117 patients were entered. The patients were randomly allocated to group A (L-TAE+FARM) or group B (L-TAE+ADR). There was no significant intergroup difference in background factors. Additional treatment consisting of repeated TAE or surgery was given to 66 patients. Four factors were analyzed in this study: the percentage of reduction in tumor size, the change in the AFP level, lipiodol accumulation, and survival. None of these factors differed significantly between the two groups. The final evaluation of this study will be based on differences in survival after a long-term follow-up. Toxic effects manifested less frequently in group A than in group B, and the decrease in the platelet count in the peripheral blood was significantly lower in group A than in group B. These results suggest that FARM exerts a more favorable effect than does ADR in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.


Journal of Gastroenterology | 1999

Evaluation of endoscopic injection sclerotherapy with and without simultaneous ligation for the treatment of esophageal varices.

Yoshiyuki Nishikawa; Yasushi Hosokawa; Toshihiko Doi; Hisashi Endo; Masahito Tanimizu; Ichinosuke Hyodo; Kenji Jinno; Tatsuro Sakata; Jun Tomoda

Abstract: For more effective and simple endoscopic injection sclerotherapy (EIS) for esophageal varices, we developed an EIS procedure with ligation (EISL) that is non-invasive, in which EIS and endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) are performed simultaneously. In this study, we compared EISL and EIS in a randomlized sample of patients (n = 14 for each procedure). For EISL, EVL was performed, including the injection site, after the injection of 5% ethanolamine oleate with iopamidol (EOI) into a varix. The mean number of treatment sessions required for eradication of esophageal varices was 2.3 ± 0.5 for EISL and 3.9 ± 0.8 for EIS (P < 0.001); the mean number of treatment sites was 6.2 ± 2.2 for EISL and 14.0 ± 5.0 for EIS (P < 0.001); the mean total amount of EOI used was 13.8 ± 5.2 ml for EISL and 26.3 ± 9.8 ml for EIS (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in rates of recurrence of varices or in bleeding between the two groups. For EISL, fewer treatment sessions and less sclerosant were sufficient, probably because the sclerosants were more effective due to the blockage of variceal blood flow by the ligation. This method should provide a novel modification of EIS.


Lung Cancer | 1997

Measurement of serum p53 protein in patients with small cell lung cancer and results of its clinicopathological evaluation

Yoshihiko Segawa; Nagio Takigawa; Koichi Mandai; Yoshinobu Maeda; Ichiro Takata; Nobukazu Fujimoto; Kenji Jinno

Serum p53 protein levels were measured in 36 patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and 35 patients with benign lung diseases in order to evaluate the relationship of these levels to clinicopathological features of SCLC. Serum levels of p53 protein were measured by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, p53 protein level was 23.92 +/- 6.78 pg/ml in patients with SCLC, and similar to that (17.47 +/- 2.86 pg/ml) in patients with benign lung diseases. By the clinical stage of SCLC, the mean level of p53 protein was 16.68 +/- 4.62 pg/ml in 21 patients with limited disease, and lower than that in 15 patients with extensive disease (34.05 +/- 14.84 pg/ml) (P = 0.23). The levels of p53 protein were not correlated with age, smoking index, or presence of cancer history for patients with SCLC. However, immunohistochemical examination disclosed a mild correlation between the expression of p53 protein by SCLC tumor and p53 protein serum level (r = 0.45, P = 0.02). Two patients with SCLC had an elevated serum level of p53 protein (> 2 S.D. above the mean for benign lung diseases). However, measurement of p53 protein serum level was not found to be clinically useful for detection of SCLC.

Collaboration


Dive into the Kenji Jinno's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Takao Tsuji

Fujita Health University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge