Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Linda B. Buck is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Linda B. Buck.


Cell | 1991

A novel multigene family may encode odorant receptors: A molecular basis for odor recognition

Linda B. Buck; Richard Axel

The mammalian olfactory system can recognize and discriminate a large number of different odorant molecules. The detection of chemically distinct odorants presumably results from the association of odorous ligands with specific receptors on olfactory sensory neurons. To address the problem of olfactory perception at a molecular level, we have cloned and characterized 18 different members of an extremely large multigene family that encodes seven transmembrane domain proteins whose expression is restricted to the olfactory epithelium. The members of this novel gene family are likely to encode a diverse family of odorant receptors.


Cell | 1994

Information coding in the olfactory system: Evidence for a stereotyped and highly organized epitope map in the olfactory bulb

Kerry J. Ressler; Susan L. Sullivan; Linda B. Buck

In the mammalian olfactory system, information from approximately 1000 different odorant receptor types is organized in the nose into four spatial zones. Each zone is a mosaic of randomly distributed neurons expressing different receptor types. In these studies, we have obtained evidence that information highly distributed in the nose is transformed in the olfactory bulb of the brain into a highly organized spatial map. We find that specific odorant receptor gene probes hybridize in situ to small, and distinct, subsets of olfactory bulb glomeruli. The spatial and numerical characteristics of the patterns of hybridization that we observe with different receptor probes indicate that, in the olfactory bulb, olfactory information undergoes a remarkable organization into a fine, and perhaps stereotyped, spatial map. In our view, this map is in essence an epitope map, whose approximately 1000 distinct components are used in a multitude of different combinations to discriminate a vast array of different odors.


Cell | 1993

A zonal organization of odorant receptor gene expression in the olfactory epithelium

Kerry J. Ressler; Susan L. Sullivan; Linda B. Buck

The mechanisms by which mammals discriminate a vast array of diverse odors are poorly understood. To gain insight into the organizational strategies underlying this discriminatory capacity, we have examined the spatial distribution of odorant receptor RNAs in the mouse olfactory epithelium. We have observed topographically distinct patterns of receptor RNAs suggesting that the nasal cavity is divided into a series of expression zones. The zones exhibit bilateral symmetry in the two nasal cavities and are organized along the dorsal-ventral and medial-lateral axes. Within each zone, a neuron may select a gene for expression from a zonal gene set via a stochastic mechanism. The observed zonal patterning may serve as an initial organizing step in olfactory sensory information coding.


Cell | 1997

A MULTIGENE FAMILY ENCODING A DIVERSE ARRAY OF PUTATIVE PHEROMONE RECEPTORS IN MAMMALS

Hiroaki Matsunami; Linda B. Buck

The vomeronasal organ of mammals is an olfactory sensory structure that detects pheromones. It contains two subsets of sensory neurons that differentially express G alpha(o) and G alpha(i2). By comparing gene expression in single neurons, we identified a novel multigene family that codes for a diverse array of candidate pheromone receptors (VRs) expressed by the G alpha(o)+ subset. Different VRs are expressed by different neurons, but those neurons are interspersed, suggesting a distributed mode of sensory coding. Chromosome mapping experiments suggest an evolutionary connection between genes encoding VRs and receptors for volatile odorants. However, a dramatically different structure for VRs and the existence of variant VR mRNA forms indicate that there are diverse strategies to detect functionally distinct sensory stimuli.


Nature | 2000

A family of candidate taste receptors in human and mouse.

Hiroaki Matsunami; Jean-Pierre Montmayeur; Linda B. Buck

The gustatory system of mammals can sense four basic taste qualities, bitter, sweet, salty and sour, as well as umami, the taste of glutamate. Previous studies suggested that the detection of bitter and sweet tastants by taste receptor cells in the mouth is likely to involve G-protein-coupled receptors. Although two putative G-protein-coupled bitter/sweet taste receptors have been identified, the chemical diversity of bitter and sweet compounds leads one to expect that there is a larger number of different receptors. Here we report the identification of a family of candidate taste receptors (the TRBs) that are members of the G-protein-coupled receptor superfamily and that are specifically expressed by taste receptor cells. A cluster of genes encoding human TRBs is located adjacent to a Prp gene locus, which in mouse is tightly linked to the SOA genetic locus that is involved in detecting the bitter compound sucrose octaacetate. Another TRB gene is found on a human contig assigned to chromosome 5p15, the location of a genetic locus (PROP) that controls the detection of the bitter compound 6-n-propyl-2-thiouracil in humans.


Nature | 2006

A second class of chemosensory receptors in the olfactory epithelium

Stephen D. Liberles; Linda B. Buck

The mammalian olfactory system detects chemicals sensed as odours as well as social cues that stimulate innate responses. Odorants are detected in the nasal olfactory epithelium by the odorant receptor family, whose ∼1,000 members allow the discrimination of a myriad of odorants. Here we report the discovery of a second family of receptors in the mouse olfactory epithelium. Genes encoding these receptors, called ‘trace amine-associated receptors’ (TAARs), are present in human, mouse and fish. Like odorant receptors, individual mouse TAARs are expressed in unique subsets of neurons dispersed in the epithelium. Notably, at least three mouse TAARs recognize volatile amines found in urine: one detects a compound linked to stress, whereas the other two detect compounds enriched in male versus female urine—one of which is reportedly a pheromone. The evolutionary conservation of the TAAR family suggests a chemosensory function distinct from odorant receptors. Ligands identified for TAARs thus far suggest a function associated with the detection of social cues.


Cell | 1993

The family of genes encoding odorant receptors in the channel catfish

John Ngal; Michael M. Dowling; Linda B. Buck; Richard Axel; Andrew Chess

The anatomical and numerical simplicity of the fish olfactory system has led us to examine the family of olfactory receptors expressed in the catfish. We have identified a family of genes encoding seven transmembrane domain receptors that share considerable homology with the odorant receptors of the rat. The size of the catfish receptor repertoire appears to be far smaller than in mammals. Analysis of the nucleotide sequences suggests that these receptor genes have undergone positive Darwinian selection to generate enhanced diversity within the putative odorant-binding domains. Individual receptor clones anneal with 0.5%-2% of the olfactory neurons, suggesting that a single cell expresses only a small subset of distinct odorant receptors. Each cell, therefore, possesses a unique identity defined by the receptors it expresses. These data suggest that the brain may discriminate among odors by determining which neurons have been activated.


Cell | 2000

The molecular architecture of odor and pheromone sensing in mammals.

Linda B. Buck

It is not yet known how signals derived from different ORs and VRs are organized beyond the bulb, nor is it known how those signals are ultimately decoded to yield the perception of an odorant or a specific endocrine or behavioral response to a pheromone. It was recently shown that a truncated form of wheat germ agglutinin or its close relative, barley lectin, can serve as a transneuronal tracer when it is expressed from a transgene in mice (27xA genetic approach to trace neural circuits. Horowitz, L.F, Montmayer, J, Echelard, Y, and Buck, L.B. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1999; 96: 3194–3199Crossref | PubMed | Scopus (69)See all References, 82xA genetic approach to visualization of multisynaptic neural pathways using plant lectin transgene. Yoshihara, Y, Mizuno, T, Nakahira, M, Kawasaki, M, Watanabe, Y, Kagamiyama, H, Jishage, K, Ueda, O, Suzuki, H, Tabuchi, K et al. Neuron. 1999; 22: 33–41Abstract | Full Text | Full Text PDF | PubMed | Scopus (119)See all References). Studies in which one of these lectins is coexpressed with a single OR or VR should allow for visualization of the patterns of inputs formed at higher levels of the odor and pheromone sensing pathways. Imaging studies should also provide important insight into the roles played by the intrinsic circuitry of the olfactory bulb and subsequent relays in the final readout of odor and pheromone signals.*E-mail: [email protected].


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2004

The mouse olfactory receptor gene family

Paul A. Godfrey; Bettina Malnic; Linda B. Buck

In mammals, odor detection in the nose is mediated by a diverse family of olfactory receptors (ORs), which are used combinatorially to detect different odorants and encode their identities. The OR family can be divided into subfamilies whose members are highly related and are likely to recognize structurally related odorants. To gain further insight into the mechanisms underlying odor detection, we analyzed the mouse OR gene family. Exhaustive searches of a mouse genome database identified 913 intact OR genes and 296 OR pseudogenes. These genes were localized to 51 different loci on 17 chromosomes. Sequence comparisons showed that the mouse OR family contains 241 subfamilies. Subfamily sizes vary extensively, suggesting that some classes of odorants may be more easily detected or discriminated than others. Determination of subfamilies that contain ORs with identified ligands allowed tentative functional predictions for 19 subfamilies. Analysis of the chromosomal locations of members of each subfamily showed that many OR gene loci encode only one or a few subfamilies. Furthermore, most subfamilies are encoded by a single locus, suggesting that different loci may encode receptors for different types of odorant structural features. Comparison of human and mouse OR subfamilies showed that the two species have many, but not all, subfamilies in common. However, mouse subfamilies are usually larger than their human counterparts. This finding suggests that humans and mice recognize many of the same odorant structural motifs, but mice may be superior in odor sensitivity and discrimination.


Neuron | 1994

A second subunit of the olfactory cyclic nucleotide-gated channel confers high sensitivity to cAMP

Emily R. Liman; Linda B. Buck

Sensory transduction in olfactory neurons is mediated by intracellular cAMP, which directly gates a nonselective cation channel. A cDNA encoding a cyclic nucleotide-gated (CNG) ion channel subunit (rOCNC1) has been cloned previously from rat olfactory epithelium. However, differences between the functional properties of rOCNC1 and the native olfactory CNG channel suggest that the native channel could be composed of several distinct subunit types. Here, we report the cloning and characterization of a cDNA encoding a second olfactory CNG channel subunit (rOCNC2) that is 52% identical to rOCNC1 and that is expressed specifically in olfactory sensory neurons. Expression of rOCNC2 alone in Xenopus oocytes does not lead to detectable CNG currents. However, coexpression of rOCNC2 with rOCNC1 results in a CNG conductance that differs from that detected upon expression of rOCNC1 alone and more closely resembles the native conductance in several respects, including its sensitivity to cAMP. This suggests that the native olfactory CNG channel is a hetero-oligomer composed of rOCNC1 and rOCNC2 subunits.

Collaboration


Dive into the Linda B. Buck's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Xiaolan Ye

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Donghui Kuang

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kunio Kondoh

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lisa F. Horowitz

Howard Hughes Medical Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Richard Axel

Howard Hughes Medical Institute

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge