Laurent Villeneuve

Prognostic Factors in Prolactin Pituitary Tumors: Clinical, Histological, and Molecular Data from a Series of 94 Patients with a Long Postoperative Follow-Up

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE Predicting pituitary tumor behavior remains a challenge. This multiparameter investigation aimed to identify markers for recurrence and progression in prolactin tumors. DESIGN From a cohort of patients treated for prolactin tumors by surgery, we retrospectively studied clinical data, tumor characteristics, clinical outcome, and the expression of nine genes by quantitative RT-PCR. RESULTS This study included 94 patients (62 females and 32 men), with long postoperative follow-up periods (mean, 138 +/- 46 months); 54.3% of patients had a macro or giant adenoma. Tumors were classified into three pathological groups based on their radiological and histological characteristics (noninvasive, 61; invasive, 22; and aggressive-invasive, 11). Immediately after surgery, 60 patients (63.8%) went into remission (prolactin level normalization). Persistently elevated prolactin levels (36.2%) were associated with increasing age, male sex, high preoperative prolactin levels, large tumor size on univariate analysis, and invasion and pathological classification on univariate and multivariate (P = 8 x 10(-10) and 3 x 10(-8)) analysis. During follow-up, 19 patients (20%) had tumors that recurred or progressed under dopamine agonist treatment. Invasion and pathological classification were associated with recurrence or progression on univariate analysis. Seven genes (ADAMTS6, CRMP1, PTTG, ASK, CCNB1, AURKB, and CENPE) were associated with tumor recurrence or progression and five of these (ADAMTS6, CRMP1, ASK, CCNB1, and CENPE) were associated with the pathological classification. CONCLUSION This study identifies both the clinical and histological factors that relate to prolactin tumor recurrence or progression. Molecular markers give additional information for prognosis of such tumors. Altogether, our results could influence the management of patients with pituitary tumors.

What made hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy an effective curative treatment for peritoneal surface malignancy: A 25‐year experience with 1,125 procedures

To review our 25‐year experience with hyperthermic intra‐peritoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC).

Réseau RENAPE : vers une nouvelle organisation des soins pour le traitement des tumeurs rares du péritoine. Description du réseau et rôle des pathologistes

As part of the national 2009-2013 Cancer Plan, and with the support of the National cancer Institute and the French ministry of health, the National network for the treatment of rare peritoneal malignancies (RENAPE) has been organized. Its main objective is to optimize the framework for the healthcare management and treatment of rare peritoneal malignancies. This specific organization covers the whole national territory including clinical expert and specialized structures and should lead to an appropriate treatment based on expertise and proximity. Within the RENAPE network, the RENA-PATH group gathers the pathologists actively involved in the management of rare peritoneal malignancies. The actions of RENA-PATH are focused primarily on the harmonization of pathological diagnostic criteria, reporting of new cases in the RENAPE registry and histology reviewing.

Mise au pointRéseau RENAPE : vers une nouvelle organisation des soins pour le traitement des tumeurs rares du péritoine. Description du réseau et rôle des pathologistesThe RENAPE network: Towards a new healthcare organization for the treatment of rare tumors of the peritoneum. Description of the network and role of the pathologists

As part of the national 2009-2013 Cancer Plan, and with the support of the National cancer Institute and the French ministry of health, the National network for the treatment of rare peritoneal malignancies (RENAPE) has been organized. Its main objective is to optimize the framework for the healthcare management and treatment of rare peritoneal malignancies. This specific organization covers the whole national territory including clinical expert and specialized structures and should lead to an appropriate treatment based on expertise and proximity. Within the RENAPE network, the RENA-PATH group gathers the pathologists actively involved in the management of rare peritoneal malignancies. The actions of RENA-PATH are focused primarily on the harmonization of pathological diagnostic criteria, reporting of new cases in the RENAPE registry and histology reviewing.

Multicentric initial experience with the use of the pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) in the management of unresectable peritoneal carcinomatosis

BACKGROUND PIPAC is a recent approach for intraperitoneal chemotherapy with promising results for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC). We aimed to evaluate the postoperative outcome of PIPAC in patients with non-resectable PC during our initial experience of the technique. METHODS All patients who underwent PIPAC for non-resectable PC in three centers were analyzed regarding postoperative outcomes. RESULTS Seventy-three patients underwent 164 PIPAC. PC was from colorectal, gastric, ovarian, malignant mesothelioma, pseudomyxoma peritonei or other origins in 20, 26, 13, 8, 1 and 5 patients respectively. Forty-five (62%), 31 (42%), 8 (11%), 6 (8%), 1 (1%) patients underwent a second, third, fourth, fifth, and sixth PIPAC respectively. At the time of the first PIPAC, the median PCI was 17 (1-39), 57 patients presented with symptomatic PC (pain: 33; ascites: 35; transit disorder like diarrhea and constipation: 11). PCI improved in 64.5% of patients, 63.5% of patients presented with complete disappearance of symptoms. Major complications occurred as the outcome of 16 PIPAC (9.7%) and 5 (6.8%) patients died within 30 days of the PIPAC procedure. Rate of mortality and major complications 40% and 62% respectively occurred in first 20 treated patients. For 64 (88%) patients, systemic chemotherapy was associated with PIPAC and could be administered after PIPAC with a median delay of 14 days (2-28). CONCLUSIONS Implementing a PIPAC program in association with systemic chemotherapy is feasible and is associated with a risk of postoperative morbidity, even in teams highly experienced in PC management and requires a learning curve in patient selection.

A Perioperative Clinical Pathway Can Dramatically Reduce Failure-to-rescue Rates After Cytoreductive Surgery for Peritoneal Carcinomatosis: A Retrospective Study of 666 Consecutive Cytoreductions

Objective: To determine whether a perioperative, standardized clinical pathway could impact the failure-to-rescue rate after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) for peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) in a tertiary center. Summary of Background Data: Morbidity and mortality remain significant after CRS for PC. Clinical pathways have been associated with better outcomes after surgery. The failure-to-rescue rate is a useful metric for evaluating quality in surgery. Materials and Methods: This study included 666 patients that received CRS for PC between 2009 and 2014. Starting in 2012, a standardized perioperative clinical pathway was introduced, which focused on patient selection, nutrition, renal protection, pain management, prevention, and early detection of complications. Complications were evaluated with the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. We used multivariate analyses to evaluate clinicopathological and perioperative factors for associations with major complications and failure-to-rescue. Complication rates were compared before and after the clinical pathway implementation. Results: Major complications occurred in 341 patients (51%), leading to 15 deaths. The complication rate was similar before and after clinical pathway introduction (54.75% vs 48.9%, respectively; P = 0.138). Only prolonged surgery (longer than 240 mins) was independently associated with major complications. The failure-to-rescue rate was 4.4% for the entire period, but it significantly decreased after introducing the clinical pathway (9.02% vs 1.02%; P < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, only renal complications were associated with the failure-to-rescue. Conclusion: Morbidity after CRS remains significant, but standardized management facilitated a reduction in the failure-to-rescue rate and improved the quality of care. Specific effort should be dedicated to preventing postoperative renal failure.

Ninety-day post-operative morbidity and mortality using the National Cancer Institute’s common terminology criteria for adverse events better describe post-operative outcome after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy

Abstract Background: The post-operative morbidity and mortality after CRS-HIPEC has been widely evaluated. However, there is a major discrepancy between rates reported due to different metrics and time of analysis used. Objective: To evaluate the legitimacy of 90-day morbidity and mortality based on the National Cancer Institute’s Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) v4.0 classification as criteria of quality for cytoreductive surgery combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC). Methods: A prospective database of all patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC for peritoneal carcinomatosis between 2004 and 2015 was queried for 90-day morbidity and mortality and survival. Results: Among 881 patients, the 90-day major complication rate based on NCI-CTCAE classification and Clavien-Dindo’s classification were 51% (n = 447 patients) and 25% (n = 222 patients), respectively. Among patients who presented with a 90-day complication based on the NCI-CTCAE classification, 50% (n = 225 patients) presented a medical complication not reported by Clavien-Dindo’s classification. After surgery, 24 patients (2.7%) died of post-operative complications, for only 10 (42%) of them the death occurred within 30-day after surgery. Occurrence of major complication based on either NCI-CTCAE classification, Clavien-Dindo’s classification or the medical complication not reported by Clavien-Dindo’s classification all negatively impacts the overall survival. Conclusion: Among commonly reported morbidity’s classification, 90-day morbidity based on NCI-CTCAE classification represents a legitimate metric of CRS-HIPEC quality. Post-operative morbidity after CRS-HIPEC should be reported using 90-day NCI-CTCAE classification.