Kristel Vandormael

Alendronate for the treatment of osteoporosis in men

BACKGROUND Despite its association with disability, death, and increased medical costs, osteoporosis in men has been relatively neglected as a subject of study. There have been no large, controlled trials of treatment in men. METHODS In a two-year double-blind trial, we studied the effect of 10 mg of alendronate or placebo, given daily, on bone mineral density in 241 men (age, 31 to 87 years; mean, 63) with osteoporosis. Approximately one third had low serum free testosterone concentrations at base line; the rest had normal concentrations. Men with other secondary causes of osteoporosis were excluded. All the men received calcium and vitamin D supplements. The main outcome measures were the percent changes in lumbar-spine, hip, and total-body bone mineral density. RESULTS The men who received alendronate had a mean (+/-SE) increase in bone mineral density of 7.1+/-0.3 percent at the lumbar spine, 2.5+/-0.4 percent at the femoral neck, and 2.0+/-0.2 percent for the total body (P<0.001 for all comparisons with base line). In contrast, men who received placebo had an increase in lumbar-spine bone mineral density of 1.8+/-0.5 percent (P<0.001 for the comparison with base line) and no significant changes in femoral-neck or total-body bone mineral density. The increase in bone mineral density in the alendronate group was greater than that in the placebo group at all measurement sites (P<0.001). The incidence of vertebral fractures was lower in the alendronate group than in the placebo group (0.8 percent vs. 7.1 percent, P=0.02). Men in the placebo group had a 2.4-mm decrease in height, as compared with a decrease of 0.6 mm in the alendronate group (P=0.02). Alendronate was generally well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS In men with osteoporosis, alendronate significantly increases spine, hip, and total-body bone mineral density and helps prevent vertebral fractures and decreases in height.

The effects of finasteride on scalp skin and serum androgen levels in men with androgenetic alopecia

BACKGROUND Data suggest that androgenetic alopecia is a process dependent on dihydrotestosterone (DHT) and type 2 5alpha-reductase. Finasteride is a type 2 5alpha-reductase inhibitor that has been shown to slow further hair loss and improve hair growth in men with androgenetic alopecia. OBJECTIVE We attempted to determine the effect of finasteride on scalp skin and serum androgens. METHODS Men with androgenetic alopecia (N = 249) underwent scalp biopsies before and after receiving 0.01, 0.05, 0.2, 1, or 5 mg daily of finasteride or placebo for 42 days. RESULTS Scalp skin DHT levels declined significantly by 13.0% with placebo and by 14.9%, 61.6%, 56. 5%, 64.1%, and 69.4% with 0.01, 0.05, 0.2, 1, and 5 mg doses of finasteride, respectively. Serum DHT levels declined significantly (P <.001) by 49.5%, 68.6%, 71.4%, and 72.2% in the 0.05, 0.2, 1, and 5 mg finasteride treatment groups, respectively. CONCLUSION In this study, doses of finasteride as low as 0.2 mg per day maximally decreased both scalp skin and serum DHT levels. These data support the rationale used to conduct clinical trials in men with male pattern hair loss at doses of finasteride between 0.2 and 5 mg.

A comparison of visual analog scale and categorical ratings of headache pain in a randomized controlled clinical trial with migraine patients

&NA; A visual analog scale (VAS) method of assessing headache pain was compared with a standard categorical four‐grade scale (4GS) in a randomized, placebo‐controlled, double‐blind, clinical trial involving 792 treated migraine outpatients who received oral rizatriptan 5 mg, sumatriptan 50 mg, or placebo for a moderate or severe headache. The VAS and 4GS were equally useful in demonstrating that the active drugs were superior to placebo at reducing headache pain, and in showing that the active drugs were similarly effective. For both rizatriptan and sumatriptan, slightly larger effect sizes were observed with the 4GS compared with the VAS. In analyses using data combined across all treatment groups, VAS and 4GS scores were highly correlated. Use of the VAS imposed additional administrative burdens. These findings suggest that the 4GS may be the preferred scale for assessing headache pain in clinical trials involving adult migraineurs.

Weekly Oral Alendronic Acid in Male Osteoporosis

AbstractObjective: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of alendronic acid 70mg once weekly for the treatment of male osteoporosis. Patients and methods: This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 12-month trial compared the effect of alendronic acid 70mg once weekly or placebo (randomised 2: 1) on bone mineral density (BMD) in 167 men with spine or hip BMD at least 2 standard deviations (SD) below the mean for young normal white males or nontraumatic fracture. All patients received calcium and vitamin D (colecalciferol). We measured lumbar spine, hip and total body BMD, and biochemical markers of bone turnover. Fractures were collected as adverse events. Results: Alendronic acid 70mg once weekly produced significant BMD increases from baseline of 4.3% at the spine, 2.1% at the femoral neck, 2.4% at the trochanter, and 1.4% at the total body, which were all significantly greater than placebo (p < 0.05). The increase at the lumbar spine was significant relative to baseline and placebo after 6 months of treatment (p < 0.001). The treatment effect was consistent regardless of BMD, age, height, weight, body mass index (BMI) and hypogonadal status at baseline. Alendronic acid significantly decreased biochemical markers of bone turnover relative to baseline and placebo. Alendronic acid was generally well tolerated, with an incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events similar to placebo. Conclusion: Alendronic acid 70mg administered once weekly is an effective and convenient alternative to daily dosing for the treatment of male osteoporosis.

Etoricoxib in the treatment of Korean patients with osteoarthritis in a double-blind, randomized controlled trial

Abstract Objective: We evaluated the COX-2 inhibitors, etoricoxib and celecoxib, in Korean patients with osteoarthritis (OA). Methods: This study included patients (≥40 years of age) with a clinical and radiographic diagnosis of knee OA. Patients were randomized to etoricoxib 30 mg (qd) or celecoxib 200 mg (qd) in a 12 week randomized, controlled, double-blind study. Prior NSAID users were to demonstrate a worsening of symptoms upon withdrawal of medication. Efficacy endpoints included the time-weighted average change from baseline in the WOMAC VA 3.0 Pain Subscale (100 mm Visual Analog Scale [VAS]; primary endpoint), the WOMAC VA 3.0 Physical Function Subscale (100 mm VAS), and Patient Global Assessment of Disease Status (PGAD) (100 mm VAS). The primary hypothesis was that etoricoxib 30 mg is non-inferior to celecoxib 200 mg as assessed by the primary endpoint (the non-inferiority margin was set at 10 mm VAS). Adverse events (AEs), laboratory parameters, and vital signs were monitored. Results: There were 239 patients (89.5% female; mean age: 63.3 years) randomized to etoricoxib 30 mg (n = 120) and celecoxib 200 mg (n = 119). The differences (etoricoxib vs celecoxib) in least square (LS) mean change (95% CI) for WOMAC Pain, WOMAC Physical Function, and PGAD were −1.63 mm (−5.37, 2.10), −1.32 mm (−4.88, 2.23), and −1.09 mm (−5.48, 3.30), respectively. Drug-related clinical AEs occurred in 6.7% (etoricoxib) and 2.5% (celecoxib) of patients. This study was limited because it was not designed or powered to adequately capture and evaluate rare AEs associated with NSAID treatment. Conclusions: Etoricoxib 30 mg administered once daily in Korean patients with knee OA demonstrated non-inferior clinical efficacy to celecoxib 200 mg over 12 weeks of treatment as assessed by all primary and secondary outcomes. Etoricoxib 30 mg qd and celecoxib 200 mg qd were generally safe and well tolerated. Clinical trial registration: NCT01554163.

A Phase I Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Exploration Study of Single-Dose Inhaled Montelukast in Patients with Chronic Asthma

Background. The efficacy of oral montelukast has been well established in asthma and allergic rhinitis in adults and children. The purpose of this study was to evaluate dose-related bronchodilation and tolerability of inhaled montelukast. Methods. Randomized, double-blind, crossover, adaptive-design study comparing single-dose administration of inhaled montelukast versus placebo in patients age 15–65 years with chronic asthma (n = 68). Montelukast was delivered as a witnessed dose through dry powder inhaler at doses of 25, 250, or 1000 μg, and doses of 50, 100, and 500 μg could be used if needed based on a prespecified dose–response algorithm. Each administration was followed by a 4- to 7-day washout period before crossing over to the next treatment. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in a forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) over the first 4 hours after administration, calculated as a time-weighted average (ΔFEV1 [0–4 hours]). Other endpoints included the onset and duration of bronchodilation and the effect of albuterol when added to inhaled montelukast. Results. Over 4 hours postdose, and compared with placebo (least-squares [LS] mean 0.03 L), inhaled montelukast 100 μg (0.13 L; p ≤ .001), 250 μg (0.10 L; p < .01), and 1000 μg (0.12 L; p ≤ .001) had significantly greater ΔFEV1 (0–4 hours). At 24 hours postdose, inhaled montelukast 100 μg (0.10 L) and 1000 μg (0.09 L) had significantly greater bronchodilation compared with placebo (0.02 L; p < .05 vs. montelukast). Montelukast 1000 μg provided significant bronchodilation versus placebo within 20 minutes of administration (0.03 L vs. –0.05 L), whereas montelukast 100 μg provided significant bronchodilation relative to placebo within 2 hours of dosing (0.09 L vs. 0.01 L). Montelukast (pooled doses) plus albuterol was significantly more effective than montelukast plus placebo for ΔFEV1 (0–90 minutes) (0.34 L vs. 0.15 L; p = .015). The tolerability of inhaled montelukast was similar to that of placebo. No serious adverse experiences were reported. Conclusions. Inhaled montelukast provided significant bronchodilation compared with placebo as early as 20 minutes after the administration that persisted for 24 hours and provided additive bronchodilation to albuterol.

The Efficacy and Tolerability of Inhaled Montelukast Plus Inhaled Mometasone Compared with Mometasone Alone in Patients with Chronic Asthma

Background. The efficacy of oral montelukast in chronic asthma is well established. Montelukast is also an effective adjunctive therapy to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in asthma uncontrolled on ICS alone. Inhaled montelukast was recently shown to provide significant bronchodilation compared with placebo in patients with chronic asthma. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of inhaled montelukast added to inhaled mometasone. Methods. This was an 8-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study comparing once-daily inhaled montelukast 1 mg plus inhaled mometasone 220 μg (delivered by separate dry powder inhalers) with placebo plus inhaled mometasone 220 μg. Men and women aged 15–85 years with chronic asthma, forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) 50–80% of the predicted value, and β-agonist reversibility ≥12% were eligible. Patients were required to meet a minimum symptom threshold while receiving open-label inhaled mometasone during a 3-week prestudy/run-in period. Patients received blinded (montelukast vs. placebo) treatment for 2 weeks, entered a 1-week washout period, then crossed over to the other treatment for 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was the average change from baseline in FEV1 over the 2-week treatment period. Secondary endpoints included daytime and nighttime symptom scores. Other endpoints included short-acting β-agonist (SABA) use, asthma exacerbations, asthma control, peak expiratory flow (PEF), and blood eosinophil count. Results. A total of 134 patients were randomized. For the primary endpoint, change from baseline in FEV1, inhaled montelukast plus inhaled mometasone was significantly more effective than placebo plus inhaled mometasone (least squares mean 0.22 L vs. 0.17 L; p = .033 [two-sided at α = 0.05]). Inhaled montelukast plus inhaled mometasone was also significantly more effective than placebo plus inhaled mometasone in improving daytime asthma symptom scores (p = .005) and nighttime asthma symptom scores (p = .015), increasing the percentage of days with asthma control (p = .004), decreasing the percentage of days with asthma exacerbations (p ≤ .001), and decreasing the blood eosinophil count (p = .013). Differences were not significant on AM or PM PEF or SABA use, although the latter approached significance (p = .073). Both treatments were well tolerated. Conclusion. Inhaled montelukast plus inhaled mometasone was significantly more effective than placebo plus inhaled mometasone in improving FEV1, symptoms, asthma control, and blood eosinophil count.

Cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy in the 1st line treatment of non-squamous NSCLC in the US

Abstract Aims: To describe cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab plus platinum and pemetrexed chemotherapy in metastatic, non-squamous, NSCLC patients in the US. Materials and methods: A model is developed utilizing partitioned survival analysis to estimate the cost-effectiveness of KEYNOTE-189 trial comparators pembrolizumab + chemotherapy (carboplatin/cisplatin + pemetrexed) vs chemotherapy alone. Clinical efficacy, treatment utilization, health utility, and safety data are derived from the trial and projected over 20 years. For extrapolating survival beyond the trial, a novel SEER population-data approach is applied (primary analysis), with separate estimation via traditional parametric extrapolation methods. Costs for drugs and non-drug disease management are also incorporated. Based on an indirect treatment comparison, cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab + chemotherapy vs pembrolizumab monotherapy is evaluated for patients with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) ≥ 50%. Results: In the full non-squamous population, pembrolizumab + chemotherapy is projected to increase life expectancy by 2.04 years vs chemotherapy (3.96 vs 1.92), for an approximate doubling of life years. Resultant incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) are

Effect of montelukast for treatment of asthma in cigarette smokers

104,823/QALY and

Alendronate treatment of osteoporosis in men.

87,242/life year. In patients with PD-L1 ≥ 50% and 1–49%, life expectancy is more than doubled (4.53 vs 1.88 years) and (4.87 vs 2.01 years), with a 32% (2.60 vs 1.97 years) increase in PD-L1 < 1% patients. Corresponding incremental costs/quality-adjusted life year (QALY) are