Kozo Tomita

Structural basis for template-independent RNA polymerization

The 3′-terminal CCA nucleotide sequence (positions 74–76) of transfer RNA is essential for amino acid attachment and interaction with the ribosome during protein synthesis. The CCA sequence is synthesized de novo and/or repaired by a template-independent RNA polymerase, ‘CCA-adding enzyme’, using CTP and ATP as substrates. Despite structural and biochemical studies, the mechanism by which the CCA-adding enzyme synthesizes the defined sequence without a nucleic acid template remains elusive. Here we present the crystal structure of Aquifex aeolicus CCA-adding enzyme, bound to a primer tRNA lacking the terminal adenosine and an incoming ATP analogue, at 2.8 Å resolution. The enzyme enfolds the acceptor T helix of the tRNA molecule. In the catalytic pocket, C75 is adjacent to ATP, and their base moieties are stacked. The complementary pocket for recognizing C74-C75 of tRNA forms a ‘protein template’ for the penultimate two nucleotides, mimicking the nucleotide template used by template-dependent polymerases. These results are supported by systematic analyses of mutants. Our structure represents the ‘pre-insertion’ stage of selecting the incoming nucleotide and provides the structural basis for the mechanism underlying template-independent RNA polymerization.

The cephalopod Loligo bleekeri mitochondrial genome: multiplied noncoding regions and transposition of tRNA genes.

Abstract. We previously reported the sequence of a 9260-bp fragment of mitochondrial (mt) DNA of the cephalopod Loligo bleekeri [J. Sasuga et al. (1999) J. Mol. Evol. 48:692–702]. To clarify further the characteristics of Loligo mtDNA, we have sequenced an 8148-bp fragment to reveal the complete mt genome sequence. Loligo mtDNA is 17,211 bp long and possesses a standard set of metazoan mt genes. Its gene arrangement is not identical to any other metazoan mt gene arrangement reported so far. Three of the 19 noncoding regions longer than 10 bp are 515, 507, and 509 bp long, and their sequences are nearly identical, suggesting that multiplication of these noncoding regions occurred in an ancestral Loligo mt genome. Comparison of the gene arrangements of Loligo, Katharina tunicata, and Littorina saxatilis mt genomes revealed that 17 tRNA genes of the Loligo mt genome are adjacent to noncoding regions. A majority (15 tRNA genes) of their counterparts is found in two tRNA gene clusters of the Katharina mt genome. Therefore, the Loligo mt genome (17 tRNA genes) may have spread over the genome, and this may have been coupled with the multiplication of the noncoding regions. Maximum likelihood analysis of mt protein genes supports the clade Mollusca + Annelida + Brachiopoda but fails to infer the relationships among Katharina, Loligo, and three gastropod species.

Protein-based peptide-bond formation by aminoacyl-tRNA protein transferase

Eubacterial leucyl/phenylalanyl-tRNA protein transferase (LF-transferase) catalyses peptide-bond formation by using Leu-tRNALeu (or Phe-tRNAPhe) and an amino-terminal Arg (or Lys) of a protein, as donor and acceptor substrates, respectively. However, the catalytic mechanism of peptide-bond formation by LF-transferase remained obscure. Here we determine the structures of complexes of LF-transferase and phenylalanyl adenosine, with and without a short peptide bearing an N-terminal Arg. Combining the two separate structures into one structure as well as mutation studies reveal the mechanism for peptide-bond formation by LF-transferase. The electron relay from Asp 186 to Gln 188 helps Gln 188 to attract a proton from the α-amino group of the N-terminal Arg of the acceptor peptide. This generates the attacking nucleophile for the carbonyl carbon of the aminoacyl bond of the aminoacyl-tRNA, thus facilitating peptide-bond formation. The protein-based mechanism for peptide-bond formation by LF-transferase is similar to the reverse reaction of the acylation step observed in the peptide hydrolysis reaction by serine proteases.

Complete crystallographic analysis of the dynamics of CCA sequence addition

CCA-adding polymerase matures the essential 3′-CCA terminus of transfer RNA without any nucleic-acid template. However, it remains unclear how the correct nucleotide triphosphate is selected in each reaction step and how the polymerization is driven by the protein and RNA dynamics. Here we present complete sequential snapshots of six complex structures of CCA-adding enzyme and four distinct RNA substrates with and without CTP (cytosine triphosphate) or ATP (adenosine triphosphate). The CCA-lacking RNA stem extends by one base pair to force the discriminator nucleoside into the active-site pocket, and then tracks back after incorporation of the first cytosine monophosphate (CMP). Accommodation of the second CTP clamps the catalytic cleft, inducing a reorientation of the turn, which flips C74 to allow CMP to be accepted. In contrast, after the second CMP is added, the polymerase and RNA primer are locked in the closed state, which directs the subsequent A addition. Between the CTP- and ATP-binding stages, the side-chain conformation of Arg 224 changes markedly; this is controlled by the global motion of the enzyme and position of the primer terminus, and is likely to achieve the CTP/ATP discrimination, depending on the polymerization stage. Throughout the CCA-adding reaction, the enzyme tail domain firmly anchors the TΨC-loop of the tRNA, which ensures accurate polymerization and termination.

Divergent evolutions of trinucleotide polymerization revealed by an archaeal CCA-adding enzyme structure

CCA‐adding enzyme [ATP(CTP):tRNA nucleotidyltransferase], a template‐independent RNA polymerase, adds the defined ‘cytidine–cytidine–adenosine’ sequence onto the 3′ end of tRNA. The archaeal CCA‐adding enzyme (class I) and eubacterial/eukaryotic CCA‐adding enzyme (class II) show little amino acid sequence homology, but catalyze the same reaction in a defined fashion. Here, we present the crystal structures of the class I archaeal CCA‐adding enzyme from Archaeoglobus fulgidus, and its complexes with CTP and ATP at 2.0, 2.0 and 2.7 Å resolutions, respectively. The geometry of the catalytic carboxylates and the relative positions of CTP and ATP to a single catalytic site are well conserved in both classes of CCA‐adding enzymes, whereas the overall architectures, except for the catalytic core, of the class I and class II CCA‐adding enzymes are fundamentally different. Furthermore, the recognition mechanisms of substrate nucleotides and tRNA molecules are distinct between these two classes, suggesting that the catalytic domains of class I and class II enzymes share a common origin, and distinct substrate recognition domains have been appended to form the two presently divergent classes.

Assembly of Qβ viral RNA polymerase with host translational elongation factors EF-Tu and -Ts

Replication and transcription of viral RNA genomes rely on host-donated proteins. Qβ virus infects Escherichia coli and replicates and transcribes its own genomic RNA by Qβ replicase. Qβ replicase requires the virus-encoded RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (β-subunit), and the host-donated translational elongation factors EF-Tu and -Ts, as active core subunits for its RNA polymerization activity. Here, we present the crystal structure of the core Qβ replicase, comprising the β-subunit, EF-Tu and -Ts. The β-subunit has a right-handed structure, and the EF-Tu:Ts binary complex maintains the structure of the catalytic core crevasse of the β-subunit through hydrophobic interactions, between the finger and thumb domains of the β-subunit and domain-2 of EF-Tu and the coiled-coil motif of EF-Ts, respectively. These hydrophobic interactions are required for the expression and assembly of the Qβ replicase complex. Thus, EF-Tu and -Ts have chaperone-like functions in the maintenance of the structure of the active Qβ replicase. Modeling of the template RNA and the growing RNA in the catalytic site of the Qβ replicase structure also suggests that structural changes of the RNAs and EF-Tu:Ts should accompany processive RNA polymerization and that EF-Tu:Ts in the Qβ replicase could function to modulate the RNA folding and structure.

Conserved Cysteine Residues of GidA Are Essential for Biogenesis of 5-Carboxymethylaminomethyluridine at tRNA Anticodon

The 5-carboxymethylaminomethyl modification of uridine (cmnm(5)U) at the anticodon first position occurs in tRNAs that read split codon boxes ending with purine. This modification is crucial for correct translation, by restricting codon-anticodon wobbling. Two conserved enzymes, GidA and MnmE, participate in the cmnm(5)U modification process. Here we determined the crystal structure of Aquifex aeolicus GidA at 2.3 A resolution. The structure revealed the tight interaction of GidA with FAD. Structure-based mutation analyses allowed us to identify two conserved Cys residues in the vicinity of the FAD-binding site that are essential for the cmnm(5)U modification in vivo. Together with mutational analysis of MnmE, we propose a mechanism for the cmnm(5)U modification process where GidA, but not MnmE, attacks the C6 atom of uridine by a mechanism analogous to that of thymidylate synthase. We also present a tRNA-docking model that provides structural insights into the tRNA recognition mechanism for efficient modification.

7-Methylguanosine at the anticodon wobble position of squid mitochondrial tRNASerGCU: molecular basis for assignment of AGA/AGG codons as serine in invertebrate mitochondria

In mitochondria of the squid, Loligo bleekeri, both the AGA and AGG codons are considered to correspond to serine instead of arginine as in the universal genetic code, and its genome encodes a single tRNA(Ser) gene with the anticodon GCT. Therefore, this gene product, tRNA(Ser)GCU, should be able to translate all four AGN (N; U, C, A, and G) codons as serine. To elucidate this recognition mechanism, the tRNA(Ser)GCU was isolated from squid liver and its complete nucleotide sequence determined. The tRNA(Ser)GCU was found to possess 7-methylguanosine (m7G) at the wobble position of the anticodon. This suggests that in the squid mitochondrial system, tRNA(Ser)GCU with the anticodon m7GCU can recognize not only the usual serine codons AGU and AGC, but also the unusual serine codons AGA and AGG, as in the case of starfish mitochondria (Matsuyama et al., J. Biol Chem. 273 (1988) 3363-3368).

Crystal structures of leucyl/phenylalanyl-tRNA- protein transferase and its complex with an aminoacyl-tRNA analog

Eubacterial leucyl/phenylalanyl‐tRNA protein transferase (L/F‐transferase), encoded by the aat gene, conjugates leucine or phenylalanine to the N‐terminal Arg or Lys residue of proteins, using Leu‐tRNALeu or Phe‐tRNAPhe as a substrate. The resulting N‐terminal Leu or Phe acts as a degradation signal for the ClpS‐ClpAP‐mediated N‐end rule protein degradation pathway. Here, we present the crystal structures of Escherichia coli L/F‐transferase and its complex with an aminoacyl‐tRNA analog, puromycin. The C‐terminal domain of L/F‐transferase consists of the GCN5‐related N‐acetyltransferase fold, commonly observed in the acetyltransferase superfamily. The p‐methoxybenzyl group of puromycin, corresponding to the side chain of Leu or Phe of Leu‐tRNALeu or Phe‐tRNAPhe, is accommodated in a highly hydrophobic pocket, with a shape and size suitable for hydrophobic amino‐acid residues lacking a branched β‐carbon, such as leucine and phenylalanine. Structure‐based mutagenesis of L/F‐transferase revealed its substrate specificity. Furthermore, we present a model of the L/F‐transferase complex with tRNA and substrate proteins bearing an N‐terminal Arg or Lys.

Closely Related CC- and A-adding Enzymes Collaborate to Construct and Repair the 3′-Terminal CCA of tRNA in Synechocystis sp. and Deinococcus radiodurans

The 3′-terminal CCA sequence of tRNA is faithfully constructed and repaired by the CCA-adding enzyme (ATP(CTP):tRNA nucleotidyltransferase) using CTP and ATP as substrates but no nucleic acid template. Until recently, all CCA-adding enzymes from all three kingdoms appeared to be composed of a single kind of polypeptide with dual specificity for adding both CTP and ATP; however, we recently found that in Aquifex aeolicus, which lies near the deepest root of the eubacterial 16 S rRNA-based phylogenetic tree, CCA addition represents a collaboration between closely related CC-adding and A-adding enzymes (Tomita, K. and Weiner, A. M. (2001) Science 294, 1334–1336). Here we show that inSynechocystis sp. and Deinococcus radiodurans, as in A. aeolicus, CCA is added by homologous CC- and A-adding enzymes. We also find that the eubacterial CCA-, CC-, and A-adding enzymes, as well as the related eubacterial poly(A) polymerases, each fall into phylogenetically distinct groups derived from a common ancestor. Intriguingly, the Thermatoga maritima CCA-adding enzyme groups with the A-adding enzymes, suggesting that these distinct tRNA nucleotidyltransferase activities can intraconvert over evolutionary time.