Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Kirsten Larsen is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Kirsten Larsen.


Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Health | 2011

Climate Change Adaptation at the Intersection of Food and Health

Ferne Edwards; Jane Dixon; Sharon Friel; Gillian Hall; Kirsten Larsen; Stewart Lockie; Beverley Wood; Mark Lawrence; Ivan Hanigan; Anthony Hogan; Libby Hattersley

Nutritious, safe, affordable, and enjoyable food is a fundamental prerequisite for health. As a nation, Australia is currently classified as food secure with the domestic production exceeding domestic consumption of most major food groups. The domestic system is almost self-sufficient in terms of nutritious plant foods, although these foods have seen steady higher price increases relative to other foods, with nutrition equity implications. However, the viability of Australia’s food security sits counter to the continued presence of a stable and supportive climate. This article reviews the current state of science concerning the interface between climate change, food systems, and human health to reveal the key issues that must be addressed if Australia is to advance human health and sustainable food systems under a changing climate.


Nutrition & Dietetics | 2016

Access and affordability of nutritious food in metropolitan Melbourne

Adam Rossimel; Sun S Han; Kirsten Larsen; Claire Palermo

Aim The cost of food is a key determinant of food choice. Little is known about the cost of food in metropolitan areas. The present study aimed to determine access to healthy food across Melbourne, Australia. Methods A random sample of 22 out of 31 local government areas was selected for inclusion in the study and one census collection district was chosen for analysis. The cost of a healthy food basket and basket of fruits and vegetables was assessed in a sample of supermarkets and green grocers. A ratio of healthy (supermarkets and grocery stores) to unhealthy (fast food and takeaway outlets) food stores was calculated. Results The median cost of a healthy food basket across 68 supermarkets for a family of four was not significantly different across suburbs (


Food security in Australia : challenges and prospects for the future | 2013

Australian Food Security Dilemmas: Comparing Nutritious Production Scenarios and Their Environmental, Resource and Economic Tensions

Graham M. Turner; Kirsten Larsen; Chris Ryan; Mark Lawrence

456.27, 20.07). Families in inner city use less of their income on the basket (15%) compared to middle and outer suburbs (19%, P = 0.02 and P = 0.03, respectively). The median price of a sample of fruits and vegetables across 24 green grocers was significantly cheaper than supermarkets (P = 0.01). Accessibility to healthy food decreased significantly between inner (ratio = 3.4), middle (ratio = 2.5) and outer suburbs (ratio = 0.91). Conclusions Those living in outer suburbs may have poorer access to healthy food. Ensuring more affordable, accessible healthy food is available for those living in outer suburban areas may improve nutrition outcomes.


Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences | 2015

Modelling food system resilience: a scenario-based simulation modelling approach to explore future shocks and adaptations in the Australian food system

Seona Candy; Che Biggs; Kirsten Larsen; Graham M. Turner

Being able to supply a nutritious diet to Australians over the coming decades is likely to prove considerably challenging according to a range of scenarios modelled in simulations of the Australian agricultural system, economy and environment. This is in stark contrast to surplus supply experienced in the past for virtually all food types. Instead of attempting to make ill-fated predictions of what the future will be like, this work determines the environmental, resource and economic implications of three substantially different scenarios using a ‘stocks and flows’ model of the Australian system. Each scenario was developed with stakeholders in a workshop process; and each attempts to deal with the effects of population growth, fuel security (peak oil), climate change impacts, greenhouse gas mitigation and fertilizer constraints in ways which are consistent within each scenario, but different between them. One scenario, labelled as Adjustment, assumes free markets and high levels of international trade; Control, as the second scenario, assumes strong policy and regulatory intervention in the market to ensure the domestic supply of core foods; the third, DIY, envisages a more decentralized future with mostly local government intervention. Comprehensive food security is not achieved in any scenario, particularly when the potential impacts of constraints in other critical resources are considered. Overall, Adjustment is skewed toward economic benefits, DIY towards environmental resilience and Control is more evenly balanced though by no means ideal.


Archive | 2008

Sustainable and secure food systems for Victoria: What do we know? What do we need to know?

Kirsten Larsen; Chris Ryan; Asha Bee Abraham

This paper outlines a process for exploring food system vulnerability and resilience using scenario modelling with the Australian Stocks and Flows Framework (ASFF). The capacity of ASFF to simulate how diverse shocks and stressors affect food system behaviour across multiple sectors—with diverse, interconnected and dynamic variables shaping system response—renders ASFF particularly suited for exploring complex issues of future food supply. We used ASFF to explore the significance of alternative agricultural policies for land use, crop production, livestock production, fisheries, food processing, transport, food waste and ultimately food supply. Policies in different scenarios varied with regard to the timetable for reducing greenhouse gas emissions, the degree of government participation or regulation in the food system and the scale of solutions (varying from centralized and global to decentralized and local). Results from the scenarios suggest that Australia does not have the ability to maintain a domestic surplus of foods required for a nutritious diet. In particular, the health of the current food system is highly vulnerable to constraints in oil supply, and increased food production threatens to precipitate a drastic decline in critical water supplies. We conclude by outlining a proposed method for using ASFF to delve deeper into the dynamics of the food system, probe the consequences of various adaptive responses to food production and supply challenges and devise potential indicators for food system resilience. Shocks and stressors to be added to the next phase of scenario modelling include soil salinity, climate extremes and credit scarcity. The ASFF methodology should be applicable to other parts of the world, although appropriate recalibration and adjustment of model assumptions would be required to reflect regional differences.


Archive | 2016

Melbourne’s food future: Planning a resilient city foodbowl

Rachel Carey; Jennifer Sheridan; Kirsten Larsen; Seona Candy


Archive | 2011

Victorian food supply scenarios

Kirsten Larsen; Graham M. Turner; Chris Ryan; Mark Lawrence


Archive | 2015

Melbourne's Foodbowl: Now and at seven million

Jennifer Sheridan; Kirsten Larsen; Rachel Carey


Archive | 2010

Food systems, climate change adaptation and human health in Australia

Ferne Edwards; Jane Dixon; Sharon Friel; Gillian Hall; I. Hannigan; Libby Hattersley; Anthony Hogan; Kirsten Larsen; Mark Lawrence; Stewart Lockie; Andreas L. Lopata; Robyn Wilson; B. Wood


Archive | 2018

Food for thought: challenges and opportunities for farming in Melbourne's foodbowl

Rachel Carey; Jennifer Sheridan; Kirsten Larsen

Collaboration


Dive into the Kirsten Larsen's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Graham M. Turner

Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Rachel Carey

University of Melbourne

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Seona Candy

University of Melbourne

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sharon Friel

Australian National University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Anthony Hogan

Australian National University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ferne Edwards

Australian National University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gillian Hall

Australian National University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jane Dixon

Australian National University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Libby Hattersley

Australian National University

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge