Kevin D. G. Pfleger

Illuminating insights into protein-protein interactions using bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET)

Bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) is a straightforward biophysical technique for studying protein-protein interactions. It requires: (1) that proteins of interest and suitable controls be labeled with either a donor or acceptor molecule, (2) placement of these labeled proteins in the desired environment for assessing their potential interaction, and (3) use of suitable detection instrumentation to monitor resultant energy transfer. There are now several possible applications, combinations of donor and acceptor molecules, potential assay environments and detection system perturbations. Therefore, this review aims to demystify and clarify the important aspects of the BRET methodology that should be considered when using this technique.

Building a new conceptual framework for receptor heteromers

Receptor heteromers constitute a new area of research that is reshaping our thinking about biochemistry, cell biology, pharmacology and drug discovery. In this commentary, we recommend clear definitions that should facilitate both information exchange and research on this growing class of transmembrane signal transduction units and their complex properties. We also consider research questions underlying the proposed nomenclature, with recommendations for receptor heteromer identification in native tissues and their use as targets for drug development.

Monitoring the formation of dynamic G-protein-coupled receptor–protein complexes in living cells

GPCRs (G-protein-coupled receptors) play an extremely important role in transducing extracellular signals across the cell membrane with high specificity and sensitivity. They are central to many of the bodys endocrine and neurotransmitter pathways, and are consequently a major drug target. It is now clear that GPCRs interact with a range of proteins, including other GPCRs. Identifying and elucidating the function of such interactions will significantly enhance our understanding of cellular function, with the promise of new and improved pharmaceuticals. Biophysical techniques involving resonance energy transfer, namely FRET (fluorescence resonance energy transfer) and BRET (bioluminescence resonance energy transfer), now enable us to monitor the formation of dynamic GPCR-protein complexes in living cells, in real time. Their use has firmly established the concept of GPCR oligomerization, as well as demonstrating GPCR interactions with GPCR kinases, beta-arrestins, adenylate cyclase and a subunit of an inwardly rectifying K+ channel. The present review examines recent technological advances and experimental applications of FRET and BRET, discussing particularly how they have been adapted to extract an ever-increasing amount of information about the nature, specificity, stoichiometry, kinetics and agonist-dependency of GPCR-protein interactions.

Bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) for the real-time detection of protein-protein interactions

A substantial range of protein-protein interactions can be readily monitored in real time using bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET). The procedure involves heterologous coexpression of fusion proteins, which link proteins of interest to a bioluminescent donor enzyme or acceptor fluorophore. Energy transfer between these proteins is then detected. This protocol encompasses BRET1, BRET2 and the recently described eBRET, including selection of the donor, acceptor and substrate combination, fusion construct generation and validation, cell culture, fluorescence and luminescence detection, BRET detection and data analysis. The protocol is particularly suited to studying protein-protein interactions in live cells (adherent or in suspension), but cell extracts and purified proteins can also be used. Furthermore, although the procedure is illustrated with references to mammalian cell culture conditions, this protocol can be readily used for bacterial or plant studies. Once fusion proteins are generated and validated, the procedure typically takes 48–72 h depending on cell culture requirements.

G protein-coupled receptor dimers: Functional consequences, disease states and drug targets

With an ever-expanding need for reliable therapeutic agents that are highly effective and exhibit minimal deleterious side effects, a greater understanding of the mechanisms underlying G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) regulation is fundamental. GPCRs comprise more than 30% of all therapeutic drug targets and it is likely that this will only increase as more orphan GPCRs are identified. The past decade has seen a dramatic shift in the prevailing concept of how GPCRs function, in particular the growing acceptance that GPCRs are capable of interacting with one another at a molecular level to form complexes, with significantly different pharmacological properties to their monomeric selves. While the ability of like-receptors to associate and form homodimers raises some interesting mechanistic issues, the possibility that unlike-receptors could heterodimerise in certain tissue types, producing a functionally unique signalling complex that binds specific ligands, provides an invaluable opportunity to refine and redefine pharmacological interventions with greater specificity and efficacy.

G-protein coupled receptor oligomerization in neuroendocrine pathways

Protein-protein interactions are fundamental processes for many biological systems including those involving the superfamily of G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs). A growing body of biochemical and functional evidence supports the existence of GPCR-GPCR homo- and hetero-oligomers. In particular, hetero-oligomers can display pharmacological and functional properties distinct from those of the homodimer or oligomer thus adding another level of complexity to how GPCRs are activated, signal and traffick in the cell. Dimerization may also play a role in influencing the activity of agonists and antagonists. We are only beginning to unravel how and why such complexes are formed, the functional implications of which will have an enormous impact on GPCR biology. Future research that studies GPCRs as dimeric or oligomeric complexes will enhance not only our understanding of GPCRs in cellular function but will also be critical for novel drug design and improved treatment of the vast array of GPCR-related conditions.

G Protein–Coupled Receptor Heteromers

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) compose one of the largest families of membrane proteins involved in intracellular signaling. They are involved in numerous physiological and pathological processes and are prime candidates for drug development. Over the past decade, an increasing number of studies have reported heteromerization between GPCRs. Many investigations in heterologous systems have provided important indications of potential novel pharmacology; however, the physiological relevance of these findings has yet to be established with endogenous receptors in native tissues. In this review, we focus on family A GPCRs and describe the techniques and criteria to assess their heteromerization. We conclude that advances in approaches to study receptor complex functionality in heterologous systems, coupled with techniques that enable specific examination of native receptor heteromers in vivo, are likely to establish GPCR heteromers as novel therapeutic targets.

Demonstration of Improvements to the Bioluminescence Resonance Energy Transfer (BRET) Technology for the Monitoring of G Protein–Coupled Receptors in Live Cells:

The bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) technique has become extremely popular for studying protein-protein interactions in living cells and real time. Of particular interest is the ability to monitor interactions between G protein–coupled receptors, such as the thyrotropin-releasing hormone receptor (TRHR), and proteins critical for regulating their function, such as β-arrestin. Using TRHR/β-arrestin interactions, we have demonstrated improvements to all 3 generations of BRET (BRET1, BRET2, and eBRET) by using the novel forms of luciferase, Rluc2 and Rluc8, developed by the Gambhir laboratory. Furthermore, for the 1st time it was possible to use the BRET2 system to detect ligand-induced G protein–coupled receptor/β-arrestin interactions over prolonged periods (on the scale of hours rather than seconds) with a very stable signal. As demonstrated by our Z′-factor data, these luciferases increase the sensitivity of BRET to such an extent that they substantially increase the potential applicability of this technology for effective drug discovery high-throughput screening. (Journal of Biomolecular Screening 2008:888-898)

Application of BRET to monitor ligand binding to GPCRs

Bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) is a well-established method for investigating protein-protein interactions. Here we present a BRET approach to monitor ligand binding to G protein–coupled receptors (GPCRs) on the surface of living cells made possible by the use of fluorescent ligands in combination with a bioluminescent protein (NanoLuc) that can be readily expressed on the N terminus of GPCRs.

Differential association modes of the thrombin receptor PAR1 with Gαi1, Gα12, and β-arrestin 1

Although many G protein‐coupled receptors (GPCRs) are known to activate multiple signaling pathways by coupling to different types of G proteins or by promoting G protein‐independent events, how this occurs remains unclear. Using bioluminescence resonance energy transfer and time‐resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer, we provide evidence for protease‐activated receptor 1 (PAR1) forming preassembled complexes with Gαi1 but not Gα12. PAR1 activation appears to rapidly induce transient Gαil activation (t1/2 = 4.13 s) but late and stable recruitment of Gα12 (t1/2 = 8.8 min) in parallel with β‐arrestin 1 = 7.5 min). However, there is no significant difference in the potency of the agonist‐dependent response between Gαi1, Gα12, and β‐arrestin 1 (EC50 values 0.48, 0.30, and 0.15 nM, respectively). Although it seems β‐arrestin 1 is recruited to preassembled PAR1‐Gαi1 complexes, this appears unlikely with Gα12, suggesting 2 distinct receptor populations. Of note, we observed a different Gα12 association mode with other GPCRs, indicating that preassembly and association dynamics may be specific properties of a receptor‐G protein pair. Furthermore, the Gα C terminus appears to play different roles in the distinct association modes. Consequently, G protein preassembly or recruitment may constitute novel mechanisms for controlling the kinetics and multitude of GPCR signaling pathways.—Ayoub, M. A., Trinquet, E., Pfleger K. D. G., Pin, J.‐P. Differential association modes of the thrombin receptor PAR1 with Gαi1, Gα12, and β‐arrestin 1. FASEB J. 24, 3522–3535 (2010). www.fasebj.org