Leslie R. Rowe

PAM50 Breast Cancer Subtyping by RT-qPCR and Concordance with Standard Clinical Molecular Markers

BackgroundMany methodologies have been used in research to identify the “intrinsic” subtypes of breast cancer commonly known as Luminal A, Luminal B, HER2-Enriched (HER2-E) and Basal-like. The PAM50 gene set is often used for gene expression-based subtyping; however, surrogate subtyping using panels of immunohistochemical (IHC) markers are still widely used clinically. Discrepancies between these methods may lead to different treatment decisions.MethodsWe used the PAM50 RT-qPCR assay to expression profile 814 tumors from the GEICAM/9906 phase III clinical trial that enrolled women with locally advanced primary invasive breast cancer. All samples were scored at a single site by IHC for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and Her2/neu (HER2) protein expression. Equivocal HER2 cases were confirmed by chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH). Single gene scores by IHC/CISH were compared with RT-qPCR continuous gene expression values and “intrinsic” subtype assignment by the PAM50. High, medium, and low expression for ESR1, PGR, ERBB2, and proliferation were selected using quartile cut-points from the continuous RT-qPCR data across the PAM50 subtype assignments.ResultsESR1, PGR, and ERBB2 gene expression had high agreement with established binary IHC cut-points (area under the curve (AUC)u2009≥u20090.9). Estrogen receptor positivity by IHC was strongly associated with Luminal (A and B) subtypes (92%), but only 75% of ER negative tumors were classified into the HER2-E and Basal-like subtypes. Luminal A tumors more frequently expressed PR than Luminal B (94% vs 74%) and Luminal A tumors were less likely to have high proliferation (11% vs 77%). Seventy-seven percent (30/39) of ER-/HER2+ tumors by IHC were classified as the HER2-E subtype. Triple negative tumors were mainly comprised of Basal-like (57%) and HER2-E (30%) subtypes. Single gene scoring for ESR1, PGR, and ERBB2 was more prognostic than the corresponding IHC markers as shown in a multivariate analysis.ConclusionsThe standard immunohistochemical panel for breast cancer (ER, PR, and HER2) does not adequately identify the PAM50 gene expression subtypes. Although there is high agreement between biomarker scoring by protein immunohistochemistry and gene expression, the gene expression determinations for ESR1 and ERBB2 status was more prognostic.

Utility of BRAF V600E mutation detection in cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules

Background Fine needle aspiration (FNA) is widely utilized for evaluation of patients with thyroid nodules. However, approximately 30% are indeterminate for malignancy. Recently, a mutation in the BRAF gene has been reported to be the most common genetic event in papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). In this retrospective study, we assessed the utility of BRAF V600E mutation detection for refining indeterminate preoperative cytologic diagnoses in patients with PTC. Methods Archival indeterminate thyroid FNAs and corresponding formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) surgical samples with PTC were identified in our patient files. DNA extracted from slide scape lysates and 5 μm FFPE sections were evaluated for the BRAF V600E mutation using LightCycler PCR and fluorescent melting curve analysis (LCPCR). Amplification products that showed deviation from the wild-type genomic DNA melting peak, discordant FNA and FFPE matched pairs, and all benign control samples, underwent direct DNA sequencing. Results A total of 19 indeterminate thyroid FNAs demonstrating PTC on FFPE surgical samples were included in the study. Using BRAF mutation analysis, the preoperative diagnosis of PTC was confirmed in 3/19 (15.8%) FNA samples that could not be conclusively diagnosed on cytology alone. However, 9/19 (47.4%) FFPE tissue samples were positive for the V600E mutation. Of the discordant pairs, 5/6 FNAs contained less than 50% tumor cells. Conclusion When used with indeterminate FNA samples, BRAF mutation analysis may be a useful adjunct technique for confirming the diagnosis of malignancy in an otherwise equivocal case. However, overall tumor cell content of some archival FNA smear slides is a limiting factor for mutation detection.

U-type exchange is the most frequent mechanism for inverted duplication with terminal deletion rearrangements

Background: Chromosomal rearrangements resulting in an interstitial inverted duplication with concomitant terminal deletion were first described for the short arm of chromosome 8 in 1976. Since then, this type of alteration has been identified and characterised for most chromosome arms. Three mechanisms are commonly proposed to explain the origin of this type of rearrangement. All three mechanisms involve formation of a dicentric chromosome that then breaks in a subsequent meiotic division to produce a monocentric duplicated and deleted chromosome. However, the events leading to the formation of the dicentric chromosome differ between the mechanisms. In one mechanism, either parent carries a paracentric inversion. This results in formation of a loop during meiotic pairing with a recombination event occurring in the loop. In the second mechanism, inverted low copy repeats in the same chromosome arm allow partial folding of one homologue onto itself with a recombination event between the inverted repeats. The third mechanism involves a pre-meiotic double-strand break with subsequent fusion, or U-type exchange, between the sister chromatids. The first two mechanisms require a single copy region to exist between the duplicated and deleted regions on the derivative chromosome, and therefore high resolution analysis of the rearrangement can be used to distinguish between these mechanisms. Methods and results: Using G-banded chromosome analysis, fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) and array comparative genomic hybridisation (CGH), we describe 17 new cases of inverted duplication with terminal deletion of 2q, 4p, 5p, 6q, 8p, 9p, 10q, 13q, 15q, 18p, 18q, and 22q. Conclusions: These new cases, combined with previously described cases, demonstrate that U-type exchange is the most frequent mechanism for this rearrangement and can be observed on most, or perhaps all, chromosome arms.

Chromosomal loss of 3q26.3-3q26.32, involving a partial neuroligin 1 deletion, identified by genomic microarray in a child with microcephaly, seizure disorder, and severe intellectual disability.

Neuroligin 1 (NLGN1) is one of five members of the neuroligin gene family and may represent a candidate gene for neurological disorders, as members of this family are involved in formation and remodeling of central nervous system synapses. NLGN1 is expressed predominantly in the central nervous system, where it dimerizes and then binds with β‐neurexin to form a functional synapse. Mutations in neurexin 1 (NRXN1) as well as two other members of the neuroligin family, NLGN3 and NLGN4, have been associated with autism and mutations in NLGN4 have also been associated with intellectual disability, seizures, and EEG abnormalities. Genomic microarray is recommended for the detection of chromosomal gains or losses in patients with intellectual disability and multiple congenital anomalies. Results of uncertain significance are not uncommon. Parental studies can provide additional information by demonstrating that the imbalance is either de novo or inherited, and therefore is more or less likely to be causative of the clinical phenotype. However, the possibility that even inherited deletions and duplications may play a role in the phenotype of the proband cannot be excluded as many copy number variants associated with neurodevelopmental conditions show incomplete penetrance and may be inherited from an unaffected parent. Here, we report on a patient with a 2.2u2009Mb deletion at 3q26.3‐3q26.32—encompassing the terminal end of NLGN1 and the entire NAALADL2 gene—detected by genomic microarray, and confirmed by FISH and real‐time quantitative PCR. The same size deletion was subsequently found in her healthy, asymptomatic, adult mother.

B-RAF V600E mutational analysis of fine needle aspirates correlates with diagnosis of thyroid nodules.

Objective: A mutation of B-type RAF kinase (B-RAF) represents the most common genetic alteration in papillary thyroid cancer (PTC), possibly signifying a more aggressive biology. Fine needle aspiration (FNA) represents the most useful initial diagnostic tool of thyroid nodules. Molecular analysis of the mutation status of B-RAF in thyroid nodule FNAs may provide guidance for treatment planning. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Subjects and Methods: A retrospective chart review was undertaken for clinically relevant data of papillary thyroid cancer (PTC), follicular variant of PTC (FV-PTC), and nonmalignant goiters. After blinded pathologic review, histologic and cytologic samples were analyzed by LightCycler PCR (LCPCR) with allele-specific fluorescent probe melting curve analysis (FMCA) for the V600E mutation of B-RAF. Results: Of the 45 patient samples analyzed, B-RAF mutation was found to be significantly higher in papillary carcinomas when compared to follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinomas (55.6% vs 14.3%, P = 0.05). Pathologic B-RAF mutational status significantly correlated with cytologic B-RAF mutational status (P < 0.0001), cytologic interpretation (P = 0.012), and histologic diagnosis (P = 0.011). Conclusions: Determination of B-RAF V600E mutation of thyroid nodule FNAs by LCPCR may be a useful tool to guide treatment planning. These data support investigating the utility of this molecular marker in a prospective manner.

Cell block preparation as an adjunctive diagnostic technique in ThinPrep monolayer preparations: a case report.

The cell block preparation, which increases cellular yield by capturing any small tissue fragments in a fluid specimen, has been used to define the histologic pattern of the cells in question. This report describes a case in which processing a cell block on residual ThinPrep® Pap Test™ material, using a thrombin‐based technique, was useful in augmenting the diagnosis of a glandular lesion. Diagn. Cytopathol. 24:142–144, 2001.

Cytologic features of nipple aspirate fluid using an automated non-invasive collection device: a prospective observational study

BackgroundDetection of cytologic atypia in nipple aspirate fluid (NAF) has been shown to be a predictor of risk for development of breast carcinoma. Manual collection of NAF for cytologic evaluation varies widely in terms of efficacy, ease of use, and patient acceptance. We investigated a new automated device for the non-invasive collection of NAF in the office setting.MethodsA multi-center prospective observational clinical trial involving asymptomatic women designed to assess fluid production, adequacy, safety and patient acceptance of the HALO NAF Collection System (NeoMatrix, Irvine, CA). Cytologic evaluation of all NAF samples was performed using previously described classification categories.Results500 healthy women were successfully enrolled. Thirty-eight percent (190/500) produced fluid and 187 were available for cytologic analysis. Cytologic classification of fluid producers showed 50% (93/187) Category 0 (insufficient cellular material), 38% (71/187) Category I (benign non-hyperplastic ductal epithelial cells), 10% (18/187) Category II (benign hyperplastic ductal epithelial cells), 3% (5/187) Category III (atypical ductal epithelial cells) and none were Category IV (unequivocal malignancy). Overall, 19% of the subjects produced NAF with adequate cellularity and 1% were found to have cytologic atypia.ConclusionThe HALO system is a simple, safe, rapid, automated method for standardized collection of NAF which is acceptable to patients. Cytologic assessment of HALO-collected NAF showed the ability to detect benign and pre-neoplastic ductal epithelial cells from asymptomatic volunteers.

The Unsatisfactory ThinPrep Pap Test

Cervical cytology specimens classified as unsatisfactory for interpretation represent a potential source of undetected disease. This prospective study analyzed the potential benefits of a laboratory procedure to reprocess unsatisfactory ThinPrep Pap Tests (Cytyc, Boxborough, MA). All unsatisfactory ThinPrep samples were reprocessed using a glacial acetic acid wash. The study period unsatisfactory rate was compared with that for the previous 12 months. The initial unsatisfactory rate was 1.3% (197/15,154). Of the unsatisfactory ThinPrep samples, 55.8% (110/197) had residual material for reprocessing. After reprocessing, 67.3% (74/110) were reclassified as satisfactory or satisfactory but limited by, and the final unsatisfactory rate was 0.8% (123/15,154), a 62% decrease. Compared with the previous 12-month rate of 0.9% (209/23,730), this was a 12% reduction. Seven (6.4%) of 110 initially classified as unsatisfactory contained an epithelial abnormality (atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance, 3; atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance, 2; low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, 1; squamous cell carcinoma, 1) on the reprocessed slide. Reprocessing of unsatisfactory ThinPrep slides yielded additional cellular abnormalities that otherwise would have been undetected. The present study confirms that reprocessing of unsatisfactory ThinPrep slides is a beneficial laboratory procedure.

Molecular Inversion Probe Array for the Genetic Evaluation of Stillbirth Using Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Tissue

Array comparative hybridization has been used successfully to identify genomic alterations in stillbirth material; however, high DNA quantity and quality requirements may limit its utility in some fetal samples. Molecular inversion probe (MIP) array analysis of FFPE stillbirth autopsy samples circumvents the challenges associated with karyotype and short-term fetal cell culture, requires limited DNA input, and allows for retrospective evaluation of fetal loss. We performed MIP analysis on archival FFPE autopsy tissue to identify underlying genetic abnormalities not previously detected using traditional cytogenetic methods. Archival FFPE stillbirth cases (≥20 weeks gestation) were identified with the following characteristics: i) the phenotype suggested underlying genomic alterations; ii) the karyotype was either normal or not available and there were no other known genetic abnormalities; or iii) previous microarray testing was not performed. Genomic DNA (75 ng) was processed onto a 330,000-feature MIP array. Twenty-seven of 29 (93.1%) FFPE samples had passing MIP quality control scores. Abnormalities were seen in 3 of 27 (11%) archival samples (deletion of 17q12, trisomy 18, and a case of 4qter duplication and 13qter deletion arising from an unbalanced 4q;13q translocation), which, if identified at the time of autopsy, may have changed the course of medical management. This study highlights the benefits of using MIP array analysis for identification of genomic alterations in FFPE stillbirth autopsy tissue.

Cytogenetic and molecular characterization of double inversion 3 associated with a cryptic BCR-ABL1 rearrangement and additional genetic changes

Rearrangements of chromosome 3 involving bands 3q21 and 3q26 have been reported in about 2% of patients with acute myeloid leukemia, and rarely in myelodysplastic syndrome or chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML). To date, only six cases of inversion of both homologues have been reported. Loss of normal chromosome 3 and duplication of the inverted chromosome have been proposed as the most likely mechanism, but have not been shown experimentally. We present a 36-year-old male with an initial diagnosis of CML and resistance to imatinib mesylate. Chromosome analysis showed an inversion within the long arm of both homologues of chromosome 3 and an interstitial deletion within the long arm of one chromosome 7. The rearrangement of EVI1 locus on both homologues of chromosome 3 was confirmed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Additional FISH studies showed a cryptic insertion of ABL1 into the BCR region, and subsequent duplication of the derivative chromosome 22. The single-nucleotide polymorphism array showed copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity on chromosomes 3 and 22, suggesting that a somatic repair mechanism is involved in the evolution of these genetic alterations. This case illustrates the complexity of genetic aberrations in neoplastic cells, and the value of array technology, used in concert with conventional cytogenetic methods, for a better understanding of the pathogenesis.