Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Laurie L. Bloomfield is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Laurie L. Bloomfield.


Biology Letters | 2005

Spatial encoding in mountain chickadees: features overshadow geometry

Emily R. Gray; Laurie L. Bloomfield; Anne E. Ferrey; Marcia L. Spetch; Christopher B. Sturdy

Encoding the global geometric shape of an enclosed environment is a principal means of orientation in human and non-human animals. Animals spontaneously encode the geometry of an enclosure even when featural information is available. Although features can be used, they typically do not overshadow geometry. However, all previously tested organisms have been reared in human-made environments with salient geometrical cues. Here, we show that wild-caught mountain chickadees (Poecile gambeli) do not spontaneously encode the geometry of an enclosure when salient features are present near the goal. However, chickadees trained without salient features encode geometric information, but this encoding is overshadowed by features.


Canadian Journal of Zoology | 2005

Note types and coding in parid vocalizations. III: The chick-a-dee call of the Carolina chickadee (Poecile carolinensis)

Laurie L. Bloomfield; Leslie S. Phillmore; Ronald G. Weisman; Christopher B. Sturdy

Species of the genus Poecile Kaup, 1829 (the chickadees) are well suited to comparative studies of acoustic communication because their songs and calls occur in similar contexts and are acousticall...


Animal Cognition | 2009

Comparing black-capped (Poecile atricapillus) and mountain chickadees (Poecile gambeli): use of geometric and featural information in a spatial orientation task

Emily R. Batty; Laurie L. Bloomfield; Marcia L. Spetch; Christopher B. Sturdy

Since Cheng (Cognition 23:149–178, 1986) first proposed the “geometric module” in rats, a great deal of research has focused on how other species use geometric information and how geometric encoding may differ across species. Here, hand-reared and wild-caught black-capped chickadees and wild-caught mountain chickadees searched for food hidden in one corner in a rectangular environment. Previous research has shown that mountain chickadees do not spontaneously encode geometric information when a salient feature is present near the goal location. Using a slightly different training and testing procedure, we found that both hand-reared and wild-caught black-capped chickadees encoded geometric information, even in the presence of a salient landmark. Some, but not all, mountain chickadees also encoded geometric information. Overall, our results suggest that use of geometric information may be a less preferred strategy for mountain chickadees than for either wild-caught or hand-reared black-capped chickadees. To our knowledge, this is the first direct interspecies comparison of use of geometric information in a spatial orientation task.


PLOS ONE | 2011

Neural Correlates of Threat Perception: Neural Equivalence of Conspecific and Heterospecific Mobbing Calls Is Learned

Marc T. Avey; Marisa Hoeschele; Michele K. Moscicki; Laurie L. Bloomfield; Christopher B. Sturdy

Songbird auditory areas (i.e., CMM and NCM) are preferentially activated to playback of conspecific vocalizations relative to heterospecific and arbitrary noise [1]–[2]. Here, we asked if the neural response to auditory stimulation is not simply preferential for conspecific vocalizations but also for the information conveyed by the vocalization. Black-capped chickadees use their chick-a-dee mobbing call to recruit conspecifics and other avian species to mob perched predators [3]. Mobbing calls produced in response to smaller, higher-threat predators contain more “D” notes compared to those produced in response to larger, lower-threat predators and thus convey the degree of threat of predators [4]. We specifically asked whether the neural response varies with the degree of threat conveyed by the mobbing calls of chickadees and whether the neural response is the same for actual predator calls that correspond to the degree of threat of the chickadee mobbing calls. Our results demonstrate that, as degree of threat increases in conspecific chickadee mobbing calls, there is a corresponding increase in immediate early gene (IEG) expression in telencephalic auditory areas. We also demonstrate that as the degree of threat increases for the heterospecific predator, there is a corresponding increase in IEG expression in the auditory areas. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the amount IEG expression between conspecific mobbing calls or heterospecific predator calls that were the same degree of threat. In a second experiment, using hand-reared chickadees without predator experience, we found more IEG expression in response to mobbing calls than corresponding predator calls, indicating that degree of threat is learned. Our results demonstrate that degree of threat corresponds to neural activity in the auditory areas and that threat can be conveyed by different species signals and that these signals must be learned.


Journal of Comparative Psychology | 2006

Statistical Classification of Black-Capped (Poecile Atricapillus) and Mountain Chickadee (Poecile Gambeli) Call Notes

Michael R. W. Dawson; Laurie L. Bloomfield; Isabelle Charrier; Christopher B. Sturdy

Both black-capped (Poecile atricapillus) and mountain chickadees (Poecile gambeli) produce a chick-a-dee call that consists of several distinct note types. In some regions, these 2 species live sympatrically, and it has been shown that 1 species will respond weakly to songs of the other. This suggests that chickadee song, and potentially other of their vocalizations, contains species-specific information. We tested the possibility that call notes were acoustically sufficient for species identification. Black-capped and mountain non-D notes were summarized as a set of 9 features and then analyzed by linear discriminant analysis. Linear discriminant analysis was able to use these notes to identify species with 100% accuracy. We repeated this approach, but with black-capped and mountain D notes that were summarized as a set of 4 features. Linear discriminant analysis was able to use these notes to identify species with 94% accuracy. This demonstrates that any of the note types in these chickadee calls possesses sufficient information for species classification.


PLOS ONE | 2014

ZENK Activation in the Nidopallium of Black-Capped Chickadees in Response to Both Conspecific and Heterospecific Calls

Marc T. Avey; Laurie L. Bloomfield; Julie E. Elie; Todd M. Freeberg; Lauren M. Guillette; Marisa Hoeschele; Homan Lee; Michele K. Moscicki; Christopher B. Sturdy

Neuronal populations in the songbird nidopallium increase in activity the most to conspecific vocalizations relative to heterospecific songbird vocalizations or artificial stimuli such as tones. Here, we tested whether the difference in neural activity between conspecific and heterospecific vocalizations is due to acoustic differences or to the degree of phylogenetic relatedness of the species producing the vocalizations. To compare differences in neural responses of black-capped chickadees, Poecile atricapillus, to playback conditions we used a known marker for neural activity, ZENK, in the caudal medial nidopallium and caudomedial mesopallium. We used the acoustically complex ‘dee’ notes from chick-a-dee calls, and vocalizations from other heterospecific species similar in duration and spectral features. We tested the vocalizations from three heterospecific species (chestnut-backed chickadees, tufted titmice, and zebra finches), the vocalizations from conspecific individuals (black-capped chickadees), and reversed versions of the latter. There were no significant differences in the amount of expression between any of the groups except in the control condition, which resulted in significantly less neuronal activation. Our results suggest that, in certain cases, neuronal activity is not higher in response to conspecific than in response to heterospecific vocalizations for songbirds, but rather is sensitive to the acoustic features of the signal. Both acoustic features of the calls and the phylogenetic relationship between of the signaler and the receiver interact in the response of the nidopallium.


Journal of the Acoustical Society of America | 2011

Note types and coding in Parid vocalizations: the chick-a-dee call of the boreal chickadee (Poecile hudsonicus).

Michele K. Moscicki; Marisa Hoeschele; Laurie L. Bloomfield; Maria Modanu; Isabelle Charrier; Christopher B. Sturdy

An important first step in characterizing a vocalization is to classify, describe, and measure the elements of that vocalization. Here, this methodology is employed to study the chick-a-dee call of the boreal chickadee (Poecile hudsonicus). The note types (A, B, C, D, and D(h)) in a sample of boreal chickadee calls are identified and described, spectral and temporal features of each note type are analyzed, and production phenomena in each note type are identified and quantified. Acoustic variability is compared across note types and individuals to determine potential features used for note-type and individual discrimination. Frequency measures appear to be the most useful features for identifying note types and individuals, though total duration may also be useful. Call syntax reveals that boreal chick-a-dee calls follow a general rule of note-type order, namely A-B-C-D(h)-D, and that any note type in this sequence may be repeated or omitted. This work provides a thorough description of the boreal chickadee chick-a-dee call and will serve as a foundation for future studies aimed at elucidating this calls functional significance within this species, as well as for studies comparing chick-a-dee calls across Poecile species.


Journal of the Acoustical Society of America | 2011

Development of a contact call in black-capped chickadees (Poecile atricapillus) hand-reared in different acoustic environments

Lauren M. Guillette; Laurie L. Bloomfield; Emily R. Batty; Michael R. W. Dawson; Christopher B. Sturdy

The tseet contact call, common to black-capped (Poecile atricapillus) and mountain chickadees (P. gambeli), is the most frequently produced vocalization of each species. Previous work has characterized the tseet call of black-capped and mountain chickadees from different geographic locations in terms of nine acoustic features. In the current study, using similar methods, the tseet call of black-capped chickadees that were hand reared with either conspecifics, heterospecifics (mountain chickadees), or in isolation from adult chickadees are described. Analysis of call features examined which acoustic features were most affected by rearing environment, and revealed that starting frequency and the slope of the descending portion of the tseet call differed between black-capped chickadees reared with either conspecific or heterospecific adults. Birds reared in isolation from adults differed from the other hand-reared groups on almost every acoustic feature. Chickadee tseet calls are more individualized when they are reared with adult conspecifics or heterospecifics compared to chickadees that are reared in isolation from adults. The current results suggest a role of learning in this commonly used contact call.


Journal of the Acoustical Society of America | 2015

What does Da Vinci have to do with it

Laurie L. Bloomfield

It may seem unusual to suggest a relationship between Leonardo Da Vinci (1452–1519) and the study of avian communication, as he is perhaps better known for his attempts at developing a theory of human flight based on the principles of avian flight. His approach, however, was that “from the study of structure comes the knowledge of function.” Here, I present how an understanding of the structure of the various vocalizations produced by chickadees may lend to an understanding of the function of these vocalizations. Chickadees are an excellent model system for this type of research given that they produce various calls that are comprised of individual units that may function in different ways. We have conducted several bioacoustics analyses in the search for similarities and differences among call structures, as well as attempted to delineate the bioacoustical markers that would provide meaningful information to listeners. Further, I will discuss what constitutes human “language” and how the calls of chickadees may satisfy the criteria for a non-human language. With this in mind, we use various field and laboratory techniques in an attempt to understand the structure of vocalizations which may in turn convey information regarding the function of the vocalizations.


Journal of the Acoustical Society of America | 2009

Birds and models: Not as different as you might think.

Christopher B. Sturdy; Michael R. W. Dawson; Lauren M. Guillette; Carly M. Nickerson; Tara M. Farrell; Marisa Hoeschele; Laurie L. Bloomfield; Isabelle Charrier

For some time, the Sturdy laboratory group has been studying chickadee vocal production and perception using a variety of approaches. These include, among others, bioacoustic analyses of vocalizations, operant conditioning studies, and, more recently, artificial neural networks. This multidisciplinary approach has been very fruitful. The addition of artificial neural networks to the standard empirical approaches has significantly enhanced the understanding of songbird behavior and has provided models of bird operant conditioning behavior, perception, and cognition, allowed the investigation of questions that would be difficult to carry out with animal studies, honed research questions and foci, and has inspired further empirical studies. This talk will provide a longitudinal review of these and related research findings capitalizing on this data‐model/model‐data interplay. Topics discussed will include models of bird note type perception, models that have directed the formation of hypotheses about importa...

Collaboration


Dive into the Laurie L. Bloomfield's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge