Leela Raju
University of Pittsburgh
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Leela Raju.
Cornea | 2015
Victoria Chang; Deepinder K. Dhaliwal; Leela Raju; Regis P. Kowalski
Purpose: We compared the resistance patterns of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) keratitis isolates with the common topically applied ophthalmic antimicrobials. Methods: We reviewed the antibiotic susceptibility results of 122 MRSA and 276 MSSA keratitis isolates from January 1993 to November 2012. In vitro susceptibility testing of each Staphylococcus aureus (SA) isolate was performed using Kirby–Bauer disk diffusion based on modified serum interpretations for cefoxitin, bacitracin, cefazolin, ciprofloxacin, gatifloxacin, gentamicin, moxifloxacin, ofloxacin, polymyxin B, sulfamethoxazole, tobramycin, and trimethoprim. Results: MRSA represented 30.7% (122 of 398) of the total SA isolates. All the SA isolates were susceptible to vancomycin, whereas they were less susceptible to the fluoroquinolones than to the nonfluoroquinolones. In comparison with MSSA, MRSA was significantly more resistant to all the antibiotics tested other than polymyxin B (both equally resistant) and vancomycin (both equally susceptible) (P < 0.001). Besides vancomycin, MRSA demonstrated the best susceptibilities to sulfamethoxazole (94.3%), bacitracin (89.3%), trimethoprim (88.5%), and gentamicin (86.1%). Additionally, MRSA was found to be significantly more resistant to the second-generation fluoroquinolones (ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin) than to the fourth-generation fluoroquinolones (moxifloxacin and gatifloxacin). An increase in resistance to the fourth-generation fluoroquinolones was detected for both MRSA and MSSA over the study period. Conclusions: The in vitro susceptibilities of commonly used topical antibiotics differ for MRSA and MSSA isolates; thus, successful treatment of bacterial keratitis should be supported with laboratory studies. Vancomycin remains the treatment of choice for MRSA keratitis. The empiric use of second-generation fluoroquinolones seems to be contraindicated in the treatment of MRSA keratitis.
Eye & Contact Lens-science and Clinical Practice | 2014
Amy C. Nau; Scott Drexler; Deepinder K. Dhaliwal; Francis S. Mah; Leela Raju; Emily Deschler
Objectives: To examine the types of contact lenses used as bandage lenses in the postoperative management of patients with Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis (K-Pro). We examined the lens parameters, the number of trial lenses used to achieve successful fit, and lens replacement schedule. The strategies to achieving a successful fit in these complex patients are reviewed. Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective chart review of patients who had undergone implantation of the Boston keratoprosthesis in 1 or more eyes from January 2006 to December 2011. Patients included male and female subjects aged 18 years or older who had been fit with bandage contact lenses as part of their postoperative management. Results: Twenty-two eyes of 15 patients met the criteria for this review. The age range was 30 to 90 years. There were eight men and seven women. The average number of lenses to achieve a successful fit varied from 1 to 8, with an average of 2.22 trial lenses used per patient. By 6 months after the surgery, 12 K-Pro eyes showed visual acuity of 20/200 or better, with 7 of those eyes attaining better than 20/80 best-corrected Snellen distance acuity. Conclusions: Our results show that it is often necessary to use custom contact lenses for K-Pro patients. Management of poor tear film quality, protein deposition, inflammation, lens replacement schedule, and antibiotic resistance are related considerations.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science | 2015
Sudha Swamynathan; Emili E. Delp; Stephen A. K. Harvey; Chelsea L. Loughner; Leela Raju; Shivalingappa K. Swamynathan
PURPOSE Although secreted Ly6/urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor-related protein-1 (Slurp1) transcript is highly abundant in the mouse cornea, corresponding protein expression remains uncharacterized. Also, SLURP1 was undetected in previous tear proteomics studies, resulting in ambiguity about its baseline levels. Here, we examine mouse corneal Slurp1 expression in different sexes, age groups, strains, and health conditions, and quantify SLURP1 in human tears from healthy or inflamed ocular surfaces. METHODS Expression of Slurp1 in embryonic day-13 (E13), E16, postnatal day-1 (PN1), PN10, PN20, and PN70 Balb/C, FVBN, C57Bl/6, and DBA/2J mouse corneas, Klf4Δ/ΔCE corneas with corneal epithelial-specific ablation of Klf4, migrating cells in wild-type corneal epithelial wound edge, and in corneas exposed to pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) poly(I:C), zymosan-A, or Pam3Csk4 was examined by QPCR, immunoblots, and immunofluorescent staining. Human SLURP1 levels were quantified by ELISA in tears from 34 men and women aged 18 to 80 years. RESULTS Expression of Slurp1, comparable in different strains and sexes, was low in E13, E16, PN1, and PN10 mouse corneas, and increased rapidly after eyelid opening in a Klf4-dependent manner. We found Slurp1 was downregulated in corneas exposed to PAMPs, and in migrating cells at the wound edge. Human SLURP1 expression, comparable in different sexes and age groups, was significantly decreased in tears from inflamed ocular surfaces (0.34%) than those from healthy individuals (0.77%). CONCLUSIONS These data describe the influence of age, sex, genetic background, and ocular surface health on mouse corneal expression of Slurp1, establish the baseline for human tear SLURP1 expression, and identify SLURP1 as a useful diagnostic and/or therapeutic target for inflammatory ocular surface disorders.
JAMA Ophthalmology | 2013
Regis P. Kowalski; Salwa Abdel Aziz; Eric G. Romanowski; Robert M. Q. Shanks; Amy C. Nau; Leela Raju
Ophthalmology | 2015
Regis P. Kowalski; Lisa M. Karenchak; Leela Raju; Nahed Ismail
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science | 2017
Amy C. Nau; Leela Raju
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science | 2015
Sudha Swamynathan; Emili E. Delp; Stephen A. K. Harvey; Leela Raju; Shivalingappa K. Swamynathan
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science | 2014
Tenley N. Bower; Divya Narendra; Amy C. Nau; Leela Raju
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science | 2014
Natasha V Nayak; Tenley Bower; Leela Raju; Amy C. Nau; Alex Mammen; Roheena M. Kamyar; Deepinder K. Dhaliwal
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science | 2013
Regis P. Kowalski; Tyler A. Kowalski; Eric G. Romanowski; Robert M. Q. Shanks; Leela Raju