Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where L.J. Cox is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by L.J. Cox.


Nuclear Technology | 2012

Initial MCNP6 Release Overview

Tim Goorley; Michael R. James; Thomas E. Booth; Forrest B. Brown; Jeffrey S. Bull; L.J. Cox; Joe W. Durkee; Jay S. Elson; Michael L Fensin; R.A. Forster; John S. Hendricks; H.G. Hughes; Russell C. Johns; B. Kiedrowski; Roger L. Martz; S. G. Mashnik; Gregg W. McKinney; Denise B. Pelowitz; R. E. Prael; J. Sweezy; Laurie S. Waters; Trevor Wilcox; T. Zukaitis

MCNP6 is simply and accurately described as the merger of MCNP5 and MCNPX capabilities, but it is much more than the sum of those two computer codes. MCNP6 is the result of five years of effort by the MCNP5 and MCNPX code development teams. These groups of people, residing in Los Alamos National Laboratory’s (LANL) X Computational Physics Division, Monte Carlo Codes Group (XCP-3), and Decision Applications Division, Radiation Transport and Applications Team (D-5), respectively, have combined their code development efforts to produce the next evolution of MCNP. While maintenance and bug fixes will continue for MCNP5 1.60 and MCNPX 2.7.0 for upcoming years, new code development capabilities only will be developed and released in MCNP6. In fact, the initial release of MCNP6 contains 16 new features not previously found in either code. These new features include the abilities to import unstructured mesh geometries from the finite element code Abaqus, to transport photons down to 1.0 eV, to transport electrons down to 10.0 eV, to model complete atomic relaxation emissions, and to generate or read mesh geometries for use with the LANL discrete ordinates code Partisn. The first release of MCNP6, MCNP6 Beta 2, is now available through the Radiation Safety Information Computational Center, and the first production release is expected in calendar year 2012. High confidence in the MCNP6 code is based on its performance with the verification and validation test suites, comparisons to its predecessor codes, the regression test suite, its code development process, and the underlying high-quality nuclear and atomic databases.


Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research Section B-beam Interactions With Materials and Atoms | 2004

MCNP™ Version 5

R.Arthur Forster; L.J. Cox; Richard Barrett; Thomas E. Booth; Judith F. Briesmeister; Forrest B. Brown; Jeffrey S. Bull; Gregg C Geisler; John T. Goorley; Russell D. Mosteller; Susan E Post; R. E. Prael; Elizabeth Carol Selcow; Avneet Sood

Abstract The Monte Carlo transport workhorse, MCNP [Los Alamos National Laboratory report LA-13709-M, 2000], is undergoing a massive renovation at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) in support of the Eolus Project of the Advanced Simulation and Computing (ASCI) Program. MCNP 1 Version 5 (V5) (expected to be released to RSICC in Fall 2002) will consist of a major restructuring from FORTRAN-77 (with extensions) to ANSI-standard FORTRAN-90 [American National Standard for Programming Language – Fortran-Extended, ANSI X3. 198-1992, 1992] with support for all of the features available in the present release (MCNP-4C2/4C3). To most users, the look-and-feel of MCNP will not change much except for the improvements (improved graphics, easier installation, better online documentation). For example, even with the major format change, full support for incremental patching will still be provided. In addition to the language and style updates, MCNP V5 will have various new user features. These include improved photon physics, neutral particle radiography, enhancements and additions to variance reduction methods, new source options, improved parallelism support (PVM, MPI, OpenMP), and new nuclear and atomic data libraries.


Medical Physics | 1999

Correlated histogram representation of Monte Carlo derived medical accelerator photon-output phase space.

A. E. Schach von Wittenau; L.J. Cox; Paul M. Bergstrom; W.P. Chandler; C. L. Hartmann Siantar; Radhe Mohan

We present a method for condensing the photon energy and angular distributions obtained from Monte Carlo simulations of medical accelerators. This method represents the output as a series of correlated histograms and as such is well-suited for inclusion as the photon-source package for Monte Carlo codes used to determine the dose distributions in photon teletherapy. The method accounts for the isocenter-plane variations of the photon energy spectral distributions with increasing distance from the beam central axis for radiation produced in the bremsstrahlung target as well as for radiation scattered by the various treatment machine components within the accelerator head. Comparison of the isocenter energy fluence computed by this algorithm with that of the underlying full-physics Monte Carlo photon phase space indicates that energy fluence errors are less than 1% of the maximum energy fluence for a range of open-field sizes. Comparison of jaw-edge penumbrae shows that the angular distributions of the photons are accurately reproduced. The Monte Carlo sampling efficiency (the fraction of generated photons which clear the collimator jaws) of the algorithm is approximately 83% for an open 10x10 field, rising to approximately 96% for an open 40x40 field. Data file sizes for a typical medical accelerator, at a given energy, are approximately 150 kB, compared to the 1 GB size of the underlying full-physics phase space file.


Applied Radiation and Isotopes | 2000

Present and future capabilities of MCNP

John S. Hendricks; K.J. Adams; Thomas E. Booth; J.F. Briesmeister; L.L. Carter; L.J. Cox; J.A. Favorite; R.A. Forster; Gregg W. McKinney; R. E. Prael

Several new capabilities have been added to MCNP4C including: (1) macrobody surfaces; (2) the superimposed mesh importance functions, so that it is no longer necessary to subdivide geometries for variance reduction; and (3) Xlib graphics and DVF Fortran 90 for PCs. There are also improvements in neutron physics, electron physics, perturbations, and parallelization. In the more distant future we are working on adaptive Monte Carlo code modernization, more parallelization, visualization, and charged particles.


12. international conference on the use of computers in radiation therapy, Salt Lake City, UT (United States), 27-30 May 1997 | 1997

Treatment of patient-dependent beam modifiers in photon treatments by the Monte Carlo dose calculation code PEREGRINE

A.E. Schach von Wittenau; L.J. Cox; Paul M. Bergstrom; S.M. Hornstein; Radhe Mohan; B. Libby; Q. Wu; D.M.J. Lovelock

The goal of the PEREGRINE Monte Carlo Dose Calculation Project is to deliver a Monte Carlo package that is both accurate and sufficiently fast for routine clinical use. One of the operational requirements for photon-treatment plans is a fast, accurate method of describing the photon phase-space distribution at the surface of the patient. The open-field case is computationally the most tractable; we know, a priori, for a given machine and energy, the locations and compositions of the relevant accelerator components (i.e., target, primary collimator, flattening filter, and monitor chamber). Therefore, we can precalculate and store the expected photon distributions. For any open-field treatment plan, we then evaluate these existing photon phase-space distributions at the patient`s surface, and pass the obtained photons to the dose calculation routines within PEREGRINE. We neglect any effect of the intervening air column, including attenuation of the photons and production of contaminant electrons. In principle, for treatment plans requiring jaws, blocks, and wedges, we could precalculate and store photon phase-space distributions for various combinations of field sizes and wedges. This has the disadvantage that we would have to anticipate those combinations and that subsequently PEREGRINE would not be able to treat other plans. Therefore, PEREGRINE tracks photons through the patient-dependent beam modifiers. The geometric and physics methods used to do this are described here. 4 refs., 8 figs.


Archive | 2014

MCNP(TM) Release 6.1.1 beta: Creating and Testing the Code Distribution

L.J. Cox; Laura Casswell

This report documents the preparations for and testing of the production release of MCNP6™1.1 beta through RSICC at ORNL. It addresses tests on supported operating systems (Linux, MacOSX, Windows) with the supported compilers (Intel, Portland Group and gfortran). Verification and Validation test results are documented elsewhere. This report does not address in detail the overall packaging of the distribution. Specifically, it does not address the nuclear and atomic data collection, the other included software packages (MCNP5, MCNPX and MCNP6) and the collection of reference documents.


Archive | 2013

Initial MCNP6 Release Overview - MCNP6 version 1.0

John T. Goorley; Michael R. James; Thomas E. Booth; Forrest B. Brown; Jeffrey S. Bull; L.J. Cox; Joe W. Durkee; Jay S. Elson; Michael L Fensin; R.A. Forster; John S. Hendricks; H. Grady Hughes; Russell C. Johns; Brian C. Kiedrowski; Roger L. Martz; S. G. Mashnik; Gregg W. McKinney; Denise B. Pelowitz; R. E. Prael; Jeremy Ed Sweezy; Laurie S. Waters; Trevor Wilcox; Anthony J. Zukaitis


Archive | 1998

Evaluated teletherapy source library

L.J. Cox; Alexis E. Schach Von Wittenau


Submitted to: 12th Biennial Radiation and Shielding Division Topical Meeting of the American Nuclear Society, Santa Fe, NM, April 14-18, 2002 | 2002

MCNP(TM) Version 5.

L.J. Cox; Richard Barrett; Thomas E. Booth; Judith F. Briesmeister; Forrest B. Brown; Jeffrey S. Bull; G. C. Giesler; John T. Goorley; Russell D. Mosteller; R.A. Forster; S. E. Post; R. E. Prael; Elizabeth Carol Selcow; Avneet Sood


Archive | 2012

Initial MCNP6 Release Overview - MCNP6 Beta 3

John T. Goorley; Michael R. James; Thomas E. Booth; Forrest B. Brown; Jeffrey S. Bull; L.J. Cox; Joe W. Durkee; Jay S. Elson; Michael L Fensin; R.A. Forster; John S. Hendricks; H. Grady Hughes; Russell C. Johns; Brian C. Kiedrowski; Roger L. Martz; S. G. Mashnik; Gregg W. McKinney; Denise B. Pelowitz; R. E. Prael; Jeremy Ed Sweezy; Laurie S. Waters; Trevor Wilcox; Anthony J. Zukaitis

Collaboration


Dive into the L.J. Cox's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jeffrey S. Bull

Los Alamos National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

R. E. Prael

Los Alamos National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

R.A. Forster

Los Alamos National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Thomas E. Booth

Los Alamos National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gregg W. McKinney

Los Alamos National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Roger L. Martz

Los Alamos National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Brian C. Kiedrowski

University of Wisconsin-Madison

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Denise B. Pelowitz

Los Alamos National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jay S. Elson

Los Alamos National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge