Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Leah J. Cosgrove is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Leah J. Cosgrove.


Nature | 1998

Crystal structure of the first three domains of the type-1 insulin-like growth factor receptor

Thomas P. J. Garrett; Neil M. McKern; Meizhen Lou; Maurice J. Frenkel; John D. Bentley; George O. Lovrecz; Thomas C. Elleman; Leah J. Cosgrove; Colin W. Ward

The type-1 insulin-like growth-factor receptor (IGF-1R) and insulin receptor (IR) are closely related members of the tyrosine-kinase receptor superfamily. IR is essential for glucose homeostasis, whereas IGF-1R is involved in both normal growth and development and malignant transformation. Homologues of these receptors are found in animals as simple as cnidarians. The epidermal growth-factor receptor (EGFR) family is closely related to the IR family and has significant sequence identity to the extracellular portion we describe here. We now present the structure of the first three domains of IGF-1R (L1–Cys-rich–L2) determined to 2.6 Å resolution. The L domains each consist of asingle-stranded right-handed β-helix. The Cys-rich region is composed of eight disulphide-bonded modules, seven of which form a rod-shaped domain with modules associated in an unusual manner. The three domains surround a central space of sufficient size to accommodate a ligand molecule. Although the fragment (residues 1–462) does not bind ligand, many of the determinants responsible for hormone binding and ligand specificity map to this central site. This structure therefore shows how the IR subfamily might interact with their ligands.


Journal of Nutrigenetics and Nutrigenomics | 2011

Nutrigenetics and nutrigenomics: viewpoints on the current status and applications in nutrition research and practice.

Michael Fenech; Ahmed El-Sohemy; Leah Cahill; Lynnette R. Ferguson; Tapaeru-Ariki C. French; E. Shyong Tai; John A. Milner; Woon-Puay Koh; Lin Xie; Michelle Zucker; Michael Buckley; Leah J. Cosgrove; Trevor Lockett; Kim Y. C. Fung; Richard Head

Nutrigenetics and nutrigenomics hold much promise for providing better nutritional advice to the public generally, genetic subgroups and individuals. Because nutrigenetics and nutrigenomics require a deep understanding of nutrition, genetics and biochemistry and ever new ‘omic’ technologies, it is often difficult, even for educated professionals, to appreciate their relevance to the practice of preventive approaches for optimising health, delaying onset of disease and diminishing its severity. This review discusses (i) the basic concepts, technical terms and technology involved in nutrigenetics and nutrigenomics; (ii) how this emerging knowledge can be applied to optimise health, prevent and treat diseases; (iii) how to read, understand and interpret nutrigenetic and nutrigenomic research results, and (iv) how this knowledge may potentially transform nutrition and dietetic practice, and the implications of such a transformation. This is in effect an up-to-date overview of the various aspects of nutrigenetics and nutrigenomics relevant to health practitioners who are seeking a better understanding of this new frontier in nutrition research and its potential application to dietetic practice.


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2006

The first three domains of the insulin receptor differ structurally from the insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor in the regions governing ligand specificity

Meizhen Lou; Thomas P. J. Garrett; Neil M. McKern; Peter A. Hoyne; V. Chandana Epa; John D. Bentley; George O. Lovrecz; Leah J. Cosgrove; Maurice J. Frenkel; Colin W. Ward

The insulin receptor (IR) and the type-1 insulin-like growth factor receptor (IGF1R) are homologous multidomain proteins that bind insulin and IGF with differing specificity. Here we report the crystal structure of the first three domains (L1–CR–L2) of human IR at 2.3 Å resolution and compare it with the previously determined structure of the corresponding fragment of IGF1R. The most important differences seen between the two receptors are in the two regions governing ligand specificity. The first is at the corner of the ligand-binding surface of the L1 domain, where the side chain of F39 in IR forms part of the ligand binding surface involving the second (central) β-sheet. This is very different to the location of its counterpart in IGF1R, S35, which is not involved in ligand binding. The second major difference is in the sixth module of the CR domain, where IR contains a larger loop that protrudes further into the ligand-binding pocket. This module, which governs IGF1-binding specificity, shows negligible sequence identity, significantly more α-helix, an additional disulfide bond, and opposite electrostatic potential compared to that of the IGF1R.


Molecular and Cellular Biology | 2007

Differential Activation of Insulin Receptor Substrates 1 and 2 by Insulin-Like Growth Factor-Activated Insulin Receptors

Adam Denley; Julie M. Carroll; Gemma V. Brierley; Leah J. Cosgrove; John C. Wallace; Briony E. Forbes; Charles T. Roberts

ABSTRACT The insulin-like growth factors (insulin-like growth factor I [IGF-I] and IGF-II) exert important effects on growth, development, and differentiation through the IGF-I receptor (IGF-IR) transmembrane tyrosine kinase. The insulin receptor (IR) is structurally related to the IGF-IR, and at high concentrations, the IGFs can also activate the IR, in spite of their generally low affinity for the latter. Two mechanisms that facilitate cross talk between the IGF ligands and the IR at physiological concentrations have been described. The first of these is the existence of an alternatively spliced IR variant that exhibits high affinity for IGF-II as well as for insulin. A second phenomenon is the ability of hybrid receptors comprised of IGF-IR and IR hemireceptors to bind IGFs, but not insulin. To date, however, direct activation of an IR holoreceptor by IGF-I at physiological levels has not been demonstrated. We have now found that IGF-I can function through both splice variants of the IR, in spite of low affinity, to specifically activate IRS-2 to levels similar to those seen with equivalent concentrations of insulin or IGF-II. The specific activation of IRS-2 by IGF-I through the IR does not result in activation of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase pathway but does induce delayed low-level activation of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway and biological effects such as enhanced cell viability and protection from apoptosis. These findings suggest that IGF-I can function directly through the IR and that the observed effects of IGF-I on insulin sensitivity may be the result of direct facilitation of insulin action by IGF-I costimulation of the IR in insulin target tissues.


Journal of Proteome Research | 2011

Butyrate-Induced Apoptosis in HCT116 Colorectal Cancer Cells Includes Induction of a Cell Stress Response

Kim Y. C. Fung; Gemma V. Brierley; Steve Henderson; Peter Hoffmann; Trevor Lockett; Richard Head; Leah J. Cosgrove

Short chain fatty acids (SCFA), principally butyrate, propionate, and acetate, are produced in the gut through the fermentation of dietary fiber by the colonic microbiotica. Butyrate in particular is the preferred energy source for the cells in the colonic mucosa and has been demonstrated to induce apoptosis in colorectal cancer cell lines. We have used proteomics, specifically 2D-DIGE and mass spectrometry, to identify proteins involved in butyrate-induced apoptosis in HCT116 cells and also to identify proteins involved in the development of butyrate insensitivity in its derivative, the HCT116-BR cells. The HCT116-BR cell line was characterized as being less responsive to the apoptotic effects of butyrate in comparison to its parent cell line. Our analysis has revealed that butyrate likely induces a cellular stress response in HCT116 cells characterized by p38 MAPK activation and an endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress response, resulting in caspase 3/7 activation and cell death. Adaptive cellular responses to stress-induced apoptosis in HCT116-BR cells may be responsible for the development of resistance to apoptosis in this cell line. We also report for the first time additional cellular processes altered by butyrate, such as heme biosynthesis and dysregulated expression of nuclear lamina proteins, which may be involved in the apoptotic response observed in these cell lines.


Molecular Cancer Therapeutics | 2010

A Human Monoclonal Antibody against Insulin-Like Growth Factor-II Blocks the Growth of Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cell Lines In vitro and In vivo

Daniel T. Dransfield; Edward H. Cohen; Qing Chang; Lindsay G. Sparrow; John D. Bentley; Olan Dolezal; Xiaowen Xiao; Thomas S. Peat; Janet Newman; Patricia A. Pilling; Tram Phan; Ilka Priebe; Gemma V. Brierley; Niksa Kastrapeli; Kris Kopacz; Diana Martik; Dina Wassaf; Douglas Rank; Greg Conley; Yan Huang; Timothy E. Adams; Leah J. Cosgrove

Elevated expression of insulin-like growth factor-II (IGF-II) is frequently observed in a variety of human malignancies, including breast, colon, and liver cancer. As IGF-II can deliver a mitogenic signal through both IGF-IR and an alternately spliced form of the insulin receptor (IR-A), neutralizing the biological activity of this growth factor directly is a potential alternative option to IGF-IR–directed agents. Using a Fab-displaying phage library and a biotinylated precursor form of IGF-II (1–104 amino acids) as a target, we isolated Fabs specific for the E-domain COOH-terminal extension form of IGF-II and for mature IGF-II. One of these Fabs that bound to both forms of IGF-II was reformatted into a full-length IgG, expressed, purified, and subjected to further analysis. This antibody (DX-2647) displayed a very high affinity for IGF-II/IGF-IIE (KD value of 49 and 10 pmol/L, respectively) compared with IGF-I (∼10 nmol/L) and blocked binding of IGF-II to IGF-IR, IR-A, a panel of insulin-like growth factor–binding proteins, and the mannose-6-phosphate receptor. A crystal complex of the parental Fab of DX-2647 bound to IGF-II was resolved to 2.2 Å. DX-2647 inhibited IGF-II and, to a lesser extent, IGF-I–induced receptor tyrosine phosphorylation, cellular proliferation, and both anchorage-dependent and anchorage-independent colony formation in various cell lines. In addition, DX-2647 slowed tumor progression in the Hep3B xenograft model, causing decreased tumoral CD31 staining as well as reduced IGF-IIE and IGF-IR phosphorylation levels. Therefore, DX-2647 offers an alternative approach to targeting IGF-IR, blocking IGF-II signaling through both IGF-IR and IR-A. Mol Cancer Ther; 9(6); 1809–19. ©2010 AACR.


Journal of Biological Chemistry | 2008

An Investigation of the Ligand Binding Properties and Negative Cooperativity of Soluble Insulin-like Growth Factor Receptors

Katharina H. Surinya; Briony E. Forbes; Filomena Occhiodoro; Grant W. Booker; Geoffrey L. Francis; Kenneth Siddle; John C. Wallace; Leah J. Cosgrove

To investigate the interaction of the insulin-like growth factor (IGF) ligands with the insulin-like growth factor type 1 receptor (IGF-1R), we have generated two soluble variants of the IGF-1R. We have recombinantly expressed the ectodomain of IGF-1R or fused this domain to the constant domain from the Fc fragment of mouse immunoglobulin. The ligand binding properties of these soluble IGF-1Rs for IGF-I and IGF-II were investigated using conventional ligand competition assays and BIAcore biosensor technology. In ligand competition assays, the soluble IGF-1Rs both bound IGF-I with similar affinities and a 5-fold lower affinity than that seen for the wild type receptor. In addition, both soluble receptors bound IGF-II with similar affinities to the wild type receptor. BIAcore analyses showed that both soluble IGF-1Rs exhibited similar ligand-specific association and dissociation rates for IGF-I and for IGF-II. The soluble IGF-1R proteins both exhibited negative cooperativity for IGF-I, IGF-II, and the 24-60 antibody, which binds to the IGF-1R cysteine-rich domain. We conclude that the addition of the self-associating Fc domain to the IGF-1R ectodomain does not affect ligand binding affinity, which is in contrast to the soluble ectodomain of the IR. This study highlights some significant differences in ligand binding modes between the IGF-1R and the insulin receptor, which may ultimately contribute to the different biological activities conferred by the two receptors.


FEBS Letters | 2000

High affinity insulin binding by soluble insulin receptor extracellular domain fused to a leucine zipper

Peter A. Hoyne; Leah J. Cosgrove; Neil M. McKern; John D. Bentley; Neva Ivancic; Thomas C. Elleman; Colin W. Ward

Insulin receptors (IRs) that are truncated at the end of the ectodomain form dimers that bind insulin with different characteristics to wild type receptors. These soluble IRs have lowered affinity for insulin compared with full‐length IR, and exhibit linear Scatchard plots in contrast to the curvilinear plots obtained with full‐length IR, IR truncated at the C‐terminus of the transmembrane region and IR ectodomains fused to the self‐associating constant domains from Fc or λ immunoglobulins. In this report, we have fused the IR ectodomain to the 33 residue leucine zipper from the transcriptional activator GCN4 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. This fusion protein binds insulin with high affinity in a manner comparable to native receptor. The respective dissociation constants were K d1 8.2×10−11 M and K d2 1.6×10−8 M for hIRedZip and K d1 5.7×10−11 M and K d2 6.3×10−9 M for membrane‐anchored, native receptor.


PLOS ONE | 2015

Blood-Based Protein Biomarker Panel for the Detection of Colorectal Cancer

Kim Y. C. Fung; Bruce Tabor; Michael Buckley; Ilka Priebe; Leanne Purins; Celine Pompeia; Gemma V. Brierley; Trevor Lockett; Peter Gibbs; Jeanne Tie; Paul McMurrick; James Moore; Andrew Ruszkiewicz; Edouard C. Nice; Timothy E. Adams; Antony W. Burgess; Leah J. Cosgrove

Background The majority of colorectal cancer (CRC) cases are preventable by early detection and removal of precancerous polyps. Even though CRC is the second most common internal cancer in Australia, only 30 per cent of the population considered to have risk factors participate in stool-based test screening programs. Evidence indicates a robust, blood-based, diagnostic assay would increase screening compliance. A number of potential diagnostic blood-based protein biomarkers for CRC have been reported, but all lack sensitivity or specificity for use as a stand-alone diagnostic. The aim of this study was to identify and validate a panel of protein-based biomarkers in independent cohorts that could be translated to a reliable, non-invasive blood-based screening test. Principal Findings In two independent cohorts (n = 145 and n = 197), we evaluated seven single biomarkers in serum of CRC patients and age/gender matched controls that showed a significant difference between controls and CRC, but individually lack the sensitivity for diagnostic application. Using logistic regression strategies, we identified a panel of three biomarkers that discriminated between controls and CRC with 73% sensitivity at 95% specificity, when applied to either of the two cohorts. This panel comprised of Insulin like growth factor binding protein 2 (IGFBP2), Dickkopf-3 (DKK3), and Pyruvate kinase M2(PKM2). Conclusions Due to the heterogeneous nature of CRC, a single biomarker is unlikely to have sufficient sensitivity or specificity for use as a stand-alone diagnostic screening test and a panel of markers may be more effective. We have identified a 3 biomarker panel that has higher sensitivity and specificity for early stage (Stage I and -II) disease than the faecal occult blood test, raising the possibility for its use as a non-invasive blood diagnostic or screening test.


Journal of Biological Chemistry | 2013

Biochemical Characterization of Individual Human Glycosylated pro-Insulin-like Growth Factor (IGF)-II and big-IGF-II Isoforms Associated with Cancer

Sameer A. Greenall; John D. Bentley; Lesley A. Pearce; Judith A. Scoble; Lindsay G. Sparrow; Nicola A. Bartone; Xiaowen Xiao; Robert C. Baxter; Leah J. Cosgrove; Timothy E. Adams

Background: Aberrant processing of the pro-IGF-II transcript produces pro- and big-IGF-II, which are secreted in a range of cancers. Results: These induce potent receptor activation and cell proliferation and retard ternary complex formation with ALS and IGFBP-3 and -5. Conclusion: They elicit unique biological responses that can be completely different from IGF-II. Significance: Understanding the effects induced by these individual isoforms is crucial to elucidate their role in tumorigenesis. Insulin-like growth factor II (IGF-II) is a major embryonic growth factor belonging to the insulin-like growth factor family, which includes insulin and IGF-I. Its expression in humans is tightly controlled by maternal imprinting, a genetic restraint that is lost in many cancers, resulting in up-regulation of both mature IGF-II mRNA and protein expression. Additionally, increased expression of several longer isoforms of IGF-II, termed “pro” and “big” IGF-II, has been observed. To date, it is ambiguous as to what role these IGF-II isoforms have in initiating and sustaining tumorigenesis and whether they are bioavailable. We have expressed each individual IGF-II isoform in their proper O-glycosylated format and established that all bind to the IGF-I receptor and both insulin receptors A and B, resulting in their activation and subsequent stimulation of fibroblast proliferation. We also confirmed that all isoforms are able to be sequestered into binary complexes with several IGF-binding proteins (IGFBP-2, IGFBP-3, and IGFBP-5). In contrast to this, ternary complex formation with IGFBP-3 or IGFBP-5 and the auxillary protein, acid labile subunit, was severely diminished. Furthermore, big-IGF-II isoforms bound much more weakly to purified ectodomain of the natural IGF-II scavenging receptor, IGF-IIR. IGF-II isoforms thus possess unique biological properties that may enable them to escape normal sequestration avenues and remain bioavailable in vivo to sustain oncogenic signaling.

Collaboration


Dive into the Leah J. Cosgrove's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Trevor Lockett

Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kim Y. C. Fung

Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gemma V. Brierley

Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Richard Head

Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ilka Priebe

Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John D. Bentley

Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Andrew Ruszkiewicz

Institute of Medical and Veterinary Science

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Colin W. Ward

Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge