Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Kevin T. Driscoll is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Kevin T. Driscoll.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2003

Global frequency and distribution of lightning as observed from space by the Optical Transient Detector

Hugh J. Christian; Richard J. Blakeslee; Dennis J. Boccippio; William L. Boeck; Dennis E. Buechler; Kevin T. Driscoll; Steven J. Goodman; John Hall; William J. Koshak; Douglas M. Mach; Michael F. Stewart

of uncertainty for the OTD global totals represents primarily the uncertainty (and variability) in the flash detection efficiency of the instrument. The OTD measurements have been used to construct lightning climatology maps that demonstrate the geographical and seasonal distribution of lightning activity for the globe. An analysis of this annual lightning distribution confirms that lightning occurs mainly over land areas, with an average land/ocean ratio of 10:1. The Congo basin, which stands out year-round, shows a peak mean annual flash density of 80 fl km 2 yr 1 in Rwanda, and includes an area of over 3 million km 2 exhibiting flash densities greater than 30 fl km 2 yr 1 (the flash density of central Florida). Lightning is predominant in the northern Atlantic and western Pacific Ocean basins year-round where instability is produced from cold air passing over warm ocean water. Lightning is less frequent in the eastern tropical Pacific and Indian Ocean basins where the air mass is warmer. A dominant Northern Hemisphere summer peak occurs in the annual cycle, and evidence is found for a tropically driven semiannual cycle. INDEX TERMS: 3304 Meteorology and Atmospheric Dynamics: Atmospheric electricity; 3309 Meteorology and Atmospheric Dynamics: Climatology (1620); 3324 Meteorology and Atmospheric Dynamics: Lightning; 3394 Meteorology and Atmospheric Dynamics: Instruments and techniques;


Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology | 2000

The Optical Transient Detector (OTD): Instrument Characteristics and Cross-Sensor Validation

Dennis J. Boccippio; William J. Koshak; Richard J. Blakeslee; Kevin T. Driscoll; Douglas M. Mach; Dennis E. Buechler; William L. Boeck; Hugh J. Christian; Steven J. Goodman

Abstract Lightning data from the U.S. National Lightning Detection Network (NLDN) are used to perform preliminary validation of the satellite-based Optical Transient Detector (OTD). Sensor precision, accuracy, detection efficiency, and biases of the deployed instrument are considered. The sensor is estimated to have, on average, about 20–40-km spatial and better than 100-ms temporal accuracy. The detection efficiency for cloud-to-ground lightning is about 46%–69%. It is most likely slightly higher for intracloud lightning. There are only marginal day/night biases in the dataset, although 55- or 110-day averaging is required to remove the sampling-based diurnal lightning cycle bias.


Geophysical Research Letters | 2000

The 1997–98 El Nino event and related wintertime lightning variations in the southeastern United States

Steve Goodman; Dennis E. Buechler; Kevin R. Knupp; Kevin T. Driscoll; Eugene W. McCaul

The El Nino Southern Oscillation (ENSO) is a climate anomaly responsible for worldwide weather impacts ranging from droughts to floods. In the United States, warm episode years are known to produce above normal rainfall along the Southeast U.S. Gulf Coast and into the Gulf of Mexico, with the greatest response observed in the October–March period of the warm episode year. The 1997–98 warm episode is notable for being the strongest event since 1982–83. With the recent launch of a lightning sensor on NASAs Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) in November 1997 and the detailed coverage of the U.S. National Lightning Detection Network (NLDN), such interannual changes in lightning activity can be examined with far greater detail than ever before. For the 1997–98 ENSO event the most significant year-to-year changes in lightning frequency worldwide occurred along the Gulf Coast and within the Gulf of Mexico basin during the Northern Hemisphere winter. Within a broad swath across the northern Gulf of Mexico basin there is a 100–150% increase in lightning days year-to-year (a peak of 33 days in the winter of 1997–98 vs. only 15 days or fewer in both the 1996–97 and 1998–99 winter). In addition, there is a nearly 200% increase in lightning hours (a peak of 138 hours in 1996–97 vs. 50 hours in both 1996–97 and 1998–99). The increase in lightning activity during ENSO occurs in association with a 100% increase in the number of synoptic scale cyclones that developed within or moved through the Gulf basin. The primary variables controlling these enhancements in thunderstorm activity are the position and strength of the jet stream.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 1992

A modeling study of the time‐averaged electric currents in the vicinity of isolated thunderstorms

Kevin T. Driscoll; Richard J. Blakeslee; Michael E. Baginski

A thorough examination of the results of a time-dependent computer model of a dipole thunderstorm revealed that there are numerous similarities between the time-averaged electrical properties and the steady state properties of an active thunderstorm. Thus, the electrical behavior of the atmosphere in the vicinity of a thunderstorm be can be determined with a formulation similar to what was first described by Holzer and Saxon in 1952. From the Maxwell continuity equation of electric current, a simple analytical equation was derived that expresses a thunderstorms average current contribution to the global electric circuit in terms of the generator current within the thundercloud, the intracloud lightning current, the cloud-to-ground lightning current, the altitudes of the charge centers, and the conductivity profile of the atmosphere. This equation was found to be nearly as accurate as the more computationally expensive numerical model, even when it is applied to a thunderstorm with a reduced conductivity thundercloud, a time-varying generator current, a varying flash rate, and a changing lightning mix.


Geophysical Research Letters | 2000

Lightning activity within a tornadic thunderstorm observed by the optical transient detector (OTD)

Dennis E. Buechler; Kevin T. Driscoll; Steve Goodman; Hugh J. Christian

The first storm-scale, total lightning observations from space during tornadogenesis are presented. During the overpass of an Oklahoma supercell, just minutes prior to tornado touchdown on 17 April 1995, the NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration) OTD (Optical Transient Detector) detected a total of 143 flashes during approximately 3 minutes of observation time. The estimated total flash rate ranges from 45 (raw counts) to 78 (corrected for detection efficiency) flashes min−1. This total flash rate was at least 17 times greater than the cloud-to-ground lightning rate detected by the National Lightning Detection Network (NLDN), indicating most of the lightning was intracloud. Cloud-to-ground lightning at this time was also dominated by positive polarity flashes. In addition, total lightning rates were decreasing rapidly prior to touchdown. These OTD observations are consistent with the limited results from recent ground based measurements of total lightning activity in tornadic storms and corroborate that such storms have unusually high total flash rates, are dominated by intracloud lightning, and that the total flash rates are observed to decrease rapidly in the minutes prior to touchdown.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 1994

Time-averaged current analysis of a thunderstorm using ground-based measurements

Kevin T. Driscoll; Richard J. Blakeslee; William J. Koshak

The amount of upward current provided to the ionosphere by a thunderstorm that appeared over the Kennedy Space Center (KSC) on July 11, 1978, is reexamined using an analytic equation that describes a bipolar thunderstorms current contribution to the global circuit in terms of its generator current, lightning currents, the altitudes of its charge centers, and the conductivity profile of the atmosphere. Ground-based measurements, which were obtained from a network of electric field mills positioned at various distances from the thunderstorm, were used to characterize the electrical activity inside the thundercloud. The location of the lightning discharges, the type of lightning, and the amount of charge neutralized during this thunderstorm were computed through a least squares inversion of the measured changes in the electric fields following each lightning discharge. These measurements provided the information necessary to implement the analytic equation, and consequently, a time-averaged estimate of this thunderstorms current contribution to the global circuit was calculated. From these results the amount of conduction current supplied to the ionosphere by this small thunderstorm was computed to be less than 25% of the time-averaged generator current that flowed between the two vertically displaced charge centers.


International Journal of Remote Sensing | 2002

Cross-sensor comparison of the Lightning Imaging Sensor (LIS)

Tomoo Ushio; Stan Heckman; Kevin T. Driscoll; Dennis J. Boccippio; Hugh J. Christian; Zen-Ichiro Kawasaki

The mapping of the lightning optical pulse detected by the Lightning Imaging Sensor (LIS) is compared with the radiation sources by Lightning Detection and Ranging (LDAR) at KSC and the National Lightning Detection Network (NLDN). Flash-based comparisons are done for the 15 August 1998 case including 122 flashes. The temporal and spatial differences are examined. For ground flash, the time difference of the first LDAR source and first LIS event has a mean of 0.23 s and the total duration of the flash has a mean of 0.28 s, compared to 0.56 s by LDAR. The LIS records the subsequent return stroke or K-change component. For cloud flash, the time difference has a mean of 0.2 s and the total duration of the flash has a mean of 0.38 s, compared to 0.44 s by LDAR. The LIS also records cloud flashes at higher altitude. The location differences are about 4 km for cloud flash and 12 km for ground flash.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 1996

Comment on “Current budget of the atmospheric electric global circuit” by Heinz W. Kasemir

Kevin T. Driscoll; Richard J. Blakeslee

In this paper, three major issues relevant to Kasemirs new model will be addressed. The first concerns Kasemirs assertion that there are significant differences between the potentials associated with the new model and the conventional model. A recalculation of these potentials reveals that both models provide equivalent results for the potential difference between the Earth and ionosphere. The second issue to be addressed is Kasemirs assertion that discrepancies in the electric potentials associated with both models can be attributed to modeling the Earth as a sphere, instead of as a planar surface. A simple analytical comparison will demonstrate that differences in the equations for the potentials of the atmosphere derived with a spherical and a planar Earth are negligible for applications to global current flow. Finally, the third issue to be discussed is Kasemirs claim that numerous aspects of the conventional model are incorrect, including the role of the ionosphere in global current flow as well as the significance of cloud-to-ground lightning in supplying charge to the global circuit. In order to refute these misconceptions, it will be shown that these aspects related to the flow of charge in the atmosphere are accurately described by the conventional model of the global circuit.


Archive | 1999

The Lightning Imaging Sensor

Hugh J. Christian; Richard J. Blakeslee; Steven J. Goodman; Douglas A. Mach; Michael F. Stewart; Dennis E. Buechler; William J. Koshak; John Hall; William L. Boeck; Kevin T. Driscoll; Dennis J. Boccippio


Archive | 1999

Global Frequency and Distribution of Lightning as Observed by the Optical Transient Detector (OTD)

Hugh J. Christian; Richard J. Blakeslee; Dennis J. Boccippio; William L. Boeck; Dennis E. Buechler; Kevin T. Driscoll; Steven J. Goodman; John Hall; William J. Koshak; Douglas M. Mach; Michael F. Stewart

Collaboration


Dive into the Kevin T. Driscoll's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Richard J. Blakeslee

Marshall Space Flight Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Dennis E. Buechler

University of Alabama in Huntsville

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Hugh J. Christian

University of Alabama in Huntsville

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Dennis J. Boccippio

Marshall Space Flight Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Steven J. Goodman

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

William J. Koshak

Marshall Space Flight Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Douglas M. Mach

University of Alabama in Huntsville

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John Hall

University of Alabama in Huntsville

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michael F. Stewart

University of Alabama in Huntsville

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge