Kostas Mimidis

Endoscopic techniques and management of foreign body ingestion and food bolus impaction in the upper gastrointestinal tract : A retrospective analysis of 139 cases

Background Ingested foreign bodies and food bolus impaction are frequently seen in endoscopic practice. Successful foreign body and food bolus removal may depend on the method used, the choice of device, and the experience level of the endoscopist, although few papers report experience and outcome of tertiary centers. Aim To investigate the effectiveness of our protocol designed for removal of ingested foreign bodies and food boluses. Methods We retrospectively reviewed all patients with a diagnosis of foreign body ingestion and food bolus impaction from 1994 to 2005 identified by computer search. Patients were excluded if medical record was incomplete. Results The analysis included 171 patients. Foreign bodies and impacted food boluses were found in 77 and 62 patients, respectively. In 32 cases (23%), the foreign bodies passed spontaneously through the gastrointestinal tract. The overall success rate for endoscopic management was obtained in 137 patients (98.6%). Surgical removal of a foreign body was required in only 2 cases (1.4%). According to the type and location of the foreign object and food bolus we used Dormia baskets, retrieval forceps, polypectomy snares, and all sizes of Roth net. No complications relating to the endoscopic procedure were observed; 50 patients (35.2%) had an underlying esophageal disease. Conclusions Endoscopic removal of upper gastrointestinal tract foreign bodies and food bolus impaction is efficacious and safe. Especially the Roth net is the best device for safe retrieval of food boluses and button disc batteries.

High-dose allopurinol for prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective randomized double-blind controlled trial

BACKGROUND Pancreatitis is the most common major complication of diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP. Allopurinol, a xanthine oxidase inhibitor that blocks generation of oxygen-derived free radicals, potentially may prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis. This study assessed the efficacy of high-dose oral allopurinol for prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis. METHODS A prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in 250 patients undergoing ERCP. Patients were randomized to receive allopurinol (600 mg) or placebo orally at 15 and 3 hours before the procedure. Patients were clinically evaluated, and serum amylase levels were determined before ERCP and at 6 and 24 hours thereafter. Standardized criteria were used to diagnose and to grade the severity of post-ERCP pancreatitis. RESULTS A total of 243 patients were included in the analysis. The two groups were similar with regard to age; gender; underlying disease; indication for treatment; ERCP findings; and type of treatment, except for biliary sphincterotomy. Only 43 patients in the allopurinol group underwent biliary sphincterotomy vs. 87 in the placebo group ( p < 0.001). The frequency of acute pancreatitis was significantly lower in the allopurinol vs. the placebo group in the final multinomial regression analysis: allopurinol group, 4/125 (3.2%), with all 4 cases graded as mild, vs. placebo group, 21/118 (17.8%), of which 8/118 (6.8%) were graded as mild, 11/118 (9.3%) as moderate, and 2/118 (1.6%) as severe with fatal outcome ( p < 0.001). The protective effect of allopurinol was also apparent in the diagnostic ERCP and the biliary sphincterotomy subgroups when the frequency of post-ERCP pancreatitis was analyzed after stratification by procedure. The mean duration of hospitalization for pancreatitis was significantly shorter in the allopurinol compared with the placebo group (2.5 vs. 5.67 days; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Pretreatment with high-dose, orally administered allopurinol decreases the frequency of post-ERCP pancreatitis. Despite the promising results of this prospective, randomized trial, further studies are needed to verify these observations before allopurinol can be recommended for routine clinical use.

Intravenous N-acetylcysteine does not prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis

BACKGROUND Acute pancreatitis remains the most common complication of ERCP. Prophylactic administration of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) probably decreases the incidence and the severity of experimental pancreatitis. The aim of the present study was to assess the efficacy of intravenous NAC for prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis in humans, who represent an appropriate model to study the potential role of NAC in this setting. METHODS A prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in 256 patients who underwent ERCP. Patients were randomized to receive intravenous NAC at a loading dose of 70 mg/kg 2 hours before and 35 mg/kg at 4-hour intervals for a total of 24 hours after the procedure, or to receive normal saline solution as placebo. Patients were clinically evaluated, and serum amylase levels were measured before and 6 hours and 24 hours after the procedure. Standardized criteria were used to diagnose and to grade the severity of post-ERCP pancreatitis. RESULTS A total of 249 patients were included in the analysis. The two groups were matched for age, gender, underlying disease and indication for treatment, ERCP findings, and type of treatment. The overall incidence of post-ERCP acute pancreatitis was 10.8%, with 12.1% in the NAC group and 9.6% in the placebo group. There were no statistical differences in the incidence or severity grades between the groups. The mean duration of hospitalization for pancreatitis also was similar in the NAC group and the placebo group (3.6 +/- 0.9 and 3 +/- 1.5 days, respectively). CONCLUSIONS The results of this trial show the absence of any beneficial effect of NAC on the incidence and the severity of ERCP-induced pancreatitis.

Secondary Aortoduodenal Fistula with a Fatal Outcome: Report of Six Cases

Secondary aortoenteric fistulas (AEFs) are a well-known but uncommon cause of gastrointestinal hemorrhage. They usually occur secondary to reconstructive surgery of an abdominal aneurysm. We report six cases of secondary aortoduodenal fistulas, involving patients who, despite presenting with classic “herald bleeding,” died as a result of delayed operative intervention. We also discuss the pathogenesis, clinical presentation, and diagnosis of AEFs, emphasizing the value of clinical suspicion and negative endoscopy in establishing the diagnosis and the need for early operative intervention.

Diagnostic yield and clinical impact of wireless capsule endoscopy in patients with chronic abdominal pain with or without diarrhea: a Greek multicenter study.

BACKGROUND Wireless capsule endoscopy has become the gold standard for the examination of small bowel. However, its role in the evaluation of patients suffering from chronic abdominal pain is not yet clearly defined. We conducted an open-label prospective multi-center study to evaluate the yield and clinical outcome of capsule endoscopy in patients with chronic abdominal pain with/without diarrhea. METHODS Seventy-two patients with chronic (>3months) abdominal pain with/without diarrhea in whom the underlying pathology could not be diagnosed by conventional modalities, underwent capsule endoscopy in either of the 6 participating centers. Patients were then followed up for clinical outcomes. RESULTS The overall diagnostic yield of capsule endoscopy was 44.4%. More specifically, its diagnostic yield was 21.4% in patients with abdominal pain and negative inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate), 66.7% in patients with abdominal pain and positive inflammatory markers, 0% in patients with abdominal pain, diarrhea and negative inflammatory markers, and 90.1% in patients with abdominal pain, diarrhea and positive inflammatory markers. Both univariate and multivariate regression analyses showed that abnormal C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate were significant factors related with positive capsule endoscopy findings. CONCLUSIONS Chronic abdominal pain with/without diarrhea should be accompanied by elevated inflammatory markers to be regarded as a valid indication for capsule endoscopy. The yield of capsule endoscopy in such patients is reasonably high and clinical outcomes of patients treated with capsule endoscopy findings as a guide are significant.

Endoclipping for gastric perforation after endoscopic polypectomy: an alternative treatment to avoid surgery.

A 47-year-old woman underwent endoscopic polypectomy of a villous adenoma in the lesser curvature of the gastric antrum. Shortly after the procedure, she complained of severe abdominal pain. An abdominal x-ray showed air under the diaphragm, suggestive of gastric perforation. On re-endoscopy, the cavity at the site of polypectomy was closed using endoscopically applied metallic clips. She was treated with intravenous hyperalimentation, omeprazole, and antibiotics for 10 days. Ingestion of food was started 10 days after admission, and she was discharged without any complaints. She is free of symptoms on follow-up after 8 months, and endoscopy showed complete healing of the perforation. The procedure is the third described for the stomach in the English literature and emphasizes the use of endoclipping in selected cases of small and well-defined perforations.

The role of capsule endoscopy in the evaluation and treatment of obscure-overt gastrointestinal bleeding during daily clinical practice: a prospective multicenter study

Abstract Objective. Capsule endoscopy (CE) is most commonly performed to evaluate obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB). However, at present the role of CE in patients with obscure-overt GIB especially during daily clinical practice is unknown. The aim of the present study was to investigate the diagnostic yield and the impact of CE on the management of patients with obscure-overt GIB. Material and methods. Between January 2007 and December 2011 we prospectively included all patients with obscure-overt GIB who underwent CE after negative bidirectional endoscopy. CE findings revealing the cause of bleeding, type of therapeutic intervention and clinical variables associated with positive CE and recurrence of GIB were evaluated. Results. One hundred and eighteen patients with a median age of 66 years (range 8–89 years) were enrolled in the final analysis. The overall diagnostic yield of the CE was 66.9%. The most common findings were angiodysplasias (33.1%), followed by ulcer (23.7%), and tumors (6.8%). Age (p = 0.001) and cardiovascular disease (p = 0.007) were significant clinical variables predicting the higher incidence of angiodysplasias. Specific therapeutic interventions were undertaken in 54 patients with positive CE (68.4%). Recurrence of GIB was observed in one patient with negative CE (2.6%) and 16 patients with positive CE (20.3%). Univariate and multivariate analysis showed high age and no therapeutic intervention as significant factors associated with recurrent bleeding. Conclusions. CE represents a promising diagnostic method in the investigation of obscure-overt GIB, with significant impact on its clinical management in daily clinical practice.

Severe acute haemorrhagic gastritis controlled by hydrogen peroxide.

A 92-year-old woman presented with severe acute haemorrhagic gastritis due to abuse of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). She was treated with instillation of 150 ml 3% hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) every 2 h via a nasogastric tube. The copious amount of bright red blood through the nasogastric tube started to decline substantially after the first administration of H2O2 and continued to reveal clear material during the second and third instillation of H2O2. The total amount of H2O2 administered was 600 ml. No rebleeding and only a few flame-shaped intramucosal haemorrhages were observed on the following four consecutive daily endoscopic evaluations. These are promising observations which will have to be confirmed with respect to the safety and efficacy of H2O2 treatment by further controlled studies.

Endoscopic hemoclip application in the treatment of nonvariceal gastrointestinal bleeding: short-term and long-term benefits.

Abstract: We conducted an uncontrolled retrospective study to evaluate endoscopic hemoclip application as the first-choice hemostatic treatment of gastrointestinal bleeding lesions from a wide variety of sources. Clinical data, endoscopic findings, complications, and short- and long-term outcomes were also investigated. A total of 52 patients (men/women, 36/16; age, 65 ± 11.5 years) were included in the study. Hemoclipping was technically successful in 51 cases (98%). The average number of therapeutic endoscopic sessions needed to achieve permanent hemostasis was 1.42 ± 1.2 (range, 1-4). The number of hemoclips required for hemostasis depended on the nature of bleeding with the average number of hemoclips used being 3.11 ± 1.12 (range, 2-8). No complications occurred, although 1 patient presented recurrent bleeding and was operated on. No further hemorrhage occurred during a median follow-up period of 17.32 ± 5.4 months (range, 2-53). Endoscopic hemoclipping provided an effective and safe modality for achieving hemostasis in gastrointestinal bleeding from a wide variety of sources, with long-term benefits.