Leah S. Cohen

Tau-induced neurodegeneration: mechanisms and targets

The accumulation of hyperphosphorylated tau is a common feature of several dementias. Tau is one of the brain microtubule-associated proteins. Here we discuss tau’s functions in microtubule assembly and stabilization and with regard to its interactions with other proteins. We describe and analyze important post-translational modifications: hyperphosphorylation, ubiquitination, glycation, glycosylation, nitration, polyamination, proteolysis, acetylation, and methylation. We discuss how these post-translational modifications can alter tau’s biological function. We analyze the role of mitochondrial health in neurodegeneration. We propose that microtubules could be a therapeutic target and review different approaches. Finally, we consider whether tau accumulation or its conformational change is related to tau-induced neurodegeneration, and propose a mechanism of neurodegeneration.

Structure of a Double Transmembrane Fragment of a G-Protein-Coupled Receptor in Micelles

The structure and dynamic properties of an 80-residue fragment of Ste2p, the G-protein-coupled receptor for alpha-factor of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, was studied in LPPG micelles with the use of solution NMR spectroscopy. The fragment Ste2p(G31-T110) (TM1-TM2) consisted of 19 residues from the N-terminal domain, the first TM helix (TM1), the first cytoplasmic loop, the second TM helix (TM2), and seven residues from the first extracellular loop. Multidimensional NMR experiments on [(15)N], [(15)N, (13)C], [(15)N, (13)C, (2)H]-labeled TM1-TM2 and on protein fragments selectively labeled at specific amino acid residues or protonated at selected methyl groups resulted in >95% assignment of backbone and side-chain nuclei. The NMR investigation revealed the secondary structure of specific residues of TM1-TM2. TALOS constraints and NOE connectivities were used to calculate a structure for TM1-TM2 that was highlighted by the presence of three alpha-helices encompassing residues 39-47, 49-72, and 80-103, with higher flexibility around the internal Arg(58) site of TM1. RMSD values of individually superimposed helical segments 39-47, 49-72, and 80-103 were 0.25 +/- 0.10 A, 0.40 +/- 0.13 A, and 0.57 +/- 0.19 A, respectively. Several long-range interhelical connectivities supported the folding of TM1-TM2 into a tertiary structure typified by a crossed helix that splays apart toward the extracellular regions and contains considerable flexibility in the G(56)VRSG(60) region. (15)N-relaxation and hydrogen-deuterium exchange data support a stable fold for the TM parts of TM1-TM2, whereas the solvent-exposed segments are more flexible. The NMR structure is consistent with the results of biochemical experiments that identified the ligand-binding site within this region of the receptor.

Expression and biophysical analysis of two double-transmembrane domain-containing fragments from a yeast G protein-coupled receptor.

Structural characterization of G protein‐coupled receptors (GPCRs) is hindered by the inherent hydrophobicity, flexibility, and large size of these signaling proteins. Insights into conformational preferences and the three‐dimensional (3D) structure of domains of these receptors can be obtained using polypeptide fragments of these proteins. Herein, we report the expression, purification, and biophysical characterization of a three‐transmembrane domain‐containing 131‐residue fragment of the yeast α‐factor receptor, Ste2p. Ste2p TM1–TM3 (G31–R161) was expressed as a TrpΔLE fusion protein in Escherichia coli. The expressed protein was subject to CNBr cleavage to remove the fusion tag and TM1–TM3 was purified by reverse‐phased HPLC. The cleavage product was isolated in yields of up to 20 mg per liter of culture in both unlabeled and uniformly [15N]‐labeled and [15N, 13C, 2H]‐labeled forms. The secondary structure of TM1–TM3 was determined to be helical in a number of membrane mimetic environments, including 2,2,2‐trifluoroethanol (TFE):water and lysomyristoylphosphatidylglycerol (LMPG) detergent micelles by circular dichroism. Preliminary HSQC analysis in 50% TFE:water and LMPG micelles prepared in sodium phosphate and 4‐(2‐hydroxyethyl)‐1‐piperazine ethanesulfonic acid (HEPES) buffers revealed that this fragment is suitable for structural analysis by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). Complete backbone assignments and a detailed localization of the secondary structural elements of TM1–TM3 in 50% TFE:water have been achieved.

Molecular mechanism of prion-like tau-induced neurodegeneration

Accumulation of hyperphosphorylated tau and the disruption of microtubules are correlated with synaptic loss and pathology of Alzheimers disease (AD). Impaired cognitive function and pathology of AD is correlated with this lesion. This review looks at the mechanism of neurodegeneration, the prion‐like behavior of tau in its interaction with normal MAPs in correlation with tau hyperphosphorylation.

Synthesis of a Double Transmembrane Domain Fragment of Ste2p by Native Chemical Ligation

Native chemical ligation (NCL) approaches have been applied extensively to soluble proteins. Fewer successes have been achieved with membrane peptides. In this report, the synthesis and semisynthesis by NCL of peptides corresponding to 1.7 transmembrane domains of the α-factor receptor from Saccharomyces cerevisiae is described. Synthesis was achieved when the ligation point was approximately in the middle of the loop joining the two transmembrane regions. In contrast, little to no ligation was observed when the ligation point was at the putative membrane interface of the sixth transmembrane domain (TM6) and the third extracellular loop (EL3). Ligations of a chemically synthesized 22-residue thioester with a synthetic 29-residue N-Cys peptide and a biosynthetic 73-residue N-Cys peptide were successfully achieved in both trifluoroethanol/guanidinium hydrochloride (TFE/GnHCl) and sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) media when mercaptoethanesulfonic acid (MESNA) was used as a catalyst. The resulting 51-residue and 95-residue ligation products were purified by reversed phase HPLC and recovered on a mg scale. Both peptides were >95% pure as determined by HPLC and had the expected molecular weight as judged by mass spectrometry. Segmental labeling of the 95-residue fragment, in which the N-Cys portion was [15N] labeled, resulted in a peptide that gave an NMR spectrum which was comparable to that of the unligated 73-residue peptide alone.

Regulation of protein kinase C isozymes during early postnatal hippocampal development

During neonatal hippocampal development, serotonin 1A receptor-mediated signaling initially employs PKCepsilon to boost neuronal proliferation and then uses PKCalpha to promote synaptogenesis. Such stage-specific involvement of a PKC isozyme could be determined by its relative expression level. In mouse hippocampi, we detected relatively low levels of alpha, beta, gamma, and delta isozymes at postnatal days 2-6 (P2-6), which was followed by a large increase in their expression. In contrast, the PKC isozymes epsilon and theta were relatively abundant at P6, following which they underwent a further increase by P15. Comparison with purified proteins confirmed that the PKCepsilon levels at P6 and P15 were respectively 1.75 and 7.36 ng per 60 microg of protein, whereas PKCalpha levels at P6 and P15 were respectively 160 pg and 1.186 ng per 60 microg of protein. Therefore, at P6, PKCepsilon was about 11-fold more abundant than PKCalpha. Consequently, signaling cascades could use the relatively abundant PKCepsilon (and possibly PKCtheta) molecules for early events at P2-6 (e.g. neurogenesis), following which PKCalpha (and the beta, gamma, or delta isozymes) could guide maturation or apoptosis. Notably, at P6 but not P15, PKCepsilon, was localized to the nuclei of neuroblasts, probably directing mitosis. In contrast, at P15 but not P6, PKCalpha was highly expressed in the processes of the differentiated hippocampal neurons. In summary, PKC isozymes follow differential profiles of expression in neonatal hippocampus and the relative abundance of each may determine its mode and stage of involvement in hippocampal development.

Comparative NMR analysis of an 80-residue G protein-coupled receptor fragment in two membrane mimetic environments.

Fragments of integral membrane proteins have been used to study the physical chemical properties of regions of transporters and receptors. Ste2p(G31-T110) is an 80-residue polypeptide which contains a portion of the N-terminal domain, transmembrane domain 1 (TM1), intracellular loop 1, TM2 and part of extracellular loop 1 of the α-factor receptor (Ste2p) from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The structure of this peptide was previously determined to form a helical hairpin in lyso-palmitoylphosphatidyl-glycerol micelles (LPPG) [1]. Herein, we perform a systematic comparison of the structure of this protein fragment in micelles and trifluoroethanol (TFE):water in order to understand whether spectra recorded in organic:aqueous medium can facilitate the structure determination in a micellar environment. Using uniformly labeled peptide and peptide selectively protonated on Ile, Val and Leu methyl groups in a perdeuterated background and a broad set of 3D NMR experiments we assigned 89% of the observable atoms. NOEs and chemical shift analysis were used to define the helical regions of the fragment. Together with constraints from paramagnetic spin labeling, NOEs were used to calculate a transiently folded helical hairpin structure for this peptide in TFE:water. Correlation of chemical shifts was insufficient to transfer assignments from TFE:water to LPPG spectra in the absence of further information.

Selective labeling of a membrane peptide with 15N-amino acids using cells grown in rich medium

Nuclear magnetic resonance spectra of membrane proteins containing multiple transmembrane helices have proven difficult to resolve due to the redundancy of aliphatic and Ser/Thr residues in transmembrane domains and the low chemical shift dispersity exhibited by residues in α‐helical structures. Although 13C‐ and 15N‐labeling are useful tools in the biophysical analysis of proteins, selective labeling of individual amino acids has been used to help elucidate more complete structures and to probe ligand–protein interactions. In general, selective labeling has been performed in Escherichia coli expression systems using minimal media supplemented with a single labeled amino acid and nineteen other unlabeled amino acids and/or by using auxotrophs for specific amino acids. Growth in minimal media often results in low yields of cells or expression products. We demonstrate a method in which one labeled amino acid is added to a rich medium. These conditions resulted in high expression (≥100 mg/L) of a test fusion protein and milligram quantities of the selectively labeled membrane peptide after cyanogen bromide cleavage to release the peptide from the fusion protein. High levels of 15N incorporation and acceptable levels of cross‐labeling into other amino acid residues of the peptide were achieved. Growth in rich media is a simple and convenient alternative to growth in supplemented minimal media and is readily applicable to the expression of proteins selectively labeled with specific amino acids.

Biosynthesis of peptide fragments of eukaryotic GPCRs in Escherichia coli by directing expression into inclusion bodies

Biosynthesis of peptides in heterologous systems is often a prerequisite to biophysical analyses. Large amounts of peptides, in particular portions of membrane proteins, are needed to optimize conditions for secondary and tertiary structure analysis. Chemical synthesis of these peptides is limited by their high hydrophobicity and also due to the need to incorporate isotopic labels for high resolution NMR analysis. In this protocol, we describe a method for the heterologous expression and purification of unlabeled and isotopically labeled peptide fragments of Ste2p, an integral membrane G protein‐coupled receptor. Copyright

Invited review GPCR structural characterization: Using fragments as building blocks to determine a complete structure

The structural characterization of G protein‐coupled receptors has surged since the development of methodologies to facilitate the crystallization of these highly helical, seven transmembrane, integral membrane receptors. In the past seven years, eighteen GPCR structures were determined by X‐ray crystallography. The crystal structures represent a static picture of these conformationally flexible signal transducers. Analyses that probe their dynamics and conformational changes require other techniques, in particular solution state nuclear magnetic resonance studies. Such investigations are challenged by the size of GPCRs, their α‐helical structure, which limits resonance dispersion, their tendencies to aggregate in micellar preparations and their conformational heterogeneity. For many years, groups have been studying GPCR fragments as a means to overcome some of these difficulties. The results of these fragment analyses are presented here. Review of the literature reveals that much of the original work depended on circular dichroism, infra‐red spectroscopy and fluorescence approaches. High resolution structures obtained by NMR are compared, where applicable, to the available crystal structures. In most cases, the work done on fragments by biophysical analysis is validated by these comparisons. Our perspective on the field of GPCR fragment analysis is presented together with the future goals that must be considered if work with fragments is continued.