Krzysztof Boczar

Safety and effectiveness of transvenous lead extraction in elderly patients

BACKGROUND There is a considerable controversy regarding safety of transvenous lead extraction (TLE) in elderly patients due to their potentially worse general condition, more concomitant diseases, more difficult sedation or analgesia. Moreover, the present experience is not relevant. The aim of the study was the comparison of safety and feasibility of TLE in elderly and middle-aged patients. METHODS We have extracted an ingrown pacemaker (PM)/implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) leads from 1,060 adult patients (21-70 years) and 192 octogenarians (mean age 83.4 ± 3.1 years) using standard mechanical systems within the last 7 years. We compared effectiveness and complications of the TLE procedures in the two mentioned groups of patients. RESULTS There were more women in octogenarians referred for TLE (45.3% vs. 36.9%). In addition, more pocket infections (37.0% vs. 24.5%), less non-infective indications for PM (46.9% vs. 57.7%) and ICD systems (7.3% vs. 28.8%) TLE were observed in this group. Leads body dwelling time was similar (76.4 ± 56.8 vs. 83.5 ± 63.0) in both groups. Procedure efficacy (full radiological success 97.4% vs. 94.6%, partial radiological success 2.6% vs. 4.34%), safety measures (major complications 1.6% vs. 1.51%, minor complications 1.0% vs. 1.9%) were similar in both compared groups. CONCLUSIONS Old age does not influence TLE effectiveness. Therefore, TLE can be safely and successfully performed in octogenarians.

Venous Stenosis and Occlusion in the Presence of Endocardial Leads.

BACKGROUND Venous stenosis and occlusion in the presence of endocardial leads constitute one of the complications of permanent cardiac pacing either by pacemaker, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator or cardiac resynchronization therapy. OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to assess the incidence of stenosis and occlusions and determine the risk factors in patients with endocardial leads in a prospective single-center study. MATERIAL AND METHODS Two hundred eighty consecutive patients aged 25-95 years (male 68.8%) were included. A contrast venography examination of the ipsilateral access vein was performed. The whole study population was divided into 2 groups, based on the presence (group I) or absence (group II) of endocardial leads. RESULTS Venous stenosis/occlusion was identified in 51 patients (37.5%) in group I and in 3 patients (3.6%) in group II; p < 0.0001. The lead presence most highly correlated with venous complications (OR = 4.172; p < 0.001). In patients with endocardial leads divided into I A and I B according to venous patency diabetes mellitus was proved in multivariate analysis to be the only protective factor against the development of venous stenosis/occlusion (OR = 0.473; p = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS The presence of endocardial leads is a predisposing factor for venous stenosis/occlusion and increases the risk 4-fold. The venous lesions in the presence of endocardial leads are less frequent among patients with diabetes mellitus.

The analysis of indications and early results of transvenous lead extraction in patients with a pacemaker, ICD and CRT - single-center experience.

INTRODUCTION Transvenous lead extraction (TLE) is a recognized method of treatment in the case of permanent stimulation complication. OBJECTIVES The objective of this study was to analyse the indications and presentation of the early experience of TLE procedures in a group of patients with old pacing systems. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with a relevant history of stimulation (at least 12 months in case of a pacemaker) qualified for the research. Indications, effectiveness and complications of TLE procedures were analysed. RESULTS Two hundred patients at the age of 66.4 (19.1-86.2 years) were enrolled and 278 leads with dwell time 76.2 months (2.1-327.4) were removed. The indications for TLE were: lead-dependent infective endocarditis in 13 cases (6.5%), pocket infection in 29 cases (14.5%), lead damage in 120 cases (60.0%), and upgrade of device system in 38 cases (19.0%). Manual traction was used to remove 66 active fixation leads (23.7%). A femoral approach was required to extract 4 leads (1.4%). Two hundred and eight leads (74.8%) were extracted using the mechanical (Cook) system and subclavian approach. Laser technique, and an electrosurgical sheath were not used. Complete procedural success was achieved in 96% of cases and overall clinical success was 98.5%. Complication rate was 5.5% (11 patients): minor and major complication rate was 3.0% (6 patients) and 2.5% (5 cases), respectively. Low body mass index (BMI) was associated with a higher rate of complications. CONCLUSIONS The dominant indication to TLE procedures was lead dysfunction. Transvenous lead extraction has a high success rate and a low complication rate. Low BMI increased the complication rate.

Complications of permanent cardiac pacing in patients with persistent left superior vena cava

BACKGROUND Persistent left superior vena cava (PLSVC) is present in about 0.3-0.5% of the general population and in about 12% of patients with other abnormalities. This congenital anomaly is usually asymptomatic and does not cause any physiological problems. However, it may become a significant problem in multiple clinical situations. Various complications related to PLVSC are encountered in anesthesiological, nephrological, oncological and cardiological procedures. The presence of PLSVC is usually incidentally detected during placement of pacemaker (PM), implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) leads. Technical difficulties during lead positioning (especially ventricular leads) are commonly known and often described in the literature. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the specific methods used for implantation of increasingly complicated pacing systems, finding an optimal strategy in patients with PLSVC, especially with electrotherapy complications. METHODS We performed a single-center retrospective analysis of 11 patients (7 women and 4 men, mean age 60.4 ± 13 years) with PLSVC hospitalized in single Cardiology Department between 2000 and 2012. The clinical characteristic, indications for PM/ICD/CRT implantation, technique of implantation and complications were evaluated. RESULTS In PLSVC patients, different indications for pacing or resynchronization therapy were represented: sick sinus syndrome (SSS) in 4 patients, 3rd degree atrio-ventricular (AV) block in 4 patients, dilated cardiomyopathy with left bundle branch block in 2 patients, dilated cardiomyopathy and non-sustained ventricular tachycardia episodes in 1 patient. In patients no. 1, 3, 4 and 10 the complications necessitated the change of leads or type of pacing. Transvenous lead extraction was successfully performed in patient no. 1 and 10 with re-implantation of new leads via PLSVC in patient no. 1 and via right superior vena cava in patient no. 10. Patient no. 3 received an additional ventricular lead via PLSVC because of 2nd degree AV block (formerly atrial lead implanted due to SSS). In patient no. 4 with left atrial pacing (lead in coronary sinus), prosthetic mitral valve replacement was combined with epicardial ventricular lead placement. Patients no. 2 and 7 received a CRT device, without technical problems in patient no. 7, whereas in patient no. 2 due to difficulties with left ventricular lead positioning a hybrid approach to epicardial lead pacing was used. In patient no. 8 an ICD was implanted with difficulty in placing defibrillator lead. Patient no. 5 received 2 atrial leads via PLSVC with successful biatrial pacing; patient no. 6 with the necessity of DDD pacing had a (ventricular) lead for left atrial pacing and a typical right ventricular lead. In patients no. 9 and 11 typical DDD pacing was used with contralateral placement of the leads due to anatomical and technical differences. After 12 years of follow-up the survival is 90.9%. Late electrotherapy complications have developed only in patient no. 8 (problems with the defibrillator lead). CONCLUSIONS Patients with PLSVC are a very heterogeneous group with different indications for pacing, therefore individualization of therapy is required. Technical complications connected with pacing of the right heart chambers are commonly known, hence transvenous left atrial or left ventricular lead implantation should be attempted. In case of difficulties in transvenous positioning of the lead, a hybrid or isolated cardiac surgery technique should be considered. Because of the increasing number of electrotherapy complications, these problems are also present in PLSVC patients. Transvenous lead extraction with re-implantation of a pacing system has not been reported yet. For this reason a thorough evaluation of the venous system is required in PLSVC patients before intervention.

Transvenous extraction of an eight-year-old ventricular lead accidentally implanted into the left ventricle

Incorrect implantation of a ventricular pacemaker (PM) lead into the left ventricle (LV) is a known problem associated with permanent pacing. The optimal management of such cases identified late has not been clearly established. Generally acceptable management options are: open-chest cardiac surgery using cardio-pulmonary bypass, chronic anticoagulation and antiplatelet-drugs therapy. Rarely, the problem is solved by percutaneous LV lead extraction. We present a case of a patient with DDD pacing and ventricular lead implanted incorrectly into the LV apex region via an atrial septal defect eight years ago. Chronic PM pocket infection developed after replacement of the device. Both leads were extracted percutaneously, and the embolic protection system (Filter-Wire EZ, Boston Scientific) was used to reduce cerebral circulation embolism. The hardest connective tissue adhesions affecting the lead and the anodal ring were found in the LV. Less dense surrounding fibrous tissue around the lead was present at all levels of the venous course of the lead and in the right atrium. Very small fragments of apparently connective tissue remnants were found in cerebral circulation protection filters, and had been removed after the procedure. We conclude that old, permanently implanted LV leads may be extracted percutaneously, especially when there is an increased risk of cardiac surgery, or where the patients consent for surgical treatment is lacking. In order to perform the procedure it is recommended to establish a cerebral protection system and intraoperative transoesophageal echocardiography which are mandatory for successful lead removal.

Inhibition of left ventricular stimulation due to left ventricular lead failure and the left ventricular T-wave protection algorithm in patient with cardiac resynchronization therapy and pacemaker dependency

The electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretation in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is often a perplexing problem. The difficulty in the device evaluation increases in the presence of unfamiliar timing cycles and a lead dysfunction. Authors describe a special function of a Biotronik CRT devices called the left ventricle T‐wave protection (LVTP), and demonstrate its behavior in a patient with left ventricular (LV) lead failure. This report shows that sometimes it might be difficult to understand the loss of resynchronization in 12‐lead ECG when LVTP feature is on, and a malfunction of left ventricular lead sensing occurs.

Venous stenosis and occlusion in the presence of endocardial leads in patients referred for transvenous lead extraction

Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of venous stenosis and occlusion (VSO) in patients referred for transvenous lead extraction (TLE) with regard to the indications for this treatment and to analyse the influence of VSO on efficacy, complications and technical challenges of TLE procedures. Methods The material consists of 133 consecutive TLE procedure records. The contrast venography examination of the ipsilateral access vein was performed prior to the operation. The whole study population was divided into two subgroups, based on the presence (subgroup I) or absence (subgroup II) of VSO. Results Phlebography was performed in 133 patients with age ranging from 25.7 to 86.1 years, 44 female (33.1%). The VSO was confirmed in 48 (36.1%) patients – subgroup I. Most of the patients were referred to TLE due to non-infectious reasons (100 pts—75.2%). The absence of VSO was observed substantially more frequently in patients with diabetes (P = 0.02). Procedural success rate reached 93.3% in subgroup I and 98.8% in subgroup II (P = 0.1). There was no significant difference in the use of advanced tools and alternative access sites. Conclusion The presence of VSO can be expected in one third of patients referred for lead extraction. There is no association between indication for TLE (infected or noninfected lead extraction) and the incidence of VSO. Diabetes proved to have a protective effect on venous patency in the previously mentioned group. VSO does not influence the effectiveness, safety, and the use of additional tools during TLE procedures.

The utility of a CHA2DS2-VASc score in predicting the presence of significant stenosis and occlusion of veins with indwelling endocardial leads.

BACKGROUND Currently, there are no studies in which a CHA2DS2-VASc score has been used to predict the risk of venous stenosis and occlusion (VSO) in patients after the implantation of a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED). METHODS The material consists of the records of 223 consecutive patients qualified for transvenous lead extraction, generator change and system revisions or upgrades in whom we assessed the utility of a CHA2DS2-VASc score in the prediction of VSO. The CHA2DS2-VASc score was calculated retrospectively based on the clinical data. The whole study population was divided into two groups, based on the presence (group I) or absence (group II) of VSO. Using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, we identified the optimal cut-off point for the CHA2DS2-VASc score that allowed the prediction of the absence of VSO. RESULTS The venography was performed in 223 consecutive patients aged on average 68.2years (25.7-95.3), 77 females (34.5%). The presence of VSO was detected in 79 (35.4%) patients aged 68.3±14.1years, 30 female (40%) patients-group I. The level of the cut-off point for the CHA2DS2-VASc score that allowed the prediction of the absence of VSO was 3.0. CONCLUSION In the whole population the incidence of VSO amounted to 35.4%. The result of the CHA2DS2-VASc score was a destimulant of VSO occurrence and was characterized by moderate sensitivity (73.4%) and specificity (42.4%) in predicting the absence of VSO. The most significant factor, which prevented VSO development was diabetes.

Analysis of electrical lead failures in patients referred for transvenous lead extraction procedures

We evaluated the influences of selected factors on electrical lead failure (ELF) occurrence in patients referred for transvenous lead extraction (TLE) procedures.

Lead-related complications after DDD pacemaker implantation

BACKGROUND Pacing leads remain the weakest link in pacemaker systems despite advances in manufacturing technology. AIM The aim of the study was to assess the long-term pacing lead performance in an unselected real-life cohort following primary DDD pacing system implantation. METHODS A single-centre retrospective analysis of patients who underwent DDD pacing system implantation between October 1984 and December 2014 and were followed-up until August 2016 was conducted. The inclusion criterion was at least one follow-up visit after post-implant discharge. The performance of each atrial and ventricular lead implanted was evaluated during the follow-up period, and the incidence of, and predictive factors for, lead dislodgement and failure were analysed. RESULTS The data of 3771 patients and 24,431.8 patient-years of follow-up were analysed. The mean follow-up of patients was 77.7 ± 61.8 months. During the study period, 7887 transvenous atrial and right ventricular pacing leads were implanted. Lead dislodgement occurred in 94 (1.2%) leads (92 [2.4%] patients), perforation in 11 (0.1%) leads (10 [0.3%] patients), and lead failure in 329 (4.2%) leads (275 [7.3%] patients). Atrial lead position was a predictive factor for lead dislodgement, while age at implantation, polyurethane 80A insulation, subclavian vein access, unipolar lead construction, and lead manufacturer were multivariate predictors of lead failure. CONCLUSIONS Leads with polyurethane 80A insulation, unipolar construction, and those implanted via subclavian vein puncture exhibited the worst long-term performance.