Lara Ferris
Flinders University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Lara Ferris.
American Journal of Physiology-gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology | 2012
Taher Omari; Lara Ferris; Eddy Dejaeger; Jan Tack; Dirk Vanbeckevoort; Nathalie Rommel
The measurement of the physical extent of opening of the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) during bolus swallowing has to date relied on videofluoroscopy. Theoretically luminal impedance measured during bolus flow should be influenced by luminal diameter. In this study, we measured the UES nadir impedance (lowest value of impedance) during bolus swallowing and assessed it as a potential correlate of UES diameter that can be determined nonradiologically. In 40 patients with dysphagia, bolus swallowing of liquids, semisolids, and solids was recorded with manometry, impedance, and videofluoroscopy. During swallows, the UES opening diameter (in the lateral fluoroscopic view) was measured and compared with automated impedance manometry (AIM)-derived swallow function variables and UES nadir impedance as well as high-resolution manometry-derived UES relaxation pressure variables. Of all measured variables, UES nadir impedance was the most strongly correlated with UES opening diameter. Narrower diameter correlated with higher impedance (r = -0.478, P < 0.001). Patients with <10 mm, 10-14 mm (normal), and ≥ 15 mm UES diameter had average UES nadir impedances of 498 ± 39 Ohms, 369 ± 31 Ohms, and 293 ± 17 Ohms, respectively (ANOVA P = 0.005). A higher swallow risk index, indicative of poor pharyngeal swallow function, was associated with narrower UES diameter and higher UES nadir impedance during swallowing. In contrast, UES relaxation pressure variables were not significantly altered in relation to UES diameter. We concluded that the UES nadir impedance correlates with opening diameter of the UES during bolus flow. This variable, when combined with other pharyngeal AIM analysis variables, may allow characterization of the pathophysiology of swallowing dysfunction.
Neurogastroenterology and Motility | 2014
Maartje Singendonk; Stamatiki Kritas; Charles Cock; Lara Ferris; Lisa McCall; Nathalie Rommel; M. P. van Wijk; Marc A. Benninga; David D. Moore; Taher Omari
Applying the 2012 Chicago Classification (CC) of esophageal motility disorders to pediatric patients is problematic as it relies upon adult‐derived criteria. As shorter esophageal length and smaller esophago‐gastric junction (EGJ) diameter may influence CC metrics, we explored the potential for age‐ and size‐adjustment of diagnostic criteria.
The Journal of Pediatrics | 2015
Maartje Singendonk; Stamatiki Kritas; Charles Cock; Lara Ferris; Lisa McCall; Nathalie Rommel; Michiel P. van Wijk; Marc A. Benninga; David Moore; Taher Omari
OBJECTIVE To perform pressure-flow analysis (PFA) in a cohort of pediatric patients who were referred for diagnostic manometric investigation. STUDY DESIGN PFA was performed using purpose designed Matlab-based software. The pressure-flow index (PFI), a composite measure of bolus pressurization relative to flow and the impedance ratio, a measure of the extent of bolus clearance failure were calculated. RESULTS Tracings of 76 pediatric patients (32 males; 9.1 ± 0.7 years) and 25 healthy adult controls (7 males; 36.1 ± 2.2 years) were analyzed. Patients mostly had normal motility (50%) or a category 4 disorder and usually weak peristalsis (31.5%) according to the Chicago Classification. PFA of healthy controls defined reference ranges for PFI ≤142 and impedance ratio ≤0.49. Pediatric patients with pressure-flow (PF) characteristics within these limits had normal motility (62%), most patients with PF characteristics outside these limits also had an abnormal Chicago Classification (61%). Patients with high PFI and disordered motor patterns all had esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction. CONCLUSIONS Disordered PF characteristics are associated with disordered esophageal motor patterns. By defining the degree of over-pressurization and/or extent of clearance failure, PFA may be a useful adjunct to esophageal pressure topography-based classification.
International Journal of Otolaryngology | 2015
Lara Ferris; Taher Omari; Margot Selleslagh; Eddy Dejaeger; Jan Tack; Dirk Vanbeckevoort; Nathalie Rommel
Objectives. Preswallow pharyngeal bolus presence is evident in patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia. Pressure flow analysis (PFA) using high resolution manometry with impedance (HRMI) with AIMplot software is a method for objective interpretation of pharyngeal and upper esophageal sphincter (UES) pressures and bolus flow patterns during swallowing. This study aimed to observe alterations in PFA metrics in the event of preswallow pharyngeal bolus presence as seen on videofluoroscopy (VFSS). Methods. Swallows from 40 broad dysphagia patients and 8 controls were recorded with a HRMI catheter during simultaneous VFSS. Evidence of bolus presence and level reached prior to pharyngeal swallow onset was recorded. AIMPlot software derived automated PFA functional metrics. Results. Patients with bolus movement to the pyriform sinuses had a higher SRI, indicating greater swallow dysfunction. Amongst individual metrics, TNadImp to PeakP was shorter and flow interval longer in patient groups compared to controls. A higher pharyngeal mean impedance and UES mean impedance differentiated the two patient groups. Conclusions. This pilot study identifies specific altered PFA metrics in patients demonstrating preswallow pharyngeal bolus presence to the pyriform sinuses. PFA metrics may be used to guide diagnosis and treatment of patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia and track changes in swallow function over time.
The Journal of Pediatrics | 2016
Lara Ferris; Nathalie Rommel; Sebastian H. Doeltgen; Ingrid Scholten; Stamatiki Kritas; Rammy Abu-Assi; Lisa McCall; Grace Seiboth; Katie Lowe; David Moore; Jenny Faulks; Taher Omari
OBJECTIVES To determine which objective pressure-impedance measures of pharyngeal swallowing function correlated with clinically assessed severity of oropharyngeal dysphagia (OPD) symptoms. STUDY DESIGN Forty-five children with OPD and 34 control children without OPD were recruited and up to 5 liquid bolus swallows were recorded with a solid-state high-resolution manometry with impedance catheter. Individual measures of pharyngeal and upper esophageal sphincter (UES) function and a swallow risk index composite score were derived for each swallow, and averaged data for patients with OPD were compared with those of control children without OPD. Clinical severity of OPD symptoms and oral feeding competency was based on the validated Dysphagia Disorders Survey and Functional Oral Intake Scale. RESULTS Those objective measures that were markers of UES relaxation, UES opening, and pharyngeal flow resistance differentiated patients with and without OPD symptoms. Patients demonstrating abnormally high pharyngeal intrabolus pressures and high UES resistance, markers of outflow obstruction, were most likely to have signs and symptoms of overt Dysphagia Disorders Survey (OR 9.24, P = .05, and 9.7, P = .016, respectively). CONCLUSION Pharyngeal motor patterns can be recorded in children by the use of HRIM and pharyngeal function can be defined objectively with the use of pressure-impedance measures. Objective measurements suggest that pharyngeal dysfunction is common in children with clinical signs of OPD. A key finding of this study was evidence of markers of restricted UES opening.
Laryngoscope | 2018
Lara Ferris; Mistyka Schar; Lisa McCall; Sebastian H. Doeltgen; Ingrid Scholten; Nathalie Rommel; Charles Cock; Taher Omari
Characterization of the pharyngeal swallow response to volume challenges is important for swallowing function assessment. The diameter of the pressure‐impedance recording catheter may influence these results. In this study, we captured key physiological swallow measures in response to bolus volume utilizing recordings acquired by two catheters of different diameter.
Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition | 2018
Lara Ferris; Sebastian K. King; Lisa McCall; Nathalie Rommel; Ingrid Scholten; Warwick J. Teague; Sebastian H. Doeltgen; Taher Omari
Gastroenterology | 2018
Taher Omari; Lara Ferris; Per Cajander; Charles Cock; Sebastian H. Doeltgen; Nathalie Rommel; Johanna Savilampi
Gastroenterology | 2018
Maartje Singendonk; Charles Cock; Luc Bieckmann; Michal M. Szczesniak; Lara Ferris; Marc A. Benninga; Taher Omari
Gastroenterology | 2018
Maartje Singendonk; Robyn Rexwinkel; Nina Steutel; Marc A. Benninga; Miranda W. Langendam; Carlo Di Lorenzo; Yvan Vandenplas; Annamaria Staiano; Lara Ferris; Nikhil Thapar; Michiel P. van Wijk; Merit M. Tabbers