Kimberley A. Clow

The Impact of an Exonoree’s Guest Lecture on Students’ Attitudes toward Wrongly Convicted Persons

Although research has addressed factors underlying wrongful conviction, relatively little research investigates how people who have been wrongly convicted are perceived by others. In particular, we examined the impact of an exonoree speaking about his experiences on attitudes and perceptions of wrongful conviction. To contribute to this understudied area, we surveyed two groups of students before and after hearing a guest lecture—either a guest lecture on wrongful conviction given by an exonoree or a guest lecture on Aboriginal issues. We assessed attitudes toward individuals who have been wrongly convicted, attitudes regarding the role of government in wrongful conviction, and attitudes about who is at risk of wrongful conviction. In general, participants who heard the exonoree’s lecture reported more attitude change toward wrongly convicted individuals in comparison to those who heard the other lecture. Our research is situated within Goffman’s theory of stigma and implications of these findings for exonorees and the literature on wrongful conviction are discussed.

Causes of Wrongful Conviction: Looking at Student Knowledge

The current study investigates the impact of a criminal justice education on student knowledge about wrongful conviction. Past research has found fallibility of hard evidence (e.g., eyewitness misidentification), police and lawyer behaviors (e.g., tunnel vision), and social group discrimination to be underlying causes of wrongful conviction. We developed a survey to investigate student knowledge of these underlying causes, comparing participants in different years and programs of study. The findings suggest that criminal justice majors were at times more aware of the underlying causes of wrongful conviction than noncriminal justice majors, specifically in regards to the fallibility of hard evidence and social group discrimination. Criminal justice majors were not more knowledgeable in the areas of police and lawyer behavior. The implications of these findings are discussed in terms of the scope of criminal justice education and future careers in criminal justice.

Stigma and wrongful conviction: all exonerees are not perceived equal

Exonerees report experiencing stigma post-incarceration. This research examined whether particular exonerees are stigmatized more than others. Participants read an article about a fictional exoneree who falsely confessed, was misidentified by an eyewitness, or was implicated by a jailhouse snitch, and then reported their perceptions. Participants in the control condition did not read an article. An exoneree who falsely confessed was more likely to be perceived as actually guilty of the crime, less competent, and less warm than the other exonerees, but participants did not express more anger or less pity toward any particular exoneree. Participants did express more pity when rating exonerees than in the control condition, but this did not translate into a greater willingness to offer the exonerees more governmental assistance (e.g., job training, psychological counseling). Exonerees who falsely confess were stigmatized more than other exonerees. The implications for the post-incarceration experiences of exonerees who falsely confess are discussed.

Mental Representation of Familiar Others: The Impact of Occupation, Sex, and Race

The current study used a double primed semantic decision task to investigate the role of social group information in mental representations of familiar others. Extrapolating from social role theory, we predicted that social role information would facilitate responding to familiar targets regardless of the specific task at hand. The names of celebrities were used as stimuli, as people know them because of their social role (i.e., their occupation). Primes and targets were matched (or mismatched) on all combinations of sex, race, and occupation. Participants were randomly assigned to task condition: indicating whether the prime and target were (a) of the same sex or not, (b) of the same race or not, or (c) of the same occupation or not. Results indicated that participants responded faster to celebrity prime-target pairs that were matched on occupation regardless of task condition. In addition, participants responded faster to celebrity prime-target pairs that were matched on sex—but only when sex was relevant to the task. Similar findings were not found for race. The implications of these findings for understanding mental representations of familiar others and for person perception are discussed.