Kevin D. Sheedy

Debt and Incomplete Financial Markets: A Case for Nominal GDP Targeting

For many households borrowing is possible only by accepting a financial contract that specifies a fixed repayment stream. However, the future income that will repay this debt is uncertain, so risk can be inefficiently distributed. This paper shows that when debt contracts are written in terms of money, a monetary policy of nominal GDP targeting improves the functioning of financial markets. By insulating households’ nominal incomes from aggregate real shocks, this policy effectively achieves risk sharing by stabilizing the ratio of debt to income. The paper also shows that when there is price stickiness, the objective of improving risk sharing should still receive considerable weight in the conduct of monetary policy relative to stabilizing inflation.

MONETARY POLICY UNDER LABOUR

This paper analyses Labours record on monetary policy and the record of the MPC which it created. The paper begins by discussing the conceptual framework and institutions behind inflation targeting as it operates in the UK. We then discuss the successes that it enjoyed up to 2007 and debate the lessons that are being learned as a consequence of the experience since then. We then raise some of the formidable challenges that UK monetary policy must now face up to including maintaining the credibility of the inflation targeting regime in the face of greater interdependence between monetary and fiscal policy, and between monetary policy and support to the banking system and financial markets.

Guarding the Guardians

Good government requires some restraints on the powerful but how can those be imposed if there is no‐one above them? This article studies the equilibrium allocation of power and resources established by self‐interested incumbents under the threat of rebellions from inside and outside the group in power. Commitment to uphold individuals’ rights can only be achieved if power is not as concentrated as incumbents would like it to be, ex post. Power sharing endogenously enables incumbents to commit to otherwise time‐inconsistent laws by ensuring more people receive rents under the status quo and thus want to defend it.