Lilian Vloet
HAN University of Applied Sciences
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Lilian Vloet.
European Journal of Emergency Medicine | 2015
Remco Ebben; Lilian Vloet; Pierre M. van Grunsven; Wim Breeman; Ben Goosselink; Rob A. Lichtveld; Joke Mintjes-de Groot; Theo van Achterberg
Objectives Adherence to prehospital guidelines and protocols is suboptimal. Insight into influencing factors is necessary to improve adherence. The aim of this study was to identify factors that influence ambulance nurses’ adherence to a National Protocol Ambulance Care (NPAC). Methods A questionnaire was developed using the literature, a questionnaire and expert opinion. Ambulance nurses (n=452) from four geographically spread emergency medical services (EMSs) in the Netherlands were invited to fill out the questionnaire. The questionnaire included questions on influencing factors and self-reported adherence. Results Questionnaires were returned by 248 (55%) of the ambulance nurses. These ambulance nurses’ adherence to the NPAC was 83.4% (95% confidence interval 81.9–85.0). Bivariate correlations showed 23 influencing factors that could be related to the individual professional, organization, protocol characteristics and social context. Multilevel regression analysis showed that 21% of the variation in adherence (R 2=0.208) was explained by protocol characteristics and social influences. Conclusion Ambulance nurses’ self-reported adherence to the NPAC seems high. To improve adherence, protocol characteristics (complexity, the degree of support for diagnosis and treatment, the relationship of the protocol with patient outcomes) and social influences (expectance of colleagues to work with the national protocol) should be addressed.
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine | 2015
Remco Ebben; Pierre M. van Grunsven; Marie Louise Moors; Peter Aldenhoven; Jordan de Vaan; Roger van Hout; Theo van Achterberg; Lilian Vloet
ObjectiveTo standardize patient handover in the chain of emergency care a handover guideline was developed. The main guideline recommendation is to use the DeMIST model (Demographics, Mechanism of Injury/illness, Injury/Illness, Signs, Treatment given) to structure pre-hospital notification and handover. To benefit from the new guideline, guideline adherence is necessary. As adherence to guidelines in emergency care settings is variable, there is a need to systematically implement the new guideline. For implementation of the guideline we developed a e-learning program tailored to influencing factors. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of this e-learning program to improve emergency care professionals’ adherence to the handover guideline during pre-hospital notification and handover in the chain of emergency medical service (EMS), emergency medical dispatch (EMD), and emergency department (ED).MethodsA prospective pre-test post-test study was conducted. The intervention was a tailored e-learning program that was offered to ambulance crew and emergency medical dispatchers (n=88). Data on adherence included pre-hospital notifications and handovers and were collected through observations and audiotapes before and after the e-learning program. Data were analyzed using X2-tests and t-tests.ResultsIn total, 78/88 (88.6%) professionals followed the e-learning program. During pre- and post-test, 146 and 169 handovers were observed respectively. After the e-learning program, no significant difference in the number of handovers with the DeMIST model (77.9% vs. 73.1%, p=.319) and the number of handovers with the correct sequence of the DeMIST model (69.9% vs. 70.5%, p=.159) existed. During the handover, the number of questions by ED staff and interruptions significantly increased from 49.0% to 68.9% and from 15.2% to 52.7% respectively (both p=.000). Most handovers were performed after patient transfer, this did not change after the intervention (p=.167). The number of handovers where information was documented during handover slightly increased from 26.9% to 29.3% (p=.632).ConclusionsThe tailored e-learning program did not improve adherence to a handover guideline in the chain of emergency care. Results show a relatively high baseline adherence rate to usage and correct sequence of the DeMIST model. Improvements in the handover process can be made on the documentation of information during handover, the number of interruptions and questions, and the handover moment.
Vakblad Sociaal Werk | 2017
Karin Landsbergen; S.A.A. Berben; Lilian Vloet
SamenvattingIn onze participatiesamenleving wonen ouderen steeds langer thuis. Veel mantelzorgers raken overbelast. De kans op ouderenmishandeling en verwaarlozing neemt daarom toe. Wat doe je als sociaal werker bij een niet-pluis gevoel? Onderzoekers van het lectoraat Acute Intensieve Zorg van de HAN ontwikkelden samen met en voor professionals in de acute zorg praktische handvatten om ouderenmishandeling te leren signaleren.
Acute Pain | 2008
S.A.A. Berben; Tineke H.J.M. Meijs; R.T.M. van Dongen; A.B. van Vugt; Lilian Vloet; J.J. Mintjes-de Groot; T. van Achterberg
BACKGROUND Acute pain in the A&E department (ED) has been described as a problem, however insight into the problem for trauma patients is lacking. OBJECTIVE This study describes the prevalence of pain, the pain intensity and the effect of conventional pain treatment in trauma patients in the ED. METHODS In a prospective cohort study of 450 trauma patients, pain was measured on admission and at discharge, using standardized and validated pain instruments. RESULTS The prevalence of pain was high, both on admission (91%) and at discharge (86%). Two thirds of the trauma patients reported moderate or severe pain at discharge. Few patients received pharmacological or non-pharmacological pain relieving treatment during their stay in the ED. Pain decreased in 37% of the patients, did not change at all in 46%, or had increased in 17% of the patients at discharge from the ED. The most effective pain treatment given was a combination of injury treatment and supplementary pharmacological interventions, however this treatment was given to a small group of patients. CONCLUSIONS Acute pain in trauma patients is a significant problem in the EDs. Pain itself does not seem to be treated systematically and sufficiently, anywhere in the cycle of injury treatment in the ED.
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine | 2013
Remco Ebben; Lilian Vloet; M.H.J. Verhofstad; Sanne Meijer; Joke Mintjes-de Groot; Theo van Achterberg
International Journal of Nursing Studies | 2010
Betsie G.I. van Gaal; Lisette Schoonhoven; Lilian Vloet; Joke Mintjes; George F. Borm; Raymond T. C. M. Koopmans; Theo van Achterberg
Journal of Emergency Nursing | 2014
Remco Ebben; Lilian Vloet; D.M.J. Schalk; Joke Mintjes-de Groot; Theo van Achterberg
European Journal of Emergency Medicine | 2012
Remco Ebben; Lilian Vloet; Joke Mintjes de Groot; Theo van Achterberg
Archive | 2011
Theo van Achterberg; Lisette Schoonhoven; M.E.J.L. Hulscher; Tom Defloor; Raymond T. C. M. Koopmans; Lilian Vloet; Bauke Koekkoek; Joke Mintjes; A. Habets; B.G.I. van Gaal; George F. Borm; A. Voss
Vakblad V&VN Ambulancezorg | 2011
Joke Mintjes; Remco Ebben; Lilian Vloet