Laura Mannocci
Duke University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Laura Mannocci.
Scientific Reports | 2016
Jason J. Roberts; Benjamin D. Best; Laura Mannocci; Ei Fujioka; Patrick N. Halpin; Debra L. Palka; Lance P. Garrison; Keith D. Mullin; Timothy V. N. Cole; Christin Brangwynne Khan; William A. McLellan; D. Ann Pabst; Gwen G. Lockhart
Cetaceans are protected worldwide but vulnerable to incidental harm from an expanding array of human activities at sea. Managing potential hazards to these highly-mobile populations increasingly requires a detailed understanding of their seasonal distributions and habitats. Pursuant to the urgent need for this knowledge for the U.S. Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico, we integrated 23 years of aerial and shipboard cetacean surveys, linked them to environmental covariates obtained from remote sensing and ocean models, and built habitat-based density models for 26 species and 3 multi-species guilds using distance sampling methodology. In the Atlantic, for 11 well-known species, model predictions resembled seasonal movement patterns previously suggested in the literature. For these we produced monthly mean density maps. For lesser-known taxa, and in the Gulf of Mexico, where seasonal movements were less well described, we produced year-round mean density maps. The results revealed high regional differences in small delphinoid densities, confirmed the importance of the continental slope to large delphinoids and of canyons and seamounts to beaked and sperm whales, and quantified seasonal shifts in the densities of migratory baleen whales. The density maps, freely available online, are the first for these regions to be published in the peer-reviewed literature.
PLOS ONE | 2012
Laura Mannocci; Willy Dabin; Emmanuelle Augeraud-Véron; Jean-François Dupuy; Christophe Barbraud; Vincent Ridoux
Fisheries interactions have been implicated in the decline of many marine vertebrates worldwide. In the eastern North Atlantic, at least 1000 common dolphins (Delphinus delphis) are bycaught each year, particularly in pelagic pair-trawls. We have assessed the resulting impact of bycatch on this population using a demographic modeling approach. We relied on a sample of females stranded along the French Atlantic and western Channel coasts. Strandings represent an extensive source of demographic information to monitor our study population. Necropsy analysis provided an estimate of individual age and reproductive state. Then we estimated effective survivorship (including natural and human-induced mortality), age at first reproduction and pregnancy rates. Reproductive parameters were consistent with literature, but effective survivorship was unexpectedly low. Demographic parameters were then used as inputs in two models. A constant parameter matrix proposed an effective growth rate of −5.5±0.5%, corresponding to the current situation (including bycatch mortality). Subsequently, deterministic projections suggested that the population would be reduced to 20% of its current size in 30 years and would be extinct in 100 years. The demographic invariant model suggested a maximum growth rate of +4.5±0.09%, corresponding to the optimal demographic situation. Then, a risk analysis incorporating Potential Biological Removal (PBR), based on two plausible scenarii for stock structure suggested that bycatch level was unsustainable for the neritic population of the Bay of Biscay under a two-stock scenario. In depth assessment of stock structure and improved observer programs to provide scientifically robust bycatch estimates are needed. Effective conservation measures would be reducing bycatch to less than 50% of the current level in the neritic stock to reach PBR. Our approach provided indicators of the status and trajectory of the common dolphin population in the eastern North Atlantic and therefore proved to be a valuable tool for management, applicable to other dolphin populations.
PLOS ONE | 2014
C. Lambert; Laura Mannocci; Patrick Lehodey; Vincent Ridoux
To date, most habitat models of cetaceans have relied on static and oceanographic covariates, and very few have related cetaceans directly to the distribution of their prey, as a result of the limited availability of prey data. By simulating the distribution of six functional micronekton groups between the surface and ≃1,000 m deep, the SEAPODYM model provides valuable insights into prey distributions. We used SEAPODYM outputs to investigate the habitat of three cetacean guilds with increasing energy requirements: sperm and beaked whales, Globicephalinae and Delphininae. We expected High Energy Requirements cetaceans to preferentially forage in habitats of high prey biomass and/or production, where they might easily meet their high energetic needs, and Low Energy Requirements cetaceans to forage in habitats of either high or low prey biomass and/or production. Cetacean sightings were collected from dedicated aerial surveys in the South West Indian Ocean (SWIO) and French Polynesia (FP). We examined cetacean densities in relation to simulated distributions of their potential prey using Generalised Additive Models and predicted their habitats in both regions. Results supported their known diving abilities, with Delphininae mostly related to prey present in the upper layers of the water column, and Globicephalinae and sperm and beaked whales also related to prey present in deeper layers. Explained deviances ranged from 9% for sperm and beaked whales in the SWIO to 47% for Globicephalinae in FP. Delphininae and Globicephalinae appeared to select areas where high prey biomass and/or production were available at shallow depths. In contrast, sperm and beaked whales showed less clear habitat selection. Using simulated prey distributions as predictors in cetacean habitat models is crucial to understand their strategies of habitat selection in the three dimensions of the ocean.
Conservation Biology | 2017
Laura Mannocci; Jason J. Roberts; David L. Miller; Patrick N. Halpin
Abstract As human activities expand beyond national jurisdictions to the high seas, there is an increasing need to consider anthropogenic impacts to species inhabiting these waters. The current scarcity of scientific observations of cetaceans in the high seas impedes the assessment of population‐level impacts of these activities. We developed plausible density estimates to facilitate a quantitative assessment of anthropogenic impacts on cetacean populations in these waters. Our study region extended from a well‐surveyed region within the U.S. Exclusive Economic Zone into a large region of the western North Atlantic sparsely surveyed for cetaceans. We modeled densities of 15 cetacean taxa with available line transect survey data and habitat covariates and extrapolated predictions to sparsely surveyed regions. We formulated models to reduce the extent of extrapolation beyond covariate ranges, and constrained them to model simple and generalizable relationships. To evaluate confidence in the predictions, we mapped where predictions were made outside sampled covariate ranges, examined alternate models, and compared predicted densities with maps of sightings from sources that could not be integrated into our models. Confidence levels in model results depended on the taxon and geographic area and highlighted the need for additional surveying in environmentally distinct areas. With application of necessary caution, our density estimates can inform management needs in the high seas, such as the quantification of potential cetacean interactions with military training exercises, shipping, fisheries, and deep‐sea mining and be used to delineate areas of special biological significance in international waters. Our approach is generally applicable to other marine taxa and geographic regions for which management will be implemented but data are sparse.
Ecography | 2014
Laura Mannocci; Sophie Laran; Pascal Monestiez; Ghislain Dorémus; Olivier Van Canneyt; Pierre Watremez; Vincent Ridoux
Progress in Oceanography | 2014
Laura Mannocci; Maxime Catalogna; Ghislain Dorémus; Sophie Laran; Patrick Lehodey; Wendy Massart; Pascal Monestiez; Olivier Van Canneyt; Pierre Watremez; Vincent Ridoux
Journal of Biogeography | 2015
Laura Mannocci; Pascal Monestiez; Jérôme Spitz; Vincent Ridoux
Diversity and Distributions | 2017
Laura Mannocci; Andre M. Boustany; Jason J. Roberts; Daniel M. Palacios; Daniel C. Dunn; Patrick N. Halpin; Shay Viehman; Jerry Moxley; Jesse Cleary; Helen Bailey; Steven J. Bograd; Elizabeth A. Becker; Beth Gardner; Jason R. Hartog; Elliott L. Hazen; Megan C. Ferguson; Karin A. Forney; Brian P. Kinlan; Matthew J. Oliver; Charles T. Perretti; Vincent Ridoux; Steven L. H. Teo; Arliss J. Winship
Journal of Marine Systems | 2013
Laura Mannocci; Pascal Monestiez; Jaime Bolaños-Jiménez; Ghislain Dorémus; Stéphane Jeremie; Sophie Laran; Renato Rinaldi; Olivier Van Canneyt; Vincent Ridoux
Trends in Ecology and Evolution | 2018
K.L. Yates; Phil J. Bouchet; M. Julian Caley; Kerrie Mengersen; Christophe F. Randin; Stephen Parnell; Alan H. Fielding; Andrew J. Bamford; Stephen Ban; A. Márcia Barbosa; Carsten F. Dormann; Jane Elith; Clare B. Embling; Gary N. Ervin; Rebecca Fisher; Susan F. Gould; Roland F. Graf; Edward J. Gregr; Patrick N. Halpin; Risto K. Heikkinen; Stefan Heinänen; Alice R. Jones; Periyadan K. Krishnakumar; Valentina Lauria; Hector M. Lozano-Montes; Laura Mannocci; Camille Mellin; Mohsen B. Mesgaran; Elena Moreno-Amat; Sophie Mormede