Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Kosei E. Yamaguchi is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Kosei E. Yamaguchi.


Science | 2016

The formation of peak rings in large impact craters

Joanna Morgan; Sean Paul Sandifer Gulick; Timothy J. Bralower; E. Chenot; Gail L. Christeson; Philippe Claeys; Charles S. Cockell; Gareth S. Collins; M.J.L. Coolen; Ludovic Ferrière; Catalina Gebhardt; Kazuhisa Goto; H. Jones; David A. Kring; Erwan Le Ber; Johanna Lofi; Xiao Long; Christopher M. Lowery; Claire Mellett; R. Ocampo-Torres; Gordon R. Osinski; Ligia Pérez-Cruz; A.E. Pickersgill; Michael H. Poelchau; A. Rae; C. Rasmussen; M. Rebolledo-Vieyra; Ulrich Riller; Honami Sato; Douglas R. Schmitt

Drilling into Chicxulubs formation The Chicxulub impact crater, known for its link to the demise of the dinosaurs, also provides an opportunity to study rocks from a large impact structure. Large impact craters have “peak rings” that define a complex crater morphology. Morgan et al. looked at rocks from a drilling expedition through the peak rings of the Chicxulub impact crater (see the Perspective by Barton). The drill cores have features consistent with a model that postulates that a single over-heightened central peak collapsed into the multiple-peak-ring structure. The validity of this model has implications for far-ranging subjects, from how giant impacts alter the climate on Earth to the morphology of crater-dominated planetary surfaces. Science, this issue p. 878; see also p. 836 Rock samples from IODP/ICDP Expedition 364 support the dynamic collapse model for the formation of the Chicxulub crater. Large impacts provide a mechanism for resurfacing planets through mixing near-surface rocks with deeper material. Central peaks are formed from the dynamic uplift of rocks during crater formation. As crater size increases, central peaks transition to peak rings. Without samples, debate surrounds the mechanics of peak-ring formation and their depth of origin. Chicxulub is the only known impact structure on Earth with an unequivocal peak ring, but it is buried and only accessible through drilling. Expedition 364 sampled the Chicxulub peak ring, which we found was formed from uplifted, fractured, shocked, felsic basement rocks. The peak-ring rocks are cross-cut by dikes and shear zones and have an unusually low density and seismic velocity. Large impacts therefore generate vertical fluxes and increase porosity in planetary crust.


Science | 2012

Comment on “Abiotic Pyrite Formation Produces a Large Fe Isotope Fractionation”

Andrew D. Czaja; Clark M. Johnson; Kosei E. Yamaguchi; Brian L. Beard

Guilbaud et al. (Reports, 24 June 2011, p. 1548) suggest that the geologic record of Fe isotope fractionation can be explained by abiological precipitation of pyrite. We argue that a detailed understanding of the depositional setting, mineralogy, and geologic history of Precambrian sedimentary rocks indicates that the Fe isotope record dominantly reflects biological fractionations and Fe redox processes.


Gsa Today | 2017

Chicxulub and the Exploration of Large Peak-Ring Impact Craters through Scientific Drilling

David A. Kring; Philippe Claeys; Sean Paul Sandifer Gulick; Joanna Morgan; Gareth S. Collins; Timothy J. Bralower; E. Chenot; Gail L. Christeson; Charles S. Cockell; M.J.L. Coolen; Ludovic Ferrière; Catalina Gebhardt; Kazuhisa Goto; H. Jones; Johanna Lofi; Christopher M. Lowery; Claire Mellett; R. Ocampo-Torres; Ligia Pérez-Cruz; A.E. Pickersgill; Michael H. Poelchau; A. Rae; C. Rasmussen; M. Rebolledo-Vieyra; Ulrich Riller; Honami Sato; Jan Smit; Sonia M. Tikoo; Naotaka Tomioka; Jaime Urrutia-Fucugauchi

The Chicxulub crater is the only well-preserved peak-ring crater on Earth and linked, famously, to the K-T or K-Pg mass extinction event. For the first time, geologists have drilled into the peak ring of that crater in the International Ocean Discovery Program and International Continental Scientific Drilling Program (IODP-ICDP) Expedition 364. The Chicxulub impact event, the environmental calamity it produced, and the paleobiological consequences are among the most captivating topics being discussed in the geologic community. Here we focus attention on the geological processes that shaped the ~200-km-wide impact crater responsible for that discussion and the expedition’s first year results.


Nature | 2018

Rapid recovery of life at ground zero of the end-Cretaceous mass extinction

Christopher M. Lowery; Timothy J. Bralower; Jeremy D. Owens; Francisco J. Rodríguez-Tovar; H. Jones; Jan Smit; Michael T. Whalen; Phillipe Claeys; Kenneth A. Farley; Sean Paul Sandifer Gulick; Joanna Morgan; S.L. Green; E. Chenot; Gail L. Christeson; Charles S. Cockell; M.J.L. Coolen; Ludovic Ferrière; Catalina Gebhardt; Kazuhisa Goto; David A. Kring; Johanna Lofi; R. Ocampo-Torres; Ligia Pérez-Cruz; A.E. Pickersgill; Michael H. Poelchau; A. Rae; C. Rasmussen; M. Rebolledo-Vieyra; Ulrich Riller; Honami Sato

The Cretaceous/Palaeogene mass extinction eradicated 76% of species on Earth1,2. It was caused by the impact of an asteroid3,4 on the Yucatán carbonate platform in the southern Gulf of Mexico 66 million years ago5, forming the Chicxulub impact crater6,7. After the mass extinction, the recovery of the global marine ecosystem—measured as primary productivity—was geographically heterogeneous8; export production in the Gulf of Mexico and North Atlantic–western Tethys was slower than in most other regions8–11, taking 300 thousand years (kyr) to return to levels similar to those of the Late Cretaceous period. Delayed recovery of marine productivity closer to the crater implies an impact-related environmental control, such as toxic metal poisoning12, on recovery times. If no such geographic pattern exists, the best explanation for the observed heterogeneity is a combination of ecological factors—trophic interactions13, species incumbency and competitive exclusion by opportunists14—and ‘chance’8,15,16. The question of whether the post-impact recovery of marine productivity was delayed closer to the crater has a bearing on the predictability of future patterns of recovery in anthropogenically perturbed ecosystems. If there is a relationship between the distance from the impact and the recovery of marine productivity, we would expect recovery rates to be slowest in the crater itself. Here we present a record of foraminifera, calcareous nannoplankton, trace fossils and elemental abundance data from within the Chicxulub crater, dated to approximately the first 200 kyr of the Palaeocene. We show that life reappeared in the basin just years after the impact and a high-productivity ecosystem was established within 30 kyr, which indicates that proximity to the impact did not delay recovery and that there was therefore no impact-related environmental control on recovery. Ecological processes probably controlled the recovery of productivity after the Cretaceous/Palaeogene mass extinction and are therefore likely to be important for the response of the ocean ecosystem to other rapid extinction events.Micro- and nannofossil, trace fossil and geochemical evidence from the Chicxulub impact crater demonstrates that proximity to the asteroid impact site did not determine rates of recovery of marine ecosystems after the end-Cretaceous mass extinction.


Chemical Geology | 2005

Biogeochemical cycling of iron in the Archean–Paleoproterozoic Earth: Constraints from iron isotope variations in sedimentary rocks from the Kaapvaal and Pilbara Cratons

Kosei E. Yamaguchi; Clark M. Johnson; Brian L. Beard; Hiroshi Ohmoto


Geological Society of America Memoirs | 2006

Chemical and biological evolution of early Earth: Constraints from banded iron formations

Hiroshi Ohmoto; Yumiko Watanabe; Kosei E. Yamaguchi; Hiroshi Naraoka; Makoto Haruna; Takeshi Kakegawa; Ken-ichiro Hayashi; Yasuhiro Kato


Geological Society of America Memoirs | 2006

Rare earth elements in Precambrian banded iron formations: Secular changes of Ce and Eu anomalies and evolution of atmospheric oxygen

Yasuhiro Kato; Kosei E. Yamaguchi; Hiroshi Ohmoto


Earth and Planetary Science Letters | 2010

Iron and carbon isotope evidence for ecosystem and environmental diversity in the ∼ 2.7 to 2.5 Ga Hamersley Province, Western Australia

Andrew D. Czaja; Clark M. Johnson; Brian L. Beard; Jennifer L. Eigenbrode; Katherine H. Freeman; Kosei E. Yamaguchi


Earth and Planetary Science Letters | 2007

Isotopic evidence for iron mobilization during Paleoproterozoic lateritization of the Hekpoort paleosol profile from Gaborone, Botswana

Kosei E. Yamaguchi; Clark M. Johnson; Brian L. Beard; Nicolas J. Beukes; Jens Gutzmer; Hiroshi Ohmoto


Precambrian Research | 2015

Sedimentology of the Paleoproterozoic Kungarra Formation, Turee Creek Group, Western Australia: A conformable record of the transition from early to modern Earth

Martin J. Van Kranendonk; Rajat Mazumder; Kosei E. Yamaguchi; Koji Yamada; Minoru Ikehara

Collaboration


Dive into the Kosei E. Yamaguchi's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Hiroshi Ohmoto

Pennsylvania State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Christopher M. Lowery

University of Texas at Austin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David A. Kring

Lunar and Planetary Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

H. Jones

Pennsylvania State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

A. Rae

Imperial College London

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge