Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Kenneth D. Craig is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Kenneth D. Craig.


Pain | 1987

Pain expression in neonates: facial action and cry

Ruth E. Grunau; Kenneth D. Craig

&NA; Pain expression in neonates instigated by heel‐lance for blood sampling purposes was systematically described using measures of facial expression and cry and compared across sleep/waking states and sex. From gate‐control theory it was hypothesized that pain behavior would vary with the ongoing functional state of the infant, rather than solely reflecting tissue insult. Awake‐alert but inactive infants responded with the most facial activity, consistent with current views that infants in this state are most receptive to environmental stimulation. Infants in quiet sleep showed the least facial reaction and the longest latency to cry. Fundamental frequency of cry was not related to sleep/waking state. This suggested that findings from the cry literature on qualities of pain cry as a reflection of nervous system ‘stress’, in unwell newborns, do not generalize directly to healthy infants as a function of state. Sex differences were apparent in speed of response, with boys showing shorter time to cry and to display facial action following heel‐lance. The findings of facial action variation across sleep/waking state were interpreted as indicating that the biological and behavioral context of pain events affects behavioral expression, even at the earliest time developmentally, before the opportunity for learned response patterns occurs. Issues raised by the study include the importance of using measurement techniques which are independent of preconceived categories of affective response.


The Clinical Journal of Pain | 2007

An interdisciplinary expert consensus statement on assessment of pain in older persons

Thomas Hadjistavropoulos; Keela Herr; Dennis C. Turk; Perry G. Fine; Robert H. Dworkin; Robert D. Helme; Kenneth C. Jackson; Patricia A. Parmelee; Thomas E. Rudy; B. Lynn Beattie; John T. Chibnall; Kenneth D. Craig; Betty Ferrell; Bruce A. Ferrell; Roger B. Fillingim; Lucia Gagliese; Romayne Gallagher; Stephen J. Gibson; Elizabeth L. Harrison; Benny Katz; Francis J. Keefe; Susan J. Lieber; David Lussier; Kenneth E. Schmader; Raymond C. Tait; Debra K. Weiner; Jaime Williams

This paper represents an expert-based consensus statement on pain assessment among older adults. It is intended to provide recommendations that will be useful for both researchers and clinicians. Contributors were identified based on literature prominence and with the aim of achieving a broad representation of disciplines. Recommendations are provided regarding the physical examination and the assessment of pain using self-report and observational methods (suitable for seniors with dementia). In addition, recommendations are provided regarding the assessment of the physical and emotional functioning of older adults experiencing pain. The literature underlying the consensus recommendations is reviewed. Multiple revisions led to final reviews of 2 complete drafts before consensus was reached.


Nature Methods | 2010

Coding of facial expressions of pain in the laboratory mouse

Dale J. Langford; Andrea L. Bailey; Mona Lisa Chanda; Sarah E Clarke; Tanya E Drummond; Stephanie Echols; Sarah Glick; Joelle Ingrao; Tammy Klassen-Ross; Michael L. LaCroix-Fralish; Lynn Matsumiya; Susana G. Sotocinal; John Tabaka; David H. W. Wong; Arn M. J. M. van den Maagdenberg; Michel D. Ferrari; Kenneth D. Craig; Jeffrey S. Mogil

Facial expression is widely used as a measure of pain in infants; whether nonhuman animals display such pain expressions has never been systematically assessed. We developed the mouse grimace scale (MGS), a standardized behavioral coding system with high accuracy and reliability; assays involving noxious stimuli of moderate duration are accompanied by facial expressions of pain. This measure of spontaneously emitted pain may provide insight into the subjective pain experience of mice.


Pain | 1993

Pain in the preterm neonate: behavioural and physiological indices

Kenneth D. Craig; Michael F. Whitfield; Ruth E. Grunau; Julie Linton; Heather D. Hadjistavropoulos

&NA; The impact of invasive procedures on preterm neonates has received little systematic attention. We examined facial activity, body movements, and physiological measures in 56 preterm and full‐term newborns in response to heel lancing, along with comparison preparatory and recovery intervals. The measures were recorded in special care and full‐term nurseries during routine blood sampling. Data analyses indicated that in all measurement categories reactions of greatest magnitude were to the lancing procedure. Neonates with gestational ages as short as 25–27 weeks displayed physiological responsivity to the heel lance, but only in the heart rate measure did this vary with gestational age. Bodily activity was diminished in preterm neonates in general, relative to full‐term newborns. Facial activity increased with the gestational age of the infant. Specificity of the response to the heel lance was greatest on the facial activity measure. Identification of pain requires attention to gestational age in the preterm neonate.


