Laura Richmond

Maintenance of sinus rhythm with an ablation strategy in patients with atrial fibrillation is associated with a lower risk of stroke and death

Objective To investigate whether catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) reduces stroke rate or mortality. Methods An international multicentre registry was compiled from seven centres in the UK and Australia for consecutive patients undergoing catheter ablation of AF. Long-term outcomes were compared with (1) a cohort with AF treated medically in the Euro Heart Survey, and (2) a hypothetical cohort without AF, age and gender matched to the general population. Analysis of stroke and death was carried out after the first procedure (including peri-procedural events) regardless of success, on an intention-to-treat basis. Results 1273 patients, aged 58±11 years, 56% paroxysmal AF, CHADS2 score 0.7±0.9, underwent 1.8±0.9 procedures. Major complications occurred in 5.4% of procedures, including stroke/TIA in 0.7%. Freedom from AF following the last procedure was 85% (76% off antiarrhythmic drugs) for paroxysmal AF, and 72% (60% off antiarrhythmic drugs) for persistent AF. During 3.1 (1.0–9.6) years from the first procedure, freedom from AF predicted stroke-free survival on multivariate analysis (HR=0.30, CI 0.16 to 0.55, p<0.001). Rates of stroke and death were significantly lower in this cohort (both 0.5% per patient-year) compared with those treated medically in the Euro Heart Survey (2.8% and 5.3%, respectively; p<0.0001). Rates of stroke and death were no different from those of the general population (0.4% and 1.0%, respectively). Conclusion Restoration of sinus rhythm by catheter ablation of AF is associated with lower rates of stroke and death compared with patients treated medically.

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Catheter Ablation Versus Medical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation in Heart Failure (The CAMTAF Trial)

Background—Restoring sinus rhythm in patients with heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) may improve left ventricular (LV) function and HF symptoms. We sought to compare the effect of a catheter ablation strategy with that of a medical rate control strategy in patients with persistent AF and HF. Methods and Results—Patients with persistent AF, symptomatic HF, and LV ejection fraction <50% were randomized to catheter ablation or medical rate control. The primary end-point was the difference between groups in LV ejection fraction at 6 months. Baseline LV ejection fraction was 32±8% in the ablation group and 34±12% in the medical group. Twenty-six patients underwent catheter ablation, and 24 patients were rate controlled. Freedom from AF was achieved in 21/26 (81%) at 6 months off antiarrhythmic drugs. LV ejection fraction at 6 months in the ablation group was 40±12% compared with 31±13% in the rate control group (P=0.015). Ablation was associated with better peak oxygen consumption (22±6 versus 18±6 mL/kg per minute; P=0.014) and Minnesota living with HF questionnaire score (24±22 versus 47±22; P=0.001) compared with rate control. Conclusions—Catheter ablation is effective in restoring sinus rhythm in selected patients with persistent AF and HF, and can improve LV function, functional capacity, and HF symptoms compared with rate control. Clinical Trial Registration—URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01411371

The impact of image integration on catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation using electroanatomic mapping: a prospective randomized study

AIMS A detailed appreciation of the left atrial/pulmonary venous (LA/PV) anatomy may be important in improving the safety and success of catheter ablation for AF. The aim of this randomized study was to determine the impact of computed tomographic (CT) integration into an electroanatomic mapping (EAM) system on clinical outcome in patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS AND RESULTS Eighty patients with AF were randomized to undergo first-time wide encirclement of ipsilateral PV pairs using EAM alone (40 patients) or with CT (40 patients, Cartomerge). Wide encirclement of the pulmonary veins was performed using irrigated radiofrequency ablation with the electrophysiological endpoint of electrical isolation (EI). The primary endpoint was single-procedure success at 6 month follow up. Acute and long-term procedural outcomes were also determined. There was no significant difference in single procedure success between EAM (56%) and cavotricuspid isthmus image (CTI) (50%) groups (P = 0.9). Acute procedural outcomes (EI, PV reconnection, sinus rhythm restored by ablation in persistent AF), fluoroscopy, and procedure durations (EI of right PVs, EI of left PVs, total) did not differ significantly between EAM and CTI groups. CONCLUSION Image integration to guide catheter ablation for AF did not significantly improve the clinical outcome. Achieving PV EI is the critical determinant of procedural success rather than the mapping tools used to achieve it.

Long-term efficacy of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: impact of additional targeting of fractionated electrograms

Objectives To investigate long-term efficacy of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) and the impact of ablating complex or fractionated electrograms (CFEs) in addition to pulmonary vein isolation and linear lesions in persistent AF (PeAF). Methods Consecutive cases from 2002–2007 were analysed. All the patients underwent a wide-area circumferential ablation with confirmation of electrical isolation. For PeAF, linear lesions were added, with additional targeting of CFE from 2005. Data were collected in a prospective database. Attempts were made to contact all patients for follow-up. Results 285 patients underwent 530 procedures. The mean (SD) age was 57 (11) years, 75% were male, 20% had structural heart disease and 53% had paroxysmal AF (PAF). The mean number of procedures was 1.9 per patient (1.7 for PAF and 2.0 for PeAF). Procedural complications included stroke or transient ischemic attack in 0.6% and pericardial effusion requiring drainage in 1.7%. During 2.7 years (0.2 to 7.4 years) of follow-up from the last procedure, there were seven deaths (unrelated to their ablation or AF) and three strokes or transient ischemic attack (0.3% per year). Freedom from AF/atrial tachyarrhythmia was 86% for PAF and 68% for PeAF. Late recurrence was 3 per 100 years of follow-up after >3 years. The Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that CFE ablation improved the outcome for PeAF after the first cluster of procedures (p=0.049), with a trend towards improved final outcome (p=0.130). Conclusions Long-term freedom from AF is achievable in most patients with PAF and PeAF with low rates of late recurrence. Additional targeting of CFE improves outcome for PeAF. Late adverse events including stroke are few.

Validation of Computed Tomography Image Integration into the EnSite NavX Mapping System to Perform Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

Introduction: The complex anatomy of the left atrium (LA) makes location of ablation catheters difficult using fluoroscopy alone, and therefore 3D mapping systems are now routinely used. We describe the integration of a CT image into the EnSite NavX System with Fusion and its validation in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation (AF) or left atrial tachycardia (AT) catheter ablation.

Characterization of fractionated atrial electrograms critical for maintenance of atrial fibrillation: a randomized, controlled trial of ablation strategies (the CFAE AF trial).

Background— Whether ablation of complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAE) modifies atrial fibrillation (AF) by eliminating drivers or atrial debulking remains unknown. This randomized study aimed to determine the effect of ablating different CFAE morphologies compared with normal electrograms (ie, debulking normal tissue) on the cycle length of persistent AF (AFCL). Methods and Results— After pulmonary vein isolation left and right atrial CFAE were targeted, until termination of AF or abolition of CFAE before DC cardioversion. Ten-second electrograms were classified according to a validated scale, with grade 1 being most fractionated and grade 5 normal. Patients were randomly assigned to have CFAE grades eliminated sequentially, from grade 1 to 5 (group 1) or grade 5 to 1 (group 2). An increase in AFCL (mean of left and right atrial appendage) ≥5 ms after a lesion was regarded as significant. CFAE (n=968) were targeted in 20 patients. AFCL increased after targeting 51±35% of grade 1 CFAE, 30±15% grade 2, 12±5% grade 3, 33±12% grade 4, and 8±15% grade 5 CFAE ( P <0.01 for grades 1, 2, and 4 versus 5; 3 versus 5, not significant). The proportion of lesions causing AFCL prolongation was unaffected by the order in which CFAE were targeted. Conclusions— Targeting CFAE is not simply atrial debulking. Ablating certain grades of CFAE increases AFCL, suggesting they are more important in maintaining AF. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: . Unique identifier: [NCT00894400][1]. [1]: /lookup/external-ref?link_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access_num=NCT00894400&atom=%2Fcircae%2F4%2F5%2F622.atomBackground— Whether ablation of complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAE) modifies atrial fibrillation (AF) by eliminating drivers or atrial debulking remains unknown. This randomized study aimed to determine the effect of ablating different CFAE morphologies compared with normal electrograms (ie, debulking normal tissue) on the cycle length of persistent AF (AFCL). Methods and Results— After pulmonary vein isolation left and right atrial CFAE were targeted, until termination of AF or abolition of CFAE before DC cardioversion. Ten-second electrograms were classified according to a validated scale, with grade 1 being most fractionated and grade 5 normal. Patients were randomly assigned to have CFAE grades eliminated sequentially, from grade 1 to 5 (group 1) or grade 5 to 1 (group 2). An increase in AFCL (mean of left and right atrial appendage) ≥5 ms after a lesion was regarded as significant. CFAE (n=968) were targeted in 20 patients. AFCL increased after targeting 51±35% of grade 1 CFAE, 30±15% grade 2, 12±5% grade 3, 33±12% grade 4, and 8±15% grade 5 CFAE (P<0.01 for grades 1, 2, and 4 versus 5; 3 versus 5, not significant). The proportion of lesions causing AFCL prolongation was unaffected by the order in which CFAE were targeted. Conclusions— Targeting CFAE is not simply atrial debulking. Ablating certain grades of CFAE increases AFCL, suggesting they are more important in maintaining AF. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00894400.

A randomized trial to compare atrial fibrillation ablation using a steerable vs. a non-steerable sheath

AIMS Catheter positioning and stability are recognized challenges in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). This prospective randomized study assessed whether routinely using a steerable sheath affects procedure outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS Fifty-six AF patients were randomized to ablation using either an Agilis NXT (St Jude Medical, St Paul, MN, USA) steerable sheath or a fixed-curve Mullins sheath (Cook Medical Inc., Bloomington, IN, USA) for the ablation catheter. A mapping system with CT integration was used to isolate the pulmonary veins (PVs) in pairs and further ablation performed if AF persisted. There was no significant difference in time to gain trans-septal access, CT registration time, time to isolate PVs, fluoroscopy time for PV isolation, total procedure time, or total fluoroscopy time. A learning curve was seen for the steerable sheath, and after correcting for this, CT registration time and right PV isolation were quicker in this group. One patient crossed over from fixed-curve to steerable. Acute, 3-, and 6-month single procedure success were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION Allowing for the usage learning curve, a steerable sheath reduced time for some elements of AF ablation. Although this did not result in improved success, it may be useful for inexperienced operators, but at increased procedure cost.

Impact of variant pulmonary vein anatomy and image integration on long-term outcome after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.

AIMS To investigate the impact of variant pulmonary vein (PV) anatomy and the use of three-dimensional image integration (3D-II) on long-term efficacy of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS Consecutive procedures from 2002 to 2007 were analysed from a prospective database. All patients underwent wide area circumferential ablation, with linear lesions added and complex fractionated electrograms targeted for persistent AF. Imaging was segmented on Carto to assess PV anatomy. RESULTS Three hundred and fifty patients underwent 1.9 ± 0.9 procedures. The mean age was 57 ± 11 years, 73% males, and 55% paroxysmal AF. Freedom from AF/atrial tachycardia was 42% for paroxysmal AF and 20% for persistent AF at 3.1 years after the first procedure, or 86 and 66%, respectively, at 2.5 years after the last procedure. The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a trend towards improved single-procedure efficacy with 3D-II (8.9% difference, P = 0.087) and a reduction in the number of procedures per patient from 2.1 ± 1.1 to 1.8 ± 0.9 (P < 0.0001). The use of 3D-II improved single-procedure efficacy with Carto (13.3% difference, P = 0.018), but not with Ensite NavX. Variant PV anatomy was identified in 28% and was associated with a lower single-procedure efficacy (10.0% difference, P = 0.024) but with no effect on final outcome. Multivariate analysis confirmed the impact of 3D-II [hazard ratio (HR) for recurrence of AF 0.67, P = 0.020] and variant PV anatomy (HR 1.37, P = 0.044). CONCLUSION The use of 3D-II improves single-procedure efficacy of PV isolation for AF. Variant PV anatomy was associated with a lower single-procedure success rate.

Point-by-Point Radiofrequency Ablation Versus the Cryoballoon or a Novel Combined Approach: A Randomized Trial Comparing 3 Methods of Pulmonary Vein Isolation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation (The Cryo Versus RF Trial).

Catheter ablation of paroxysmal AF using the Cryoballoon (CRYO) has yielded similar success rates to conventional wide encirclement using radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA), but randomized data are lacking. Pilot data suggested a high success rate with a combined approach (COMBINED) using wide encirclement with RFCA followed by 2 CRYO applications to each vein. We compared these 3 strategies in a randomized controlled trial.

Randomized trial comparing robotic to manual ablation for atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) is a physically demanding procedure for the operator, involving radiation exposure, and has limited success rates. Remote robotic navigation (RRN) may offer benefit to the procedure, though only 1 previous small randomized trial has assessed this. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to investigate the impact of RRN on 1-year single-procedure success rates. METHODS RRN was compared to manual ablation in a randomized control trial setting by using an intention-to-treat analysis. RESULTS A total of 157 patients underwent ablation (116/157 (74%) persistent AF; 67/116 (58%) of these long-standing persistent AF). There were no significant differences between the RRN and manual groups with respect to 1-year single-procedure success rates (19/78 (24%) and 26/78 (33%), respectively; P = .29), acute wide area circumferential ablation reconnection rates, complication rates, or procedure times. On multivariable analysis, fluoroscopy times were significantly shorter in the RRN group. The number of catheter displacements during ablation was lower in the RRN group, as was subjectively assessed operator fatigue. The crossover rate from RRN to manual ablation was 11/78 (14%), mainly secondary to technical problems with the RRN system. A learning curve was evident for RRN ablation: the fluoroscopy and procedure times were significantly lower after the first 10 cases in an operators experience. CONCLUSION This randomized trial showed no difference in the success rate for catheter ablation of AF between a RRN and manual approach. The results highlight the learning curve for RRN ablation and suggest that the use of this technology leads to an improvement in fluoroscopy times, catheter stability, and operator fatigue.