Kerstin M. Gustafsson

Effects of the oral, direct factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban on commonly used coagulation assays.

Summary.  Introduction: Rivaroxaban is an oral direct factor Xa inhibitor developed for prophylaxis and treatment of thromboembolic disorders. Laboratory monitoring is not necessary but the dose‐dependent effects on common reagents and assay procedures are largely unknown. Objectives: To investigate the effect of rivaroxaban on commonly used coagulation assays. Materials and Methods: Rivaroxaban was added to plasma from healthy subjects in the concentration range 0–1000 μg L−1 and analyzed using different reagents for activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), prothrombin time (PT), antithrombin, fibrinogen and activated protein C (APC) resistance assays. Results: At an expected peak concentration of rivaroxaban in clinical use, the APTTs were almost invariably prolonged but at lower concentrations the effect was weak. The concentration needed to double the APTT varied between 389 ± 106 and 617 ± 149 μg L−1 for different reagents. The PT assays showed a marked degree of difference. In general, the Quick PT type assays were more sensitive compared with the Owren type PT assays. The results from antithrombin assays were dependent on the type of reagent, with the Xa‐based assay being sensitive for rivaroxaban with an estimated increase of 0.09 IU mL−1 per 100 μg L−1 rivaroxaban. There were only minor effects on fibrinogen assays based on thrombin reagents. The APTT‐based assay for APC resistance is affected in a dose‐dependent manner whereas an assay based on the activation of coagulation at the prothrombinase level was unaffected. Conclusions: Different assays, and even different reagents within an assay group, display variable effects by therapeutic concentrations of rivaroxaban.

Effects of the oral, direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran on five common coagulation assays

Dabigatran is an oral, reversible thrombin inhibitor that has shown promising results in large clinical trials. Laboratory monitoring is not needed but the effects on common coagulation assays are incompletely known. Dabigatran was added to plasma from healthy subjects in the concentration range 0-1,000 μg/l and analysed using several reagents for activated thromboplastin time (APTT), prothrombin time (PT), fibrinogen, antithrombin, and activated protein C resistance. Typical trough concentrations are about 50 μg/l, peak concentrations 100-300 μg/l. At 100 μg/l all APTT-results were prolonged. The concentration required to double APTT ranged between 227 and 286 μg/l, the responses for all five reagents were similar. PT-reagents were much less affected with almost no samples above INR 1.2 at 100 μg/l. The effect was sample dilution dependent with PT Quick type more sensitive than PT Owren type methods. If a patient on dabigatran has prolonged APTT, >90 seconds, and Quick PT INR>2 or Owren PT INR>1.5 over-dosing or accumulation of dabigatran should be considered. Two of four fibrinogen reagents underestimated the fibrinogen concentration considerably at expected peak concentration. Methods based on inhibition of thrombin over-estimated the antithrombin concentration, but not Xa-based. The APC-resistance methods over-estimated the APC-ratio, which may lead to miss-classification of factor V Leiden patients as being normal. Different coagulation assays, and even different reagents within an assay group, display variable effects at therapeutic concentrations of dabigatran. Some of these assay variations are of clinical importance, thus knowledge is needed for a correct interpretation of results.

Effects of the oral, direct factor Xa inhibitor apixaban on routine coagulation assays and anti-FXa assays

Apixaban is an oral direct factor Xa inhibitor developed for the prophylaxis and treatment of thromboembolic disorders. Laboratory monitoring is not necessary, but the effects on common coagulation reagents and assays constitute clinically valuable information.

Fluorescence-Based Blood Coagulation Assay Device for Measuring Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time

The measurement of blood clotting time is important in a range of clinical applications such as assessing coagulation disorders and controlling the effect of various anticoagulant drug therapies. Clotting time tests essentially measure the onset of clot formation which results from the formation of fibrin fibers in the blood sample. However, such assays are inherently imprecise due to the highly variable nature of the clot formation process and the sample matrix. This work describes a clotting time measurement assay which uses a fluorescent probe to very precisely detect the onset of fibrin clot formation. It uses a microstructured surface which enhances the formation of multiple localized clot loci and which results in the abrupt redistribution of the fluorescent label at the onset of clot formation in both whole blood and plasma. This methodology was applied to the development of an activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) test in a lateral flow microfluidic platform and used to monitor the effect of heparin dosage where it showed linearity from 0 to 2 U/mL in spiked plasma samples (R(2)=0.996, n = 3), correlation against gold standard coagulometry of 0.9986, and correlation against standard hospital aPTT in 32 patient samples of 0.78.

Laboratory diagnosis of thrombophilia by endothelial-cell-modulated coagulation.

This study investigated whether the addition of endothelial cells to blood or blood plasma is of value in global laboratory diagnostic testing for thrombotic tendency. Plasma from thrombotic patients and healthy individuals was exposed to human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC), in monolayers or suspensions, and fibrin deposition or clotting time, respectively, was registered. The latter was determined by a novel rheometric procedure that also gave information about coagulum rigidity. Plasma from patients (n = 10) tended to deposit more fibrin on HUVEC monolayers than plasma from healthy individuals (n = 10). When mixed with suspended HUVEC, plasma from patients (n = 14) showed shorter clotting times than plasma from healthy individuals [n = 13; 4.79 +/- 1.02 min (mean +/- SD) compared with 6.80 +/- 1.50 min, P < 0.001]. Coagulum rigidity among patients also differed from that of healthy individuals (P < 0.05). The study showed that the addition of endothelial cells to blood plasma is of value in global laboratory diagnostic testing for thrombotic tendency.

Endogenous thrombin potential is higher during the luteal phase than during the follicular phase of a normal menstrual cycle

STUDY QUESTION Do thrombin generation and haemostatic parameters differ during the two phases of the menstrual cycle? SUMMARY ANSWER Total thrombin concentration is higher during the luteal phase compared with the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY The coagulation cascade is affected by many variables, such as fluctuations in the levels of sex hormones. The studies on the variations in haemostatic parameters during the menstrual cycle have produced diverse results. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION Thrombin generation and selected haemostatic parameters (fibrinogen, factor II, factor VII, factor VIII, factor X, von Willebrand factor, antithrombin and D-dimer) were measured during the two phases of a normal menstrual cycle in 102 healthy women not taking any form of hormone medication. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS The study cohort consisted of 102 healthy women with regular menstrual cycles. Thrombin generation was measured by the calibrated automated thrombogram method. Progesterone and sex hormone-binding globulin were measured by chemiluminescence enzyme immunoassays. Estradiol was measured by a sensitive radioimmunoassay. Fibrinogen was measured by a clotting method, antithrombin was measured by a chromogenic method and factor II, factor VII, factor VIII, factor X, von Willebrand factor and D-dimer were measured by photometric methods. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE It was shown that the total amount of generated thrombin (Endogenous Thrombin Potential) was significantly higher during the luteal compared with the follicular phase (P = 0.027). Factor X was significantly higher during the follicular phase (P = 0.028). Progesterone exhibited significant associations (measured by the least squares regression analysis) with fibrinogen and factor X during the follicular phase (P = 0.043 and P = 0.033, respectively) and with factors II and VII during the luteal phase (P = 0.034 and P = 0.024, respectively). The validity of the results from the regression analysis was further confirmed by performing correlation analyses (Pearson correlation matrix) for haemostatic markers for the luteal and follicular phases (accepted correlation level >0.8). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION The wide confidence interval for the differences in endogenous thrombin potential during the two phases could imply that the size of the cohort may not be sufficient to fully evaluate the biological variations. Additionally, the haemostatic markers were not shown to have significant associations with thrombin generation, suggesting that the increased thrombin concentration during the luteal phase would be mediated by another mechanism, as yet unidentified. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS The associations between progesterone and the haemostatic markers, as shown for both phases of the menstrual cycle, suggest a previously unknown or undefined yet potentially significant role for progesterone in the coagulation system. However, it has been shown that the use of progestogen-only preparations does not affect the coagulation system, which is partly the reason why they are considered safe for women with thrombophilia or previous thrombotic event. Further studies are required in order to demonstrate whether our results can be extrapolated for synthetic progestins, which might have significant implication on the indications for their use.

Large early variation of residual platelet reactivity in Acute Coronary Syndrome patients treated with clopidogrel: Results from Assessing Platelet Activity in Coronary Heart Disease (APACHE)

INTRODUCTION There is a large inter-individual variation in response to clopidogrel treatment and previous studies have indicated higher risk of thrombotic events in patients with high residual platelet reactivity (HRPR), but the optimal time-point for testing is not established. The aim of this study was to investigate the optimal time-point for aggregometry testing and the risk of major adverse cardiac events associated with HRPR. METHOD AND RESULTS We included 125 patients with ACS (73 with STEMI, and 71 received abciximab). The prevalence of HRPR varied substantially over time. The rate of HRPR in patients treated and not treated with abciximab were 43% vs 67% (p=0.01) before, 2% vs 23% (p=0.001) 6-8h after, 8% vs 9% (p=0.749) 3days after, and 23% vs 12% (p=0.138) 7-9 days after loading dose of clopidogrel. We found HRPR in 18% of the patients but only four ischemic events during 6months follow-up, with no significant difference between HRPR patients compared to the rest of the population. There were 3 TIMI major bleedings, all of which occurred in the low residual platelet reactivity (LRPR) group. CONCLUSION There is a large variation in platelet reactivity over time, also depending on adjunctive therapy, which has a large impact on optimal time-point for assessment. We found HRPR in almost 1 in 5 patients, but very few MACE, and not significantly higher in HRPR patients. In a contemporary ACS population, with low risk for stent thrombosis, the predictive value of HRPR for ischemic events will probably be low.

Pretreatment with ticagrelor may offset additional inhibition of platelet and coagulation activation with bivalirudin compared to heparin during primary percutaneous coronary intervention

BACKGROUND It remains unknown if bivalirudin compared to heparin confers any additional inhibition of platelet and coagulation activation during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) after pretreatment with ticagrelor. METHODS In this substudy of VALIDATE-SWEDEHEART trial, 103 patients pretreated with ticagrelor were randomized before PPCI to heparin or bivalirudin. Blood samples were collected before and 1 and 12 h after PPCI. We measured platelet reactivity (PR) using Multiplate, soluble P-selectin, thrombin-antithrombin complexes (TAT) and prothrombin fragments 1 + 2 (F1 + 2) as markers of platelet and coagulation activation. RESULTS The median (IQR) time from ticagrelor administration to randomization was 63 (29) vs 60 (24) minutes, p = 0.28. ADP-induced PR did not significantly differ between groups over time (heparin vs bivalirudin, AUC 73 (62) vs 74 (68), p = 0.74, 32 (42) vs 43 (51), p = 0.38, 15 (15) vs 19 (15), p = 0.29, before, 1 and 12 h after PPCI). Soluble P-selectin did not significantly differ between groups. At 1 h TAT significantly increased with bivalirudin (3.0 (1.3) to 4.3 (4.2) ug/L; p < 0.01), but not with UFH (3.1 (2.1) to 3.5 (1.6) ug/L, p = 0.24). F1 + 2 increased in both groups but the rise was numerically higher with bivalirudin (170 (85) to 213 (126) pmol/L vs 168 (118) to 191 (103) pmol/L). At 12 h, a comparable significant increase in thrombin generation was observed in both groups. CONCLUSION In patients treated with ticagrelor, we found no major differences between bivalirudin and heparin in platelet aggregation or coagulation markers, which is in agreement with the neutral clinical results of the VALIDATE-SWEDEHEART study.

Effects of the oral, direct factor Xa inhibitor edoxaban on routine coagulation assays, lupus anticoagulant and anti-Xa assays

Abstract Edoxaban is an oral direct factor Xa inhibitor for prophylaxis and treatment of thromboembolic disorders. The effects on common coagulation assays are clinically valuable information and in certain clinical situations a quick assessment of the anticoagulant is wanted. Our aim was to investigate the effect of edoxaban on routine coagulation methods and evaluate anti-Xa assays, commonly used for other direct factor Xa inhibitors, for estimation of the drug concentration. Edoxaban was spiked to plasma samples from healthy subjects in the concentration range 0–742 µg/L and analyzed using different reagents for activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and prothrombin time (PT). Assays for antithrombin, activated protein C resistance, lupus anticoagulant (LA) and chromogenic anti-Xa assays were also included. Edoxaban displayed similar effects in vitro to other oral direct Xa inhibitors. The concentration needed to double the coagulation time varied between assays and reagents; 539–758 µg/L for the APTT and between 329 and 2505 µg/L for the PT. Edoxaban gave false high antithrombin activities in assays based on Xa-inhibition. Two integrated assays for LA, both based on activation with dilute Russell’s viper venom, displayed different results. Chromogenic anti-Xa assays displayed linear dose-response curves with edoxaban up to approximately 500 µg/L. In conclusion, therapeutic concentrations of edoxaban variably affect different coagulation assays, and even different reagents within an assay group. In comparison with other oral Xa-inhibitors, the in vitro effects of edoxaban were more similar to rivaroxaban than apixaban. For measurement of edoxaban concentration in plasma, it is possible to use the chromogenic anti-Xa assays.

LONG TERM VARIATION OF HIGH ON TREATMENT PLATELET REACTIVITY AFTER AN ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION

High on clopidogrel treatment Platelet Reactivity (HPR) has been identified as a risk factor for new ischemic events after an acute myocardial infarction (MI). Little is known about variation of HPR over time. We used Multiplate®, a whole blood impedance aggregation method, to assess ADP-