Pain | 2005

Facing others in pain: the effects of empathy.

Liesbet Goubert; Kenneth D. Craig; Tine Vervoort; Stephen Morley; Mjl Sullivan; Acd Williams; Annmarie Cano; Geert Crombez

Department of Experimental-Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium Research Institute for Psychology & Health, Utrecht, The Netherlands Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada Academic Unit of Psychiatry & Behavioural Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK Department of Psychology, University of Montreal, Quebec, Canada Sub-Department of Clinical Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK Department of Psychology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA


Pain | 1990

Neonatal facial and cry responses to invasive and non-invasive procedures

Ruth E. Grunau; Celeste Johnston; Kenneth D. Craig

&NA; Evaluation of pain in neonates is difficult due to their limited means of communication. The aim was to determine whether behavioural reactions of cry and facial activity provoked by an invasive procedure could be discriminated from responses to non‐invasive tactile events. Thirty‐six healthy full‐term infants (mean age 2.2 h) received 3 procedures in counterbalanced order: intramuscular injection, application of triple dye to the umbilical stub, and rubbing thigh with alcohol. Significant effects of procedure were found for total face activity and latency to face movement. A cluster of facial actions comprised of brow bulging, eyes squeezed shut, deepening of the naso‐labial furrow and open mouth was associated most frequently with the invasive procedure. Comparisons between the 2 non‐invasive procedures showed more facial activity to thigh swabbing and least to application of triple dye to the umbilical cord. Acoustic analysis of cry showed statistically significant differences across procedures only for latency to cry and cry duration for the group as a whole. However, babies who cried to two procedures showed higher pitch and greater intensity to the injection. There were no significant differences in melody, dysphonation, or jitter. Methodological difficulties for investigators in this area were examined, including criteria for the selection of cries for analysis, and the logical and statistical challenges of contrasting cries induced by different conditions when some babies do not always cry. It was concluded that facial expression, in combination with short latency to onset of cry and long duration of first cry cycle typifies reaction to acute invasive procedures.


Behaviour Research and Therapy | 2002

A theoretical framework for understanding self-report and observational measures of pain: a communications model.

Thomas Hadjistavropoulos; Kenneth D. Craig

Self-report and observational measures of pain are examined from the perspective of a model of human communication. This model examines the experience of pain as affected by intrapersonal and contextual factors, the process whereby it is encoded into expressive behaviour, and the process of decoding by observers prior to their engaging in action. Self-report measures primarily capture expressive pain behaviour that is under the control of higher mental processes, whereas observational measures capture behaviour that is less subject to voluntary control and more automatic. Automatic expressive behaviours are subject to less purposeful distortion than are behaviours dependent upon higher mental processes. Consequently, observational measures can be used and have clinical utility as indices of pain when self-report is not available, for example, in infants, young children, people with intellectual disabilities or brain damage, and seniors with dementia. These measures are also useful when the credibility of self-report is questioned and even when credible self-report is available. However, automatic behaviours may be more difficult for observers to decode. The model outlined herein takes into account the role of various human developmental stages in pain experience and expression and in understanding the utility of self-report and observational measures. We conclude that both observational and self-report measures are essential in the assessment of pain because of the unique information that each type contributes.


The New England Journal of Medicine | 1997

Efficacy and Safety of Lidocaine–Prilocaine Cream for Pain during Circumcision

Anna Taddio; Bonnie Stevens; Kenneth D. Craig; Pratap Rastogi; Shlomit Ben-David; Andrew Shennan; Peggy Mulligan; Gideon Koren

BACKGROUND Neonatal circumcision is a painful surgical procedure often performed without analgesia. We assessed the efficacy and safety of 5 percent lidocaine-prilocaine cream (Emla) in neonates undergoing circumcision. METHODS We carried out a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial in 68 full-term male neonates: 38 were assigned to receive lidocaine-prilocaine cream, and 30 to receive placebo. One gram of lidocaine-prilocaine or placebo cream was applied to the penis under an occlusive dressing for 60 to 80 minutes before circumcision. Behavioral (facial activity and time spent crying) and physiologic (heart rate and blood pressure) responses were recorded during the procedure. Blood samples were obtained at various times after drug application for measurements of methemoglobin and plasma lidocaine, prilocaine, and o-toluidine (a metabolite of prilocaine). RESULTS A total of 68 and 59 neonates were included in the safety and efficacy analyses, respectively. Demographic characteristics such as gestational age and birth weight did not differ between the lidocaine-prilocaine and placebo groups. During circumcision, the neonates in the lidocaine-prilocaine group had less facial activity (P= 0.01), spent less time crying (P<0.001), and had smaller increases in heart rate (P=0.007) than the neonates in the placebo group. Facial-activity scores were 12 to 49 percent lower during various steps of the procedure in the lidocaine-prilocaine group. As compared with neonates in the placebo group, infants in the lidocaine-prilocaine group cried less than half as much and had heart-rate increases of 10 beats per minute less. Blood methemoglobin concentrations (expressed as a percentage of the hemoglobin concentration) were similar (1.3 percent) in both groups. Lidocaine and prilocaine were detected in plasma in 23 (61 percent) and 21 (55 percent) of the infants treated with lidocaine-prilocaine cream, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Lidocaine-prilocaine cream is efficacious and safe for the prevention of pain from circumcision in neonates.


Psychological Bulletin | 2011

A Biopsychosocial Formulation of Pain Communication.

Thomas Hadjistavropoulos; Kenneth D. Craig; Steve Duck; Annmarie Cano; Liesbet Goubert; Philip L. Jackson; Jeffrey S. Mogil; Pierre Rainville; Michael J. L. Sullivan; Amanda C. de C. Williams; Tine Vervoort; Theresa Dever Fitzgerald

We present a detailed framework for understanding the numerous and complicated interactions among psychological and social determinants of pain through examination of the process of pain communication. The focus is on an improved understanding of immediate dyadic transactions during painful events in the context of broader social phenomena. Fine-grain consideration of social transactions during pain leads to an appreciation of sociobehavioral events affecting both suffering persons as well as caregivers. Our examination considers knowledge from a variety of perspectives, including clinical health psychology, social and developmental processes, evolutionary psychology, communication studies, and behavioral neuroscience.


Pain | 1993

Developmental changes in pain expression in premature, full-term, two- and four-month-old infants

Celeste Johnston; Bonnie Stevens; Kenneth D. Craig; Ruth E. Grunau

&NA; The purpose of this study was to examine the behavioural responses of infants to pain stimuli across different developmental ages. Eighty infants were included in this cross‐sectional design. Four subsamples of 20 infants each included: (1) premature infants between 32 and 34 weeks gestational age undergoing heel‐stick procedure; (2) full‐term infants receiving intramuscular vitamin K injection; (3) 2‐month‐old infants receiving subcutaneous injection for immunisation against DPT; (4) 4‐month‐old infants receiving subcutaneous injection for immunisation against DPT. Audio and video recordings were made for 15 sec from stimulus. Cry analysis was conducted on the first full expiratory cry by FFT with time and frequency measures. Facial action was coded using the Neonatal Facial Action Coding System (NFCS). Results from multivariate analysis showed that premature infants were different from older infants, that full‐term newborns were different from others, but that 2‐ and 4‐month‐olds were similar. The specific variables contributing to the significance were higher pitched cries and more horizontal mouth stretch in the premature group and more taut tongue in the full‐term newborns. The results imply that the premature infant has the basis for communicating pain via facial actions but that these are not well developed. The full‐term newborn is better equipped to interact with his caretakers and express his distress through specific facial actions. The cries of the premature infant, however, have more of the characteristics that are arousing to the listener which serve to alert the caregiver of the state of distress from pain.

Collaboration


Dive into the Kenneth D. Craig's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Christine T. Chambers

University of British Columbia

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ruth E. Grunau

University of British Columbia

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kenneth M. Prkachin

University of Northern British Columbia

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Rami Nader

University of British Columbia

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Melanie A. Badali

University of British Columbia

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge