Levente Molnár

Long-term experience with coronary sinus side branch stenting to stabilize left ventricular electrode position

BACKGROUND Despite technical advancements, implantation of coronary sinus (CS) leads may be challenging, and dislocation remains a relevant clinical problem. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness, safety, and long-term outcome of stent implantation to anchor the lead to the wall of the CS side branch. METHODS Stenting of a CS side branch was performed in 312 patients. The procedure was performed because of postoperative lead dislocation in 16 patients and because of an intraoperative unstable lead position or phrenic nerve stimulation in 296 cases. A bare metal coronary stent was introduced over a second guide wire in the same CS sheath. The stent was deposited 5-35 mm proximal to the most proximal electrode. Mechanical damage of the CS side branch or pericardial effusion was not observed owing to stenting. RESULTS During follow-up (median 28.4, interquartile range 15-37, maximum 70 months), a clinically important increase in the left ventricular pacing threshold was found in four cases and reoperation was necessary in only two patients (0.6%). Phrenic nerve stimulation was observed in 18 instances, and repositioning with an ablation catheter was performed in seven cases. Impedance measurements did not suggest lead insulation failure. Three stented leads were extracted without complication after 3-49 months owing to infection, while four leads were extracted easily during heart transplantation after 7-27 months. CONCLUSION Stent implantation to stabilize CS lead position seems to be an effective and safe procedure in prevention and treatment of CS lead dislocation in selected cases.

Minimal invasive coronary sinus lead reposition technique for the treatment of phrenic nerve stimulation

AIMS Phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS), which is often intolerable for the patient, is a known complication of resynchronization therapy. We describe a new, minimal invasive method for treating PNS. METHODS AND RESULTS Untreatable PNS was found in nine cardiac resynchronization therapy patients with distal coronary sinus (CS) lead position 6 +/- 6 (0.5-17) months after the implantation. Ablation catheter and Amplatz Left 2 type guiding catheter were introduced into the right atrium via the right femoral vein. Coronary sinus was cannulated with the Amplatz catheter, and on a normal guide wire, a coronary stent was introduced beside the lead into the side branch in seven cases or a bigger stent into the CS in two patients. The ablation catheter was looped around the CS lead in the atrium with bent tip and was drawn backward together with the CS electrode. New lead positions were evaluated with electrophysiological measurements, and the suitable position was stabilized with inflation of the stent. Pericardial effusion was not detected on post-operative echocardiography. After repositioning, suitable pacing parameters were registered (threshold: 1.6 +/- 1.1 V; 0.5 ms, impedance: 565 +/- 62 ohm). Phrenic nerve stimulation was not found with 7.5 V; 1.5 ms pacing. During follow-up (7.7 +/- 4.6 months), stable pacing threshold and impedance values were measured; transient and reprogrammable PNS was present in only one patient. CONCLUSION Coronary sinus electrode reposition using the femoral approach seems to be a safe and effective procedure, which means smaller burden for the patients compared with the established reposition operation. The technique can be used successfully if the CS lead is in a distal position.

Usefulness of electroanatomical mapping during transseptal endocardial left ventricular lead implantation

AIM Failure rate to implant left ventricular (LV) lead transvenously is 4-8% in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) patients. Epicardial lead placement is an alternative method and if not applicable case reports and small series showed the feasibility of endocardial LV lead implantation. Electroanatomical mapping might be a useful tool to guide this procedure. METHODS AND RESULTS Four patients had undergone endocardial LV lead implantation after unsuccessful transvenous implantation or epicardial LV lead dysfunction using the transseptal approach. Electroanatomical mapping was used to mark the location of the transseptal puncture. This location point guided the mapping catheter from the subclavian access and facilitated positioning of the LV lead at the adjacent latest activation area of the left ventricle detected by activation mapping. Endocardial active fixation LV leads were successfully implanted in all patients with stable electrical parameters immediately after implantation and over a mean follow-up of 18.3 months (lead impedance 520 ± 177 vs. 439 ± 119 Ω and pacing threshold 0.8 ± 0.2 V, 0.5 ms vs. 0.6 ± 0.1 V, 0.5 ms, respectively). Patients were maintained on anticoagulation therapy with a target international normalized ratio of 3.5-4.5 and did not show any thromboembolic, haemorrhagic events, or infection. Echocardiography showed significant improvement of LV systolic function with marked improvement of the functional status. CONCLUSIONS Electroanatomical mapping is a useful technical tool to guide endocardial LV lead implantation. It helps to identify the location of the transseptal puncture and the use of activation mapping might facilitate location of the optimal lead positions during CRT.

The ratio of the neutrophil leucocytes to the lymphocytes predicts the outcome after cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Abstract Aims The low lymphocyte counts and high neutrophil leucocyte fractions have been associated with poor prognosis in chronic heart failure. We hypothesized that the baseline ratio of the neutrophil leucocytes to the lymphocytes (NL ratio) would predict the outcome of chronic heart failure patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Methods and results The qualitative blood counts and the serum levels of N-terminal of the prohormone brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) of 122 chronic heart failure patients and 122 healthy controls were analysed prospectively in this observational study. The 2-year mortality was considered as primary endpoint and the 6-month reverse remodelling (≥15% decrease in the end-systolic volume) as secondary endpoint. Multivariable regression analyses were applied and net reclassification improvement (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) were calculated. The NL ratio was elevated in chronic heart failure patients when compared with the healthy controls [2.93 (2.12–4.05) vs. 2.21 (1.64–2.81), P < 0.0001]. The baseline NL ratio exceeding 2.95 predicted the lack of the 6-month reverse remodelling [n = 63, odds ratio = 0.38 (0.17–0.85), P = 0.01; NRI = 0.49 (0.14–0.83), P = 0.005; IDI = 0.04 (0.00–0.07), P = 0.02] and the 2-year mortality [n = 29, hazard ratio = 2.44 (1.04–5.71), P = 0.03; NRI = 0.63 (0.24–1.01), P = 0.001; IDI = 0.04 (0.00–0.08), P = 0.02] independently of the NT-proBNP levels or other factors. Conclusion The NL ratio is elevated in chronic heart failure and predicts outcome after CRT. According to the reclassification analysis, 4% of the patients would have been better categorized in the prediction models by combining the NT-proBNP with the NL ratio. Thus, a single blood count measurement could facilitate the optimal patient selection for the CRT.

Longer right to left ventricular activation delay at cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation is associated with improved clinical outcome in left bundle branch block patients.

Abstract Aims Data on longer right to left ventricular activation delay (RV-LV AD) predicting clinical outcome after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) by left bundle branch block (LBBB) are limited. We aimed to evaluate the impact of RV-LV AD on N-terminal pro–B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), ejection fraction (EF), and clinical outcome in patients implanted with CRT, stratified by LBBB at baseline. Methods and results Heart failure (HF) patients undergoing CRT implantation with EF ≤ 35% and QRS ≥ 120 ms were evaluated based on their RV-LV AD at implantation. Baseline and 6-month clinical parameters, EF, and NT-proBNP values were assessed. The primary endpoint was HF or death, the secondary endpoint was all-cause mortality. A total of 125 patients with CRT were studied, 62% had LBBB. During the median follow-up of 2.2 years, 44 (35%) patients had HF/death, 36 (29%) patients died. Patients with RV-LV AD ≥ 86 ms (lower quartile) had significantly lower risk of HF/death [hazard ratio (HR): 0.44; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.23–0.82; P = 0.001] and all-cause mortality (HR: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.23–1.00; P = 0.05), compared with those with RV-LV AD < 86 ms. Patients with RV-LV AD ≥ 86 ms and LBBB showed the greatest improvement in EF (28–36%; P<0.001), NT-proBNP (2771–1216 ng/mL; P < 0.001), and they had better HF-free survival (HR: 0.23, 95% CI: 0.11–0.49, P < 0.001) and overall survival (HR: 0.35, 95% CI: 0.16–0.75; P = 0.007). There was no difference in outcome by RV-LV AD in non-LBBB patients. Conclusion Left bundle branch block patients with longer RV-LV activation delay at CRT implantation had greater improvement in NT-proBNP, EF, and significantly better clinical outcome.

Rotational atherectomy of undilatable coronary stents: Stentablation, a clinical perspective and recommendation

AIMS Our aim was to examine procedural viability and midterm outcomes following the use of rotational atherectomy (RA) on malapposed, crippled, otherwise non-salvageable metallic stents (i.e., stentablation [SA]), and convey important procedural pointers for practitioners encountering such situations. METHODS AND RESULTS Data on twelve SA subjects were analysed. The primary endpoint was procedural success: effective ablation of the malapposed stent and successful implantation of a new device. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and all-cause death at six months following the index procedure were examined as a secondary endpoint. All twelve patients underwent successful SA and novel stent implantation, with sufficient salvage of coronary anatomy (residual stenosis <30%). At six-month follow-up, however, MACE amounted to 50% and all-cause mortality to 25% in the inspected subjects. CONCLUSIONS We found that, although feasible as an acute salvage option, SA distinctively increases post-procedural midterm MACE and mortality rates. This places emphasis on the importance of avoiding eventual SA situations, underlining the importance of ample lesion preparation prior to stent implantation.

Implantable intravascular defibrillator: Defibrillation thresholds of an intravascular cardioverter-defibrillator compared with those of a conventional ICD in humans

BACKGROUND A percutaneous intravascular cardioverter-defibrillator (PICD) has been developed with a right ventricular (RV) single-coil lead and titanium electrodes in the superior vena cava (SVC)-brachiocephalic vein (BCV) region and the inferior vena cava (IVC). OBJECTIVE To compare defibrillation thresholds (DFTs) of the PICD with those of a conventional ICD in humans. METHODS Ten patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and ejection fraction ≤35% were randomized to initial testing with either PICD or conventional ICD. A standard dual-coil lead was positioned in the RV apex. If randomized to PICD, the device was placed into the vasculature such that 1 titanium electrode was positioned in the SVC-BCV region and the second in the IVC. For PICD DFTs, the RV coil of the conventional ICD lead was connected to the PICD mandrel [shock vector: RV (+) to SVC-BCV (-) + IVC (-)]. When testing the conventional ICD, a subcutaneous pocket was formed in the left pectoralis region and the ICD was connected to the lead system and positioned in the pocket [shock vector: RV (+) to SVC (-) + active can (-)]. Each device was removed before testing with the other. A step-down binary search protocol determined the DFT, with the initial shock being 9 J. RESULTS The mean PICD DFT was 7.6 ± 3.3 J, and the conventional ICD system demonstrated a mean DFT of 9.5 ± 4.7 J (N = 10; paired t test, P = .28). CONCLUSION The intravascular defibrillator has DFTs similar to those of commercially available ICDs.

Catheter-induced brachial artery dissection during transradial angioplasty.

The transradial approach is becoming a very popular technique in coronary and peripheral interventions because of its low vascular complication rate and improved patient comfort. Reported complications during the transradial approach are radial artery spasm, perforation, occlusion and formation of pseudoaneurysms. The kinking of the diagnostic catheter during catheter manipulation in a severely tortuous subclavian artery can occur very easily, and catheter movements at this point can cause barchial and subclavian artery dissection. We report a case of brachial and subclavian artery dissection during transradial diagnostic angiography, treated by angioplasty and stenting.

Direct comparison of steroid and non-steroid eluting small surface pacing leads: randomized, multicenter clinical trial.

BACKGROUND The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of small surface steroid-eluting atrial and ventricular pacing leads in comparison to non-steroid leads using remote monitoring system (Biotronik Home Monitoring®). METHODS In this randomized multicenter prospective trial, SIELLO T steroid-eluting ventricular leads (n = 42) were compared to BPPU T non-steroid leads (n = 46) and SIELLO JT steroid-eluting atrial leads (n = 24) to BPPU JT non-steroid leads (n = 27) (Biotronik, Berlin, Germany) in pacemaker devices with remote monitoring capabilities. Lead parameters were evaluated during implantation, at 1-week and 1, 3, 6-month outpatient follow-up. Remote monitoring data were collected weekly. RESULTS Atrial and ventricular steroid-eluting leads had stable sensing and impedance as compared to non-steroid leads at implantation and during follow-up. Patients with non-steroid atrial leads had significantly higher threshold compared to steroid leads at 1-week and at 1, 3, 6-month follow-up with a peak at 1-month (1-month 1.4 ± 0.6 vs. 0.7 ± 0.3 V at 0.4 ms, p < 0.001; 6-month 0.3 ± 0.5 vs. 0.2 ± 0.3 V at 0.4 ms, p = 0.002). Patients with non-steroid ventricular leads had significantly higher threshold compared to steroid leads at 1, 3, 6-month (6-month 1.0 ± 0.3 vs. 0.6 ± 0.2 V at 0.4 ms, p < 0.001). Remote monitoring confirmed consistent results. During the study, 3 patients died of non-lead-related death. Lead repositioning was necessary in 2 atrial, 2 ventricular steroid leads and in 1 ventricular non-steroid lead. CONCLUSIONS Atrial and ventricular pacemaker leads with steroid showed significantly lower pacing threshold compared to non-steroid leads, confirmed by remote monitoring.

Physiologic effects of hypothermia

Therapeutic use of hypothermia has come to the frontline in the past decade again in the prevention and in mitigation of neurologic impairment. The application of hypothermia is considered as a successful therapeutic measure not just in neuro- or cardiac surgery, but also in states causing brain injury or damage. According to our present knowledge this is the only proven therapeutic tool, which improves the neurologic outcome after cardiac arrest, decreasing the oxygen demand of the brain. Besides influencing the nervous system, hypothermia influences the function of the whole organ system. Beside its beneficial effects, it has many side-effects, which may be harmful to the patient. Before using it for a therapeutic purpose, it is very important to be familiar with the physiology and complications of hypothermia, to know, how to prevent and treat its side-effects. The purpose of this article is to summarize the physiologic and pathophysiologic effects of hypothermia.