Kenneth L. Cashdollar
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Kenneth L. Cashdollar.
Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries | 2000
Kenneth L. Cashdollar
This paper is an overview of and introduction to the subject of dust explosions. The purpose is to provide information on the explosibility and ignitability properties of dust clouds that can be used to improve safety in industries that generate, process, use, or transport combustible dusts. The requirements for a dust explosion are: a combustible dust, dispersed in air, a concentration above the flammable limit, the presence of a sufficiently energetic ignition source, and some confinement. An explosion of a fuel in air involves the rapid oxidation of combustible material, leading to a rapid increase in temperature and pressure. The violence of an explosion is related to the rate of energy release due to chemical reactions relative to the degree of confinement and heat losses. The combustion properties of a dust depend on its chemical and physical characteristics, especially its particle size distribution. In this paper, the explosion characteristics of combustible dusts will be compared and contrasted with those of flammable gases, using methane as an example. These characteristics include minimum explosible concentration, maximum explosion pressure, maximum rate of pressure rise, limiting oxygen concentration, ignition temperature, and amount of inert dust necessary to prevent flame propagation. The parameters considered include the effects of dust volatility, dust particle size, turbulence, initial pressure, initial temperature, and oxygen concentration. Both carbonaceous and metal dusts will be used as examples. The goal of this research is to better understand the fundamental aspects of dust explosions.
Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries | 2000
Kenneth L. Cashdollar; Isaac A. Zlochower; Gregory M. Green; Richard A. Thomas; Martin Hertzberg
This paper reports the results of flammability studies for methane, propane, hydrogen, and deuterium gases in air conducted by the Pittsburgh Research Laboratory. Knowledge of the explosion hazards of these gases is important to the coal mining industry and to other industries that produce or use flammable gases. The experimental research was conducted in 20 L and 120 L closed explosion chambers under both quiescent and turbulent conditions, using both electric spark and pyrotechnic ignition sources. The data reported here generally confirm the data of previous investigators, but they are more comprehensive than those reported previously. The results illustrate the complications associated with buoyancy, turbulence, selective diffusion, and ignitor strength versus chamber size. Although the lower flammable limits (LFLs) are well defined for methane (CH4) and propane (C3H8), the LFLs for hydrogen (H2) and its heavier isotope deuterium (D2) are much more dependent on the limit criterion chosen. A similar behavior is observed for the upper flammable limit of propane. The data presented include lower and upper flammable limits, maximum pressures, and maximum rates of pressure rise. The rates of pressure rise, even when normalized by the cube root of the chamber volume (V1/3), are shown to be sensitive to chamber size.
Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries | 1996
Kenneth L. Cashdollar
This paper reports US Bureau of Mines (USBM) research on the explosibility of coal dusts. The purpose of this work is to improve safety in mining and other industries that process or use coal. Most of the tests were conducted in the USBM 20 litre laboratory explosibility chamber. The laboratory data show relatively good agreement with those from full-scale experimental mine tests. The parameters measured included minimum explosible concentrations, maximum explosion pressures, maximum rates of pressure rise, minimum oxygen concentrations, and amounts of limestone rock dust required to inert the coals. The effects of coal volatility and particle size were evaluated, and particle size was determined to be at least as important as volatility in determining the explosion hazard. For all coals tested, the finest sizes were the most hazardous. The coal dust explosibility data are compared to those of other hydrocarbons, such as polyethylene dust and methane gas, in an attempt to understand better the basics of coal combustion.
Review of Scientific Instruments | 1985
Kenneth L. Cashdollar; Martin Hertzberg
The Bureau of Mines has designed a 20‐l test chamber for the explosibility testing of dusts, gases, and their mixtures. It can be used to measure lean and rich limits of flammability, explosion pressures and rates of pressure rise, minimum ignition energies, minimum oxygen concentrations for flammability, and amounts of inhibitor necessary to prevent explosions. The 20‐l chamber can be used at initial pressures that are below, at, or above atmospheric as long as the maximum explosion pressure is less than 21 bar, which is the rated pressure of the chamber. The chamber instrumentation includes a pressure transducer, optical dust probes, an oxygen sensor, and multichannel infrared pyrometers. Ignition sources used include electric sparks and electrically activated chemical ignitors. Examples of the various types of data that can be obtained for dusts and gases are shown.
Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries | 2000
John E. Going; Kris Chatrathi; Kenneth L. Cashdollar
Abstract Two types of flammability limits have been measured for various dusts in the Fike 1-m 3 (1000-L) chamber and in the Pittsburgh Research Laboratory (PRL) 20-L chamber. The first limit is the minimum explosible concentration (MEC), which was measured at several ignition energies. In addition to the three dusts studied previously (bituminous coal, anthracite coal, and gilsonite), this work continues the effort by adding three additional dusts: RoRo93, lycopodium, and iron powder. These materials were chosen to extend the testing to non-coal materials as well as to a metallic dust. The new MEC data corroborate the previous observations that very strong ignitors can overdrive the ignition in the smaller 20-L chamber. Recommendations are given in regard to appropriate ignition energies to be used in the two chambers. The study also considered the other limiting component, oxygen. Limiting oxygen concentration (LOC) testing was performed in the same 20-L and 1-m 3 vessels for gilsonite, bituminous coal, RoRo93, and aluminum dusts. The objective was to establish the protocol for testing at different volumes. A limited investigation was made into overdriving in the 20-L vessel. The LOC results tended to show slightly lower results for the smaller test volume. The results indicated that overdriving could occur and that ignition energies of 2.5 kJ in the 20-L vessel would yield comparable results to those in the 1-m 3 vessel using 10.0 kJ. The studies also illustrate the importance of dust concentration on LOC determinations.
