L. J. Clark

How do roots penetrate strong soil

The mechanical and physiological bases for root growth against high mechanical impedance are reviewed. The best estimates of maximum axial root growth pressure (σmax) in completely impeded pea roots appear to be from 0.5 to 0.6 MPa, which results from a turgor pressure of about 0.8 MPa. When roots are incompletely impeded, a range of responses has been reported. Roots do not change elongation rate in a simple mechanical way in response to changes in mechanical impedance. Instead, ethylene might play a key role in mediating an increase in root diameter and a decrease in elongation rate. These changes persist for some hours or days after impedance is removed. Differences between species in their ability to penetrate strong soil layers are not related to differences in σmax, but appear to be due to differences in root diameter. In rice, differences between cultivars in the ability of their roots to penetrate strong wax layers are not related to their elongation rates through uniformly strong media. Differences between species or cultivars in their ability to penetrate strong layers may be due to differences in the tendency of roots to deflect or buckle when they grow from a weak to a strong environment.

The effect of soil strength on the yield of wheat

Although it is well-known that high soil strength is a constraint to root and shoot growth, it is not clear to what extent soil strength is the main physical stress that limits crop growth and yield. This is partly because it is difficult to separate the effects of soil drying and high soil strength, which tend to occur together. The aim of this paper is to test the hypothesis that for two different soil types, yield is closely related to soil strength irrespective of difference in soil water status and soil structure. Winter (Triticum aestivum L., cv. Hereward) and spring wheat (cv. Paragon) were grown in the field on two soils, which had very different physical characteristics. One was loamy sand and the other sandy clay loam; compaction and loosening treatments were applied in a fully factorial design to both. Crop growth and yield, carbon isotope discrimination, soil strength, water status, soil structure and hydraulic properties were measured. The results showed that irrespective of differences in soil type, structure and water status, soil strength gave a good prediction of crop yield. Comparison with previous data led to the conclusion that, irrespective of whether it was due to drying or compaction (poor soil management), soil strength appeared to be an important stress that limits crop productivity.

Does Soil Strength Play a Role in Wheat Yield Losses Caused by Soil Drying

Shoot growth in wheat is sensitive to high soil strength, but as high strength and drying tend to occur together it has proved difficult to separate the effects of water stress and mechanical impedance. The results of two field experiments in 2003 and 2004, where soil strength was manipulated by compaction and irrigation, demonstrated that the yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) was sensitive to physical stress in the root zone. We obtained linear relationships between yield and soil strength and between yield and accumulated soil moisture data (accumulation analogous to thermal time), with similar slopes for both seasons. We were unable to detect root-sourced signals of xylem-sap ABA concentration, despite changes in stomatal conductance. When mechanical impedance and matric potential were varied independently in controlled environments, the growth of wheat was sensitive to mechanical impedance, but not to small changes in matric potential. While the response of stomatal conductance to soil drying in the field could be interpreted as evidence of hydraulic signalling, we suggest that the role of high soil strength, in limiting growth rates on moderately dry soil, requires further research.

Root penetration of strong soil in rainfed lowland rice: comparison of laboratory screens with field performance

Rice cvs with better hardpan penetration would be expected to be more drought resistant in the rainfed lowlands. Although laboratory methods to facilitate the identification or breeding of cvs with good root-penetration ability have been described, there is a need to validate such screens against field performance. Here, we compare previous field measurements with laboratory screening measurements in eight cvs (IR20, CT9993, KDML 105, IR58821, NSG 19, IR62266, Mahsuri and IR52561). These were screened (together with Moroberekan, SG329 and IR36 for comparative purposes) using a flooded wax-layer screen. Of the eight cvs, IR58821 gave the best penetration of a 60% wax layer, with a mean penetration of 5.8 root axes per plant. The worst performer was IR52561, with a mean of 0.6 axes per plant. The cvs IR20, CT9993, KDML 105, IR58821 were also screened (together with Azucena, Bala, Moroberekan, Kinandang Patong and IR36 for comparative purposes) using a (non-flooded) sand-core screen. The sand-core screen allowed mechanical impedance of the whole sand core to be varied independently of aeration and water status. High impedance treatments were obtained by placing weights on the sand cores, which greatly decreased root growth, although differences between cvs in response to impedance in the sand-core screen were small. The ability of rice roots to penetrate wax layers did not appear to be related to their elongation through strong sand, but rather to their ability to resist buckling on encountering the wax layer. Comparison with field measurements showed that cvs with good performance in the wax-layer screen did not necessarily have good hardpan penetration in the field, although IR58821 was the best performer in the field. It is concluded that further work is required to compare root penetration in the field with root penetration in laboratory screens.

Sensing the physical and nutritional status of the root environment in the field: a review of progress and opportunities

The challenge that faces agriculture at the start of the 21st Centuary is to provide security of food production in a sustainable way. Achieving this task is difficult enough, but against a background of climate change, it becomes a moving target. However, one certainty is that soil factors that limit crop growth must be taken into account as new strategies for crop management are developed. To achieve this, it is necessary to measure the physical and nutritional status of the root environment in the field. Before considering measurement methods, our understanding of how the plant interacts with its soil environment is reviewed, so that it is clear what needs to be measured. Soil strength due to soil drying is identified as an important stress that limits agricultural productivity. The scope to measure Soil factors that directly affect plant growth is reviewed. While in situ sensors are better developed, progress in the development of remote sensors of soil properties are also reviewed. A robust approach is needed to interpret soil measurements at the field scale and here geostatistics has much to offer. The present review takes a forward look and explores how our understanding of plant responses to soil conditions, the newly emerging sensing technologies and geostatistical tools can be drawn together to develop robust tools for Soil and crop management. This is not intended to be an exhaustive review. Instead, file authors focus on those aspects that they consider to be most important and where the greatest progress is being made.

The impact of mechanical impedance on the emergence of carrot and onion seedlings

The development of a method using wax layers to simulate the effect of strong soil crusts on seedling emergence is described. Wax layers of different strengths were prepared by melting together white soft paraffin and paraffin wax in different proportions. The wax discs were placed above seeds planted in wet, but well-aerated sand in controlled environments. The effect of adding charcoal to the wax discs to prevent transmission of light was also tested. When wax layer penetrometer pressure was 0.2–0.25 MPa, light transmission greatly decreased the final emergence of carrot, but not onion seedlings. Penetrometer pressures above 0.25 MPa greatly decreased emergence through black wax layers in both carrot and onion. The presence of 2–4 mm stones immediately below wax layers (to simulate aggregates) decreased the emergence of onion shoots through wax layers with penetrometer pressures of 0.25 MPa and above. The emergence of carrot and onion seedlings from wax layers was compared to emergence in the field from different soil types and aggregate sizes. In both laboratory and field experiments, carrot gave better emergence than onion when emergence was relatively poor. Results were consistent with the hypothesis that mechanical impedance is a major factor in poor crop emergence in temperate conditions.

The temperature-dependence of the maximum axial growth pressure of roots of pea (Pisum sativum L.)

Although it has been suggested that the maximum axial growth pressure of roots is temperature-dependent, this has not previously been tested experimentally. In this paper we report the temperature-dependence of the maximum axial growth pressure of completely mechanically-impeded roots of pea (Pisum sativum L. cv Meteor). Maximum growth pressures were somewhat lower at 15 and 20°C than at 10, 25 or 30°C, but there was no overall trend for maximum growth pressure to increase or decrease with temperature. Turgor pressure in unimpeded roots varied little with temperature and we suggest that cell wall tension in completely impeded roots also varies little with temperature.

Mechanical Impedance and Nutrient Acquisition in Rice

The aim of this work was to examine the effect of mechanical impedance on nutrient acquisition and gene expression in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Roots were mechanically impeded in a sand-core apparatus to vary impedance independently of aeration and water status. The effect of impedance on plant growth, anion concentration and expression of genes for anion transporters was compared for six varieties with differences in root penetration ability. Impedance decreased shoot growth more than root growth in all varieties, resulting in increased root/shoot ratios. Impedance substantially increased shoot tissue nitrate concentration in all varieties but only caused a small increase in shoot sulphate and phosphate concentrations. High impedance increased expression of the sulphate transporter OsST1 in five varieties, which was associated with decreased sulphate concentration in root tissues. In contrast, impedance decreased expression of the phosphate transporter OsPT2 expression in all varieties, which was associated with decreased phosphate concentration in root tissues. Localisation of expression of the sulphate transporter by in situ hybridisation indicated high levels of expression in lateral bud primordia. It was suggested that the decreased root phosphate concentrations of impeded roots were caused by low phosphate transporter gene expression, while the increase in sulphate transporter gene expression was due to a derepression mechanism of control.