Leslie A. Deane

Robotic versus standard laparoscopic partial/wedge nephrectomy: a comparison of intraoperative and perioperative results from a single institution.

PURPOSE Laparoscopic partial/wedge nephrectomy, similar to laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, is a technically challenging procedure that is performed by a limited number of expert laparoscopic surgeons. The incorporation of a robotic surgical interface has dramatically increased the use of minimally invasive pelvic surgery such that robotic laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is commonly performed even by laparoscopically naïve surgeons. This analysis compares the outcomes of our initial experience with robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RLPN) performed by an experienced open surgeon to that of standard laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) performed by two experienced laparoscopic surgeons. PATIENTS AND METHODS We reviewed the medical records of 11 consecutive patients who underwent 12 standard LPNs (EMM, RVC) (one patient had two unilateral tumors) and 10 consecutive patients (representing the first 11 of such robotic procedures performed at our institution) who underwent 11 RLPNs (one patient had bilateral tumors managed in an asynchronous manner) (DKO). RESULTS The mean tumor size was 2.3 cm (range 1.7-6.2 cm) for LPN and 3.1 cm (range 2.5-4 cm) for RLPN. The mean total procedure time was 289.5 minutes (range 145-369 min) for LPN and 228.7 minutes (range 98-375 min) for RLPN (P=0.102). The mean estimated blood loss was 198 mL (range 75-500 mL) for LPN v 115 mL (25-300 mL) for RLPN (P=0.169). The mean warm ischemia time was 35.3 minutes (range 15-49 min) in the LPN group and 32.1 minutes (range 30-45 minutes) in the RLPN group (P=0.501). CONCLUSIONS Introducing a robotic interface for laparoscopic partial/wedge resection allowed a fellowship-trained urologic oncologist with limited reconstructive laparoscopic experience to achieve results comparable to those for laparoscopic partial/wedge resection performed by experienced laparoscopic surgeons. In this regard, the learning curve appears truncated, similar to that with robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.

Percutaneous and Laparoscopic Cryoablation of Small Renal Masses

PURPOSE We reviewed our 4-year experience with percutaneous cryoablation and laparoscopy for treating small renal masses. MATERIALS AND METHODS After institutional review board approval we retrospectively analyzed renal cryoablation procedures performed between March 2003 and October 2007. An in-depth analysis was performed concerning demographics, hospital course and short-term outcome with respect to percutaneous vs laparoscopic cryoablation. RESULTS A total of 37 patients underwent treatment for 43 renal masses. Of the 37 patients 19 underwent laparoscopic cryoablation (24 tumors) and 18 underwent percutaneous cryoablation (19 tumors) using computerized tomography fluoroscopy. For percutaneous cryoablation a saline instillation was used in 58% of cases to move nonrenal vital structures away from the targeted renal mass. There were 5 cases of hemorrhage requiring transfusion, all of which were associated with the use of multiple cryoprobes. The transfusion rate in the percutaneous and laparoscopic cryoablation groups was 11.1% and 27.8%, respectively. Operative time was significantly longer in the laparoscopic cryoablation group compared to the percutaneous cryoablation group at 147 (range 89 to 209) vs 250.2 (range 151 to 360) minutes, respectively. The overall complication rate (including transfusion) was lower in the percutaneous cryoablation group compared to the laparoscopic cryoablation group (4 of 18 [22.2%] vs 8 of 20 [40%], respectively). Hospital stay was significantly shorter in the percutaneous vs laparoscopic cryoablation group at 1.3 vs 3.1 days, p <0.0001, respectively. Narcotic use in the percutaneous cryoablation group was more than half that used by the laparoscopic cryoablation group (5.1 vs 17.8 mg, p = 0.03, respectively). Among patients with biopsy proven renal cell carcinoma during a median followup of 11.4 and 13.4 months in the percutaneous and laparoscopic cryoablation groups, cancer specific survival was 100% and 100%, respectively, and the treatment failure rate was 5.3% and 4.2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Percutaneous cryoablation is an efficient, minimally morbid method for the treatment of small renal masses and it appears to be superior to the laparoscopic approach. Short-term followup has shown no difference in tumor recurrence or need for re-treatment. Of note, hemorrhage was solely associated with the use of multiple probes.

Rapid Communication: Robot-Assisted NOTES Nephrectomy: Initial Report

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) using the daVinci robot (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA) has never been applied to urologic surgery. Here we present our initial experience with a combined transvaginal and transcolonic, single-port, robot-assisted NOTES nephrectomy. METHODS An acute experiment was performed in a female farm pig. A single 12-mm trocar was placed in the midline, and two 12-mm standard laparoscopic ports were placed into the abdomen via the vagina and the colon. The robotic ports were then telescoped into the 12-mm ports, and the daVinci S robot was docked. Dissection was performed using the Hot Shears and the ProGrasp instruments. The robotic camera was placed via the midline port and held by an assistant. Using the 12-mm transvaginal port, the renal artery and vein were divided separately with a vascular Endo GIA (US Surgical, Norwalk, CT) stapler. The kidney was placed into a 10-mm entrapment sack and removed intact via the vagina. RESULTS Total operative time was 150 minutes. Estimated blood loss was less than 50 mL. No intraoperative complications occurred. CONCLUSION A robot-assisted NOTES nephrectomy was accomplished in a porcine model using the daVinci S robot. Additional testing on survival animals is necessary to further explore this approach.

Comparative Analysis of Laparoscopic and Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy with Ileal Conduit Urinary Diversion

PURPOSE To compare our experience with laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LACIC) and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy (RACIC) with ileal conduit urinary diversion. PATIENTS AND METHODS Prospective data were gathered on 20 consecutive patients undergoing LACIC performed between August 2002 and July 2005, and on 14 consecutive patients undergoing RACIC performed between March 2005 and December 2006. Radical cystectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy was performed laparoscopically or robotically, and an ileal conduit urinary diversion was performed extracorporeally. RESULTS There was no significant difference in terms of preoperative factors or baseline tumor characteristics and no significant difference in mean operative time (410 min v 419 min) between groups. There was less blood loss (212 mL v 653 mL; P < 0.0001) and fewer transfusions (42.8% v 70%; P < 0.0011) in the RACIC group. There was one intraoperative complication (7%) and no conversions in the RACIC group. There were three (15%) intraoperative complications all leading to conversion in patients undergoing LACIC. Three (21%) patients in the RACIC group and 10 (50%) patients in the LACIC group had at least 1 post-operative complication. The mean number of days to oral intake was less in the RACIC group (2.3 v 6.1; P = 0.012). There was no significant difference in the number of lymph nodes excised (P = 0.09) between groups. Bilateral extended lymphadenectomy was performed in 10 (71%) RACIC patients with a mean of 22.3 lymph nodes harvested and in 16 (80%) LACIC patients with a mean of 16.5 lymph nodes harvested. There were no positive margins in patients in the LACIC group and one (7.1%) among patients in the RACIC group--a patient with pT4 disease. CONCLUSION Both laparoscopic and robot-assisted radical cystectomies can be performed safely without compromising oncologic standards for surgical margins and extent of lymphadenectomy. In this early experience, the robot-assisted approach appears to have a shorter learning curve, and it is associated with less blood loss, fewer postoperative complications, and earlier return of bowel function than LACIC.

Comparative Study of In Vivo Lymphatic Sealing Capability of the Porcine Thoracic Duct Using Laparoscopic Dissection Devices

PURPOSE Sealing the lymphatic vessels during abdominal and pelvic surgery is important to prevent the leakage of lymphatic fluid and its resultant sequelae. To our knowledge we compared for the first time the quality of lymphatic sealing by each of 4 commonly used laparoscopic dissection devices. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 12 domestic pigs were used to test dissecting devices, including monopolar scissors (Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Cincinnati, Ohio), Harmonic ACE Scalpel, LigaSure V, EnSeal and Trissector. A midline incision was made from mid sternum to umbilicus, the diaphragm was divided and the porcine thoracic duct was isolated. In all animals each device was used to seal an area of the duct and each seal was placed at least 2 cm from the prior seal. In group 1 the thoracic duct of 6 pigs was cannulated with a 5Fr catheter and the seal was subjected to burst pressure testing using a burst pressure measuring device (Cole-Parmer, Vernon Hills, Illinois). In the 6 pigs in group 2 each seal was immediately sent for histopathological evaluation. Specimens were given a score for the extent of cautery damage, including 0-none, 1-minimal, 2-moderate, 3-severe and 4-extreme. RESULTS A total of 64 seals were created, of which 35 were subjected to burst pressure testing. Mean size of the thoracic duct was 2.6 mm. No acute seal failures were observed with any bipolar device or the harmonic shears. However, 2 immediate failures (33%) were seen with monopolar scissors. Mean burst pressure for monopolar scissors, Harmonic ACE Scalpel, LigaSure V, EnSeal and Trissector was 46 (range 0 to 165), 540 (range 175 to 795), 258 (range 75 to 435), 453 (range 255 to 825) and 379 mm Hg (range 175 to 605), respectively (p <0.05). Trissector, Harmonic ACE Scalpel and EnSeal generated seals with significantly higher burst pressure than that of monopolar scissors (p <0.05). Histopathological evaluation revealed that LigaSure caused less thermal damage than Trissector and EnSeal (p <0.05). CONCLUSIONS Each device tested except monopolar scissors consistently produced a supraphysiological seal and should be suitable for sealing lymphatic vessels during laparoscopic surgery.

In Vitro Evaluation of Nitinol Urological Retrieval Coil and Ureteral Occlusion Device: Retropulsion and Holmium Laser Fragmentation Efficiency

PURPOSE Retropulsion of ureteral stones during laser lithotripsy may result in difficult and incomplete stone fragmentation. The Stone Cone nitinol urological retrieval coil and the NTrap nitinol ureteral occlusion device have been introduced into clinical practice to possibly limit stone retropulsion and enhance the efficiency of holmium laser (Convergent Laser Technologies, Alameda, California) stone fragmentation. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 360 BegoStone Plus phantom stones (Bego USA, Smithfield, Rhode Island) of similar mass and weight were divided into 3 groups, including control, Stone Cone and NTrap. The groups were further subdivided according to fiber size (200 or 400 microm) and pulse width (350 or 700 microsec). These stones were placed in a horizontal pipette 12 mm in diameter, submerged in normal saline and disintegrated at laser settings of 1 J and 10 Hz continuously applied for 300 seconds. Retropulsion in cm and fragmentation efficiency with mass loss in mg were measured after treatment. RESULTS The 2 devices were effective for preventing retropulsion. In the control group the mean +/- SD retropulsion distance using a 350-microsec pulse width with the 200 and 400 microm fibers was 18.4 +/- 5.9 and 14.1 +/- 4.6 cm, while it was 6.2 +/- 2.6 and 5.6 +/- 2.4, respectively, using the 700-microsec pulse width. There was a statistically significant higher loss of stone weight in the Stone Cone and NTrap experimental groups than in the control group (p <0.0001). However, there was no difference between the 2 experimental groups across all groups (p = 0.32). CONCLUSIONS The Stone Cone and NTrap eliminated retropulsion and equally improved fragmentation efficiency. The maximum efficiency of fragmentation was seen using the 200 microm fiber at a 700-microsec pulse width.

Third Prize: Flank Position Is Associated with Higher Skin-to-Surface Interface Pressures in Men Versus Women: Implications for Laparoscopic Renal Surgery and the Risk of Rhabdomyolysis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE There have been several reports of rhabdomyolysis occurring after prolonged laparoscopic procedures in the flank position. Accordingly, we evaluated interface pressures between the skin and three commonly used operating room table surfaces. The aim of our study was to determine if pressure changes could be related to body mass index (BMI), sex, position, and/or the table surface material. PATIENTS AND METHODS Ten men and 10 women were grouped according to BMI <25 or >or=25, with five participants in each group. Subjects were placed in the left lateral decubitus position with the operating table flat, half flexed, fully flexed, half flexed with the kidney rest elevated, and fully flexed with the kidney rest elevated. Interface pressures were recorded, using an X-Sensor pressure sensing mat, for 5-minute periods in each of the described positions on each surface. RESULTS Sex and BMI were statistically significant predictors of increased pressures (P= 0.0042 and 0.0402, respectively). The parameter estimate for the difference between men and women was 4.63 mm Hg (P= 0.0002), and the difference for BMI >or= 25 compared with <25 was also significant (P < 0.0209). Full table flexion (50-degree) produced significantly higher pressures than both flat (P= 0.0001) and the half-flexed (25-degree) position (P < 0.0001). Positions with the kidney rest elevated were associated with significantly higher pressures than without elevation (P < 0.0001). With regard to the surface used, egg crate provided lower pressures than gel pads (P= 0.0117). CONCLUSION Women have significantly lower interface pressures when compared with men. BMI >or= 25 also increases interface pressures. The use of the kidney rest is associated with markedly increased pressure; use of a half-flexed position is preferable to a full-flexed position. These data have implications for patient positioning and identification of persons at risk for rhabdomyolysis during laparoscopic renal surgery.

Laparoscopic nephrectomy for renal cell cancer: radical and total

We routinely use a Veress needle to obtain the pneumoperitoneum by placing it 4 cm above and 4 cm medial to the anterior superior iliac spine. Then, a point 4 cm below the costal margin in the mid-clavicular line is selected for placing the first trocar. We typically use a 12-mm visual trocar and then, after removing the obturator, inspect the peritoneal cavity to ensure safety of the previously passed Veress needle and for intra-abdominal pathology. A second 12-mm port is placed at the site of Veress insertion and the primary camera either in the midline above the umbilicus (in thin patients) or lateral to the rectus sheath (in obese patients).

Robotic-Assisted Ureteral Reimplantation with Boari Flap and Psoas Hitch: A Single-Institution Experience

Robotic-assisted ureteral reimplantations were performed on 3 patients at a single institution, 2 with Boari flap and psoas hitch and 1 with psoas hitch alone. These were for urothelial carcinoma of the distal ureter, ureteral obstruction caused by distal ureteral endometriosis, and ureteral transaction during gynecologic surgery. We used intraoperative ureteroscopy to confirm tumor margins as well as a simple technique for retrograde placement of transvesicle wire prior to ureteral anastomosis. Surgery and recovery were uneventful. This illustrates that robotic-assisted ureteral reimplantation with Boari flap and psoas hitch is a safe and viable approach for ureterovesicle reconstruction.

Histological Evaluation of Cold Versus Hot Cutting: Clinical Impact on Margin Status for Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy

PURPOSE While most laparoscopic nephron sparing surgery is performed using cold scissors, energy based devices may also be used. A criticism of this approach has been the potential thermal destruction of the cellular architecture at the tumor margin, precluding the ability to accurately determine whether tumor cells are present. We clinically characterized the histological appearance of tumor margins excised with cold scissors, and bipolar and ultrasonic shears. MATERIALS AND METHODS We evaluated 40 renal mass excisions performed by a total of 3 urologists at our institution between February 2003 and March 2007. There were 10 bipolar (5 mm LigaSure), 20 ultrasonic (Harmonic Scalpel) and 10 cold excisions. All slides were randomly evaluated twice by a single pathologist blinded to surgeon and excision method. Histological interpretation of the margin was scored as clear vs indeterminate. Variables, including margin fragmentation, artifact, extravascular blood clot, parenchymal hemorrhage, capillary congestion and vessel sealing, were assessed and scored on a scale of 0 to 3, that is 0--none, 1-1% to 25%, 2-26% to 50% and 3--greater than 50%. RESULTS The pathologist was able to confidently identify cells at the margin as being malignant or benign in all cases. Histologically the ultrasonic scalpel demonstrated increased fragmentation and extravascular blood clotting compared with those of the other cutting methods (p <0.025 and <0.026, respectively). The ultrasonic scalpel also showed increased artifact depth compared to that of cold cutting (p <0.001). There were no statistical differences between the groups regarding margin artifact, parenchymal hemorrhage or capillary congestion. No statistical significance was observed in any variables between bipolar and cold cutting. CONCLUSIONS Despite some degree of cellular damage the ability to determine whether cells at the margin were benign or malignant was not affected by using an energy based bipolar or ultrasonic device.