Lifang Ma

Mutual inhibition between YAP and SRSF1 maintains long non-coding RNA, Malat1-induced tumourigenesis in liver cancer.

Emerging studies have revealed that Malat1 is overexpressed in many malignant diseases, including liver cancer, and contributes to enhancing cell migration or facilitating proliferation. However, the mechanism underlying its regulation has largely remained elusive. Here, we characterised the oncoprotein Yes-associated protein (YAP), which up-regulated metastasis-associated lung adenocarcinoma transcript 1 (Malat1) expression at both transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels, whereas serine/arginine-rich splicing factor 1 (SRSF1) played an opposing role. SRSF1 inhibited YAP activity by preventing its co-occupation with TCF/β-catenin on the Malat1 promoter. In contrast, overexpression of YAP impaired the nuclear retention of both SRSF1 and itself via an interaction with Angiomotin (AMOT). This effect removed the inhibitory role of SRSF1 on Malat1 in the nucleus. Furthermore, higher expression of YAP was consistent with a lower SRSF1 nuclear accumulation in human liver cancer tissues. We also revealed that overexpression of YAP combined with a knockdown of SRSF1 resulted in conspicuously enhanced transwell cell mobility, accelerated tumour growth rate, and loss of body weight in a tail vein-injected mouse models. Taken together, these data provided a novel mechanism underlying the balance between SRSF1, YAP and Malat1 and uncovered a new role of YAP in regulating long non-coding RNA (lncRNA). Thus, disrupting the interaction between YAP and SRSF1 may serve as a crucial therapeutic method in liver cancer.

Mutual interaction between YAP and CREB promotes tumorigenesis in liver cancer

Yes‐associated protein (YAP), the downstream effecter of the Hippo‐signaling pathway as well as cyclic adenosine monophosphate response element‐binding protein (CREB), has been linked to hepatocarcinogenesis. However, little is known about whether and how YAP and CREB interact with each other. In this study, we found that YAP‐CREB interaction is critical for liver cancer cell survival and maintenance of transformative phenotypes, both in vitro and in vivo. Moreover, both CREB and YAP proteins are highly expressed in a subset of human liver cancer samples and are closely correlated. Mechanistically, CREB promotes YAP transcriptional output through binding to −608/−439, a novel region from the YAP promoter. By contrast, YAP promotes protein stabilization of CREB through interaction with mitogen‐activated protein kinase 14 (MAPK14/p38) and beta‐transducin repeat containing E3 ubiquitin protein ligase (BTRC). Gain‐of‐function and loss‐of‐function studies demonstrated that phosphorylation of CREB by MAPK14/p38 at ser133 ultimately leads to its degradation. Such effects can be enhanced by BTRC through phosphorylation of MAPK14/p38 at Thr180/Tyr182. However, YAP negatively controls phosphorylation of MAPK14/p38 through inhibition of BTRC expression. Conclusion: There is a novel positive autoregulatory feedback loop underlying the interaction between YAP and CREB in liver cancer, suggesting that YAP and CREB form a nexus to integrate the protein kinase A, Hippo/YAP, and MAPK14/p38 pathways in cancer cells and thus may be helpful in the development of effective diagnosis and treatment strategies against liver cancer. (Hepatology 2013;53:1011–1020)

Tumor suppressor long non-coding RNA, MT1DP is negatively regulated by YAP and Runx2 to inhibit FoxA1 in liver cancer cells

Recent studies are indicative for strong carcinogenetic roles of Runt related transcription factor 2 (Runx2) and Yes associated protein (YAP) in several cancer types. However, whether and how the interaction between Runx2 and YAP plays a role in liver tumorigenesis still remain illusive. Here, we identified a close relationship between Runx2 and YAP in liver cancer cells. Runx2 had a positive role on YAP expression and vice versa. We also found that Rux2 and YAP were capable of inhibiting long non-coding RNA (lncRNA), Metallothionein 1D, Pseudogene (MT1DP) expression through direct promoter binding. Overexpression of MT1DP resulted in reduced cell proliferation and colony formation in soft agar, but increased apoptosis in liver cancer cells, whereas knockdown of this lncRNA had the opposite effect, indicating that MT1DP acts as a tumor suppressor. Furthermore, MT1DP was revealed as a negative regulator of Alfa-fetoprotein (AFP), a classic liver cancer tumor marker, through inhibiting protein synthesis of Forkhead box A1 (FoxA1), an important transcription factor in liver development and cancer progression. Furthermore, we found that FoxA1 plays a positive role on YAP and Runx2 expression. Specially, opening the compacted chromatin by FoxA1 around CREB binding site within the YAP promoter facilitates CREB-mediated YAP transcription. Finally, MT1DP-inhibited in vivo liver cancer cell growth could be rescued by a combination of overexpression of FoxA1, Runx2 and YAP. Taken together, the close relationship between Rnux2 and YAP plays a pro-carcinogenetic role in liver cancer cells through inhibiting tumor suppressor lncRNA, MT1DP in a FoxA1 dependent manner.

Mutual interaction between YAP and c-Myc is critical for carcinogenesis in liver cancer.

Yes-associated protein (YAP), the downstream effector of Hippo signaling pathway as well as c-Myc has been linked to hepatocarcinogenesis. However, little is known about whether and how YAP and c-Myc interacts with each other. In this study, we find YAP-c-Myc interaction is critical for liver cancer cell both in vitro and in vivo. Moreover, both c-Myc and YAP proteins are closely correlated in human liver cancer samples. Mechanistically, YAP promotes c-Myc transcriptional output through c-Abl. By contrast, c-Myc enhances protein expression independent of transcription. Taken together, our study uncovers a novel positive auto-regulatory feedback loop underlying the interaction between YAP and c-Myc in liver cancer, suggesting YAP and c-Myc links Hippo/YAP and c-Myc pathways, and thus may be helpful in the development of effective diagnosis and treatment strategies against liver cancer.

Cluster of Differentiation 166 (CD166) Regulated by Phosphatidylinositide 3-Kinase (PI3K)/AKT Signaling to Exert Its Anti-apoptotic Role via Yes-associated Protein (YAP) in Liver Cancer

Background: CD166 is overexpressed and regarded as a valuable prognostic marker in tumors. Results: An autoregulatory feedback between PI3K/AKT and CD166 was revealed, and YAP was identified as a CD166 downstream effecter. Conclusion: CD166 is regulated by PI3K/AKT to exert its anti-apoptotic role via YAP. Significance: The relationship between CD166 and YAP provides new therapeutic insights into liver cancer. Cluster of differentiation 166 (CD166 or Alcam) is a cell surface molecule that can be greatly induced in liver cancer cells after serum deprivation, suggesting its role in influencing cell survival. However, whether and how CD166 acts as an anti-apoptotic regulator needs to be further investigated. Here, we report that gene silencing of CD166 promoted apoptosis via down-regulation of Bcl-2 in liver cancer cells. PI3K/AKT signaling was found to up-regulate CD166 expression independently of transcription. We also revealed that CD166 promoted both AKT expression and activity, thus providing a novel positive regulatory feedback between PI3K/AKT signaling and CD166. Moreover, Yes-associated protein (YAP) was identified as a CD166 downstream effecter, which can partly rescue CD166 knockdown-induced apoptosis and reduced in vivo cancer cell growth. Mechanically, CD166 modulated YAP expression and activity through at least two different ways, transcriptional regulation of YAP through cAMP-response element-binding protein and post-transcriptional control of YAP stability through inhibition to AMOT130. We also showed that CD9 enhanced CD166-mediated regulation of YAP via a mechanism involving facilitating CD166-CD166 homophilic interaction. Tissue microarray analysis revealed that CD166 and YAP were up-regulated and closely correlated in liver cancer samples, demonstrating the importance of their relationship. Taken together, this work summarizes a novel link between CD166 and YAP, explores the interplay among related important signaling pathways, and may lead to more effective therapeutic strategies for liver cancer.

Impaired Phosphorylation and Ubiquitination by p70 S6 Kinase (p70S6K) and Smad Ubiquitination Regulatory Factor 1 (Smurf1) Promote Tribbles Homolog 2 (TRIB2) Stability and Carcinogenic Property in Liver Cancer

Background: TRIB2 is functionally important for liver cancer cell survival and transformation. Results: Structure-function and biochemistry-based analysis revealed domains critical for TRIB2 protein stability. Conclusion: Impaired phosphorylation and ubiquitination by p70S6K and Smurf1 increase protein stability of TRIB2 in liver cancer. Significance: The uncovered mechanism underlying regulation of TRIB2 provides new therapeutic insights into TRIB2-dependent liver cancer. Tribbles homolog 2 (TRIB2) is critical for both solid and non-solid malignancies. Recently, TRIB2 was identified as a liver cancer-specific Wnt/β-catenin signaling downstream target and is functionally important for liver cancer cell survival and transformation. TRIB2 functions as a protein that interacts with E3 ubiquitin ligases and thereby modulates protein stability of downstream effectors. However, the regulation underlying TRIB2 protein stability per se has not yet been reported. In this study, we found that TRIB2 was up-regulated and exhibited high stability in liver cancer cells compared with other cells. We performed a structure-function analysis of TRIB2 and identified a domain (amino acids 1–5) at the N terminus that interacted with the E3 ubiquitin ligase Smurf1 and was critical for protein stability. Deletion of this domain extended TRIB2 half-life time accompanied with a more significant malignant property compared with wild type TRIB2. Furthermore, Smurf1-mediated ubiquitination required phosphorylation of TRIB2 by p70 S6 kinase (p70S6K) via another domain (amino acids 69–85) that is also essential for correct TRIB2 subcellular localization. Mutation of Ser-83 diminished p70S6K-induced phosphorylation of TRIB2. Moreover, the high stability of TRIB2 may be due to the fact that both p70S6K and Smurf1 were down-regulated and negatively correlated with TRIB2 expression in both liver cancer tissues and established liver cancer cell lines. Taken together, impaired phosphorylation and ubiquitination by p70S6K and Smurf1 increase the protein stability of TRIB2 in liver cancer and thus may be helpful in the development of diagnosis and treatment strategies against this malignant disease.

MEK1 promotes YAP and their interaction is critical for tumorigenesis in liver cancer

Mitogen‐activated protein kinase kinase 1 (MAP2K1/MEK1) as well as Yes‐associated protein (YAP), the downstream effector of Hippo signaling pathway, is linked to hepatocarcinogenesis. However, little is known about whether and how MEK1 interacts with YAP. In this study, we find that MEK1‐YAP interaction is critical for liver cancer cell proliferation and maintenance of transformed phenotypes both in vitro and in vivo. Moreover, MEK1 and YAP proteins are closely correlated in human liver cancer samples. Mechanistically, inhibition of MEK1 by both PD98059 and U0126 as well as RNAi reduces beta‐transducin repeat containing E3 ubiquitin protein ligase (BTRC), which acts as a potential endogenous YAP protector.

Serum CD166: A novel hepatocellular carcinoma tumor marker

BACKGROUND We evaluated the diagnostic value of serum-CD166 in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS Tissue-CD166 was measured using immunohistochemistry. Cell proliferation and migration were evaluated using MTT and Transwell assays, respectively. Serum-CD166 was examined using ELISA and western blotting. RESULTS CD166 was up-regulated in HCC compared to those in normal liver tissues. Cell proliferation was positively correlated and cell migration was negatively correlated with endogenous CD166 expression in HCC cells. CD166 inhibition using specific shRNA decreased cell proliferation but increased cell migration. Serum CD166 concentrations were much higher in HCC than in colon cancer, hepatitis B, hepatitis C, cirrhosis, gastric cancer, breast cancer, lung cancer and healthy individuals. Serum CD166 also decreased dramatically after curative surgery. A positive correlation was found between serum CD166 and AFP (R=0.7141, p=0.000). Serum CD166 was also positively correlated with γ-GT, bile acid, ALT, AST, and ALP but was negatively correlated with Alb and pre-Alb. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for serum-CD166 was 0.9860, which was better than AFP (AUC-ROC, 0.9354) for the differentiation of HCC patients from healthy individuals, with a cut-off of 261 ng/ml (sensitivity: 100.00%, specificity: 89.41%). CONCLUSION Serum CD166 is a novel diagnostic tumor marker for HCC.

The association between the migration inhibitory factor -173g/c polymorphism and cancer risk: a meta-analysis

Previous studies have suggested that macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) −173G/C polymorphism may be associated with cancer risk. However, previous research has demonstrated conflicting results. Therefore, we followed the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and the meta-analysis on genetic association studies checklist, and performed a meta-analysis to investigate the association between MIF −173G/C polymorphisms and the risk of cancer. Odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were combined to measure the association between MIF promoter polymorphisms and cancer risk. The pooled ORs were performed for the dominant model, recessive model, allelic model, homozygote comparison, and heterozygote comparison. The publication bias was examined by Begg’s funnel plots and Egger’s test. A total of ten studies enrolling 2,203 cases and 2,805 controls met the inclusion criteria. MIF (−173G/C) polymorphism was significantly associated with increased cancer risk under the dominant model (OR=1.32, 95%, CI=1.00–1.74, P=0.01) and the heterozygote comparison (OR=1.38, CI=1.01–1.87, P=0.04). In subgroup analysis, MIF polymorphism and prostate were related to increased risk of prostate and non-solid cancer. In conclusion, MIF polymorphism was significantly associated with cancer risk in heterozygote comparison. The MIF −173G/C polymorphism may be associated with increased cancer risk.

CD166 plays a pro-carcinogenic role in liver cancer cells via inhibition of FOXO proteins through AKT

Cluster of differentiation 166 (CD166) is a cell surface membrane protein, which is regarded as a valuable prognostic marker in several types of epithelial tumors. We previously reported that CD166 exerts its pro-carcinogenic role by enhancing YAP function in liver cancer cells. However, YAP cannot completely rescue the increased anti‑carcinogenic effects by gene silencing of CD166, whose downstream effectors require further investigation. Here, we found that knockdown of CD166 inhibits phosphorylation of anti-carcinogenic FOXO proteins. Overexpression of CD166 led, not only to a faster protein degradation rate, but also a more accumulated ubiquitination of FOXO compared to the control. Moreover, overexpression of CD166 facilitated FOXO protein localization from the nuclear fraction to the cytosolic fraction, suggesting that CD166 modulates FOXO protein stability through alteration of their subcellular localization. In addition, simultaneous overexpression of CD166 partially reversed the evoked anti-carcinogenic effects by overexpression of FOXO both in vitro and in vivo. Furthermore, CD166 knockdown‑induced anti‑carcinogenic effects and dephosphorylation of FOXO proteins were rescued by overexpression of AKT. In liver cancer tissues, we also observed that higher expression levels of CD166, phospho-AKT, total AKT and phospho‑FOXO were correlated with lower expression levels of total FOXO, suggesting that the upregulation of CD166 leads to the activation of AKT, which in turn facilitates phosphorylation and degradation of FOXO. Taken together, our data demonstrate that AKT is an inter-mediator between the upstream regulator, CD166, and downstream effector, FOXO, in liver cancer cells. Disrupting the relationship between CD166 and the AKT/FOXO axis may serve as a novel therapeutic target for liver cancer patients.