Kira Q. Stolen

Newly detected atrial fibrillation in patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator is a strong risk marker of increased mortality.

BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation (AF) has been associated with higher rates of all-cause mortality in patients with heart failure (HF). The risk of newly detected AF in patients receiving implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy is unknown. METHODS Newly detected AF was evaluated in all patients enrolled in the Inhibition of Unnecessary RV Pacing with AV Search Hysteresis in ICDs (INTRINSIC RV) study. The relationships between AF and endpoints (total mortality, ICD shocks, and HF hospitalizations) were analyzed retrospectively with proportional-hazards models. RESULTS At 108 centers, 1530 patients meeting VITALITY AVT ICD indications were followed for 12 months. Of these, 1356 (89%) had no history of AF at the time of implant. Patients with a history of AF had a higher prevalence of HF (52% vs. 36%; P <.01) and had higher rates of HF hospitalization (hazard ratio [HR] 2.14 [1.29-3.54], P <.01), death (HR 2.22 [1.26-3.92], P <.01), and any ICD shock (HR 1.75 [1.19-2.58], P <.01) compared with those with no history. AF incidence during the first 3 months of implant was available in 1317 (86%; 1170 no AF, 147 history of AF) patients. New-onset AF during the first 3 months of implant (45 of 1170, 4%) was associated with a significant increased risk of death (HR 2.86 [1.02-8.05], P = .05) but not with inappropriate ICD shock (HR 2.43 [0.87-6.75], P = .09) or HF hospitalization (HR 1.17 [0.28-4.82], P = .83). CONCLUSION History of AF at the time of ICD implant identifies additional risk of HF and death. Newly detected AF is associated with significantly higher rates of death. The relationship between newly detected AF and inappropriate ICD shock or HF hospitalization is uncertain and requires further study.

Atrial support pacing in heart failure: results from the multicenter PEGASUS CRT trial.

Atrial Pacing in Heart Failure.

Arrhythmia rate distribution and tachyarrhythmia therapy in an ICD population: Results from the INTRINSIC RV trial

BACKGROUND Appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy for ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) depends, in part, on the programming of tachycardia zones. OBJECTIVE We assessed events treated with ICD shocks or antitachycardia pacing (ATP) in the Inhibition of Unnecessary RV Pacing with AV Search Hysteresis in ICDs (INTRINSIC RV) trial. METHODS ATP and shock episodes from 1530 patients with dual-chamber ICDs were analyzed. RESULTS For episodes in which electrograms were stored and adjudicated, ATP was delivered for 763 episodes (182 patients), shock-only was delivered for 300 episodes (146 patients), and shock following ATP was delivered for 81 episodes (56 patients). ATP was delivered appropriately for 507 episodes (130 patients), with 93% success, and inappropriately for 256 episodes (89 patients). For ATP episodes, appropriate (VT: 170 ± 28 bpm) and inappropriate (not VT: 165 ± 21 bpm) rates did not differ (P = .16). When the initial therapy was shock, onset rates were higher for appropriate therapy than for inappropriate therapy (224 ± 46 bpm vs 187 ± 31 bpm; P <.001). Inappropriate ATP was more likely to be followed by a shock (odds ratio 2.49; 95% confidence interval 1.56-3.97; P <.001). Fifty-eight percent (225 of 381) of shocked episodes had rates <200 bpm. For episodes between 200 and 250 bpm, 20% (23 of 113) were polymorphic VT or VF, 59% were monomorphic VT, 19% were supraventricular, and <1% was artifact. For episodes >250 bpm, 37% were VF, 28% polymorphic VT, 23% monomorphic VT, 7% supraventricular, and 5% artifact. CONCLUSIONS In a general ICD population, ATP treated VT effectively or obviated the need for shock. Most ventricular arrhythmias <250 bpm were not VF. Proper zone programming may identify and treat VT without shock.