P. B. Leeds-Harrison

Does Soil Strength Play a Role in Wheat Yield Losses Caused by Soil Drying

Shoot growth in wheat is sensitive to high soil strength, but as high strength and drying tend to occur together it has proved difficult to separate the effects of water stress and mechanical impedance. The results of two field experiments in 2003 and 2004, where soil strength was manipulated by compaction and irrigation, demonstrated that the yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) was sensitive to physical stress in the root zone. We obtained linear relationships between yield and soil strength and between yield and accumulated soil moisture data (accumulation analogous to thermal time), with similar slopes for both seasons. We were unable to detect root-sourced signals of xylem-sap ABA concentration, despite changes in stomatal conductance. When mechanical impedance and matric potential were varied independently in controlled environments, the growth of wheat was sensitive to mechanical impedance, but not to small changes in matric potential. While the response of stomatal conductance to soil drying in the field could be interpreted as evidence of hydraulic signalling, we suggest that the role of high soil strength, in limiting growth rates on moderately dry soil, requires further research.

Sensing the physical and nutritional status of the root environment in the field: a review of progress and opportunities

The challenge that faces agriculture at the start of the 21st Centuary is to provide security of food production in a sustainable way. Achieving this task is difficult enough, but against a background of climate change, it becomes a moving target. However, one certainty is that soil factors that limit crop growth must be taken into account as new strategies for crop management are developed. To achieve this, it is necessary to measure the physical and nutritional status of the root environment in the field. Before considering measurement methods, our understanding of how the plant interacts with its soil environment is reviewed, so that it is clear what needs to be measured. Soil strength due to soil drying is identified as an important stress that limits agricultural productivity. The scope to measure Soil factors that directly affect plant growth is reviewed. While in situ sensors are better developed, progress in the development of remote sensors of soil properties are also reviewed. A robust approach is needed to interpret soil measurements at the field scale and here geostatistics has much to offer. The present review takes a forward look and explores how our understanding of plant responses to soil conditions, the newly emerging sensing technologies and geostatistical tools can be drawn together to develop robust tools for Soil and crop management. This is not intended to be an exhaustive review. Instead, file authors focus on those aspects that they consider to be most important and where the greatest progress is being made.

Estimating the hydraulic conductivity of aggregates conditioned by different tillage treatments from sorption measurements

Abstract A procedure is described for obtaining the hydraulic conductivity of the soil of individual aggregates from measurements of the water uptake at negative pressure heads from a small circular porous membrane in contact with the surface of the aggregate. The method was validated with measurements on a fine sand that gave results in agreement with those obtained using a constant head permeameter. It was then used to obtain hydraulic conductivity values of aggregates taken from experimental plots under different cultivation treatments. It was found that hydraulic conductivity values of aggregates from field plots that were cultivated by implements hauled by a tractor that compacted the soil, were significantly smaller than those of aggregates from plots that were cultivated by a gantry system that did not compact the soil.

A framework for integrating flood defence and biodiversity in washlands in England

Abstract Concerns about increased flood risk and loss of biodiversity in lowland areas, coupled with changing priorities in the countryside have drawn attention to the potential contribution that managed washlands can make to improved flood management, habitats and wildlife. Following a review of research literature, a survey of flood managers and conservation officers, and an evaluation of selected case sites in England, a framework to help integrate potential flood management and biodiversity opportunities was constructed. This framework consists of three components, namely: a Hydraulic classification which categorises washlands according to degree of hydraulic control; a Habitat classification which captures attributes of washland hydrology that define the type of existing or potential habitats; and, a Menu of Interventions to “engineer” or manage particular flooding and soil wetness regimes and thereby better exploit habitat potential. Washlands were also categorised by main type of benefit whether this is flood management, conservation, or in the case of integrated washland, a balance of the two. The advantages of alternative administrative and funding arrangements for washlands, whether land acquisition or annual payment to existing land owners, were also explored. It was concluded that the classification of washland flooding and water level regimes can help to define habitat potential. It can also help to guide hydraulic engineering and management actions that can be taken to realise this potential. Although there is potential synergy between flooding and biodiversity under some flood regimes, biodiversity benefits mainly depend on the management of water regimes following flood events. There is a clear need to “join up” hitherto fragmented policy and funding mechanisms in order to exploit the potential for washlands to simultaneously deliver flood management and biodiversity benefits.