Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Corinne G. Husten is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Corinne G. Husten.


American Journal of Preventive Medicine | 2001

Reviews of evidence regarding interventions to reduce tobacco use and exposure to environmental tobacco smoke.

David P. Hopkins; Peter A. Briss; Connie J Ricard; Corinne G. Husten; Vilma G Carande-Kulis; Jonathan E. Fielding; Mary O Alao; Jeffrey W. McKenna; Donald J. Sharp; Jeffrey R. Harris; Trevor A. Woollery; Kate W. Harris

This report presents the results of systematic reviews of effectiveness, applicability, other effects, economic evaluations, and barriers to use of selected population-based interventions intended to reduce tobacco use and exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. The related systematic reviews are linked by a common conceptual approach. These reviews form the basis of recommendations by the Task Force on Community Preventive Services (TFCPS) regarding the use of these selected interventions. The TFCPS recommendations are presented on page 67 of this supplement.


Journal of American College Health | 1999

Smoking initiation and smoking patterns among US college students.

Sherry A. Everett; Corinne G. Husten; Laura Kann; Charles W. Warren; Donald J. Sharp; Linda Crossett

The ages at which 18- to 24-year-old college students started smoking and its relationship to subsequent smoking were explored, using data from the 1995 National College Health Risk Behavior Survey. Most students (70%) had tried smoking; among those who had tried, 42% were current smokers, 19% were current frequent smokers, and 13% were current daily smokers. The majority (81%) who had ever smoked daily began doing so at age 18 years or younger, and 19% began smoking daily at age 19 years or older. Women were as likely as men to report ever having smoked a whole cigarette or ever having smoked daily. Most students (82%) who had ever smoked daily had tried to quit, but 3 in 4 were still smokers. Policies and programs designed to prevent the initiation of smoking and to help smokers quit are needed at both the high school and the college levels to reduce the proportion of young adults who smoke cigarettes.


Nicotine & Tobacco Research | 2009

How should we define light or intermittent smoking? Does it matter?

Corinne G. Husten

Multiple terms for light and intermittent smokers (LITS), each with a range of definitions, are found in the literature. Because of this wide range of terms and definitions, there has been interest in developing a standard definition of LITS. However, several factors need to be taken into account in setting such a definition. In the literature, levels of cigarette consumption often serve as a proxy measure for toxin exposure, level of addiction, or level of disease risk. However, for a variety of reasons, consumption may not be a good surrogate for these predictor and outcome measures. Some of these reasons include: differences in tobacco products that may affect exposure, changes in understanding about the levels of tobacco use that sustain addiction, how closely consumption measured as cigarettes smoked per day correlates with other markers of exposure, the effect of compensation (changes in smoking behavior to adjust for changes in nicotine levels or in volume of cigarettes smoked), the nonlinear relationship between consumption and disease risk for some diseases, whether people maintain the same levels of smoking over time, and the meaningfulness of various levels of cigarette consumption if other tobacco products are used concurrently. Public health will need to consider, in light of these factors, whether a categorization of LITS is warranted. This commentary briefly explores each of these aspects of LITS: (a) the terms used in the literature for LITS and the range of definitions found for each term; (b) the most valid LITS categories based on the stability of the various levels of consumption over time; (c) the validity of using consumption as a surrogate measure of toxin exposure, addiction, disease risk, or program impact; (d) the implications of polytobacco use for consumption being used as such a proxy; and (e) whether better measures exist for exposure, addiction, and disease risk. Finally, recommendations regarding the use of consumption as a predictor or as an outcome variable and possible relevant categorizations are discussed.


Tobacco Control | 1997

Cigarette smoking and smoking cessation among older adults: United States, 1965-94.

Corinne G. Husten; Dana M Shelton; Jeffrey H. Chrismon; Yun-Chen W Lin; Paul Mowery; Felicia A Powell

OBJECTIVE: To characterise patterns of cigarette smoking and smoking cessation among older adults in the United States. DESIGN: Data from the National Health Interview Surveys (NHIS) 1965-94 were analysed. The NHIS is a cross-sectional survey using a representative national sample. SETTING: In most cases interviews were conducted in the home; telephone interviews were conducted when respondents could not be interviewed in person. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were from a representative sample of the American civilian, non-institutionalised population aged 18 and older. Sample sizes for the years analysed ranged from n = 19,738 to n = 138,988 overall, and n = 3806 to n = 12,491 for those aged 65 years and older. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Using the NHIS data from 1965-94, trends in current smoking and the prevalence of smoking cessation by demographic characteristics among older adults (65 years and older) were assessed and compared with trends among younger adults. A logistic regression analysis was conducted to determine the demographic characteristics of former smokers compared with current smokers among those aged 65 and older. RESULTS: The prevalence of current smoking among 65 year olds and older declined from 1965 to 1994 (17.9% to 12.0%). Although smoking prevalence was lower among older adults than younger adults (aged 18-64), the rate of decline in smoking was slower among older adults. Among older adults, the prevalence of cessation rose with increasing educational attainment, and was consistently higher for men than for women and for whites compared with blacks. After adjustment for demographic factors among older adults who had ever smoked, increasing age and educational attainment were strongly related to the likelihood of being a former smoker. Although there were no racial differences among women, older white (OR = 2.6) and Hispanic (OR = 3.67) men were significantly more likely to be former smokers than older black men. Also, the gender difference in smoking cessation was noted only for whites. CONCLUSIONS: Given the projected increase in the elderly population, the medical and economic consequences of smoking will become a greater burden in the next decades. Therefore, focusing attention on cessation among the elderly is an immediate and urgent priority for public health professionals and clinicians.


Tobacco Control | 1996

Environmental tobacco smoke exposure and health effects in children: results from the 1991 National Health Interview Survey.

David M. Mannino; Michael Siegel; Corinne G. Husten; Deborah Rose; Ruth A. Etzel

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of environmental tobacco smoke exposure on the health of children in the United States. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional study of children who participated in the 1991 National Health Interview Survey. PARTICIPANTS: 17448 children residing in the United States. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rates of respiratory illnesses and all illnesses, and the morbidity due to these illnesses, in children exposed to environmental tobacco smoke in the home daily compared with those in children not exposed in the home. Our analyses controlled for age, socioeconomic status, race, family size, sex, season, and region of the country. RESULTS: Children who were exposed to environmental tobacco smoke had a higher incidence of acute respiratory illnesses (relative risk (RR) = 1.10, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.95 to 1.26) and all chronic respiratory diseases (RR = 1.28, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.65) than children who were not exposed, although both CIs included unity, and chance cannot be ruled out as being responsible for these findings. Children who were exposed to environmental tobacco smoke had, on average, 1.87 more days of restricted activity (95% CI 0.20 to 3.54), 1.06 more days of bed confinement (95% CI 0.20 to 1.92), and 1.45 more days of school absence (95% CI 0.40 to 2.50) per year than children who were not exposed. CONCLUSIONS: Environmental tobacco smoke exposure in the home, which is completely preventable, is an important predictor of increased morbidity in children.


American Journal of Preventive Medicine | 2001

Evidence reviews and recommendations on interventions to reduce tobacco use and exposure to environmental tobacco smoke: a summary of selected guidelines.

David P. Hopkins; Corinne G. Husten; Jonathan E. Fielding; J. Niels Rosenquist; Lori L Westphal

The reports in this supplement to the American Journal of Preventive Medicine by the Task Force on Community Preventive Services1 (TFCPS) and Hopkins et al.2 represent the work of the TFCPS, an independent, nonfederal group of national, regional, and local public health and prevention services experts supported by public and private partners. These reports are the second published section of what will be the forthcoming Guide to Community Preventive Services: Systematic Reviews and Evidence-Based Methods. The first published section was on vaccine-preventable diseases.3–5 In addition to expanding the Guide to Community Preventive Serives (the Community Guide), these reviews and evidence-based recommendations add to the growing body of guidelines that identify and document the effectiveness of interventions to reduce tobacco use and exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS). The TFCPS reports complement other recent efforts that provide information and guidance to health care providers, health care systems, and communities on strategies to reduce the annual tobacco-related toll of addiction, illness, disability, and death. This article presents a summary of selected guidelines and evidence reviews available as of August 2000, and provides an accessible review of the current evidence of effectiveness of interventions to reduce tobacco use and exposure to ETS. The first section of this article describes the focus and general content of selected evidence reviews and guidelines, and information on the organization of the summary tables. The second section presents the summary evidence tables, organized by type or category of intervention. The third section provides a brief discussion of the comparisons across evidence reviews.


Tobacco Control | 2007

Tobacco-related disease mortality among men who switched from cigarettes to spit tobacco

S. Jane Henley; Cari J. Connell; Patricia Richter; Corinne G. Husten; Terry F. Pechacek; Eugenia E. Calle; Michael J. Thun

Background: Although several epidemiological studies have examined the mortality among users of spit tobacco, none have compared mortality of former cigarette smokers who substitute spit tobacco for cigarette smoking (“switchers”) and smokers who quit using tobacco entirely. Methods: A cohort of 116 395 men were identified as switchers (n = 4443) or cigarette smokers who quit using tobacco entirely (n = 111 952) when enrolled in the ongoing US American Cancer Society Cancer Prevention Study II. From 1982 to 31 December 2002, 44 374 of these men died. The mortality hazard ratios (HR) of tobacco-related diseases, including lung cancer, coronary heart disease, stroke and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, were estimated using Cox proportional hazards regression modelling adjusted for age and other demographic variables, as well as variables associated with smoking history, including number of years smoked, number of cigarettes smoked and age at quitting. Results: After 20 years of follow-up, switchers had a higher rate of death from any cause (HR 1.08, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01 to 1.15), lung cancer (HR 1.46, 95% CI 1.24 to 1.73), coronary heart disease (HR 1.13, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.29) and stroke (HR 1.24, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.53) than those who quit using tobacco entirely. Conclusion: The risks of dying from major tobacco-related diseases were higher among former cigarette smokers who switched to spit tobacco after they stopped smoking than among those who quit using tobacco entirely.


American Journal of Preventive Medicine | 2003

Smoking and functional status among Medicare managed care enrollees.

David R Arday; Micah H Milton; Corinne G. Husten; Samuel C. Haffer; Sara C. Wheeless; Shelton M. Jones; Ruby E. Johnson

BACKGROUND Smoking is a major determinant of health status and outcomes. Current smoking has been associated with lower scores on the Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36). Whether this occurs among the elderly and disabled Medicare populations is not known. This study assessed the relationships between smoking status and both physical and mental functioning in the Medicare managed-care population. METHODS During the spring of 1998, data were collected from 134309 elderly and 8640 disabled Medicare beneficiaries for Cohort 1, Round 1 of the Medicare Health Outcomes Survey. We subsequently used these data to calculate mean standardized SF-36 scores, self-reported health status, and prevalence of smoking-related illness, by smoking status, after adjusting for demographic factors. RESULTS Among the disabled, everyday and someday smokers had lower standardized physical component (PCS) and mental component (MCS) scores than never smokers (-2.4 to -4.5 points; p <0.01 for all). Among the elderly, the lowest PCS and MCS scores were seen among recent quitters (-5.1 and -3.7 points, respectively, below those for never smokers; p <0.01 for both), but current smokers also had significantly lower scores on both scales. For the elderly and disabled populations, MCS scores of long-term quitters were the same as nonsmokers. Similar patterns were seen across all eight SF-36 scales. Ever smokers had higher odds of reporting both less-than-good health and a history of smoking-related chronic disease. CONCLUSIONS In the elderly and disabled Medicare populations, smokers report worse physical and mental functional status than never smokers. Long-term quitters have better functional status than those who still smoke. More effort should be directed at helping elderly smokers to quit earlier. Smoking cessation has implications for improving both survival and functional status.


Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report | 2015

Frequency of Tobacco Use Among Middle and High School Students--United States, 2014.

Linda J. Neff; René A. Arrazola; Ralph S. Caraballo; Catherine G. Corey; Shanna Cox; Brian A. King; Conrad J. Choiniere; Corinne G. Husten

The use of tobacco products during adolescence increases the risk for adverse health effects and lifelong nicotine addiction. In 2014, an estimated 4.6 million middle and high school students were current users of any tobacco product, of whom an estimated 2.2 million were current users of two or more types of tobacco products. Symptoms of nicotine dependence are increased for multiple tobacco product users compared with single-product users. CDC and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) analyzed data from the 2014 National Youth Tobacco Survey (NYTS) to determine how frequently (the number of days in the preceding 30 days) U.S. middle school (grades 6–8) and high school (grades 9–12) students used cigarettes, e-cigarettes, cigars, and smokeless tobacco products. Among current users (≥1 day during the preceding 30 days) in high school, frequent use (≥20 days during the preceding 30 days) was most prevalent among smokeless tobacco users (42.0%), followed by cigarette smokers (31.6%), e-cigarette users (15.5%), and cigar smokers (13.1%); a similar pattern was observed for those who used during all 30 days. Among current users in middle school, frequent use was greatest among smokeless tobacco users (29.2%), followed by cigarette smokers (20.0%), cigar smokers (13.2%) and e-cigarette users (11.8%). Current use of two or more types of tobacco products was common, even among students who used tobacco products 1–5 days during the preceding 30 days: 77.3% for cigar smokers, 76.9% for cigarette smokers, 63.4% for smokeless tobacco users, and 54.8% for e-cigarettes users. Preventing youths from initiating the use of any tobacco product is important to tobacco use prevention and control strategies in the United States. Monitoring the frequency and patterns of tobacco use among youths, including the use of two or more tobacco products, is important to inform evidence-based interventions to prevent and reduce all forms of tobacco use among youths.


Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report | 2017

Tobacco Product Use Among Adults — United States, 2015

Elyse Phillips; Teresa W. Wang; Corinne G. Husten; Catherine G. Corey; Benjamin J. Apelberg; Ahmed Jamal; David M. Homa; Brian A. King

Tobacco use remains the leading cause of preventable disease and death in the United States (1). Despite declining cigarette smoking prevalence among U.S. adults, shifts in the tobacco product landscape have occurred in recent years (2,3). Previous estimates of tobacco product use among U.S. adults were obtained from the National Adult Tobacco Survey, which ended after the 2013-2014 cycle. This year, CDC and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) assessed the most recent national estimates of tobacco product use among adults aged ≥18 years using, for the first time, data from the 2015 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), an annual, nationally representative, in-person survey of the noninstitutionalized U.S. civilian population. The 2015 NHIS adult core questionnaire included 33,672 adults aged ≥18 years, reflecting a 55.2% response rate. Data were weighted to adjust for differences in selection probability and nonresponse, and to provide nationally representative estimates. In 2015, 20.1 % of U.S. adults currently (every day or some days) used any tobacco product, 17.6% used any combustible tobacco product, and 3.9% used ≥2 tobacco products. By product, 15.1% of adults used cigarettes; 3.5% used electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes); 3.4% used cigars, cigarillos, or filtered little cigars; 2.3% used smokeless tobacco; and 1.2% used regular pipes, water pipes, or hookahs.* Current use of any tobacco product was higher among males; persons aged <65 years; non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska natives (AI/AN), whites, blacks, and persons of multiple races; persons living in the Midwest; persons with a General Educational Development (GED) certificate; persons with annual household income of <

Collaboration


Dive into the Corinne G. Husten's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ann Malarcher

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Micah H Milton

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Cathy L. Backinger

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Donald J. Sharp

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alyssa Easton

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Charles W. Warren

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Linda Crossett

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Linda L. Pederson

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge