Kylee Tustin

Proportion of life lived with dystonia inversely correlates with response to pallidal deep brain stimulation in both primary and secondary childhood dystonia

The aim of this study was to examine the impact of dystonia aetiology and duration, contracture, and age at deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery on outcome in a cohort of children with medically refractory, disabling primary, secondary‐static, or secondary‐progressive dystonias, including neurodegeneration with brain iron accumulation (NBIA).

Beyond the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale: Deep brain stimulation in childhood secondary dystonia

PURPOSE Deep brain stimulation is now widely accepted as an effective treatment for children with primary generalized dystonia. More variable results are reported in secondary dystonias and its efficacy in this heterogeneous group has not been fully elucidated. Deep brain stimulation outcomes are typically reported using impairment-focused measures, such as the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale, which provide little information about function and participation outcomes or changes in non-motor areas. The aim is to demonstrate that in some cases of secondary dystonia, the sole use of impairment level measures, such as the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale, may be insufficient to fully evaluate outcome following deep brain stimulation. METHODS Six paediatric cases who underwent deep brain stimulation surgery with a minimum of one year follow up were selected on the basis of apparent non-response to deep brain stimulation, defined as a clinically insignificant change in the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Movement Scale (<20%), but where other evaluation measures demonstrated clinical efficacy across several domains. RESULTS Despite no significant change in Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale scores following deep brain stimulation, parallel outcome measures demonstrated significant benefit in a range of child and family-centred goal areas including: pain and comfort, school attendance, seating tolerance, access to assistive technology and in some cases carer burden. CONCLUSIONS Sole use of impairment-focused measures, are limited in scope to evaluate outcome following deep brain stimulation, particularly in secondary dystonias. Systematic study of effects across multiple dimensions of disability is needed to determine what deep brain stimulation offers patients in terms of function, participation, care, comfort and quality of life. Deep brain stimulation may offer meaningful change across multiple domains of functioning, disability and health even in the absence of significant change in dystonia rating scales.

Original articleBeyond the Burke–Fahn–Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale: Deep brain stimulation in childhood secondary dystonia

PURPOSE Deep brain stimulation is now widely accepted as an effective treatment for children with primary generalized dystonia. More variable results are reported in secondary dystonias and its efficacy in this heterogeneous group has not been fully elucidated. Deep brain stimulation outcomes are typically reported using impairment-focused measures, such as the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale, which provide little information about function and participation outcomes or changes in non-motor areas. The aim is to demonstrate that in some cases of secondary dystonia, the sole use of impairment level measures, such as the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale, may be insufficient to fully evaluate outcome following deep brain stimulation. METHODS Six paediatric cases who underwent deep brain stimulation surgery with a minimum of one year follow up were selected on the basis of apparent non-response to deep brain stimulation, defined as a clinically insignificant change in the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Movement Scale (<20%), but where other evaluation measures demonstrated clinical efficacy across several domains. RESULTS Despite no significant change in Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale scores following deep brain stimulation, parallel outcome measures demonstrated significant benefit in a range of child and family-centred goal areas including: pain and comfort, school attendance, seating tolerance, access to assistive technology and in some cases carer burden. CONCLUSIONS Sole use of impairment-focused measures, are limited in scope to evaluate outcome following deep brain stimulation, particularly in secondary dystonias. Systematic study of effects across multiple dimensions of disability is needed to determine what deep brain stimulation offers patients in terms of function, participation, care, comfort and quality of life. Deep brain stimulation may offer meaningful change across multiple domains of functioning, disability and health even in the absence of significant change in dystonia rating scales.

Interventional studies in childhood dystonia do not address the concerns of children and their carers

AIMS This study aimed to determine the main concerns/priorities of the parents and carers of children with dystonia referred to our service and whether medical interventional studies addressed these concerns. METHODS Records of children assessed by our service from June 2005-December 2012 were reviewed and expressed parental/carer concerns at initial assessment categorized using the International Classification of Functioning (ICF) Framework. Medline, CINAHL and Embase databases were searched for outcome measures of medical and surgical interventional studies in childhood dystonia. RESULTS Data was collected from 273 children and young people with dystonia. The most commonly expressed concerns were: pain (104/273, 38.1%); difficulties in delivering activities of daily-living (66/273, 24.2%), difficulties with hand-use (59/273, 21.6%) and seating (41/273, 15.0%). Literature review identified 70 interventional studies, 46 neurosurgical and 24 pharmacological. The majority of neurosurgical studies (34/46) used impairment scales to measure change, with pharmacological studies typically reporting more subjective changes in motor symptoms. Only a minority of studies used assessments or scales capable of objectively addressing the concerns reported by our cohort. INTERPRETATIONS Existing interventional studies in childhood dystonia poorly address the main concerns of children with dystonia and their carers, limiting the conclusions which may be drawn as to true impact of these interventions in childhood.

Evaluation of functional goal outcomes using the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) following Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) in childhood dystonia

PURPOSE To evaluate the functional goal-directed outcomes of Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) in childhood dystonia according to aetiology and to explore relationship with a traditional impairment-based measure. METHOD This is a prospective case series study involving thirty children with dystonia with a 1-year follow-up post-DBS. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) and Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) were used as primary outcome measures. Results were analysed based on aetiology in 3 groups: 1. primary/primary plus dystonia; 2. secondary dystonia-cerebral palsy (CP); 3. secondary dystonia-non-CP group. Correlation between functional outcome using COPM and dystonia improvement as captured by BFMDRS was measured. RESULTS All groups demonstrated significant improvement in individualised goal attainment, measured with the COPM, at 1-year post-DBS. The secondary dystonia-CP group also achieved significant improvement at 6 months for performance and satisfaction scores. In the majority of secondary dystonias, the BFMDRS failed to demonstrate significant improvement. A linear correlation between change in BFMDRS and COPM scores was observed when the entire cohort was analysed. INTERPRETATION/CONCLUSIONS DBS improved functional performance, independently of the dystonic phenotype. Improvements in individualized COPM functional goal areas were seen in the absence of significant changes in BFMDRS scores, highlighting the relative insensitivity of impairment scales in this patient group.

Functional priorities in daily life for children and young people with dystonic movement disorders and their families

PURPOSE This study aims to describe the most prevalent functional concerns of a group of young people with dystonia and their primary carers, and to explore the relationship between concerns, aetiology, severity of motor disability and manual ability. METHOD The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) was completed with 57 children with dystonic movement disorders (65% males/35% females, mean 11.2 years (3.5-18.1)): 25% had primary dystonia, 75% secondary dystonia. Gross motor and manual function were classified using the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) and the Manual Ability Classification System (MACS). COPM concerns were analysed with respect to aetiology and severity of motor disability. RESULTS Almost three quarters of the respondents were GMFCS/MACS IV-V. All respondents had at least one concern around self-care. Other concerns included access to assistive technology, pain, dressing activities, use of tools and social participation. The nature and presence of concerns did not statistically differ according to the severity of gross motor or manual function impairment, though qualitative differences were noted. No statistical difference was found in relation to aetiology. INTERPRETATION Children and young people with dystonia have common functional concerns and priorities independent of the cause of dystonia, gross motor severity or manual function ability.

Burke–Fahn–Marsden dystonia severity, Gross Motor, Manual Ability, and Communication Function Classification scales in childhood hyperkinetic movement disorders including cerebral palsy: a ‘Rosetta Stone’ study

Hyperkinetic movement disorders (HMDs) can be assessed using impairment‐based scales or functional classifications. The Burke–Fahn–Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale‐movement (BFM‐M) evaluates dystonia impairment, but may not reflect functional ability. The Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS), Manual Ability Classification System (MACS), and Communication Function Classification System (CFCS) are widely used in the literature on cerebral palsy to classify functional ability, but not in childhood movement disorders. We explore the concordance of these three functional scales in a large sample of paediatric HMDs and the impact of dystonia severity on these scales.

Improvement in upper limb function in children with dystonia following deep brain stimulation

BACKGROUND Childhood dystonia can severely impact upper limb function. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been shown to be effective in reducing dystonic symptoms in childhood. Functional recovery following DBS is however not well understood. AIMS To explore changes in upper limb function following DBS in paediatric dystonia. METHODS Upper limb outcomes, using the Melbourne Assessment of Unilateral Upper Limb Function, are reported in 20 cases of childhood dystonia (unilateral n = 1, four limb n = 19) at 6 and 12 months following DBS. RESULTS Improvement in at least in one upper limb was seen in the majority of cases (n = 17, 85%) at 12 months following DBS. Deterioration of scores in both upper limbs was seen in 3 children with progressive disorders. Grouping the children aetiologically, a significant improvement in the dominant hand was obtained for the primary dystonia/dystonia-plus group at both six (p = 0.018) and twelve months (p = 0.012). In secondary dystonia due to a static disorder, improvement was also seen at 6 (p = 0.043) and 12 months (p = 0.046) in the non-dominant hand. No significant change was found in the group of children with progressive disorders. CONCLUSIONS DBS has the potential to alter upper limb function in children with primary and secondary dystonia. The dominant hand improved most in children with primary dystonias, with greater improvement in the non-dominant hand in secondary-static cases.

Progression to musculoskeletal deformity in childhood dystonia

AIM Dystonia is a movement disorder characterized by involuntary muscle contractions, resulting in abnormalities of posture and movement. Children with dystonia are at risk of developing fixed musculoskeletal deformities (FMDs). FMDs cause pain, limit function and participation and interfere with care. We aimed to explore factors relating to the development of FMD in a large cohort of children with dystonia. METHOD The case notes of all children referred to our Complex Motor Disorder service between July 2005 and December 2011 were reviewed. Data from 279 children (median age 9 years 10 months, Standard Deviation 4 years 2 months) with motor disorders including a prominent dystonic element were analyzed. Parametric accelerated failure time regression was used to identify the factors related to development of contractures. RESULTS FMDs were present at referral in more than half (n = 163, 58%) of cases. Three quarters (n = 120, 74%) of children with FMD had deformities around the hip, and 42% had spinal deformity (n = 68). Compared to pure primary dystonia, FMD onset was earlier with a diagnosis of secondary or heredodegenerative dystonia, and a mixed spastic-dystonic phenotype (all p < 0.001). FMD onset was also earlier with increasing Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) level (p < 0.001). The effect of aetiological classification was lost when controlling for GMFCS level and motor phenotype. INTERPRETATION Children with secondary or heredodegenerative dystonia are at greater risk of progression to FMD compared to primary dystonia, likely due to more severe dystonia within these groups. Children with additional spasticity are at particular risk, requiring close monitoring.

Intrathecal baclofen trials: complications and positive yield in a pediatric cohort

OBJECT Intrathecal baclofen (ITB) is an effective management option for childhood hypertonia. Given the potential complications of implanted ITB pumps, trials of ITB are usually performed as part of the workup for ITB pumps. Two methods are used for ITB trials, lumbar puncture (LP) and catheter insertion into the intrathecal space. Little has been written to date on the number of positive trials and complications in trials. This study aimed to report the outcomes and complications in ITB trials for childhood hypertonia (dystonia, spastic, or mixed). METHODS A retrospective case notes review was conducted of all patients who underwent ITB trials at the Evelina London Childrens Hospital between 2005 and 2012 (inclusive). Positive trials were defined as a reduction in Modified Ashworth Scale by a minimum of 1 point in at least 2 muscle groups and improvement reported by the caregivers in the areas of goals agreed upon between professionals and the families. RESULTS Our patient group comprised children with dystonia (n = 7), mixed spasticity/dystonia (n = 29), spasticity (n = 4), and pain (n = 1). A total of 47 trials were attempted in 41 children. Forty trials were successfully completed, with 39 being positive. Thirty-three were catheter trials, and 14 were LPs. The overall complication rate in the 47 attempted trials was 53%: 61% in catheter trials, and 36% in LP trials. This difference was not statistically significant. The most common complications were vomiting (n = 9) and CSF leak (n = 4). The most serious complication was meningitis (n = 1) in a catheter trial. No patients experienced a permanent injury. CONCLUSIONS There is a high risk of minor self-limiting complications with ITB trials, which needs to be factored into the decision process of progression to trials. The rate of positive trials in this study was 98%, of which 21% did not progress to pump implantation. While the authors would still advocate for ITB trials prior to ITB pump insertion to aid parental decision-making, this figure suggests that with good patient selection, ITB pumps could be placed without a preceding trial.