Kyle C. Meng
Princeton University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Kyle C. Meng.
Nature | 2011
Solomon M. Hsiang; Kyle C. Meng; Mark A. Cane
It has been proposed that changes in global climate have been responsible for episodes of widespread violence and even the collapse of civilizations. Yet previous studies have not shown that violence can be attributed to the global climate, only that random weather events might be correlated with conflict in some cases. Here we directly associate planetary-scale climate changes with global patterns of civil conflict by examining the dominant interannual mode of the modern climate, the El Niño/Southern Oscillation (ENSO). Historians have argued that ENSO may have driven global patterns of civil conflict in the distant past, a hypothesis that we extend to the modern era and test quantitatively. Using data from 1950 to 2004, we show that the probability of new civil conflicts arising throughout the tropics doubles during El Niño years relative to La Niña years. This result, which indicates that ENSO may have had a role in 21% of all civil conflicts since 1950, is the first demonstration that the stability of modern societies relates strongly to the global climate.
Ecology and Society | 2014
Albert V. Norström; Astrid Dannenberg; Geoff McCarney; Manjana Milkoreit; Florian K. Diekert; Gustav Engström; Ram Fishman; Johan Gars; Efthymia Kyriakopoolou; Vassiliki Manoussi; Kyle C. Meng; Marc Metian; Mark Sanctuary; Maja Schlüter; Michael Schoon; Lisen Schultz; Martin Sjöstedt
The purpose of the United Nations-guided process to establish Sustainable Development Goals is to galvanize governments and civil society to rise to the interlinked environmental, societal, and economic challenges we face in the Anthropocene. We argue that the process of setting Sustainable Development Goals should take three key aspects into consideration. First, it should embrace an integrated social-ecological system perspective and acknowledge the key dynamics that such systems entail, including the role of ecosystems in sustaining human wellbeing, multiple cross-scale interactions, and uncertain thresholds. Second, the process needs to address trade-offs between the ambition of goals and the feasibility in reaching them, recognizing biophysical, social, and political constraints. Third, the goal-setting exercise and the management of goal implementation need to be guided by existing knowledge about the principles, dynamics, and constraints of social change processes at all scales, from the individual to the global. Combining these three aspects will increase the chances of establishing and achieving effective Sustainable Development Goals.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2014
Solomon M. Hsiang; Kyle C. Meng
Significance Whether climatic changes affect civil conflicts has been the subject of intense academic debate. Much of this controversy originates from a highly cited dispute between a previous PNAS paper—which finds that civil war incidence in sub-Saharan Africa is associated with increasing local temperature—and a subsequent rebuke of this result, also published in PNAS. We reexamine this apparent disagreement by comparing the statistical models from the two papers using formal tests. When we implement the correct statistical procedure, we find that the evidence presented in the second paper is actually consistent with that of the first. We conclude that the original grounds for the dispute over whether the climate–conflict relationship exists were erroneous. A recent study by Burke et al. [Burke M, Miguel E, Satyanath S, Dykema J, Lobell D (2009) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106(49):20670–20674] reports statistical evidence that the likelihood of civil wars in African countries was elevated in hotter years. A following study by Buhaug [Buhaug H (2010) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107(38):16477–16482] reports that a reexamination of the evidence overturns Burke et al.’s findings when alternative statistical models and alternative measures of conflict are used. We show that the conclusion by Buhaug is based on absent or incorrect statistical tests, both in model selection and in the comparison of results with Burke et al. When we implement the correct tests, we find there is no evidence presented in Buhaug that rejects the original results of Burke et al.
Energy Policy | 2007
Kyle C. Meng; Robert H. Williams; Michael A. Celia
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics | 2016
Thomas Fujiwara; Kyle C. Meng; Tom S. Vogl
Nature Climate Change | 2014
Mark A. Cane; Edward Miguel; Marshall Burke; Solomon M. Hsiang; David B. Lobell; Kyle C. Meng; Shanker Satyanath
National Bureau of Economic Research | 2013
Thomas Fujiwara; Kyle C. Meng; Tom S. Vogl
Economics and Finance Faculty Publications | 2018
Stephen R. Carpenter; Kenneth J. Arrow; Scott Barrett; Reinette Biggs; William A. Brock; Anne-Sophie Crépin; Gustav Engström; Carl Folke; Terry P. Hughes; Nils Kautsky; Chuan-Zhong Li; Geoffrey R. McCarney; Kyle C. Meng; Karl-Göran Mäler; Stephen Polasky; Marten Scheffer; Jason F. Shogren; Thomas Sterner; Jeffrey R. Vincent; Brian Walker; Anastasios Xepapadeas; Aart de Zeeuw
Archive | 2015
Solomon M. Hsiang; Marshall Burke; Edward Miguel; Kyle C. Meng; Mark A. Cane
Archive | 2015
Solomon M. Hsiang; Marshall Burke; Edward Miguel; Kyle C. Meng; Mark A. Cane