Lee A. Albacker
Foundation Medicine
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Lee A. Albacker.
Cancer Research | 2017
Ryan J. Hartmaier; Lee A. Albacker; Juliann Chmielecki; Mark Bailey; Jie He; Michael E. Goldberg; Shakti Ramkissoon; James Suh; Julia A. Elvin; Samuel Chiacchia; Garrett Michael Frampton; Jeffrey S. Ross; Vincent A. Miller; Philip J. Stephens; Doron Lipson
Genomic profiling is widely predicted to become a standard of care in clinical oncology, but more effective data sharing to accelerate progress in precision medicine will be required. Here, we describe cancer-associated genomic profiles from 18,004 unique adult cancers. The dataset was composed of 162 tumor subtypes including multiple rare and uncommon tumors. Comparison of alteration frequencies to The Cancer Genome Atlas identified some differences and suggested an enrichment of treatment-refractory samples in breast and lung cancer cohorts. To illustrate novelty within the dataset, we surveyed the genomic landscape of rare diseases and identified an increased frequency of NOTCH1 alterations in adenoid cystic carcinomas compared with previous studies. Analysis of tumor suppressor gene patterns revealed disease specificity for certain genes but broad inactivation of others. We identified multiple potentially druggable, novel and known kinase fusions in diseases beyond those in which they are currently recognized. Analysis of variants of unknown significance identified an enrichment of SMAD4 alterations in colon cancer and other rare alterations predicted to have functional impact. Analysis of established, clinically relevant alterations highlighted the spectrum of molecular changes for which testing is currently recommended, as well as opportunities for expansion of indications for use of approved targeted therapies. Overall, this dataset presents a new resource with which to investigate rare alterations and diseases, validate clinical relevance, and identify novel therapeutic targets. Cancer Res; 77(9); 2464-75. ©2017 AACR.
Genome Medicine | 2017
Ryan J. Hartmaier; Jehad Charo; David Fabrizio; Michael E. Goldberg; Lee A. Albacker; W. Pao; Juliann Chmielecki
BackgroundThe integration of genomics with immunotherapy has potential value for cancer vaccine development. Given the clinical successes of immune checkpoint modulators, interest in cancer vaccines as therapeutic options has been revived. Current data suggest that each tumor contains a unique set of mutations (mutanome), thus requiring the creation of individualized cancer vaccines. However, rigorous analysis of non-individualized cancer immunotherapy approaches across multiple cancer types and in the context of known driver alterations has yet to be reported. We therefore set out to determine the feasibility of a generalizable cancer vaccine strategy based on targeting multiple neoantigens in an HLA-A/B subtype-directed manner.MethodsA cancer gene-focused, hybrid capture-based genomic analysis was performed on 63,220 unique tumors. Neoantigens were predicted using a combined peptide processing and MHC-I binding prediction tool (IEDB) for all recurrent (>10 tumors) missense alterations and non-frameshift indels for the two most common HLA-A/B subtypes in North American/European populations.ResultsDespite being overwhelmingly unique overall, many mutanomes (~45%) contain at least one mutation from a set of ten mutations chosen to maximize the number of unique tumors. This held true for tumors driven by KRAS G12C (n = 1799), PIK3CA E545K (n = 1713), or EGFR L858R (n = 478) alterations, which define distinct sample subsets. We therefore hypothesized that sets of carefully selected mutations/neoantigens may allow the development of broadly applicable semi-universal cancer vaccines. To test the feasibility of such an approach, antigen processing and MHC-I binding prediction was applied for HLA subtypes A*01:01/B*08:01 and A*02:01/B*44:02. In tumors with a specific HLA type, 0.7 and 2.5% harbored at least one of a set of ten neoantigens predicted to bind to each subtype, respectively. In comparison, KRAS G12C-driven tumors produced similar results (0.8 and 2.6% for each HLA subtype, respectively), indicating that neoantigen targets still remain highly diverse even within the context of major driver mutations.ConclusionsThis “best case scenario” analysis of a large tumor set across multiple cancer types and in the context of driver alterations reveals that semi-universal, HLA-specific cancer vaccine strategies will be relevant to only a small subset of the general population. Similar analysis of whole exome/genome sequencing, although not currently feasible at scale in a clinical setting, will likely uncover further diversity.
Cancer Discovery | 2018
Ferdinandos Skoulidis; Michael E. Goldberg; Danielle Greenawalt; Matthew D. Hellmann; Mark M. Awad; Justin F. Gainor; Alexa B. Schrock; Ryan J. Hartmaier; Sally E. Trabucco; Siraj M. Ali; Julia A. Elvin; Gaurav Singal; Jeffrey S. Ross; David Fabrizio; Peter Szabo; Han Chang; Ariella Sasson; Sujaya Srinivasan; Stefan Kirov; Joseph D. Szustakowski; Patrik Vitazka; Robin Edwards; Jose A. Bufill; Neelesh Sharma; Sai-Hong Ignatius Ou; Nir Peled; David R. Spigel; Hira Rizvi; Elizabeth Jimenez Aguilar; Brett W. Carter
KRAS is the most common oncogenic driver in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAC). We previously reported that STK11/LKB1 (KL) or TP53 (KP) comutations define distinct subgroups of KRAS-mutant LUAC. Here, we examine the efficacy of PD-1 inhibitors in these subgroups. Objective response rates to PD-1 blockade differed significantly among KL (7.4%), KP (35.7%), and K-only (28.6%) subgroups (P < 0.001) in the Stand Up To Cancer (SU2C) cohort (174 patients) with KRAS-mutant LUAC and in patients treated with nivolumab in the CheckMate-057 phase III trial (0% vs. 57.1% vs. 18.2%; P = 0.047). In the SU2C cohort, KL LUAC exhibited shorter progression-free (P < 0.001) and overall (P = 0.0015) survival compared with KRASMUT;STK11/LKB1WT LUAC. Among 924 LUACs, STK11/LKB1 alterations were the only marker significantly associated with PD-L1 negativity in TMBIntermediate/High LUAC. The impact of STK11/LKB1 alterations on clinical outcomes with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors extended to PD-L1-positive non-small cell lung cancer. In Kras-mutant murine LUAC models, Stk11/Lkb1 loss promoted PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor resistance, suggesting a causal role. Our results identify STK11/LKB1 alterations as a major driver of primary resistance to PD-1 blockade in KRAS-mutant LUAC.Significance: This work identifies STK11/LKB1 alterations as the most prevalent genomic driver of primary resistance to PD-1 axis inhibitors in KRAS-mutant lung adenocarcinoma. Genomic profiling may enhance the predictive utility of PD-L1 expression and tumor mutation burden and facilitate establishment of personalized combination immunotherapy approaches for genomically defined LUAC subsets. Cancer Discov; 8(7); 822-35. ©2018 AACR.See related commentary by Etxeberria et al., p. 794This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 781.
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer | 2017
Victoria Wang; Anatoly Urisman; Lee A. Albacker; Siraj M. Ali; Vincent A. Miller; Rahul Aggarwal; David M. Jablons
BackgroundLarge cell neuroendocrine tumor (LCNEC) of the lung is a rare and aggressive tumor similar to small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Thus, it is often treated similarly to SCLC in the front-line setting with a platinum doublet. However, treatment for patients beyond the first line remains undefined.Case presentationWe report the case of a patient with stage IB LCNEC (PD-L1 negative but positive for PD-L1 amplification and tumor mutation burden high) who progressed after adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery and subsequent therapy with an antibody drug conjugate targeting a neuroendocrine-specific cell surface marker but achieved a significant and durable response with pembrolizumab, a humanized IgG4 monoclonal anti-PD-1 antibody.ConclusionsImmunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors is an effective treatment option for patients with metastatic LCNEC, even if PD-L1 expression is negative.
Cancer Research | 2016
Scott A. Foster; Daniel M. Whalen; Ayşegül Özen; Matt Wongchenko; JianPing Yin; Ivana Yen; Gabriele Schaefer; John Mayfield; Juliann Chmielecki; Phil Stephens; Lee A. Albacker; Yibing Yan; Kyung Song; Georgia Hatzivassiliou; Charles Eigenbrot; Christine Yu; Andrey S. Shaw; Gerard Manning; Nicholas J. Skelton; Sarah G. Hymowitz; Shiva Malek
Kinase domain mutations are frequent drivers of many different types of cancer. While the effect of hotspot point mutations (such as BRAF V600E or EGFR L858R) is well described, the mechanism of deletion mutations, such as the recurrent EGFR exon 19 deletions is not fully understood. In this work, we have discovered and characterized analogous deletions in BRAF mutant patient samples of varying tumor types, with the highest frequency (15 patients) in pancreatic cancer representing ∼5% of KRAS wildtype patients in this data set. In addition, we have identified additional patients (3) with similar deletions in HER2 that have been previously reported at low frequency in breast cancer. The crystal structure of the most frequent BRAF deletion, molecular modeling of lower frequency BRAF deletions, and extensive molecular modeling in conjunction with molecular dynamic simulations of the most frequent EGFR deletion highlight the commonality of the mechanism of activation of this class of oncogenic alterations. These deletions truncate the loop between the β3 strand and αC-helix (β3-αC loop) of the kinase domain, forcing αC into the active (“in”) conformation, and constitutively activating these kinases. Similar to BRAF V600E mutations, constitutive activity of these BRAF β3-αC deletions is CRAF-independent and dimer-independent. Because these deletions genetically restrict the flexibility of this region of the kinase domain, they render these kinases resistant to inhibitors such as vemurafenib (for BRAF) or lapatinib (for EGFR and HER2) that bind in the αC “out” conformation. Functional characterization of the full spectrum of deletion lengths explains the high prevalence of 5 amino acid deletions in BRAF, EGFR, and HER2 in various cancers, with deletions of this length resulting in the strongest activation of kinase activity likely due to the optimal positioning of αC. This work exploits the selective power of oncogenic mutations to highlight a conserved mechanism of kinase activation and underscores the importance of conformation-specific kinase inhibitors to target mutationally activated kinases in cancer. Citation Format: Scott Foster, Dan Whalen, Aysegul Ozen, Matt Wongchenko, JianPing Yin, Ivana Yen, Gabriele Schaefer, John Mayfield, Juliann Chmielecki, Phil Stephens, Lee Albacker, Yibing Yan, Kyung Song, Georgia Hatzivassiliou, Charles Eigenbrot, Christine Yu, Andrey Shaw, Gerard Manning, Nicholas Skelton, Sarah Hymowitz, Shiva Malek. Activation mechanism of oncogenic C-helix shifting mutations in BRAF, EGFR, and HER2. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 4374.
Cancer Cell | 2016
Scott A. Foster; Daniel M. Whalen; Ayşegül Özen; Matthew Wongchenko; JianPing Yin; Ivana Yen; Gabriele Schaefer; John Mayfield; Juliann Chmielecki; Philip J. Stephens; Lee A. Albacker; Yibing Yan; Kyung Song; Georgia Hatzivassiliou; Charles Eigenbrot; Christine Yu; Andrey S. Shaw; Gerard Manning; Nicholas J. Skelton; Sarah G. Hymowitz; Shiva Malek
Lung Cancer | 2017
Sai-Hong Ignatius Ou; Jean Cui; Alexa B. Schrock; Michael E. Goldberg; Viola W. Zhu; Lee A. Albacker; Philip J. Stephens; Vincent A. Miller; Siraj M. Ali
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2018
David Fabrizio; Garrett Michael Frampton; Lee A. Albacker; Ethan Sokol; Julia A. Elvin; Jo-Anne Vergilio; James Suh; Shakti Ramkissoon; Eric Allan Severson; Sugganth Daniel; Siraj M. Ali; Jon Chung; Alexa B. Schrock; Vincent A. Miller; Jeffrey J. Pu; Robert John Corona; Gennady Bratslavsky; Jeffrey S. Ross
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2018
Jeffrey S. Ross; Ethan Sokol; Julia A. Elvin; Jo-Anne Vergilio; James Suh; Shakti Ramkissoon; Sugganth Daniel; Eric Allan Severson; Jonathan Keith Killian; Siraj M. Ali; Alexa B. Schrock; Jon Chung; Garrett Michael Frampton; Lee A. Albacker; Robert John Corona; Michael D Mix; Anna Shapiro; Gennady Bratslavsky; Vincent A. Miller
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2018
Lee A. Albacker; Dean Pavlick; Jeffrey S. Ross; Glenn J. Lesser; Robert John Corona; Howard Colman; Morris D. Groves; Sigmund Hsu; Andrew S. Chi; Vincent A. Miller; Garrett Michael Frampton; Shakti Ramkissoon