James F. Borin

Robotic versus standard laparoscopic partial/wedge nephrectomy: a comparison of intraoperative and perioperative results from a single institution.

PURPOSE Laparoscopic partial/wedge nephrectomy, similar to laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, is a technically challenging procedure that is performed by a limited number of expert laparoscopic surgeons. The incorporation of a robotic surgical interface has dramatically increased the use of minimally invasive pelvic surgery such that robotic laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is commonly performed even by laparoscopically naïve surgeons. This analysis compares the outcomes of our initial experience with robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RLPN) performed by an experienced open surgeon to that of standard laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) performed by two experienced laparoscopic surgeons. PATIENTS AND METHODS We reviewed the medical records of 11 consecutive patients who underwent 12 standard LPNs (EMM, RVC) (one patient had two unilateral tumors) and 10 consecutive patients (representing the first 11 of such robotic procedures performed at our institution) who underwent 11 RLPNs (one patient had bilateral tumors managed in an asynchronous manner) (DKO). RESULTS The mean tumor size was 2.3 cm (range 1.7-6.2 cm) for LPN and 3.1 cm (range 2.5-4 cm) for RLPN. The mean total procedure time was 289.5 minutes (range 145-369 min) for LPN and 228.7 minutes (range 98-375 min) for RLPN (P=0.102). The mean estimated blood loss was 198 mL (range 75-500 mL) for LPN v 115 mL (25-300 mL) for RLPN (P=0.169). The mean warm ischemia time was 35.3 minutes (range 15-49 min) in the LPN group and 32.1 minutes (range 30-45 minutes) in the RLPN group (P=0.501). CONCLUSIONS Introducing a robotic interface for laparoscopic partial/wedge resection allowed a fellowship-trained urologic oncologist with limited reconstructive laparoscopic experience to achieve results comparable to those for laparoscopic partial/wedge resection performed by experienced laparoscopic surgeons. In this regard, the learning curve appears truncated, similar to that with robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.

MicroRNA-1 is a candidate tumor suppressor and prognostic marker in human prostate cancer

We previously reported that miR-1 is among the most consistently down-regulated miRs in primary human prostate tumors. In this follow-up study, we further corroborated this finding in an independent data set and made the novel observation that miR-1 expression is further reduced in distant metastasis and is a candidate predictor of disease recurrence. Moreover, we performed in vitro experiments to explore the tumor suppressor function of miR-1. Cell-based assays showed that miR-1 is epigenetically silenced in human prostate cancer. Overexpression of miR-1 in these cells led to growth inhibition and down-regulation of genes in pathways regulating cell cycle progression, mitosis, DNA replication/repair and actin dynamics. This observation was further corroborated with protein expression analysis and 3′-UTR-based reporter assays, indicating that genes in these pathways are either direct or indirect targets of miR-1. A gene set enrichment analysis revealed that the miR-1-mediated tumor suppressor effects are globally similar to those of histone deacetylase inhibitors. Lastly, we obtained preliminary evidence that miR-1 alters the cellular organization of F-actin and inhibits tumor cell invasion and filipodia formation. In conclusion, our findings indicate that miR-1 acts as a tumor suppressor in prostate cancer by influencing multiple cancer-related processes and by inhibiting cell proliferation and motility.

Comparative Study of In Vivo Lymphatic Sealing Capability of the Porcine Thoracic Duct Using Laparoscopic Dissection Devices

PURPOSE Sealing the lymphatic vessels during abdominal and pelvic surgery is important to prevent the leakage of lymphatic fluid and its resultant sequelae. To our knowledge we compared for the first time the quality of lymphatic sealing by each of 4 commonly used laparoscopic dissection devices. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 12 domestic pigs were used to test dissecting devices, including monopolar scissors (Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Cincinnati, Ohio), Harmonic ACE Scalpel, LigaSure V, EnSeal and Trissector. A midline incision was made from mid sternum to umbilicus, the diaphragm was divided and the porcine thoracic duct was isolated. In all animals each device was used to seal an area of the duct and each seal was placed at least 2 cm from the prior seal. In group 1 the thoracic duct of 6 pigs was cannulated with a 5Fr catheter and the seal was subjected to burst pressure testing using a burst pressure measuring device (Cole-Parmer, Vernon Hills, Illinois). In the 6 pigs in group 2 each seal was immediately sent for histopathological evaluation. Specimens were given a score for the extent of cautery damage, including 0-none, 1-minimal, 2-moderate, 3-severe and 4-extreme. RESULTS A total of 64 seals were created, of which 35 were subjected to burst pressure testing. Mean size of the thoracic duct was 2.6 mm. No acute seal failures were observed with any bipolar device or the harmonic shears. However, 2 immediate failures (33%) were seen with monopolar scissors. Mean burst pressure for monopolar scissors, Harmonic ACE Scalpel, LigaSure V, EnSeal and Trissector was 46 (range 0 to 165), 540 (range 175 to 795), 258 (range 75 to 435), 453 (range 255 to 825) and 379 mm Hg (range 175 to 605), respectively (p <0.05). Trissector, Harmonic ACE Scalpel and EnSeal generated seals with significantly higher burst pressure than that of monopolar scissors (p <0.05). Histopathological evaluation revealed that LigaSure caused less thermal damage than Trissector and EnSeal (p <0.05). CONCLUSIONS Each device tested except monopolar scissors consistently produced a supraphysiological seal and should be suitable for sealing lymphatic vessels during laparoscopic surgery.

Third Prize: Flank Position Is Associated with Higher Skin-to-Surface Interface Pressures in Men Versus Women: Implications for Laparoscopic Renal Surgery and the Risk of Rhabdomyolysis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE There have been several reports of rhabdomyolysis occurring after prolonged laparoscopic procedures in the flank position. Accordingly, we evaluated interface pressures between the skin and three commonly used operating room table surfaces. The aim of our study was to determine if pressure changes could be related to body mass index (BMI), sex, position, and/or the table surface material. PATIENTS AND METHODS Ten men and 10 women were grouped according to BMI <25 or >or=25, with five participants in each group. Subjects were placed in the left lateral decubitus position with the operating table flat, half flexed, fully flexed, half flexed with the kidney rest elevated, and fully flexed with the kidney rest elevated. Interface pressures were recorded, using an X-Sensor pressure sensing mat, for 5-minute periods in each of the described positions on each surface. RESULTS Sex and BMI were statistically significant predictors of increased pressures (P= 0.0042 and 0.0402, respectively). The parameter estimate for the difference between men and women was 4.63 mm Hg (P= 0.0002), and the difference for BMI >or= 25 compared with <25 was also significant (P < 0.0209). Full table flexion (50-degree) produced significantly higher pressures than both flat (P= 0.0001) and the half-flexed (25-degree) position (P < 0.0001). Positions with the kidney rest elevated were associated with significantly higher pressures than without elevation (P < 0.0001). With regard to the surface used, egg crate provided lower pressures than gel pads (P= 0.0117). CONCLUSION Women have significantly lower interface pressures when compared with men. BMI >or= 25 also increases interface pressures. The use of the kidney rest is associated with markedly increased pressure; use of a half-flexed position is preferable to a full-flexed position. These data have implications for patient positioning and identification of persons at risk for rhabdomyolysis during laparoscopic renal surgery.

Prone retrograde laser lithotripsy facilitates endoscope-guided percutaneous renal access for staghorn calculi: two scopes are better than one.

THE MANAGEMENT OF STAGHORN CALCULI has evolved significantly during the past three decades since Fernstrom and Johannson1 used the first percutaneous tract created specifically for nephrolithotomy.1 The previous gold standard of open surgery has been largely abandoned in favor of minimally invasive techniques that promise less morbidity. Shockwave lithotripsy monotherapy or in combination with percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), multitract PCNL, and single-tract PCNL in combination with flexible nephroscopy or ureteroscopy have all been described with varying degrees of success, as measured by stone-free rates and complications. What is clear is that complete stone removal should remain the primary goal of treatment, particularly in the case of struvite stones.2 The American Urological Association Nephrolithiasis Guideline Panel, in their report on staghorn calculi, analyzed all relevant literature from 1992 to 2003 and concluded that PCNL should be used as first-line treatment because of an overall stone-free rate of 78%, which was superior to all other methods and had similar rates of complications.2

Flexible Ureteroscopy-Directed Retrograde Nephrostomy for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Description of a Technique

We describe flexible ureteroscopy-directed retrograde nephrostomy access using a puncture wire to achieve renal access. This is a natural extension of modern retrograde intrarenal surgical techniques and a modernization of the original Lawson technique for retrograde nephrostomy tract creation. In appropriately selected patients, this approach is safe and permits reduced radiation exposure. We believe this technique is easy to learn and may overcome the difficult learning curve of antegrade nephrostomy techniques faced by urologists who have not undergone subspecialty training in endourology.

The ‘buoy’ stent: evaluation of a prototype indwelling ureteric stent in a porcine model

To assess a prototype ureteric ‘buoy’ stent with a 10 F upper body tapering to a 3F tail, developed to potentially reduce stent‐related irritative symptoms while providing an adequate mould for healing after endopyelotomy.

Comparison of Healing after Cystotomy and Repair with Fibrin Glue and Sutured Closure in the Porcine Model

PURPOSE We compared healing after laparoscopic cystotomy using fibrin glue, sutures, or a combination to determine whether fibrin glue can obviate the need for sutures and whether there is any detriment when glue is used in the presence of sutures. MATERIALS AND METHODS In 24 Yorkshire pigs, a 3.5 cm vertical cystotomy was created laparoscopically and repaired as follows: Group 1--no closure; group 2--fibrin glue closure; group 3--suture repair; group 4--combined fibrin glue and suture repair. All animals had a Foley catheter for 1 week. In each group, three animals were harvested at 1 week (acute) and three animals were harvested at 6 weeks (chronic). RESULTS Acute: Group 1--all pigs had an unhealed defect that leaked when evaluated by cystography. Groups 2, 3, 4--mean leak pressures were 80, 97, and 60 cm H(2)O (P = 0.36), respectively. Mean bladder capacity was not significantly different between groups. Chronic: No leakage seen on a cystogram at 1 week; at 6 weeks, bladders were filled at > or =95 to 100 cm H(2)O without leakage. Histologically, there was more inflammation in the acute group v chronic group pigs. In the acute group pigs repaired with glue or suture + glue, there was more inflammation and less epithelial continuity than in the suture alone group. At 6 weeks, there was no difference between groups. CONCLUSION Fibrin glue provoked an intense inflammatory response that might have delayed healing acutely, resulting in a lower burst pressure in both scenarios in which it was used (i.e., alone or in combination with sutures). However, by 6 weeks, there did not seem to be any difference between groups either clinically or histopathologically.

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: six degrees of haemostasis.

Study Type – Therapy (case series) 
Level of Evidence 4

Evaluation of the outcomes of electrosurgical induced bowel injury treated with tissue glue/sealant versus sutured repair in a rabbit model.

INTRODUCTION Bowel injury is an uncommon, although potentially devastating, intraoperative laparoscopic complication. Questions have been raised about the possible use of a tissue adhesive to repair injured bowel. We compared glued repair and sutured repair of both large bowel (LB) and small bowel (SB) electrosurgical injuries in a rabbit model. METHODS Pneumoperitoneum was obtained, and four laparoscopic ports were placed in each of 48 New Zealand rabbits. The hook electrode was used in a specified manner to create an equal number of uniform full-thickness injuries to either the SB or the LB. Laparoscopic repair was performed with a 3-0 silk Lembert suture (LS), fibrin glue (FG), or BioGlue (BG), or repair was not performed (i.e., no repair, NR); the animals were monitored for 3 weeks. Adverse clinical outcomes and findings at laparotomy were recorded. Pathologic assessment included an objective scaled evaluation of the intensity of the inflammatory response and degree of healing. RESULTS In the SB injury group, deteriorating clinical condition necessitated early euthanasia in one animal repaired with FG, one animal repaired with BG, and two animals with NR. LS repair animals had no adverse clinical outcomes. The LB injury group had no adverse clinical outcomes regardless of the method of repair, including the control group. Of the animals that survived for 3 weeks, the animals repaired with BG had more intraabdominal adhesions (100%) than LS (33%), FG (55%), and NR (50%) (p = 0.001). The pathologic assessment revealed that BG induced a more intense inflammatory response (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION In the rabbit, suture repair of an electrosurgical SB injury appears to have improved outcomes when compared with a glued repair. In contrast, LB injury responded well to any form of treatment. The data suggest that suture is superior to biological glues when dealing with a laparoscopic electrosurgical bowel injury.