Liliane Krespi

Host-stage selection by Trybliographa rapae, a parasitoid of the cabbage root fly Delia radicum.

Host‐stage selection by Trybliographa rapae Westwood (Hymenoptera: Figitidae) was studied in choice and no‐choice experiments in the laboratory. The parasitoid was able to reproduce in first, second, and third instars of the cabbage root fly, Delia radicum L. (Diptera: Anthomyiidae), but oviposition occurred more frequently in third instars when all three developmental stages were offered simultaneously. Oviposition in third instars increased the rate of development of offspring and their body size, but did not alter sex ratio. Results are discussed in the light of predictions made by the theory of optimal host acceptance.

Playing the hare or the tortoise in parasitoids: could different oviposition strategies have an influence in host partitioning in two Aphidius species?

In this paper, we compare the host selection behaviours of two parasitoids, Aphidius rhopalosiphi and Aphidius picipes, in order to analyse whether behavioural adaptations to the defensive behaviour of their host (the grain aphid Sitobion avenae) could, in part, be responsible for the simultaneous presence of both species in cereal fields. The oviposition behaviour of A. picipes differed from that of A. rhopalosiphi by including a number of ‘fluttering wings’ sequences followed by immobility. It resulted in a 44 times longer host-handling time for A. picipes than for A. rhopalosiphi. Hosts attacked by A. picipes exhibited fewer defensive behaviours than hosts attacked by A. rhopalosiphi. A. picipes and A. rhopalosiphi rejected respectively 0% and 53% of unparasitized hosts presenting cornicle secretions, one of the defensive means of aphids. Furthermore, A. picipes females rejected 100% of the hosts that were already parasitized, whereas A. rhopalosiphi was previously described to reject only 20 to 40% of such hosts. Such differences could be explained by the way the two species deal with the aphid defensive behaviour. Field analyses, showed that A. rhopalosiphi was already present in wheat fields in early April whereas A. picipes appeared later and only achieved a low level of parasitism. However, when both species were present simultaneously, they shared the same resource.

Selection Strategies of Parasitized Hosts in a Generalist Parasitoid Depend on Patch Quality but Also on Host Size

Host rejection, superparasitism, and ovicide are three possible host selection strategies that parasitoid females can adopt when they encounter parasitized hosts. These differ in costs (in terms of time and energy required) and benefits (in terms of number and quality of offspring produced). Their relative payoff should vary with patch quality, (i.e., proportion of parasitized hosts present), and female choice between them should be adapted accordingly. We conducted behavioral observations to test the effect of the ratio of parasitized/unparasitized hosts present in a patch on the host selection strategies of Pachycrepoideus vindemmiae Rondani (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae). This species being a generalist known to attack hosts of a great range of size, we also tested the impact of host size on female decisions with two host species differing greatly in size (Drosophila melanogaster and Delia radicum). We evaluated the adaptive value of each strategy in relation to host parasitization status and host size by measuring their duration and the potential number of offspring produced.

Intraspecific Variations in Host Discrimination Behavior in the Pupal Parasitoid Pachycrepoideus vindemmiae Rondani (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae)

Abstract In solitary parasitoid species, superparasitism incurs a high cost because only one individual can emerge per host. While avoiding already-parasitized hosts seems advantageous, it requires an ability to discriminate between parasitized and unparasitized hosts. The ability to discriminate can be based on physical or chemical cues or signal associated either internally or externally with a given host. The type of stimuli used to recognize parasitized hosts generally depends on the features of these hosts but also on costs and benefits associated with reusing them. Some local factors such as mortality rate of females, host availability, and competition level can influence this trade-off. In species that occupy a large geographic range, local conditions may favor either external or internal mechanisms of host discrimination. We describe the behaviors associated with host discrimination in Pachycrepoideus vindemmiae Rondani (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae), a solitary pupal parasitoid of cyclorraphous dipteran species. To detect potential intraspecific variability in their host discrimination behavior, we compared two P. vindemmiae populations originating from different geographical areas in France. Our results revealed different host discrimination strategies in both populations and indicated a potential trade-off between the speed and the accuracy of host discrimination. One population discriminated hosts externally (faster but less accurately), whereas the other discriminated internally (more slowly but more accurately). In our experimental conditions, these two strategies resulted in differences in the fitness gains of both populations. The ecological conditions that could have selected for such differences in the host discrimination and oviposition strategies of the two populations remain to be investigated.

Costs of secondary parasitism in the facultative hyperparasitoid Pachycrepoideus dubius: does host size matter?

Although hyperparasitism frequently occur in parasitic insects, many aspects of this strategy remain unknown. We investigated possible fitness costs of hyperparasitism as influenced by host size. Our study was conducted with the facultative hyperparasitoid Pachycrepoideus dubius Ashmead (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae), which parasitizes host species differing greatly in size. We compared some fitness traits (level of successful parasitism, development time, sex ratio and offspring size) of P. dubius developing on large secondary/primary (Delia radicum L. (Diptera: Anthomyiidae)/Trybliographa rapae Westwood (Hymenoptera: Figitidae)) or small secondary/primary host species (Drosophila melanogaster L./Asobara tabida Nees (Hymenoptera: Braconidae)). In no‐choice and choice experiments, P. dubius was able to develop on different stages of T. rapae (L2 (endophagous), L4 (ectophagous), and pupae) but that it preferred to parasitize unparasitized D. radicum pupae over pupae parasitized by T. rapae. Furthermore, in P. dubius, hyperparasitism was associated with fitness costs (lower level of successful parasitism, smaller adult size) and these costs were greater on the smallest host complex. We hypothesize that the size of D. melanogaster pupae parasitized by A. tabida may be close to the suboptimal host size for P. dubius beneath which the costs of hyperparasitism make this strategy nonadaptive. Hyperparasitism in terms of trade‐offs between host quality and abundance of competitors is discussed.

Do past experience and competitive ability influence foraging strategies of parasitoids under interspecific competition

Abstract 1. In solitary parasitoids, several species can exploit the same host patch and competition could potentially be a strong selective agent as only one individual can emerge from a host. In cereal crops, Aphidius rhopalosiphi and A. ervi share the grain aphid Sitobion avenae as host.

How could host discrimination abilities influence the structure of a parasitoid community

Three related Aphidius parasitoid species share the same host, the grain aphid Sitobion avenae. Among this parasitoid community, Aphidius rhopalosiphi is the most abundant species in the field. Both the interspecific host discrimination of A. rhopalosiphi towards hosts parasitized by the two other species (i.e. A. avenae and A. ervi) and the interspecific host discrimination of the two other species towards hosts parasitized by A. rhopalosiphi were studied here. Results showed that females of A. rhopalosiphi and A. avenae both discriminated between unparasitized hosts and hosts parasitized by the other species. This discrimination occurred only after ovipositor insertion, suggesting the perception of an internal marker of parasitism. Likewise, females of A. rhopalosiphi and A. ervi were able to discriminate between unparasitized hosts and hosts parasitized by the other species. However, in this combination of species, recognition of parasitized hosts occurred before ovipositor insertion, through an antennal perception, suggesting the presence an external cue indicating parasitism. Hence, interspecific host discrimination in the three Aphidius species is based on internal or external cues, which are used either alone or together. Our results showed that the cues used for interspecific host discrimination depend on the specific identity of the interaction. These differences seemed strongly linked to the way the different species respond to defensive behaviours of their aphid hosts. Results are discussed in the context of optimal foraging and possible consequences for community structure.

Spatiotemporal variations in aphid‐parasitoid relative abundance patterns and food webs in agricultural ecosystems

Understanding the stability of communities is fundamental in theoretical and applied ecology. Organisms atop trophic chains are particularly sensitive to disturbance, especially when they are dependent on a specific trophic resource subject to strong fluctuations in density and quality, which is the case of parasitoids. We investigated the (1) variability in spatiotemporal relative abundance patterns of a cereal aphid parasitoid community, determining at what scales such patterns vary in agrosystems. We also investigated whether (2) parasitoid relative abundances are strongly influenced by host relative abundances and if (3) different host species are exploited at distinct rates. Aphid parasitoid populations were monitored in three remote agricultural regions in France between 2010 and 2012. Five parasitoid species (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Aphidiinae) and three aphid species (Hemiptera: Aphididae) were identified in each of those three regions. Fields sampled in one region in a single year exhibited similar relative abundance patterns, with aphid parasitoid communities varying across regions and years. All parasitoid species were able to exploit each monitored host species. Metopolophium dirhodum Wlk was consistently a more frequent species among parasitized aphids than among living aphids, indicating that this aphid species was exploited at a higher rate than the other two aphid species found (Sitobion avenae F and Rhopalosiphum padi L). Those findings suggest the cereal aphid-parasitoid network is not strictly determined by the intrinsic permanent environmental characteristics but partially varies from one year to another. The similarity in abundance patterns in different fields of a region in a given year suggests the existence of a mechanism allowing a rapid synchronisation of the relative abundance patterns at an intra-regional scale. This phenomenon could be useful in predicting host-parasitoid communities and bear important consequences for the ecosystem service provided by parasitoids.

Seasonal variations of host resources influence foraging strategy in parasitoids

Many species have to cope with decreased resource availability and life expectancy during winter. The optimal foraging theory predicts that under these conditions, generalist foraging strategies should be favoured, via the acceptance of suboptimal resources. In contrast, during favourable seasons, specialist foraging strategies, i.e., a preferential consumption of the most profitable resources, should be favoured instead. Although spatial and fine‐scale temporal dimensions of the influence of resource distribution on foraging strategies have long been studied in individual species, guild‐level, large‐scale temporal approaches (over multiple seasons) have rarely been considered. Parasitoids that can remain active during winter are an interesting model system which allows direct testing of resource profitability and reaching conclusions about foraging strategies from an evolutionary point of view. Here, we analysed how temporal variations of host resource availability in northwestern France impact the foraging strategies of parasitoid wasps. The foraging behaviours of dominant cereal aphid parasitoid species in relation to the two most abundant aphid host species were observed in winter and in spring. Because of a seasonal change in the host–parasitoid community and of a few species present in the fields each season, we were unable to confirm our hypothesis at the species level for all the studied species. Nevertheless, this study brought results consistent with our assumptions at the guild level, indicating that different species of a guild favour similar foraging strategies. In winter, female parasitoids generally adopted an opportunistic strategy, accepting all aphid hosts encountered, even if they were suboptimal. In spring, parasitoids displayed a specialist strategy by selecting preferentially a host species, but the better quality of preferentially selected species remains to be fully demonstrated.