Peggy Dartigues

Characterization of a Large Panel of Patient-Derived Tumor Xenografts Representing the Clinical Heterogeneity of Human Colorectal Cancer

Purpose: Patient-derived xenograft models are considered to represent the heterogeneity of human cancers and advanced preclinical models. Our consortium joins efforts to extensively develop and characterize a new collection of patient-derived colorectal cancer (CRC) models. Experimental Design: From the 85 unsupervised surgical colorectal samples collection, 54 tumors were successfully xenografted in immunodeficient mice and rats, representing 35 primary tumors, 5 peritoneal carcinoses and 14 metastases. Histologic and molecular characterization of patient tumors, first and late passages on mice includes the sequence of key genes involved in CRC (i.e., APC, KRAS, TP53), aCGH, and transcriptomic analysis. Results: This comprehensive characterization shows that our collection recapitulates the clinical situation about the histopathology and molecular diversity of CRC. Moreover, patient tumors and corresponding models are clustering together allowing comparison studies between clinical and preclinical data. Hence, we conducted pharmacologic monotherapy studies with standard of care for CRC (5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and cetuximab). Through this extensive in vivo analysis, we have shown the loss of human stroma cells after engraftment, observed a metastatic phenotype in some models, and finally compared the molecular profile with the drug sensitivity of each tumor model. Through an experimental cetuximab phase II trial, we confirmed the key role of KRAS mutation in cetuximab resistance. Conclusions: This new collection could bring benefit to evaluate novel targeted therapeutic strategies and to better understand the basis for sensitivity or resistance of tumors from individual patients. Clin Cancer Res; 18(19); 5314–28. ©2012 AACR.

Prognostic similarities and differences in optimally resected liver metastases and peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancers.

PURPOSE To analyze and compare survival in patients operated for colorectal liver metastases (LM) with that in patients optimally resected for peritoneal metastases (PM). PATIENTS AND METHODS This study concerns 287 patients with LM and 119 patients with PM treated with surgery plus chemotherapy between 1993 and 2009, excluding patients presenting both LM and PM. RESULTS Mortality (respectively, 2.7% and 4.2%), morbidity (respectively, 11% and 17%), and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates (respectively, 38.5% and 36.5%) were not statistically different between the LM group and the PM group. Multivariate analysis showed that the extent of the disease was the main prognostic factor, which led us to divide the population into 5 subgroups. The best 5-year OS rate (72.4%) was obtained in patients with minimal peritoneal disease [peritoneal cancer index (PCI) ≤5]. OS was similar for the patients with less than 10 LM and those with a PCI between 6 and 15 (respectively, 39.4% and 38.7%). Five-year OS was lower in patients with more than 10 LM (18.1%), and dramatically low for patients with a PCI > 15 (11.8%). CONCLUSIONS This study underlines the prognostic impact of the tumor burden in metastatic colorectal disease. In selected patients, similar survival rates can be obtained after optimal treatment of LM and PM. As the role of optimal surgical resection of LM is widely accepted, our results confirm that an optimal attitude should also be adopted to treat PM with a PCI < 16, particularly in patients with very low PCI (<5) where survival could be better than LM.

Modified selection criteria for complete cytoreductive surgery plus HIPEC based on peritoneal cancer index and small bowel involvement for peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal origin

BACKGROUND Complete cytoreductive surgery (CCRS) plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is on the verge of becoming the gold standard treatment for selected patients presenting peritoneal metastases (PM) of colorectal origin. PM is scored with the peritoneal cancer index (PCI), which is the main prognostic factor. However, small bowel (SB) involvement could exert an independent prognostic impact. AIM To define an adequate cut-off for the PCI and to appraise whether SB involvement exerts an impact on this cut-off. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients (n = 139) treated with CCRS plus HIPEC were prospectively verified and retrospectively analyzed. One hundred presented with SB involvement of different extents and at different locations. RESULTS All the patients with a PCI ≥ 15 exhibited SB involvement. Five-year overall survival was 48% when the PCI was <15 vs 12% when it was ≥ 15 (p < 0.0001. The multivariate analysis retained two prognostic factors: PCI ≥ 15 (p = 0.02, HR = 1.8), and the involvement of area 12 (lower ileum) (p = 0.001, HR = 3.1). When area 12 was invaded, it significantly worsened the prognosis: 5-year overall survival of patients with a PCI <15 and area 12 involved was 15%, close to that of patients with a PCI ≥ 15 (12%) and far lower than that of patients with a PCI <15 and no area 12 involvement (70%). CONCLUSION A PCI greater than 15 appears to be a relative contraindication for treatment of colorectal PM with CCRS + HIPEC. Involvement of the lower ileum is also a negative prognostic factor to be taken into consideration.

Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma is the most common T-cell lymphoma in two distinct French information data sets

Reliable information regarding the current prevalence of peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) entities is missing. Herein we report on the frequency of PTCL entities in France between 2010 and 2013. Using Lymphopath , a national lymphoma network established by the French National Cancer Agency, which

Réseau RENAPE : vers une nouvelle organisation des soins pour le traitement des tumeurs rares du péritoine. Description du réseau et rôle des pathologistes

As part of the national 2009-2013 Cancer Plan, and with the support of the National cancer Institute and the French ministry of health, the National network for the treatment of rare peritoneal malignancies (RENAPE) has been organized. Its main objective is to optimize the framework for the healthcare management and treatment of rare peritoneal malignancies. This specific organization covers the whole national territory including clinical expert and specialized structures and should lead to an appropriate treatment based on expertise and proximity. Within the RENAPE network, the RENA-PATH group gathers the pathologists actively involved in the management of rare peritoneal malignancies. The actions of RENA-PATH are focused primarily on the harmonization of pathological diagnostic criteria, reporting of new cases in the RENAPE registry and histology reviewing.

Mise au pointRéseau RENAPE : vers une nouvelle organisation des soins pour le traitement des tumeurs rares du péritoine. Description du réseau et rôle des pathologistesThe RENAPE network: Towards a new healthcare organization for the treatment of rare tumors of the peritoneum. Description of the network and role of the pathologists

As part of the national 2009-2013 Cancer Plan, and with the support of the National cancer Institute and the French ministry of health, the National network for the treatment of rare peritoneal malignancies (RENAPE) has been organized. Its main objective is to optimize the framework for the healthcare management and treatment of rare peritoneal malignancies. This specific organization covers the whole national territory including clinical expert and specialized structures and should lead to an appropriate treatment based on expertise and proximity. Within the RENAPE network, the RENA-PATH group gathers the pathologists actively involved in the management of rare peritoneal malignancies. The actions of RENA-PATH are focused primarily on the harmonization of pathological diagnostic criteria, reporting of new cases in the RENAPE registry and histology reviewing.

Central retroperitoneal recurrences from colorectal cancer: Are lymph node and locoregional recurrences the same disease?

BACKGROUND Central retroperitoneal recurrences (CRRs) from colorectal carcinoma carry a poor prognosis. A CRR is sometimes defined as a locoregional recurrence (LR) and sometimes as a lymph node recurrence (NR). This study was conducted to determine the nature of CRR and evaluate prognostic factors after complete CRR resection. METHODS Between January 1988 and December 2008, 31 patients underwent a complete resection of CRR. CRRs were divided into NR (n = 23) and LR (n = 8), whether pathological examination disclosed lymph node involvement or not. RESULTS No differences were found between LR and NR regarding TNM stage, primary tumour location, time interval from primary tumour resection to CRR, number of metastatic sites, number of metastatic lesions and therapeutic management. The median preoperative CEA level was higher in the NR group (p = 0.003). After a median follow-up of 47 months NRs were associated with better overall survival (OS) (p = 0.03). Three-year OS and disease-free survival (DFS) in the LR and NR groups were 27% and 0% versus 81% and 26%, respectively. Twenty-seven (87%) patients developed a re-recurrence within a median interval of 15 months. The number of metastatic sites or lesions, the size of the CRR, the type of chemotherapy, radiotherapy, the interval between the primary resection and CRR and the TNM stage had no impact on OS. CONCLUSION LR in patients with CRR had a poorer prognosis than NR. A multimodality approach with complete resection may yield long-term survival for NR.

