Lewis Couchman

Plasma Clozapine, Norclozapine, and the Clozapine:Norclozapine Ratio in Relation to Prescribed Dose and Other Factors: Data From a Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Service, 1993-2007

Therapeutic drug monitoring of plasma clozapine and of its principal plasma metabolite N-desmethylclozapine (norclozapine) (predose or “trough” sample) can help in monitoring adherence, in dose adjustment, and in minimizing the risk of toxicity. To obtain data to assist in the interpretation of analytical results, the results from a clozapine therapeutic drug monitoring service, 1993-2007, have been audited. There were 104,127 samples from 26,796 patients [18,750 (70%) men aged at time of first sample (median, range) 34 (10-89) years, and 7763 (30%) female aged 38 (12-90) years]. Clozapine was not detected (plasma concentration <0.01 mg/L) in 1.5% of samples (prescribed clozapine dose up to 900 mg/d). Plasma clozapine was either below 0.35 mg/L or greater than 0.60 mg/L in 42.5% and 28.4% of samples, respectively; in 0.4% samples plasma clozapine was 2.0 mg/L or more. Although plasma clozapine was broadly related to prescribed dose, there was much variation: 1.2% of samples had plasma clozapine >1.0 mg/L at prescribed clozapine doses up to 150 mg/d (76.2% < 0.35 mg/L), whereas 23.3% of samples had plasma clozapine < 0.35 mg/L at doses of 850 mg/d and over (18.0% > 1.0 mg/L). The highest plasma clozapine and norclozapine concentrations encountered were 4.95 and 2.45 mg/L, respectively. Although the median plasma clozapine:norclozapine ratio was 1.25 at plasma clozapine concentrations < 0.35 mg/L, the median ratio was 2.08 at plasma clozapine concentrations > 1.0 mg/L. Data (median, 10th-90th percentile) for both clozapine and norclozapine by prescribed clozapine dose band are useful in assessing partial adherence. Analysis of the plasma clozapine:norclozapine ratio by clozapine concentration provides clear evidence that clozapine N-demethylation becomes saturated at higher plasma clozapine concentrations and adds urgency to the requirement for dose adjustment should smoking habit change. A clozapine:norclozapine ratio greater then 2 suggests either a nontrough sample, or that clozapine N-demethylation has become saturated.

Rapid development of sensitive, high-throughput, quantitative and highly selective mass spectrometric targeted immunoassays for clinically important proteins in human plasma and serum

OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to develop high-throughput, quantitative and highly selective mass spectrometric, targeted immunoassays for clinically important proteins in human plasma or serum. DESIGN AND METHODS The described method coupled mass spectrometric immunoassay (MSIA), a previously developed technique for immunoenrichment on a monolithic microcolumn activated with an anti-protein antibody and fixed in a pipette tip, to selected reaction monitoring (SRM) detection and accurate quantification of targeted peptides, including clinically relevant sequence or truncated variants. RESULTS In this report, we demonstrate the rapid development of MSIA-SRM assays for sixteen different target proteins spanning seven different clinically important areas (including neurological, Alzheimers, cardiovascular, endocrine function, cancer and other diseases) and ranging in concentration from pg/mL to mg/mL. The reported MSIA-SRM assays demonstrated high sensitivity (within published clinical ranges), precision, robustness and high-throughput as well as specific detection of clinically relevant isoforms for many of the target proteins. Most of the assays were tested with bona-fide clinical samples. In addition, positive correlations, (R2 0.67-0.87, depending on the target peptide), were demonstrated for MSIA-SRM assay data with clinical analyzer measurements of parathyroid hormone (PTH) and insulin growth factor 1 (IGF1) in clinical sample cohorts. CONCLUSIONS We have presented a practical and scalable method for rapid development and deployment of MS-based SRM assays for clinically relevant proteins and measured levels of the target analytes in bona fide clinical samples. The method permits the specific quantification of individual protein isoforms and addresses the difficult problem of protein heterogeneity in clinical proteomics applications.

LC-MS in analytical toxicology: some practical considerations

Liquid chromatography, coupled with single-stage or tandem mass spectrometry, is a powerful tool increasingly used in analytical toxicology. However, the atmospheric pressure ionization processes involved are complex, and subject to interference from matrix components, for example. Further, the techniques used in sample preparation, chromatography and mass analysis are developing rapidly. An understanding of the advantages and limitations of LC-MS ensures appropriate analyses are performed, and that reliable results are generated. Consideration should be given to the influence of the sample preparation and chromatographic conditions on the ionization of the analyte at the mass spectrometer interface. This review aims to provide some practical guidance and examples to aid method development for commonly encountered analytes in analytical toxicology.

Measurement of the Direct Oral Anticoagulants Apixaban, Dabigatran, Edoxaban, and Rivaroxaban in Human Plasma Using Turbulent Flow Liquid Chromatography With High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry

Background: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are prescribed for systemic anticoagulation. Fixed doses are recommended, but dose individualization may be warranted. Functional coagulation assays may be available, but their use requires knowledge of the drug taken. To provide alternative methodology for guiding dosage, we have developed and validated a liquid chromatography–mass spectrometric assay for apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban at the concentrations attained during therapy. Methods: Samples, calibrators, and internal quality controls (100 &mgr;L) were mixed with internal standard solution (50 &mgr;g/L both dabigatran-13C6 and rivaroxaban-13C6 in acetonitrile) and, after centrifugation (16,400g, 4 minutes), supernatant (100 &mgr;L) was injected onto a Cyclone-C18-P-XL TurboFlow column. Analytes were focused onto an Accucore PhenylHexyl (2.1 × 100 mm, 2.6 &mgr;m) analytical column and eluted using a methanol + acetonitrile (1 + 1):aqueous ammonium acetate (10 mmol/L) gradient. Data were acquired using high-resolution mass spectrometry in full-scan mode (100–2000 m/z) with data-dependent fragmentation to confirm peak identity. Calibration was linear (1–500 &mgr;g/L all analytes). Results: Total analysis time was 6 minutes. Intra-assay imprecision (% RSD) at 1 &mgr;g/L was 2.6%, 4.2%, 17.3%, and 9.5% for apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban, respectively. Mean recovery was 96%–101%. No signal suppression or enhancement was observed. Apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban were stable over 3 freeze–thaw cycles, after storage at room temperature, and at 2–8°C for up to 2 weeks. Edoxaban was stable over 3 freeze–thaw cycles but showed a mean deterioration of 16% if stored at 2–8°C (2 weeks) and of 18% and 70% (1 day and 2 weeks, respectively) at room temperature. Conclusions: The method is suitable for high-throughput therapeutic drug monitoring of DOACs. The acquisition of full scan data allows for the retrospective identification of metabolites. The method can be used to identify a particular DOAC if information on the drug taken is lacking.

Variability in the analysis of 25-hydroxyvitamin D by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry: The devil is in the detail

BACKGROUND Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) is increasingly used in clinical laboratories for the analysis of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD), but measurement is not straightforward. Importantly, LC-MS/MS is not a single technique: variables in sample preparation, chromatography and ionisation/fragmentation should each be considered. METHODS We analysed results from a survey organised by the international Vitamin D External Quality Assessment Scheme (DEQAS), to determine the influence of such variables on the results for two DEQAS distributions. RESULTS 65 laboratories returned questionnaires. 346 (57%) individual results were from laboratories using electrospray ionisation (ESI), and 259 (43%) from laboratories using atmospheric pressure chemical ionisation (APCI). Although the mean ratio of results was not significantly different between ESI and APCI (P=0.5828), there was greater variation (P<0.0001) in results obtained by laboratories using ESI. Greater variation (P<0.05) was also observed between results from laboratories monitoring non-specific water-loss transitions. Only 3 laboratories (5%) could resolve the isobaric metabolite 3-epi-25OHD(3) from 25OHD(3). CONCLUSIONS There are many variables to consider when using LC-MS/MS, including assay standardisation/calibration, chromatography and MS conditions. MS/MS alone cannot distinguish isobaric metabolites such as 3-epi-25OHD(3). Interference can also occur if non-specific transitions are used. Laboratories should always subscribe to an EQA scheme for 25OHD analysis.

LC-MS/MS of some atypical antipsychotics in human plasma, serum, oral fluid and haemolysed whole blood

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of atypical antipsychotics is common, but published methods often specify relatively complex sample preparation and analysis procedures. The aim of this work was to develop and validate a simple liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method for the analysis of amisulpride, aripiprazole and dehydroaripiprazole, clozapine and norclozapine, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone and 9-hydroxyrisperidone, and sulpiride in small (200 μL) volumes of plasma or serum for TDM purposes. The applicability of the method as developed to haemolysed whole blood and to oral fluid was also investigated. Analytes and internal standards were extracted into butyl acetate:butanol (9+1, v/v) and a portion of the extract analysed by LC-MS/MS (100 mm × 2.1 mm i.d. Waters Spherisorb S5SCX; eluent: 50 mmol/L methanolic ammonium acetate, pH* 6.0; flow-rate 0.5 mL/min; positive ion APCI-SRM, two transitions per analyte). Assay calibration (human plasma, oral fluid, and haemolysed whole blood calibration solutions) was performed by plotting the ratio of the peak area of the analyte to that of the appropriate internal standard. Assay validation was as per FDA guidelines. Assay calibration was linear across the concentration ranges studied. Inter- and intra-assay precision and accuracy were within 10% for all analytes in human plasma. Similar results were obtained for oral fluid and haemolysed whole blood, except that aripiprazole and dehydroaripiprazole were within 15% accuracy at low concentration (15 μg/L) in oral fluid, and olanzapine inter-assay precision could not be assessed in these matrices due to day-by-day degradation of this analyte. Recoveries varied between 16% (sulpiride) and 107% (clozapine), and were reproducible as well as comparable between human plasma, human serum, calf serum and haemolysed whole blood. For oral fluid, recoveries were reproducible, but differed slightly from those in plasma suggesting the need for calibration solutions to be prepared in this medium if oral fluid is to be analysed. LLOQs were 1-5 μg/L depending on the analyte. Neither ion suppression/enhancement, nor interference from some known metabolites of the antipsychotics studied has been encountered. The method has also been applied to the analysis of blood samples collected post-mortem after dilution (1+1, 1+3; v/v) in analyte-free calf serum.

Plasma olanzapine in relation to prescribed dose and other factors: data from a therapeutic drug monitoring service, 1999-2009.

Olanzapine therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is the measurement of plasma olanzapine to assess adherence and guide dosage. We have audited data from an olanzapine TDM service, 1999-2009. Multiple linear regression analysis was conducted to investigate the contribution of dose, age, sex, body weight, and smoking status to the plasma olanzapine concentration. There were 5856 samples from 3207 patients. The prescribed olanzapine dosage was 2.5 to 95 mg/d. No olanzapine was detected in 6% of samples. For olanzapine dosages of 2.5 to 20 mg/d, only 35% of results were within a suggested target range of 20 to 39 ng/mL. At doses above 20 mg/d, 30% to 59% of results were 60 ng/mL or greater depending on dose band. In patients aged 17 years or younger (92 samples), median plasma olanzapine was higher than that in adult patients at almost all olanzapine doses. Multiple linear regression analysis of results from 627 adults from whom complete data were available showed that dose, smoking status, sex, age, and body weight together explained 24% the variance in plasma olanzapine. Degree of adherence, timing of sample postdose, drug-drug interactions, and pharmacogenetic factors also may have contributed to the observed variance. However, it is clear that female nonsmokers had higher plasma olanzapine concentrations for a given dose than male smokers. Olanzapine TDM is useful in assessing adherence and may have a role in limiting olanzapine dosage to minimize the risk of long-term toxicity.

An automated, high-throughput method for targeted quantification of intact insulin and its therapeutic analogs in human serum or plasma coupling mass spectrometric immunoassay with high resolution and accurate mass detection (MSIA-HR/AM)

The detection and quantification of insulin and its therapeutic analogs is important for medical, sports doping, and forensic applications. Synthetic variants contain slight sequence variations to affect bioavailability. To reduce sample handling bias, a universal extraction method is required for simultaneous extraction of endogenous and variant insulins with subsequent targeted quantification by LC‐MS. A mass spectrometric immunoassay (MSIA), a multiplexed assay for intact insulin and its analogues that couples immunoenrichment with high resolution and accurate mass (HR/AM) spectrometric detection across the clinical range is presented in this report. The assay is sensitive, selective, semi‐automated and can potentially be applied to detect new insulin isoforms allowing their further incorporation into second or third generation assays.

Commercial insulin immunoassays fail to detect commonly prescribed insulin analogues

OBJECTIVES Blood insulin and C-peptide are key investigations in the differential diagnosis of hypoglycaemia. Analogues of insulin have modified primary-sequences compared to native human insulin, as such may not cross react with insulin assays. This has important implications in detecting surreptitious or malicious insulin administration. The aim of this study is to assess the cross-reactivity of all insulins currently listed in the British National Formulary (BNF65, 2013) in clinical insulin assays currently used in UK clinical laboratories. DESIGN AND METHODS Sample sets were prepared for all 15 exogenous insulin classes listed in the BNF, at concentrations of 1000 pmol/L and 300 pmol/L, using pooled human serum. Samples were sent blinded to 5 participating analytical laboratories to cover analysis on the 10 major clinical insulin assays used in the UK. RESULTS The ability of insulin assays to detect exogenous insulin preparations was highly variable and ranged from 0% to >140% for a single exogenous insulin. Four assays were highly specific for the human insulin sequence and had no cross-reactivity with any synthetic analogue insulin. Two detected all insulin types (human sequence, animal and synthetic analogue), with the remaining having variable cross-reactivity. CONCLUSION The cross-reactivity of the 15 exogenous insulin preparations is highly variable in the assays used in clinical laboratories around the UK. It is important that laboratories and clinicians are aware of the limitations of their local assays to avoid missing the important diagnosis of hypoglycaemia secondary to excessive exogenous insulin. Where necessary, samples should be referred to specialist centres for insulin analysis and ideally by a validated and fully-quantitative mass spectrometry-based method.

LC-MS candidate reference methods for the harmonisation of parathyroid hormone (PTH) measurement: a review of recent developments and future considerations

Abstract The analysis of intact parathyroid hormone (PTH) (PTH1-84) is useful in the diagnosis of hyper- and hypocalcaemia, hyperparathyroidism, and in the prevention of bone mineral disorders in renal patients. The analysis is complicated by the presence of PTH fragments, which may accumulate in renal failure and cross-react in immunoassays, including the most recent third-generation immunoassays. Large variability exists between different commercially available assays. This article reviews the current literature on PTH testing, with emphasis on the use of mass spectrometry-based methods, and considers the important sources of variation which still need to be addressed prior to the development of much needed candidate reference methods for PTH analysis. Recently, mass spectrometric methods have been developed for the quantitation of PTH1-84 using surrogate tryptic peptides, but even these methods are subject to significant interferences due to the presence of newly observed modified PTH species, such as oxidised and phosphorylated PTH variants, which can accumulate in patient samples. Further work, including: 1) the use of high-resolution mass spectrometry; and 2) the analysis of PTH without prior protease digestion, is required before these approaches can be considered as reference methods against which other methods should be harmonised.