Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Linda L. Pederson is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Linda L. Pederson.


American Journal of Preventive Medicine | 2001

Smoking among lesbians, gays, and bisexuals: a review of the literature

Heather Ryan; Pascale M. Wortley; Alyssa Easton; Linda L. Pederson; Greg Greenwood

OBJECTIVES To collect estimates of smoking prevalence among lesbian, gay, and bisexual people from the published literature and to compare with general population estimates. METHODS Databases were searched for all studies published in English on tobacco use among lesbians, gays, and bisexuals. From 1987 through 2000, twelve studies were identified (four youth, eight adult): seven were based on convenience samples; one on a population-based probability sample; one involved random sampling within selected census tracts; one was based on a large multicenter clinical trial; and two were representative school-based samples. Study findings were compared to national survey data from the corresponding time period. RESULTS Estimated smoking rates for lesbians, gays, and bisexuals ranged from 38% to 59% among youth and from 11% to 50% among adults. National smoking rates during comparable periods ranged from 28% to 35% for adolescents and were approximately 28% for adults. CONCLUSIONS While information in the published literature is limited, it appears that smoking rates are higher among adolescent and adult lesbians, gays, and bisexuals than in the general population. Steps should be taken to ensure representation of lesbians, gays, and bisexuals in tobacco-use surveillance and to collect data in order to understand the apparent high smoking rates in these groups. Attempts should be made to target prevention and cessation interventions to lesbians, gays, and bisexuals.


Nicotine & Tobacco Research | 2004

Does a relationship exist between body weight, concerns about weight, and smoking among adolescents? An integration of the literature with an emphasis on gender.

Beth K. Potter; Linda L. Pederson; Stella S.H. Chan; Jo-Anne Aubut; John J. Koval

It has been speculated that body weight and concern about body weight are important factors in initiation of tobacco use among adolescents, particularly females. An examination of studies that have explored these relationships can provide important information on possible underlying mechanisms that could be used for prevention interventions. This review summarizes recent studies examining weight concerns and youth smoking, with a focus on gender differences. These studies were integrated with the few studies that have examined the relationship between actual body weight and smoking among adolescents. A total of 55 primary research articles met inclusion criteria for the review. Of these, 19 studies assessed the relationship between body weight and smoking, and 50 studies addressed weight concerns and smoking. Some evidence indicated a positive relationship between smoking and body weight among adolescents, although not all studies found a positive association. In terms of the relationship between weight concerns and adolescent smoking, the amount of evidence supporting a positive association differed depending on the dimension of weight concern considered, with the strongest evidence for dieting behaviors. For dieting behaviors, disordered eating symptoms, and some aspects of general weight concerns, the positive relationship with smoking was more consistent among female adolescents than among male adolescents. Possible explanations for these findings are discussed, and priorities for future research are identified.


Nicotine & Tobacco Research | 2008

Monitoring polytobacco use among adolescents: Do cigarette smokers use other forms of tobacco?

Jennifer M. Bombard; Valerie J. Rock; Linda L. Pederson; Kat J. Asman

The extent of concurrent use of cigarettes and one or more other tobacco products (polytobacco use) is important to explore because users may be at an increased risk for adverse health effects and nicotine dependency. We determined national population estimates of current cigarette and current polytobacco use for at least 50,000 students from the 2002 and 2004 National Youth Tobacco Surveys. We identified which tobacco products were most often used in conjunction with cigarettes and used multivariate analyses to identify factors associated with polytobacco use. The overall prevalence was 16.0% for current cigarette smoking among all respondents and 15.0% for current cigarette smoking among respondents with complete information on concurrent cigarette and other tobacco product use: 8.1% used cigarettes only, and 6.9% were polytobacco users. Among current male cigarette smokers, 62.0% used other tobacco products; among current female cigarette smokers, 30.9% did. Among current cigarette smokers using one other tobacco product, cigars or smokeless tobacco were the most frequently used products. In multivariate analysis, polytobacco use was associated with being male; being in middle school; residing in the Midwest, South, or West; being able to obtain cigarettes from a retailer; being subject to peer influence; having favorable beliefs about tobacco; being willing to use tobacco promotional items; being exposed to tobacco advertisements; and having higher levels of lost autonomy (an indicator of nicotine dependency). Youth interventions need to broaden their focus to address the use of all tobacco products, paying particular attention to adolescent males and youth living outside of the Northeast.


Nicotine & Tobacco Research | 2007

Literature Review and Summary of Perceptions, Attitudes, Beliefs, and Marketing of Potentially Reduced Exposure Products: Communication Implications

Linda L. Pederson; David E. Nelson

Potentially reduced exposure products (PREPs) have continued to enter the market during the 1990s and first part of the 21st century. Attempts by the tobacco industry to develop and market products with implied reductions in adverse health effects (i.e., harm reduction) are not new. Over the last half of the 20th century, the tobacco industry developed and marketed several products that purported to reduce the health risks associated with smoking cigarettes. Among these were filtered cigarettes in the 1950s and light and ultra-light cigarettes in the 1970s and 1980s. This review summarizes published and unpublished research that is directly relevant to the marketing, advertising, and communication about PREPs. The marketing strategies for these new products do not appear to differ from those used by the tobacco industry for light and ultra-light cigarettes. Although smokers report not using the new products in large numbers because of dissatisfaction with taste, they are interested in using products with reduced risk. Despite the absence of explicit health claims by the industry for PREPs, many smokers believe that these products are safer based on the advertising claims of reduced exposure and a belief that claims are approved by the government. No data are available to indicate that PREPs are useful for prevention or cessation of smoking, nor does specific research exist to suggest what health communication messages will provide smokers with accurate information about these products.


Journal of School Health | 2009

Associations of Trying to Lose Weight, Weight Control Behaviors, and Current Cigarette Use Among US High School Students

Jonetta Johnson; Danice K. Eaton; Linda L. Pederson; Richard Lowry

BACKGROUND Approximately one-quarter of high school students currently use cigarettes. Previous research has suggested some youth use smoking as a method for losing weight. The purpose of this study was to describe the association of current cigarette use with specific healthy and unhealthy weight control practices among 9th-12th grade students in the United States. METHODS Youth Risk Behavior Survey data (2005) were analyzed. Behaviors included current cigarette use, trying to lose weight, and current use of 2 healthy and 3 unhealthy behaviors to lose weight or to keep from gaining weight. Separate logistic regression models calculated adjusted odds ratios (AORs) for associations of current cigarette use with trying to lose weight (Model 1) and the 5 weight control behaviors, controlling for trying to lose weight (Model 2). RESULTS In Model 1, compared with students who were not trying to lose weight, students who were trying to lose weight had higher odds of current cigarette use (AOR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.15-1.49). In Model 2, the association of current cigarette use with the 2 healthy weight control behaviors was not statistically significant. Each of the 3 unhealthy weight control practices was significantly associated with current cigarette use, with AORs for each behavior approximately 2 times as high among those who engaged in the behavior, compared with those who did not. CONCLUSION Some students may smoke cigarettes as a method of weight control. Inclusion of smoking prevention messages into existing weight management interventions may be beneficial.


Nicotine & Tobacco Research | 2003

Nondaily smokers: A descriptive analysis

Pascale M. Wortley; Corinne G. Husten; Angela Trosclair; Jeff Chrismon; Linda L. Pederson


American Journal of Preventive Medicine | 2005

A Review of Interventions to Reduce Tobacco Use in Colleges and Universities

Rebecca Murphy-Hoefer; Reba Griffith; Linda L. Pederson; Linda Crossett; Shanthalaxmi R. Iyer; Marc D. Hiller


Addictive Behaviors | 2007

Are Smokers Only Using Cigarettes? Exploring Current Polytobacco Use Among an Adult Population

Jennifer M. Bombard; Linda L. Pederson; David E. Nelson; Ann Malarcher


Preventing Chronic Disease | 2007

Young Adults’ Perceptions of Cigarette Warning Labels in the United States and Canada

Michelle O'Hegarty; Linda L. Pederson; Gayane Yenokyan; David E. Nelson; Pascale M. Wortley


Journal of Applied Social Psychology | 2004

Theory-Based Determinants of Youth Smoking: A Multiple Influence Approach1

Scott C. Carvajal; Carrie Hanson; Roberta A. Downing; Karin K. Coyle; Linda L. Pederson

Collaboration


Dive into the Linda L. Pederson's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David E. Nelson

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Pascale M. Wortley

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alyssa Easton

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Angela Trosclair

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Corinne G. Husten

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Danice K. Eaton

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jennifer M. Bombard

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Linda Crossett

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge