Laura L. Price
Sandia National Laboratories
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Laura L. Price.
Archive | 2015
Laura L. Price; Mike Gross; Jeralyn L. Prouty; Mark J. Rigali; Brian Craig; Zenghu Han; John Lee; Yung Liu; Ron Pope; Kevin J. Connolly; Matt Feldman; Josh Jarrell; Georgeta Radulescu; John M Scaglione; Alan Wells
The mission of the United States Department of Energy’s Office of Environmental Management is to complete the safe cleanup of the environmental legacy brought about from five decades of nuclear weapons development and government-sponsored nuclear energy research. Some of the wastes that that must be managed have been identified as good candidates for disposal in a deep borehole in crystalline rock (SNL 2014a). In particular, wastes that can be disposed of in a small package are good candidates for this disposal concept. A canister-based system that can be used for handling these wastes during the disposition process (i.e., storage, transfers, transportation, and disposal) could facilitate the eventual disposal of these wastes. This report provides information for a program plan for developing specifications regarding a canister-based system that facilitates small waste form packaging and disposal and that is integrated with the overall efforts of the DOE’s Office of Nuclear Energy Used Fuel Disposition Campaigns Deep Borehole Field Test. Groundwork for Universal Canister System Development September 2015 ii Wastes to be considered as candidates for the universal canister system include capsules containing cesium and strontium currently stored in pools at the Hanford Site, cesium to be processed using elutable or nonelutable resins at the Hanford Site, and calcine waste from Idaho National Laboratory. The initial emphasis will be on disposal of the cesium and strontium capsules in a deep borehole that has been drilled into crystalline rock. Specifications for a universal canister system are derived from operational, performance, and regulatory requirements for storage, transfers, transportation, and disposal of radioactive waste. Agreements between the Department of Energy and the States of Washington and Idaho, as well as the Deep Borehole Field Test plan provide schedule requirements for development of the universal canister system. Future work includes collaboration with the Hanford Site to move the cesium and strontium capsules into dry storage, collaboration with the Deep Borehole Field Test to develop surface handling and emplacement techniques and to develop the waste package design requirements, developing universal canister system design options and concepts of operations, and developing system analysis tools. Areas in which further research and development are needed include material properties and structural integrity, in-package sorbents and fillers, waste form tolerance to heat and postweld stress relief, waste package impact limiters, sensors, cesium mobility under downhole conditions, and the impact of high pressure and high temperature environment on seals design. September 2015 Groundwork for Universal Canister System Development
Archive | 2015
Laura L. Price; Amanda Crystal Barela; Walter M. Walkow; Richard Reed Schetnan; Matthew Brian Arnold
An Evaluation and Screening team supporting the Fuel Cycle Technologies Program Office of the United States Department of Energy, Office of Nuclear Energy is conducting an evaluation and screening of a comprehensive set of fuel cycle options. These options have been assigned to one of 40 evaluation groups, each of which has a representative fuel cycle option [Todosow 2013]. A Fuel Cycle Data Package System Datasheet has been prepared for each representative fuel cycle option to ensure that the technical information used in the evaluation is high-quality and traceable [Kim, et al., 2013]. The information contained in the Fuel Cycle Data Packages has been entered into the Nuclear Fuel Cycle Options Catalog at Sandia National Laboratories so that it is accessible by the evaluation and screening team and other interested parties. In addition, an independent team at Savannah River National Laboratory has verified that the information has been entered into the catalog correctly. This report documents that the 40 representative fuel cycle options have been entered into the Catalog, and that the data entered into the catalog for the 40 representative options has been entered correctly.
Archive | 2014
Laura L. Price; Robert P. Rechard
Archive | 2016
Laura L. Price; Amanda Crystal Barela; Richard Reed Schetnan; Walter M. Walkow
Archive | 2016
Geoffrey A. Freeze; Emily Stein; Laura L. Price; Robert J. MacKinnon; Jack Bruce Tillman
Archive | 2016
David Sassani; Je-Hun Jang; Paul Mariner; Laura L. Price; Robert P. Rechard; Mark J. Rigali; Ralph Rogers; Emily Stein; Walter M. Walkow; Philippe F. Weck
Archive | 2016
Mark J. Rigali; Laura L. Price
Archive | 2015
David Sassani; Laura L. Price; Robert P. Rechard; Ralph Rogers; Emily Stein
Archive | 2015
Ernest Hardin; Laura L. Price; Robert J. MacKinnon
Archive | 2015
Laura L. Price; David Sassani; Peter N. Swift; Evaristo J. Bonano