Combustion Science and Technology | 1993
Kenneth L. Cashdollar; Kris Chatrathi
Abstract Minimum explosible concentrations (MEC) of dusts were measured in the Bureau of Mines 20-L chamber and in the Fike L-m3 (1000-L) chamber. The MEC values for gilsonite dust and bituminous coal dust were measured in each chamber at several ignition energies. The explosibility of anthracite coal was also studied in the two chambers. Strong chemical ignitors with energies of 500 to 10 000 J were used in the tests. The uniformity of the dust dispersions in each of the chambers was studied by using optical dust probes. One purpose of the research was to determine if the 20-L chamber was “overdriven” at high ignition energies. The MEC-values measured in the 20-L chamber with 2500-J ignitors were comparable to those measured in the 1-m3 chamber with 10 000 J ignitors. At higher ignition energies in the 20-L chamber, there was evidence of overdriving.
Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries | 2000
Kevin J. Liekhus; Isaac A. Zlochower; Kenneth L. Cashdollar; Sinisa M. Djordjevic; Cindy Loehr
Abstract An experimental program was conducted to evaluate the accuracy of some current methods for predicting the flammability of gas mixtures containing hydrogen and flammable or nonflammable volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in air. The specific VOCs tested were toluene, 1,2-dichloroethane, 2-butanone, and carbon tetrachloride. The lower flammability limits (LFLs) of gas mixtures containing equal molar quantities of the components were determined in a 19.4-l laboratory flammability chamber using a strong spark ignition source and a pressure criterion for flammability. All but one of the LFL values for the individual components were in agreement with earlier literature values. However, the LFL of 1,2-dichloroethane was found to be significantly lower than the range of values reported for previous determinations in smaller chambers. Two methods for calculating the LFL of mixtures were considered. The Group Factor (atomic) Contribution Method was determined to be generally more accurate than the LeChatelier Method for estimating the LFL of the gas mixtures reported here, although the LeChatelier Method was usually more conservative. The Group Factor Method predicted higher values (nonconservative) for the LFLs of several mixtures than were experimentally measured. For the case of a mixture of hydrogen and carbon tetrachloride, the Group Method estimation of the LFL was seriously in error.
Applied Optics | 1979
Kenneth L. Cashdollar
This paper describes a pyrometer that measures the continuum radiation from particles in a flame or explosion at three wavelengths (0.8 microm, 0.9 microm, and 1.0 microm). The particle temperature is calculated from the radiation data using the Planck equation. Temperatures measured for coal dust explosions in a closed vessel are presented.
Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries | 2000
Michael J. Sapko; E. S. Weiss; Kenneth L. Cashdollar; Isaac A. Zlochower
Abstract This paper describes dust explosion research conducted in an experimental mine and in a 20-L laboratory chamber at the Pittsburgh Research Laboratory (PRL) of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). The primary purpose of this research is to improve safety in mining, but the data are also useful to other industries that manufacture, process, or use combustible dusts. Explosion characteristics such as the minimum explosible concentration and the rock dust inerting requirements were measured for various combustible dusts from the mining industries. These dusts included bituminous coals, gilsonite, oil shales, and sulfide ores. The full-scale tests were conducted in the Lake Lynn experimental mine of NIOSH. The mine tests were initiated by a methane–air explosion at the face (closed end) that both entrained and ignited the dust. The laboratory-scale tests were conducted in the 20-L chamber using ignitors of various energies. One purpose of the laboratory and mine comparison is to determine the conditions under which the laboratory tests best simulate the full-scale tests. The results of this research showed relatively good agreement between the laboratory and the large-scale tests in determining explosion limits. Full-scale experiments in the experimental mine were also conducted to evaluate the explosion resistance characteristics of seals that are used to separate non-ventilated, inactive workings from active workings of a mine. Results of these explosion tests show significant increases in explosion overpressure due to added coal dust and indications of pressure piling.
Symposium (International) on Combustion | 1988
Martin Hertzberg; Kenneth L. Cashdollar; Isaac A. Zlochower
Data are presented for the flammability limits of Pittsburgh Seam bituminous coal dust, polyethylene powder, and methane in air at pressures in the range 0.5 to 3 bar. Explosibility test chambers of 20 and 120 L were used, and ignitability limitations were overcome with efficient pyrotechnic ignitors with nominal energies of 500 to 5,000 J. The propagation criterion used was based on the maximum explosion pressure and the size-normalized maximum rate of pressure rise. The latter is a dynamic criterion that tends to minimize “overdriving” effects as the 20-L data are taken to their asymptotic limits at high ignition energies. The measured lean limits in air at atmospheric pressure are 90 g/m 3 for the coal dust, 35 g/m 3 for polyethylene, and 4.9 vol pct for methane. The rich limit for methane is 18–19 vol pct, whereas the dusts have no rich limits out to concentrations as high as 4,000 g/m 3 . A linear, lean-limit pressure dependence was measured for the dusts which was essentially the same as the pressure dependence measured for methane when all are expressed in comparable units: namely, mass concentration of fuel per unit volume of air. This observation further confirms a lean limit dust flame propagation mechanism that is controlled by the gas-phase reaction rate. The limit concentrations are then determined by the dust loading required to generate a lean limit concentration of pyrolysis products in the volatiles-air mixture, and the dust behaves as an equivalent “homogeneous,” premixed gas, regardless of the initial pressure.