Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Lenna A. Mahoney is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Lenna A. Mahoney.


Archive | 2009

Pretreatment Engineering Platform Phase 1 Final Test Report

Dean E. Kurath; Brady D. Hanson; Michael J. Minette; David L. Baldwin; Brian M. Rapko; Lenna A. Mahoney; Philip P. Schonewill; Richard C. Daniel; Paul W. Eslinger; James L. Huckaby; Justin M. Billing; Parameshwaran S. Sundar; Gary B. Josephson; James J. Toth; Satoru T. Yokuda; Ellen Bk Baer; Steven M. Barnes; Elizabeth C. Golovich; Scot D. Rassat; Christopher F. Brown; John Gh Geeting; Gary J. Sevigny; Amanda J. Casella; Jagannadha R. Bontha; Rosanne L. Aaberg; Pamela M. Aker; Consuelo E. Guzman-Leong; Marcia L. Kimura; S. K. Sundaram; Richard P. Pires

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) was tasked by Bechtel National Inc. (BNI) on the River Protection Project, Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (RPP-WTP) project to conduct testing to demonstrate the performance of the WTP Pretreatment Facility (PTF) leaching and ultrafiltration processes at an engineering-scale. In addition to the demonstration, the testing was to address specific technical issues identified in Issue Response Plan for Implementation of External Flowsheet Review Team (EFRT) Recommendations - M12, Undemonstrated Leaching Processes.( ) Testing was conducted in a 1/4.5-scale mock-up of the PTF ultrafiltration system, the Pretreatment Engineering Platform (PEP). Parallel laboratory testing was conducted in various PNNL laboratories to allow direct comparison of process performance at an engineering-scale and a laboratory-scale. This report presents and discusses the results of those tests.


Archive | 2007

Estimate of Hanford Waste Rheology and Settling Behavior

Adam P. Poloski; Beric E. Wells; Joel M. Tingey; Lenna A. Mahoney; Mark N. Hall; Scott L. Thomson; Gary L. Smith; Michael E. Johnson; Joseph E. Meacham; Mark A. Knight; Michael G. Thien; Jim J. Davis; Yasuo Onishi

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of River Protection’s Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) will process and treat radioactive waste that is stored in tanks at the Hanford Site. Piping, pumps, and mixing vessels have been selected to transport, store, and mix the high-level waste slurries in the WTP. This report addresses the analyses performed by the Rheology Working Group (RWG) and Risk Assessment Working Group composed of Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Bechtel National Inc. (BNI), CH2M HILL, DOE Office of River Protection (ORP) and Yasuo Onishi Consulting, LLC staff on data obtained from documented Hanford waste analyses to determine a best-estimate of the rheology of the Hanford tank wastes and their settling behavior. The actual testing activities were performed and reported separately in referenced documentation. Because of this, many of the required topics below do not apply and are so noted.


Other Information: PBD: 21 Jul 2000 | 2000

Overview of the Flammability of Gases Generated in Hanford Waste Tanks

Lenna A. Mahoney; James L. Huckaby; Samuel A. Bryan; Gerald D. Johnson

This report presents an overview of what is known about the flammability of the gases generated and retained in Hanford waste tanks in terms of the gas composition, the flammability and detonability limits of the gas constituents, and the availability of ignition sources. The intrinsic flammability (or nonflammability) of waste gas mixtures is one major determinant of whether a flammable region develops in the tank headspace; other factors are the rate, surface area, volume of the release, and the tank ventilation rate, which are not covered in this report.


Archive | 2010

Hanford Sludge Simulant Selection for Soil Mechanics Property Measurement

Beric E. Wells; Renee L. Russell; Lenna A. Mahoney; Garrett N. Brown; Donald E. Rinehart; William C. Buchmiller; Elizabeth C. Golovich; Jarrod V. Crum

The current System Plan for the Hanford Tank Farms uses relaxed buoyant displacement gas release event (BDGRE) controls for deep sludge (i.e., high level waste [HLW]) tanks, which allows the tank farms to use more storage space, i.e., increase the sediment depth, in some of the double-shell tanks (DSTs). The relaxed BDGRE controls are based on preliminary analysis of a gas release model from van Kessel and van Kesteren. Application of the van Kessel and van Kesteren model requires parametric information for the sediment, including the lateral earth pressure at rest and shear modulus. No lateral earth pressure at rest and shear modulus in situ measurements for Hanford sludge are currently available. The two chemical sludge simulants will be used in follow-on work to experimentally measure the van Kessel and van Kesteren model parameters, lateral earth pressure at rest, and shear modulus.


Archive | 2011

Surface Tension Estimates for Droplet Formation in Slurries with Low Concentrations of Hydrophobic Particles, Polymer Flocculants or Surface-Active Contaminants

Phillip A. Gauglitz; Lenna A. Mahoney; Jeremy Blanchard; Judith Ann Bamberger

In support of the K-Basin project, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) was requested to evaluate the appropriate surface tension value to use in models predicting the formation of droplets from spray leaks of K-Basin slurries. The specific issue was whether it was more appropriate to use the surface tension of pure water in model predictions for all plausible spray leaks or to use a lower value. The surface tension of K-Basin slurries is potentially affected not only by particles but by low concentrations of nonionic polyacrylamide flocculant and perhaps by contaminants with surfactant properties, which could decrease the surface tension below that of water. A lower surface tension value typically results in smaller droplets being formed with a larger fraction of droplets in the respirable size range, so using the higher surface tension value of pure water is not conservative and thus needs a strong technical basis.


Archive | 2003

Assessment of Tank 241-S-112 Liquid Waste Mixing in Tank 241-SY-101

Yasuo Onishi; Donald S. Trent; Beric E. Wells; Lenna A. Mahoney

The objectives of this study were to evaluate mixing of liquid waste from Tank 241-S-112 with waste in Tank 241-SY-101 and to determine the properties of the resulting waste for the cross-site transfer to avoid potential double-shell tank corrosion and pipeline plugging. We applied the time-varying, three-dimensional computer code TEMPEST to Tank SY-101 as it received the S-112 liquid waste. The model predicts that temperature variations in Tank SY-101 generate a natural convection flow that is very slow, varying from about 7 x 10{sup -5} to 1 x 10{sup -3} ft/sec (0.3 to about 4 ft/hr) in most areas. Thus, natural convection would eventually mix the liquid waste in SY-101 but would be very slow to achieve nearly complete mixing. These simulations indicate that the mixing of S-112 and SY-101 wastes in Tank SY-101 is a very slow process, and the density difference between the two wastes would further limit mixing. It is expected to take days or weeks to achieve relatively complete mixing in Tank SY-101.


Archive | 2014

Estimation of 240Pu Mass in a Waste Tank Using Ultra-Sensitive Detection of Radioactive Xenon Isotopes from Spontaneous Fission

Ted W. Bowyer; Christopher J. Gesh; Derek A. Haas; James C. Hayes; Lenna A. Mahoney; Joseph E. Meacham; Donaldo P. Mendoza; Khris B. Olsen; Amanda M. Prinke; Bruce D. Reid; Vincent T. Woods

We report on a technique to detect and quantify the amount of 240Pu in a large tank used to store nuclear waste from plutonium production at the Hanford nuclear site. While the contents of this waste tank are known from previous grab sample measurements, our technique could allow for determination of the amount of 240Pu in the tank without costly sample retrieval and analysis of this highly radioactive material. This technique makes an assumption, which was confirmed, that 240Pu dominates the spontaneous fissions occurring in the tank.


Archive | 2011

Alternative Sodium Recovery Technology—High Hydroxide Leaching: FY10 Status Report

Lenna A. Mahoney; Doinita Neiner; Reid A. Peterson; Brian M. Rapko; Renee L. Russell; Philip P. Schonewill

Boehmite leaching tests were carried out at NaOH concentrations of 10 M and 12 M, temperatures of 85°C and 60°C, and a range of initial aluminate concentrations. These data, and data obtained during earlier 100°C tests using 1 M and 5 M NaOH, were used to establish the dependence of the boehmite dissolution rate on hydroxide concentration, temperature, and initial aluminate concentration. A semi-empirical kinetic model for boehmite leaching was fitted to the data and used to calculate the NaOH additions required for leaching at different hydroxide concentrations. The optimal NaOH concentration for boehmite leaching at 85°C was estimated, based on minimizing the amount of Na that had to be added in NaOH to produce a given boehmite conversion.


ASME 2007 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition | 2007

Safety Basis Design Development Challenges

Jonathan Young; Pete Lowry; Bruce Schmitt; Robin Sullivan; Lenna A. Mahoney; Grant W. Ryan

“Designing in Safety” is a desired part of the development of any new potentially hazardous system, process, or facility. It is a required part of nuclear safety activities as specified in the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Order 420.1B, Facility Safety. This order addresses the design of nuclear related facilities developed under federal regulation 10CFR830, Nuclear Safety Management. 10CFR830 requires that safety basis documentation be provided to identify how nuclear safety is being adequately addressed as a condition for system operation (e.g., the safety basis). To support the development of the safety basis, a safety analysis is performed. Although the concept of developing a design that addresses safety is simple, the execution can be complex and challenging. This paper addresses those complexities and challenges for the design activity of a system to treat sludge, a corrosion product of spent nuclear fuel, at DOE’s Hanford Site in Washington State. The system being developed is referred to as the Sludge Treatment Project (STP). This paper describes the portion of the safety analysis that addresses the selection of design basis events using the experience gained from the STP and the development of design requirements for safety features associated with those events. Specifically, the paper describes the safety design process and the application of the process for two types of potential design basis accidents associated with the operation of the system, 1) flashing spray leaks and 2) splash and splatter leaks. Also presented are the technical challenges that are being addressed to develop effective safety features to deal with these design basis accidents.© 2007 ASME


Archive | 2004

Overview of Hanford Site High-Level Waste Tank Gas and Vapor Dynamics

James L. Huckaby; Lenna A. Mahoney; James G. Droppo; Joseph E. Meacham

Hanford Site processes associated with the chemical separation of plutonium from uranium and other fission products produced a variety of volatile, semivolatile, and nonvolatile organic and inorganic waste chemicals that were sent to high-level waste tanks. These chemicals have undergone and continue to undergo radiolytic and thermal reactions in the tanks to produce a wide variety of degradation reaction products. The origins of the organic wastes, the chemical reactions they undergo, and their reaction products have recently been examined by Stock (2004). Stock gives particular attention to explaining the presence of various types of volatile and semivolatile organic species identified in headspace air samples. This report complements the Stock report by examining the storage of volatile and semivolatile species in the waste, their transport through any overburden of waste to the tank headspaces, the physical phenomena affecting their concentrations in the headspaces, and their eventual release into the atmosphere above the tanks.

Collaboration


Dive into the Lenna A. Mahoney's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Beric E. Wells

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Dean E. Kurath

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Phillip A. Gauglitz

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Scot D. Rassat

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Carolyn A. Burns

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Philip P. Schonewill

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Satoru T. Yokuda

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Brian M. Rapko

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Consuelo E. Guzman-Leong

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge