Li Ming Su

The Learning Curve for Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: An International Multicenter Study

PURPOSEnIt is not yet possible to estimate the number of cases required for a beginner to become expert in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. We estimated the learning curve of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for positive surgical margins compared to a published learning curve for open radical prostatectomy.nnnMATERIALS AND METHODSnWe reviewed records from 8,544 consecutive patients with prostate cancer treated laparoscopically by 51 surgeons at 14 academic institutions in Europe and the United States. The probability of a positive surgical margin was calculated as a function of surgeon experience with adjustment for pathological stage, Gleason score and prostate specific antigen. A second model incorporated prior experience with open radical prostatectomy and surgeon generation.nnnRESULTSnPositive surgical margins occurred in 1,862 patients (22%). There was an apparent improvement in surgical margin rates up to a plateau at 200 to 250 surgeries. Changes in margin rates once this plateau was reached were relatively minimal relative to the CIs. The absolute risk difference for 10 vs 250 prior surgeries was 4.8% (95% CI 1.5, 8.5). Neither surgeon generation nor prior open radical prostatectomy experience was statistically significant when added to the model. The rate of decrease in positive surgical margins was more rapid in the open vs laparoscopic learning curve.nnnCONCLUSIONSnThe learning curve for surgical margins after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy plateaus at approximately 200 to 250 cases. Prior open experience and surgeon generation do not improve the margin rate, suggesting that the rate is primarily a function of specifically laparoscopic training and experience.

Association of Surgeon Subjective Characterization of Nerve Sparing Quality With Potency Following Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy

PURPOSEnWe assessed whether a surgeon self-graded assessment of neurovascular bundle preservation quality predicted potency following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.nnnMATERIALS AND METHODSnFrom April 2001 to January 2007 a total of 767 laparoscopic radical prostatectomies were performed by 2 surgeons who graded left and right neurovascular bundle sparing qualities on a scale of 0 to 5. The total number of nerves spared was also recorded. We defined a composite variable, the bilateral sum neurovascular bundle sparing score, to encode 1 independent variable (scale of 0 to 10) for analysis. Multivariate linear regression models were evaluated to assess the significance of the bilateral sum neurovascular bundle sparing score for predicting validated potency outcomes, controlling for significant clinical variables in preoperatively potent men (Sexual Health Inventory for Men 21 or greater). The bilateral sum neurovascular bundle sparing score based model was compared to a model based on the separate number of nerves spared.nnnRESULTSnA total of 313 patients were preoperatively potent, of whom 226 (72%), 77 (25%) and 10 (3%) underwent bilateral, unilateral and no neurovascular bundle sparing, respectively. Of the men who underwent bilateral neurovascular bundle sparing 64.3% were engaging in intercourse by 1 year. Regression models indicated that the bilateral sum neurovascular bundle sparing score and the number of nerves spared were highly significant independent positive predictors of postoperative sexual function (p <0.001). The bilateral sum neurovascular bundle sparing score model provided differential prognostic information in the majority group that underwent bilateral nerve preservation. Other independently predictive variables were patient age at surgery, months since surgery and preoperative Sexual Health Inventory for Men 21 to 25 (each p <0.001).nnnCONCLUSIONSnCavernous nerve preservation during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is not an all or none phenomenon. A surgeon subjective sense of neurovascular bundle sparing quality may aid in accurately characterizing the return of sexual function following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Partial nerve preservation may lead to an incremental improvement in the return of sexual function.

The Impact of Prostate Size on Urinary Quality of Life Indexes Following Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy

PURPOSEnWe assessed the effects of prostate size on long-term health related quality of life and functional outcomes after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.nnnMATERIALS AND METHODSnA total of 729 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer were stratified by pathological prostate gland weight, including group 1--less than 35 gm, group 2--35 to 70 gm and group 3--greater than 70 gm. Urinary health related quality of life was assessed preoperatively and at regular intervals following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy using the validated Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite questionnaire.nnnRESULTSnA total of 613 evaluable patients were studied with a mean age of 57.7 years, a preoperative prostate specific antigen of 6.0 ng/ml, a median preoperative and postoperative Gleason score of 6, and a mean pathological gland weight of 51.3 gm (range 13.4 to 145.7). Patients with the largest glands had significantly worse baseline urinary function, as demonstrated by Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite urinary domain summary (p <0.001) and subscale scores, including scores for urinary bother (p <0.001), urinary irritative/obstructive (p = 0.001) and urinary incontinence (p = 0.03). Patients in group 3 also had significantly older age, a higher body mass index, longer operative time and more blood loss (each p <0.05). Despite preoperative differences and possible confounders all groups approached similar urinary health related quality of life outcomes at all time points postoperatively. At 12 months patients with the largest glands had improved Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite urinary irritative/obstructive and urinary bother subscale scores compared to their baseline scores (p <0.05).nnnCONCLUSIONSnIn laparoscopic radical prostatectomy despite preoperative differences increasing prostatic size is not associated with delayed or worse postoperative urinary health related quality of life. Furthermore, in patients with large glands an improvement in urinary irritative/obstructive and bother symptoms from baseline may be seen 12 months postoperatively.

Learning curve of positive margin rate in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

estimate -2.99, 95%CI -3.45,-2.53) but more anastomotic strictures (OR 1.40, 95%CI 1.04,1.87) and higher rates of salvage therapy (OR 3.67, 95%CI 2.81,4.81). Patients of high-volume MIRP experienced fewer anastomotic strictures (OR 0.93, 95%CI 0.87,0.99) and less salvage therapy (OR 0.92, 95%CI 0.88,0.98). CONCLUSIONS: Men undergoing MIRP vs. open radical prostatectomy have lower risk for perioperative complications and shorter lengths of stay, but are at higher risk for salvage therapy and anastomotic strictures. However, risk for these unfavorable outcomes decreases with increasing MIRP surgical volume.