Nodular lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin lymphoma: a Lymphoma Study Association retrospective study

Nodular lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin lymphoma represents a distinct entity from classical Hodgkin lymphoma. We conducted a retrospective study to investigate the management of patients with nodular lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin lymphoma. Clinical characteristics, treatment and outcome of adult patients with nodular lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin lymphoma were collected in Lymphoma Study Association centers. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed, and the competing risks formulation of a Cox regression model was used to control the effect of risk factors on relapse or death as competing events. Among 314 evaluable patients, 82.5% had early stage nodular lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin lymphoma. Initial management consisted in watchful waiting (36.3%), radiotherapy (20.1%), rituximab (8.9%), chemotherapy or immuno-chemotherapy (21.7%), combined modality treatment (12.7%), or radiotherapy plus rituximab (0.3%). With a median follow-up of 55.8 months, the 10-year PFS and OS estimates were 44.2% and 94.9%, respectively. The 4-year PFS estimates were 79.6% after radiotherapy, 77.0% after rituximab alone, 78.8% after chemotherapy or immuno-chemotherapy, and 93.9% after combined modality treatment. For the whole population, early treatment with chemotherapy or radiotherapy, but not rituximab alone (Hazard ratio 0.695 [0.320–1.512], P=0.3593) significantly reduced the risk of progression compared to watchful waiting (HR 0.388 [0.234–0.643], P=0.0002). Early treatment appears more beneficial compared to watchful waiting in terms of progression-free survival, but has no impact on overall survival. Radiotherapy in selected early stage nodular lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin lymphoma, and combined modality treatment, chemotherapy or immuno-chemotherapy for other patients, are the main options to treat adult patients with a curative intent.

Mediastinal gray zone lymphoma: clinico-pathological characteristics and outcomes of 99 patients from the Lymphoma Study Association.

Mediastinal gray zone lymphoma, B-cell lymphomas with intermediate features between classical Hodgkin lymphoma and primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma, have not been well described in the literature. We report the clinical characteristics and outcomes of a large retrospective series of 99 cases centrally reviewed by a panel of hematopathologists, with a consensus established for the diagnosis. Cases were defined as classical Hodgkin lymphoma-like morphology (64.6%) with primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma immunophenotype, primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma-like morphology (30.3%) with classical Hodgkin lymphoma or composite (5.1%) (synchronous occurrence of classical Hodgkin lymphoma and primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma). The median age was 32 years (13–83 years); 55% were women. Thirteen of 81 evaluable cases (16%) were Epstein-Barr virus-positive. Twenty-eight percent of patients presented primary refractory disease (progression under first-line treatment or relapse within one year). The 3-year event-free and overall survival rates were 63% and 80%, respectively. Patients treated with a standard regimen (RCHOP/ABVD) had worse event-free survival (P=0.003) and overall survival (P=0.02) than those treated with a dose-intensive chemotherapy (high-dose RCHOP/escalated BEACOPP). Rituximab added to chemotherapy was not associated with better event-free survival (P=0.55) or overall survival (P=0.88). Radiotherapy for patients in complete remission had no impact on event-free survival. In multivariate prognostic analysis, ECOG-PS and anemia were the strongest factors associated with a shorter event-free survival and overall survival, respectively. In conclusion, this report describes the largest series of mediastinal gray zone lymphoma. Our data suggest that a dose-intensive treatment might improve the outcome of this rare and aggressive disease.

The histopathological classification, diagnosis and differential diagnosis of mucinous appendiceal neoplasms, appendiceal adenocarcinomas and pseudomyxoma peritonei

The vermiform appendix is the primary site of several distinctive benign and malignant neoplasms. Some can produce the clinical syndrome of pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP). A consensus on their terminology was reached by an international panel of pathologists and clinicians working under the auspices of the Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI), and this review discusses the application of the PSOGI classification to routine reporting. We discuss diagnosis and differential diagnosis together with implications for patient management, covering low‐grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms, high‐grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms, serrated polyps, adenomas and adenocarcinomas. We do not cover goblet cell tumours or neuroendocrine neoplasms in this paper.